Different ventilation strategies alter surfactant responses in preterm rabbits

1992 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 2089-2096 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. D. Rider ◽  
A. H. Jobe ◽  
M. Ikegami ◽  
B. Sun

The effect of ventilation strategy on in vivo function of different surfactants was evaluated in preterm rabbits delivered at 27 days gestational age and ventilated with either 0 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at tidal volumes of 10–11 ml/kg or 3 cmH2O PEEP at tidal volumes of 7–8 ml/kg after treatment with one of four different surfactants: sheep surfactant, the lipids of sheep surfactant stripped of protein (LH-20 lipid), Exosurf, and Survanta. The use of 3 cmH2O PEEP decreased pneumothoraces in all groups except for the sheep surfactant group where pneumothoraces increased (P < 0.01). Ventilatory pressures (peak pressures - PEEP) decreased more with the 3 cmH2O PEEP, low-tidal-volume ventilation strategy for Exosurf-, Survanta-, and sheep surfactant-treated rabbits (P < 0.05), whereas ventilation efficiency indexes (VEI) improved only for Survanta- and sheep surfactant-treated rabbits with 3 cmH2O PEEP (P < 0.01). Pressure-volume curves for sheep surfactant-treated rabbits were better than for all other treated groups (P < 0.01), although Exosurf and Survanta increased lung volumes above those in control rabbits (P < 0.05). The recovery of intravascular radiolabeled albumin in the lungs and alveolar washes was used as an indicator of pulmonary edema. Only Survanta and sheep surfactant decreased protein leaks in the absence of PEEP, whereas all treatments decreased labeled albumin recoveries when 3 cmH2O PEEP was used (P < 0.05). These experiments demonstrate that ventilation style will alter a number of measurements of surfactant function, and the effects differ for different surfactants.

Author(s):  
Xiang Li ◽  
Zhi-Lin Ni ◽  
Jun Wang ◽  
Xiu-Cheng Liu ◽  
Hui-Lian Guan ◽  
...  

AbstractLow tidal volume ventilation strategy may lead to atelectasis without proper positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuver (RM) settings. RM followed by individualized PEEP was a new method to optimize the intraoperative pulmonary function. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to compare the effects of individualized PEEP + RM on intraoperative pulmonary function and hemodynamic with other PEEP and RM settings. The primary outcomes were intraoperative oxygenation index and dynamic compliance, while the secondary outcomes were intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial pressure. In total, we identified 15 clinical trials containing 36 randomized groups with 3634 participants. Ventilation strategies were divided into eight groups by four PEEP (L: low, M: moderate, H: high, and I: individualized) and two RM (yes or no) settings. The main results showed that IPEEP + RM group was superior to all other groups regarding to both oxygenation index and dynamic compliance. LPEEP group was inferior to LPEEP + RM, MPEEP, MPEEP + RM, and IPEEP + RM in terms of oxygenation index and LPEEP + RM, MPEEP, MPEEP + RM, HPEEP + RM, IPEEP, and IPEEP + RM in terms of dynamic compliance. All comparisons were similar for secondary outcomes. Our analysis suggested that individualized PEEP and RM may be the optimal low tidal volume ventilation strategy at present, while low PEEP without RM is not suggested.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document