Coordination of Smooth Pursuit and Saccade Target Selection in Monkeys

2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 2206-2214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilbert R. Case ◽  
Vincent P. Ferrera
Keyword(s):  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
Saccade Target ◽  
Target Color ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Moving Targets ◽  
Neural Signals ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Selection For ◽  
Selection Signal

The coordination of saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements in macaque monkeys was investigated using a target selection paradigm with two moving targets crossing at a center fixation point. A task in which monkeys selected a target based on its color was used to test the hypothesis that common neural signals underlie target selection for pursuit and saccades, as well as testing whether target selection signals are available to the saccade and pursuit systems simultaneously or sequentially. Several combinations of target color, speed, and direction were used. In all cases, smooth pursuit was highly selective for the rewarded target before any saccade occurred. On >80% of the trials, the saccade was directed toward the same target as both pre- and postsaccadic pursuit. The results favor a model in which a shared target selection signal is simultaneously available to both the saccade and pursuit systems, rather than a sequential model.

Target selection for predictive smooth pursuit eye movements

2004 ◽  
Vol 155 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Poliakoff ◽  
C. J. S. Collins ◽  
G. R. Barnes
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Selection For

The effect of a moving distractor on the initiation of smooth-pursuit eye movements

1997 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent P. Ferrera ◽  
Stephen G. Lisberger
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
Motion Processing ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Response Preparation ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Motion Processing

AbstractAs a step toward understanding the mechanism by which targets are selected for smooth-pursuit eye movements, we examined the behavior of the pursuit system when monkeys were presented with two discrete moving visual targets. Two rhesus monkeys were trained to select a small moving target identified by its color in the presence of a moving distractor of another color. Smooth-pursuit eye movements were quantified in terms of the latency of the eye movement and the initial eye acceleration profile. We have previously shown that the latency of smooth pursuit, which is normally around 100 ms, can be extended to 150 ms or shortened to 85 ms depending on whether there is a distractor moving in the opposite or same direction, respectively, relative to the direction of the target. We have now measured this effect for a 360 deg range of distractor directions, and distractor speeds of 5–45 deg/s. We have also examined the effect of varying the spatial separation and temporal asynchrony between target and distractor. The results indicate that the effect of the distractor on the latency of pursuit depends on its direction of motion, and its spatial and temporal proximity to the target, but depends very little on the speed of the distractor. Furthermore, under the conditions of these experiments, the direction of the eye movement that is emitted in response to two competing moving stimuli is not a vectorial combination of the stimulus motions, but is solely determined by the direction of the target. The results are consistent with a competitive model for smooth-pursuit target selection and suggest that the competition takes place at a stage of the pursuit pathway that is between visual-motion processing and motor-response preparation.

Target Selection by the Frontal Cortex during Coordinated Saccadic and Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1611-1627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna Srihasam ◽  
Daniel Bullock ◽  
Stephen Grossberg
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Current Model ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
Motion Processing ◽  
Parallel Model ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Pontine Nucleus ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements

Oculomotor tracking of moving objects is an important component of visually based cognition and planning. Such tracking is achieved by a combination of saccades and smooth-pursuit eye movements. In particular, the saccadic and smooth-pursuit systems interact to often choose the same target, and to maximize its visibility through time. How do multiple brain regions interact, including frontal cortical areas, to decide the choice of a target among several competing moving stimuli? How is target selection information that is created by a bias (e.g., electrical stimulation) transferred from one movement system to another? These saccade–pursuit interactions are clarified by a new computational neural model, which describes interactions between motion processing areas: the middle temporal area, the middle superior temporal area, the frontal pursuit area, and the dorsal lateral pontine nucleus; saccade specification, selection, and planning areas: the lateral intraparietal area, the frontal eye fields, the substantia nigra pars reticulata, and the superior colliculus; the saccadic generator in the brain stem; and the cerebellum. Model simulations explain a broad range of neuroanatomical and neurophysiological data. These results are in contrast with the simplest parallel model with no interactions between saccades and pursuit other than common-target selection and recruitment of shared motoneurons. Actual tracking episodes in primates reveal multiple systematic deviations from predictions of the simplest parallel model, which are explained by the current model.

scholarly journals Comparison of the precision of smooth pursuit in humans and head unrestrained monkeys

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Churan ◽  
Doris I. Braun ◽  
Karl R. Gegenfurtner ◽  
Frank Bremmer
Keyword(s):  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Moving Targets ◽  
Decay Function ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Motion Onset ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Optimal Values ◽  
Over Time

Direct comparison of results of humans and monkeys is often complicated by differences in experimental conditions. We replicated in head unrestrained macaques experiments of a recent study comparing human directional precision during smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) and saccades to moving targets (Braun & Gegenfurtner, 2016). Directional precision of human SPEM follows an exponential decay function reaching optimal values of 1.5°-3° within 300 ms after target motion onset, whereas precision of initial saccades to moving targets is slightly better. As in humans, we found general agreement in the development of directional precision of SPEM over time and in the differences between directional precision of initial saccades and SPEM initiation. However, monkeys showed overall lower precision in SPEM compared to humans. This was most likely due to differences in experimental conditions, such as in the stabilization of the head, which was by a chin and a head rest in human subjects and unrestrained in monkeys. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document