Research on Data Visualization Analysis in Education Curriculum Quality Management and Student Development

Author(s):  
Ming Lu
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 309-324
Author(s):  
Jihye Kang ◽  
Bok-Eun Son

This study was conducted to develop evaluation criteria to manage and improve the quality of the university's General Education curriculum. To this end, the evaluation area and evaluation criteria for the management of the quality of education were first derived through literature research. The evaluation tool obtained feasibility of feasibility verification and research results through two revised Delphi surveys (N=10). as well as through meetings with practitioners(N=7) in charge of quality management of the liberal curriculum. The results are as follows. First, this study developed a systematic evaluation criteria for the entire curriculum, such as curriculum development, support, operation, performance and improvement, rather than fragmenting the curriculum based on the CIPP evaluation model. Second, this study applied modified Delphi techniques to manage the quality of the General Education curriculum to derive a total of seven sub-items and 17 evaluation criteria. Also, the content feasibility (CVI) and inter-evaluator agreement(IRA) results developed evaluation criteria with a validity score above 0.80. Based on these findings, the university presented measures and implications for managing the quality of the liberal arts curriculum.


Author(s):  
Jianqiang Li ◽  
Jingnan Wang ◽  
Chengyao Xiong ◽  
Yanan Wang ◽  
Yan Pei

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Chen ◽  
Bo Fan ◽  
Jie Zheng ◽  
Hongyan Cui

At present, it has become a hot research field to improve production efficiency and improve life experience through big data analysis. In the process of big data analysis, how to vividly display the results of the analysis is crucial. So, this paper introduces a set of big data visualization analysis platform based on financial field. The platform adopts the MVC system architecture, which is mainly composed of two parts: the background and the front end. The background part is built on the Django framework, and the front end is built with html5, css3, and JavaScript. The chart is rendered by Echarts. The platform can realize the classification of customers' savings potential through bank data, and make portraits of customers with different savings levels. The data analysis results can be dynamically displayed and interact wit


1969 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 85-110
Author(s):  
Martha Cleveland-Innes ◽  
Claudia Emes

Using well-known tenets of student development and student success as a central organizing premise, it is suggested that higher education curriculum should include outcomes related to the development of students as competent, lifelong learners. This imperative is driven by demands on higher education to prepare graduates for complex, dynamic, and information based social and occupational experiences. Curricula that prepare students with appropriate knowledge and skills to manoeuvre a changed and changing society is in order. Labelled a learner-centred curriculum, this approach includes, but goes beyond, the already explored learner-centred instruction (Lieberman, 1994; McCombs & Whistler, 1997; SCCOE, 2000; Soifer, Young & Irwin, 1989) to content and skill development regarding the mechanisms of learning and growth. RÉSUMÉ Utilisant des principes bien connus du développement et du succès de l’étudiant comme prémisse centrale d’organisation, la réforme du programme d’enseignement supérieur doit inclure des résultants liés au développement de l’étudiant en tant qu’apprenti compétent à vie. Cet impératif est motivé par la nouvelle exigence en matière d’enseignement supérieur pour préparer les diplômés à des expériences sociales et professionnelles complexes, dynamiques, et basées sur l’information. Un nouveau programme qui prépare les étudiants à des connaissances et compétences appropriées pour faire avancer une société qui change constamment. Perçue comme un programme axé sur l’élève, cette approche inclu et dépasse le cadre de l’enseignement personnalisé déjà étudié à fond (Lieberman, 1994; McCombs & Whistler, 1997; SCCOE, 2000; Soifer, Young & Irwin, 1989). Elle comprend le développement du contenu et des aptitudes relatif aux mécanismes d’apprentissage et de croissance.


2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (11) ◽  
pp. 299-310
Author(s):  
Tong Wang ◽  
Lei Zhao ◽  
Yanfeng Cao ◽  
Zhijian Qu ◽  
Panjing Li

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document