scholarly journals Interval Breast Cancer Rates and Histopathologic Tumor Characteristics after False-Positive Findings at Mammography in a Population-based Screening Program

Radiology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 287 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solveig Hofvind ◽  
Silje Sagstad ◽  
Sofie Sebuødegård ◽  
Ying Chen ◽  
Marta Roman ◽  
...  
Radiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 204106
Author(s):  
Kristin Johnson ◽  
Kristina Lång ◽  
Debra M. Ikeda ◽  
Anna Åkesson ◽  
Ingvar Andersson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena Squillace ◽  
Lorenzo Pizzi ◽  
Flavia Rallo ◽  
Carmen Bazzani ◽  
Gianni Saguatti ◽  
...  

AbstractWe conducted a cross-sectional study to assess the likelihood of returning for routine breast cancer screening among women who have experienced a false-positive result (FPR) and to describe the possible individual and organizational factors that could influence subsequent attendance to the screening program. Several information were collected on demographic and clinical characteristics data. Electronic data from 2014 to 2016 related to breast screening program of the Local Health Authority (LHA) of Bologna (Italy) of women between 45 and 74 years old were reviewed. A total of 4847 women experienced an FPR during mammographic screening and were recalled to subsequent round; 80.2% adhered to the screening. Mean age was 54.2 ± 8.4 years old. Women resulted to be less likely to adhere to screening if they were not-Italian (p = 0.001), if they lived in the Bologna district (p < 0.001), if they had to wait more than 5 days from II level test to end of diagnostic procedures (p = 0.001), if the diagnostic tests were performed in a hospital with the less volume of activity and higher recall rate (RR) (p < 0.001) and if they had no previous participation to screening tests (p < 0.001). Our results are consistent with previous studies, and encourages the implementation and innovation of the organizational characteristics for breast cancer screening. The success of screening programs requires an efficient indicators monitoring strategy to develop and evaluate continuous improvement processes.


2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 2501-2506 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.D.M. Otten ◽  
J. Fracheboud ◽  
G.J. den Heeten ◽  
S.J. Otto ◽  
R. Holland ◽  
...  

BMJ ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 345 (nov16 1) ◽  
pp. e7536-e7536 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kalager ◽  
R. M. Tamimi ◽  
M. Bretthauer ◽  
H.-O. Adami

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 277-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrián González-Marrón ◽  
Juan Carlos Martín-Sánchez ◽  
Ferrán Garcia-Alemany ◽  
Encarna Martínez-Martín ◽  
Nuria Matilla-Santander ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document