Multiple Sclerosis: Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging for Evaluation of Normal-appearing White Matter

Radiology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 222 (3) ◽  
pp. 729-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander C. Guo ◽  
James R. MacFall ◽  
James M. Provenzale
2014 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios Gratsias ◽  
Eftychia Kapsalaki ◽  
Styliani Kogia ◽  
Efthimios Dardiotis ◽  
Vaia Tsimourtou ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 65 (3a) ◽  
pp. 561-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel E. Maia de Andrade ◽  
Emerson L. Gasparetto ◽  
Luiz Celso Hygino Cruz Jr. ◽  
Fabiana Brito Ferreira ◽  
Roberto Cortês Domingues ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE: To study the white matter of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) with diffusion tensor magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (DTI). METHOD: Forty patients with clinical-laboratorial diagnosis of relapsing-remitting MS and 40 age- and sex-matched controls, who underwent conventional and functional (DTI) MR imaging, were included in the study. The DTI sequences resulted in maps of fractional anisotropy (FA) and regions of interest were placed on the plaques, peri-plaque regions, normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) around the plaques, contralateral normal white matter (CNWM) and normal white matter of the controls (WMC). The FA values were compared and the statistical treatment was performed with the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The mean FA in plaques was 0.268, in peri-plaque regions 0.365, in NAWM 0.509, in CNWM 0.552 and in WMC 0.573. Statistical significant differences in FA values were observed in plaques, peri-plaque regions and in NAWM around the plaques when compared to the white matter in the control group. There was no significant difference between the FA values of the CNWM of patients with MS and normal white matter of controls. CONCLUSION: Patients with MS show difference in the FA values of the plaques, peri-plaques and NAWM around the plaques when compared to the normal white matter of controls. As a result, DTI may be considered more efficient than conventional MR imaging for the study of patients with MS.


Radiology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 246 (1) ◽  
pp. 222-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunshui Yu ◽  
Fuchun Lin ◽  
Kuncheng Li ◽  
Tianzi Jiang ◽  
Wen Qin ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 366-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Carotenuto ◽  
Beniamino Giordano ◽  
George Dervenoulas ◽  
Heather Wilson ◽  
Mattia Veronese ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose We evaluated myelin changes throughout the central nervous system in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients by using hybrid [18F]florbetapir PET-MR imaging. Methods We included 18 relapsing-remitting MS patients and 12 healthy controls. Each subject performed a hybrid [18F]florbetapir PET-MR and both a clinical and cognitive assessment. [18F]florbetapir binding was measured as distribution volume ratio (DVR), through the Logan graphical reference method and the supervised cluster analysis to extract a reference region, and standard uptake value (SUV) in the 70–90 min interval after injection. The two quantification approaches were compared. We also evaluated changes in the measures derived from diffusion tensor imaging and arterial spin labeling. Results [18F]florbetapir DVRs decreased from normal-appearing white matter to the centre of T2 lesion (P < 0.001), correlated with fractional anisotropy and with mean, axial and radial diffusivity within T2 lesions (coeff. = −0.15, P < 0.001, coeff. = −0.12, P < 0.001 and coeff. = −0.16, P < 0.001, respectively). Cerebral blood flow was reduced in white matter damaged areas compared to white matter in healthy controls (−10.9%, P = 0.005). SUV70–90 and DVR are equally able to discriminate between intact and damaged myelin (area under the curve 0.76 and 0.66, respectively; P = 0.26). Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that [18F]florbetapir PET imaging can measure in-vivo myelin damage in patients with MS. Demyelination in MS is not restricted to lesions detected through conventional MRI but also involves the normal appearing white matter. Although longitudinal studies are needed, [18F]florbetapir PET imaging may have a role in clinical settings in the management of MS patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document