Soothing the sleeping giant: improving skeletal muscle oxygen kinetics and exercise intolerance in HFpEF

2015 ◽  
Vol 119 (6) ◽  
pp. 734-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satyam Sarma ◽  
Benjamin D. Levine

Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have similar degrees of exercise intolerance and dyspnea as patients with heart failure with reduced EF (HFrEF). The underlying pathophysiology leading to impaired exertional ability in the HFpEF syndrome is not completely understood, and a growing body of evidence suggests “peripheral,” i.e., noncardiac, factors may play an important role. Changes in skeletal muscle function (decreased muscle mass, capillary density, mitochondrial volume, and phosphorylative capacity) are common findings in HFrEF. While cardiac failure and decreased cardiac reserve account for a large proportion of the decline in oxygen consumption in HFrEF, impaired oxygen diffusion and decreased skeletal muscle oxidative capacity can also hinder aerobic performance, functional capacity and oxygen consumption (V̇o2) kinetics. The impact of skeletal muscle dysfunction and abnormal oxidative capacity may be even more pronounced in HFpEF, a disease predominantly affecting the elderly and women, two demographic groups with a high prevalence of sarcopenia. In this review, we 1) describe the basic concepts of skeletal muscle oxygen kinetics and 2) evaluate evidence suggesting limitations in aerobic performance and functional capacity in HFpEF subjects may, in part, be due to alterations in skeletal muscle oxygen delivery and utilization. Improving oxygen kinetics with specific training regimens may improve exercise efficiency and reduce the tremendous burden imposed by skeletal muscle upon the cardiovascular system.

2012 ◽  
Vol 302 (5) ◽  
pp. H1050-H1063 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Poole ◽  
Daniel M. Hirai ◽  
Steven W. Copp ◽  
Timothy I. Musch

The defining characteristic of chronic heart failure (CHF) is an exercise intolerance that is inextricably linked to structural and functional aberrations in the O2 transport pathway. CHF reduces muscle O2 supply while simultaneously increasing O2 demands. CHF severity varies from moderate to severe and is assessed commonly in terms of the maximum O2 uptake, which relates closely to patient morbidity and mortality in CHF and forms the basis for Weber and colleagues' ( 167 ) classifications of heart failure, speed of the O2 uptake kinetics following exercise onset and during recovery, and the capacity to perform submaximal exercise. As the heart fails, cardiovascular regulation shifts from controlling cardiac output as a means for supplying the oxidative energetic needs of exercising skeletal muscle and other organs to preventing catastrophic swings in blood pressure. This shift is mediated by a complex array of events that include altered reflex and humoral control of the circulation, required to prevent the skeletal muscle “sleeping giant” from outstripping the pathologically limited cardiac output and secondarily impacts lung (and respiratory muscle), vascular, and locomotory muscle function. Recently, interest has also focused on the dysregulation of inflammatory mediators including tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-1β as well as reactive oxygen species as mediators of systemic and muscle dysfunction. This brief review focuses on skeletal muscle to address the mechanistic bases for the reduced maximum O2 uptake, slowed O2 uptake kinetics, and exercise intolerance in CHF. Experimental evidence in humans and animal models of CHF unveils the microvascular cause(s) and consequences of the O2 supply (decreased)/O2 demand (increased) imbalance emblematic of CHF. Therapeutic strategies to improve muscle microvascular and oxidative function (e.g., exercise training and anti-inflammatory, antioxidant strategies, in particular) and hence patient exercise tolerance and quality of life are presented within their appropriate context of the O2 transport pathway.


2015 ◽  
Vol 119 (6) ◽  
pp. 739-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. Haykowsky ◽  
Corey R. Tomczak ◽  
Jessica M. Scott ◽  
D. Ian Paterson ◽  
Dalane W. Kitzman

This mini-review summarizes the literature regarding the mechanisms of exercise intolerance in patients with heart failure and reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFREF and HFPEF, respectively). Evidence to date suggests that the reduced peak pulmonary oxygen uptake (pulm V̇o2) in patients with HFREF compared with healthy controls is due to both central (reduced convective O2 transport) and peripheral factors (impaired skeletal muscle blood flow, decreased diffusive O2 transport coupled with abnormal skeletal morphology, and metabolism). Although central and peripheral impairments also limit peak pulm V̇o2 in HFPEF patients compared with healthy controls, emerging data suggest that the latter may play a relatively greater role in limiting exercise performance in these patients. Unlike HFREF, currently there is limited evidence-based therapies that improve exercise capacity in HFPEF patients, therefore future studies are required to determine whether interventions targeted to improve peripheral vascular and skeletal muscle function result in favorable improvements in peak pulm and leg V̇o2 and their determinants in HFPEF patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M R Dos Santos ◽  
G W P Fonseca ◽  
L Sherveninas ◽  
F R Souza ◽  
A C Battaglia Filho ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Obesity may have a protective role in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), a phenomenon known as obesity paradox. However, some patients can also present sarcopenic obesity with similar exercise intolerance as lean patients with muscle wasting. However, the impact of body fat distribution on exercise intolerance in HFrEF is unknown. Purpose To study the association between android to gynoid fat ratio and functional capacity (VO2 peak) in male patients with HFrEF. Methods We enrolled 118 male with HFrEF with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%, mean age of 56±7 years old. Body composition was measured with dual x-ray absorptiometry. Android and gynoid fat were measured and the ratio between them was calculated (A/G ratio). Appendicular lean mass (ALM) was calculated as the lean muscle mass of both arms and legs divided by the height squared. Sarcopenic obesity was defined according to Foundation for the National Institutes of Health criteria (ALM adjusted for body mass index <0.789 for men). Muscle strength was assessed using the handgrip dynamometer (cutoff point for sarcopenia was defined as proposed by European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People). Blood sample was used to measure metabolic and hormonal parameters. Results Of those 118 patients, 15 (12.7%) showed sarcopenic obesity. In our cohort, the median A/G ratio was 0.55. A/G ratio >0.55 was detected in 60 patients. Weight and BMI were higher in patients with A/G ratio >0.55 (P<0.001). Absolute peak VO2 was similar between patients with A/G ratio lower or higher than 0.55 (1.48±0.40 vs. 1.43±0.40 L/min, P=0.559), while relative peak VO2 was lower in patients with A/G ratio >0.55 (18.7±5.3 vs. 22.5±6.1 mL/kg/min, P<0.001). LVEF, total cholesterol, LDL, haemoglobin, and IGF-1 were similar between patients with A/G ratio lower or higher than 0.55 (P>0.05). On the other hand, HDL, total testosterone, free testosterone, and DHEA were lower in patients with A/G ratio >0.55 (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed A/G Ratio >0.55 to be independently associated with reduced peak VO2 (L/min) adjusted for age, BMI, LVEF, presence of sarcopenia, anabolic hormones, and haemoglobin (odds ratio 3.895, 95% CI 1.030–14.730, p=0.045). Conclusion Our data suggest that body fat distribution, particularly android and gynoid fat composition, might have an important adverse role on functional capacity in male patients with HFrEF. Acknowledgement/Funding FAPESP #2016/24306-0 and 2016/24833-0


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 685-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ippei Nakano ◽  
Hiroaki Hori ◽  
Arata Fukushima ◽  
Takashi Yokota ◽  
Shintaro Kinugawa ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-30
Author(s):  
A GARNIER ◽  
D FORTIN ◽  
C DELOMENIE ◽  
I MOMKEN ◽  
V VEKSLER ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document