<em><em></em></em><p>What if nothing is like the official documents that protect childhood say? What if, in practice, there is the planned birth of right-naked beings in the peripheries of the peripheries – baby sacer – and what if for them the passage through Early Childhood Education is nothing more than a stage of “Destiny Pedagogy”, an “educational process” that keeps them on the sidelines? This study,which is an excerpt of a thesis with further reflections, addresses the contingencies of schooling of poor children. Bauman, Boaventura, Pinto and Sarmento, respectively, emphasize the ideas of “Modern Liquid Consumption Society”, “Abyssal Thinking”, and the “Social Structure as a constraint to inequalities and discrimination” with and among children.</p><div><hr align="left" size="1" width="33%" /><div><p><a title="" href="file:///C:/Users/MCris/Desktop/baby%201.docx#_ftnref1">[1]</a> Termo produzido a partir da ideia de <em>homo sacer</em>, contudo, reforçando a influência estadunidense nas regras de consumo no Brasil.</p></div></div>
Early Childhood Adversity, Toxic Stress, and the Role of the Pediatrician: Translating Developmental Science Into Lifelong Health
