A new method for the estimation of the components of energy expenditure in patients with major trauma

1994 ◽  
Vol 267 (6) ◽  
pp. E1002-E1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Franch-Arcas ◽  
L. D. Plank ◽  
D. N. Monk ◽  
R. Gupta ◽  
K. Maher ◽  
...  

The management of critically ill patients would be better understood if the total energy expenditure (TEE) and its components are known. To quantify the different components of energy expenditure in patients with major trauma, we used a technique combining measurements of body composition and oxygen consumption. We determined changes in body weight, total body water, total body protein, total body potassium, total body fat, and bone mineral content every 5 days over a 10-day period in a group of nine multiply injured patients. Resting energy expenditure was measured by indirect calorimetry (REEm), and a predicted value was obtained from total body potassium (REEp). TEE was assessed by adding the total calorie intake to the changes in body energy stores, and the activity energy expenditure (AEE) was calculated by subtracting REEm from TEE. Mean daily values for REEm, REEp, TEE, and AEE were 2,236 +/- 140, 1,683 +/- 82, 3,029 +/- 276, and 793 +/- 213 kcal/day, respectively, over the 10-day study period. Although not statistically significant, the mean AEE was four times smaller for the first 5 days of study than for the second 5 days (298 +/- 400 vs. 1,254 +/- 588 kcal/day). The technique of combining indirect calorimetry and body composition measurements offers a new approach to evaluate energy expenditure and a new way to study metabolic disorders and therapeutic strategies in critically ill patients.

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Lillelund Rousing ◽  
Mie Hviid Hahn-Pedersen ◽  
Steen Andreassen ◽  
Ulrike Pielmeier ◽  
Jean-Charles Preiser

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 573-581
Author(s):  
Charles CH Lew ◽  
Chengsi Ong ◽  
Amartya Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Andrea Marshall ◽  
Yaseen M Arabi

Introduction: Number of recently published studies on nutritional support in the intensive care unit (ICU) have resulted in a paradigm shift of clinical practices. This review summarises the latest evidence in four main topics in the ICU, namely: (1) function of validated nutrition screening/assessment tools, (2) types and validity of body composition measurements, (3) optimal energy and protein goals, and (4) delivery methods. Methods: Recent studies that investigated the above aims were outlined and discussed. In addition, recent guidelines were also compared to highlight the similarities and differences in their approach to the nutrition support of critically ill patients. Results: Regardless of nutritional status and body composition, all patients with >48 hours of ICU stay are at nutrition risk and should receive individualised nutrition support. Although a recent trial did not demonstrate an advantage of indirect calorimetry over predictive equations, it was recommended that indirect calorimetry be used to set energy targets with better accuracy. Initiation of enteral nutrition (EN) within 24–48 hours was shown to be associated with improved clinical outcomes. The energy and protein goals should be achieved gradually over the first week of ICU stay. This practice should be protocolised and regularly audited as critically ill patients receive only part of their energy and protein goals. Conclusions: Metabolic demands of critically ill patients can be variable and nutrition support should be tailored to each patient. Given that many nutrition studies are on-going, we anticipate improvements in the individualisation of nutrition support in the near future. Key words: Critical care, Critical illness, Intensive care, Nutrition, Nutritional intake, Nutrition support


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document