Thinking Vs Doing Uncertainty of Design Thinking Tools in Facilitating Maker Workshops

Author(s):  
Yin Li ◽  
Kun Jia ◽  
Qing Xia ◽  
Zhiyong Fu
Resuscitation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 84-85
Author(s):  
Clint Jean Louis ◽  
Diego Reyero Diez ◽  
Carlos Beaumont Caminos ◽  
Fermina Beramendi Garciandia ◽  
José Roldan Rámirez ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Fabien Durand ◽  
Michael E. Helms ◽  
Joanna Tsenn ◽  
Daniel A. McAdams ◽  
Julie S. Linsey

Much design theory research seeks to create, evaluate, improve or optimize design methods. Whether that research focuses on design thinking, tools, methods, or education, short design problems are often provided to participants in order to evaluate the effects of the variables being tested. When designing and creating such problems, certain characteristics may influence design outcomes: experience and exposure to the design problems vary between participants, and each problem may be more or less favorable to the controlled variable. In this paper we conjecture a small set of design problem characteristics that may influence experimental outcomes, and we discuss two experiments targeted at uncovering this influence. In our first experiment we examine differences in evaluation metrics between two design problems. In a follow up experiment we correlate the hypothesized characteristics to the variances in experiment outcome. These early results assist to further compare and contrast the empirical differences in common evaluation metrics, as well as show how familiarity and extent of the subjects’ knowledge of a design problem influence these metrics. We also expose the potential for interaction between the design method and the design problem.


Author(s):  
Lediaa ANDRAWES ◽  
Gerda GEMSER ◽  
Adela MCMURRAY

There is continued criticism regarding the over-reliance on donor-centred accountability mechanisms in aid projects. Conversely, there is increasing interest in Design Thinking as an approach to support greater beneficiary-centred accountability. Accountability can be conceptualised as ‘felt’ virtue which privileges internal motivations of decision-makers; and as ‘imposed’ mechanism which privileges externally enforced structures on decision-makers. However, there is limited understanding about whether Design Thinking tools can influence the accountability of decision-makers. This participatory action research study utilised semi-structured interviews and observations. The analysis revealed decision-makers perceived two tools, being Personas and Journey Maps, as having influenced their ‘felt’ accountability. Suggestions on how the tools may be contributing to the ‘felt’ accountability of decision-makers include: building a shared picture among diverse groups, humanising complex information, grounding discussions in realities, and deepening empathy. This study contributes to extant literature by showing that Design Thinking can enhance, decision-makers’ ‘felt’ accountability through new sense-making practices and tools.


Author(s):  
Franziska Dobrigkeit ◽  
Philipp Pajak ◽  
Danielly de Paula ◽  
Matthias Uflacker

1970 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 75-90
Author(s):  
Marta Skowrońska

The paper discusses design thinking methodology, arguing that this perspective may be useful for sociology, particularly urban sociology. The author demonstrates that design thinking tools are similar to some sociological research tools. Marta Skowrońska, Miasto i myślenie projektowe. Design thinking jako skrzynka narzędziowa [Design thinking as a tool box] edited by M. Nowak, „Człowiek i Społeczeństwo” vol. XLVIII: Kuchnia badań miejskich. Studia na temat praktyki empirycznej badaczy miasta [A backstage of urban research. Studies on the empirical practices of city research scientists], Poznań 2019, pp. 75–90, Adam Mickiewicz University. ISSN 0239-3271. Marta Skowrońska, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, Wydział Socjologii, ul. Szamarzewskiego 89, 60-568 Poznań, [email protected]


Author(s):  
Shalini Kalia ◽  
Lubna Nafees

Admissions are critical for any business school (B-school). A good school aims at a diverse participant mix who reflect a broad range of industries, functions, countries, and backgrounds to enrich the learning experience. Therefore, admissions or the intake process becomes crucial and decides the fate of both the school and students. This chapter maps the journey of the design thinking tools applied in redesigning of the admission process and its impact in context to a leading Indian B-school. This study has broader implications for B-schools in general as the model will help them understand the need of applying design-thinking techniques in redesigning new age admission strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document