Circular Tomosynthesis: Potential in Imaging of Breast and Upper Cervical Spine—Preliminary Phantom and in Vitro Study

Radiology ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 228 (2) ◽  
pp. 569-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grant M. Stevens ◽  
Robyn L. Birdwell ◽  
Christopher F. Beaulieu ◽  
Debra M. Ikeda ◽  
Norbert J. Pelc
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
César Hidalgo-García ◽  
Ana I. Lorente ◽  
Carlos López-de-Celis ◽  
Orosia Lucha-López ◽  
Miguel Malo-Urriés ◽  
...  

AbstractThis study compares upper cervical spine range of motion (ROM) in the three cardinal planes before and after occiput-atlas (C0–C1) stabilization. After the dissection of the superficial structures to the alar ligament and the fixation of C2, ten cryopreserved upper cervical columns were manually mobilized in the three cardinal planes of movement without and with a screw stabilization of C0–C1. Upper cervical ROM and mobilization force were measured using the Vicon motion capture system and a load cell respectively. The ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was 19.8° ± 5.2° in flexion and 14.3° ± 7.7° in extension. With stabilization, the ROM was 11.5° ± 4.3° and 6.6° ± 3.5°, respectively. The ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was 4.7° ± 2.3° in right lateral flexion and 5.6° ± 3.2° in left lateral flexion. With stabilization, the ROM was 2.3° ± 1.4° and 2.3° ± 1.2°, respectively. The ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was 33.9° ± 6.7° in right rotation and 28.0° ± 6.9° in left rotation. With stabilization, the ROM was 28.5° ± 7.0° and 23.7° ± 8.5° respectively. Stabilization of C0–C1 reduced the upper cervical ROM by 46.9% in the sagittal plane, 55.3% in the frontal plane, and 15.6% in the transverse plane. Also, the resistance to movement during upper cervical mobilization increased following C0–C1 stabilization.


2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Michel Dugailly ◽  
Stéphane Sobczak ◽  
Victor Sholukha ◽  
Serge Van Sint Jan ◽  
Patrick Salvia ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 110872
Author(s):  
Ana I. LORENTE ◽  
César HIDALGO-GARCÍA ◽  
Pablo FANLO-MAZAS ◽  
Jacobo RODRÍGUEZ-SANZ ◽  
Carlos LÓPEZ-de-CELIS ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ana I Lorente ◽  
Mario Maza Frechín ◽  
Albert Pérez Bellmunt ◽  
César Hidalgo García

The rotation stress test is used to evaluate stability of the craniocervical junction by assuming that it gives the maximum rotation. However, a more complex manipulation might show a higher rotation: the rotation with extension and contralateral bending. This was tested in vitro with ten upper cervical spine specimens.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Waseem Ur Rahman ◽  
Wei Jiang ◽  
Guohua Wang ◽  
Zhijun Li

BACKGROUND: The finite element method (FEM) is an efficient and powerful tool for studying human spine biomechanics. OBJECTIVE: In this study, a detailed asymmetric three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) model of the upper cervical spine was developed from the computed tomography (CT) scan data to analyze the effect of ligaments and facet joints on the stability of the upper cervical spine. METHODS: A 3D FE model was validated against data obtained from previously published works, which were performed in vitro and FE analysis of vertebrae under three types of loads, i.e. flexion/extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending. RESULTS: The results show that the range of motion of segment C1–C2 is more flexible than that of segment C2–C3. Moreover, the results from the FE model were used to compute stresses on the ligaments and facet joints of the upper cervical spine during physiological moments. CONCLUSION: The anterior longitudinal ligaments (ALL) and interspinous ligaments (ISL) are found to be the most active ligaments, and the maximum stress distribution is appear on the vertebra C3 superior facet surface under both extension and flexion moments.


1992 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. -J. Wilke ◽  
K. Fischer ◽  
A. Kugler ◽  
F. Magerl ◽  
L. Claes ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. -J. Wilke ◽  
K. Fischer ◽  
A. Kugler ◽  
F. Magerl ◽  
L. Claes ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 363-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay K. Goel ◽  
Charles R. Clark ◽  
D. McGowan ◽  
S. Goyal

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 3002-3010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aniruddh N. Nayak ◽  
Matthew I. Stein ◽  
Chris R. James ◽  
Roger B. Gaskins ◽  
Andres F. Cabezas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document