scholarly journals Differential encoding of spatial information among retinal on cone bipolar cells

2015 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 1757-1772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Purgert ◽  
Peter D. Lukasiewicz
Keyword(s):  
Parallel Processing ◽  
Visual Processing ◽  
Amacrine Cell ◽  
Spatial Information ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Spatial Tuning ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells

The retina is the first stage of visual processing. It encodes elemental features of visual scenes. Distinct cone bipolar cells provide the substrate for this to occur. They encode visual information, such as color and luminance, a principle known as parallel processing. Few studies have directly examined whether different forms of spatial information are processed in parallel among cone bipolar cells. To address this issue, we examined the spatial information encoded by mouse ON cone bipolar cells, the subpopulation excited by increments in illumination. Two types of spatial processing were identified. We found that ON cone bipolar cells with axons ramifying in the central inner plexiform layer were tuned to preferentially encode small stimuli. By contrast, ON cone bipolar cells with axons ramifying in the proximal inner plexiform layer, nearest the ganglion cell layer, were tuned to encode both small and large stimuli. This dichotomy in spatial tuning is attributable to amacrine cells providing stronger inhibition to central ON cone bipolar cells compared with proximal ON cone bipolar cells. Furthermore, background illumination altered this difference in spatial tuning. It became less pronounced in bright light, as amacrine cell-driven inhibition became pervasive among all ON cone bipolar cells. These results suggest that differential amacrine cell input determined the distinct spatial encoding properties among ON cone bipolar cells. These findings enhance the known parallel processing capacity of the retina.

scholarly journals Heterocellular coupling between amacrine cell and ganglion cells

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Marc ◽  
Crystal Sigulinsky ◽  
Rebecca L. Pfeiffer ◽  
Daniel Emrich ◽  
James R. Anderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gap Junctions ◽  
Ganglion Cell ◽  
Bipolar Cell ◽  
Amacrine Cell ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Tem Analysis

AbstractAll superclasses of retinal neurons display some form of electrical coupling including the key neurons of the inner plexiform layer: bipolar cells (BCs), amacrine or axonal cells (ACs) and ganglion cells (GCs). However, coupling varies extensively by class. For example, mammalian rod bipolar cells form no gap junctions at all, while all cone bipolar cells form class-specific coupling arrays, many of them homocellular in-superclass arrays. Ganglion cells are unique in that classes with coupling predominantly form heterocellular cross-class arrays of ganglion cell::amacrine cell (GC::AC) coupling in the mammalian retina. Ganglion cells are the least frequent superclass in the inner plexiform layer and GC::AC gap junctions are sparsely arrayed amidst massive cohorts of AC::AC, bipolar cell BC::BC, and AC::BC gap junctions. Many of these gap junctions and most ganglion cell gap junctions are suboptical, complicating analysis of specific ganglion cells. High resolution 2 nm TEM analysis of rabbit retinal connectome RC1 allows quantitative GC::AC coupling maps of identified ganglion cells. Ganglion cells classes apparently avoid direct cross-class homocellular coupling altogether even though they have opportunities via direct membrane touches, while transient OFF alpha ganglion cells and transient ON directionally selective (DS) ganglion cells are strongly coupled to distinct amacrine / axonal cell cohorts.A key feature of coupled ganglion cells is intercellular metabolite flux. Most GC::AC coupling involves GABAergic cells (γ+ amacrine cells), which results in significant GABA flux into ganglion cells. Surveying GABA coupling signatures in the ganglion cell layer across species suggests that the majority of vertebrate retinas engage in GC::AC coupling.Multi-hop synaptic queries of the entire RC1 connectome clearly profiles the coupled amacrine and axonal cells. Photic drive polarities and source bipolar cell class selec-tivities are tightly matched across coupled cells. OFF alpha ganglion cells are coupled to OFF γ+ amacrine cells and transient ON DS ganglion cells are coupled to ON γ+ amacrine cells including a large interstitial axonal cell (IAC). Synaptic tabulations show close matches between the classes of bipolar cells sampled by the coupled amacrine and ganglion cells. Further, both ON and OFF coupling ganglion networks show a common theme: synaptic asymmetry whereby the coupled γ+ neurons are also presynaptic to ganglion cell dendrites from different classes of ganglion cells outside the coupled set. In effect, these heterocellular coupling patterns enable an excited ganglion cell to directly inhibit nearby ganglion cells of different classes. Similarly, coupled γ+ amacrine cells engaged in feedback networks can leverage the additional gain of bipolar cell synapses in shaping the signaling of a spectrum of downstream targets based on their own selective coupling with ganglion cells.

Morphological differentiation of bipolar cells in the ferret retina

1999 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 1133-1144 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.D. MILLER ◽  
M.N. TRAN ◽  
G.-K. WONG ◽  
D.M. OAKLEY ◽  
R.O.L. WONG
Keyword(s):  
Visual Processing ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Morphological Differentiation ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Axon Terminals ◽  
Ribbon Synapses ◽  
Rod Bipolar Cells ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells ◽  
Dye Labeling

Bipolar cells are not only important for visual processing but input from these cells may underlie the reorganization of ganglion cell dendrites in the inner plexiform layer (IPL) during development. Because little is known about the development of bipolar cells, here we have used immunocytochemical markers and dye labeling to identify and follow their differentiation in the neonatal ferret retina. Putative cone bipolar cells were immunoreacted for calbindin and recoverin, and rod bipolar cells were immunostained for protein kinase C (PKC). Our results show that calbindin-immunoreactive cone bipolar cells appear at postnatal day 15 (P15), at which time their axonal terminals are already localized to the inner half of the IPL. By contrast, recoverin-immunoreactive cells with terminals in the IPL are present at birth, but many of these cells may be immature photoreceptors. By the second postnatal week, recoverin-positive cells resembling cone bipolar cells were clearly present, and with increasing age, two distinct strata of immunolabeled processes occupied the IPL. PKC-containing rod bipolar cells emerged by the fourth postnatal week and at this age have stratified arbors in the inner IPL. The early bias of bipolar axonal arbors in terminating in the inner or outer half of the IPL is confirmed by dye labeling of cells with somata in the inner nuclear layer. At P10, several days before ribbon synapses have been previously observed in the ferret IPL, the axon terminals of all dye-labeled bipolar cells were clearly stratified. The results suggest that bipolar cells could provide spatially localized interactions that are suitable for guiding dendritic lamination in the inner retina.

Modulation of Excitatory Synaptic Transmission by GABAC Receptor-Mediated Feedback in the Mouse Inner Retina

2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 2285-2298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ko Matsui ◽  
Jun Hasegawa ◽  
Masao Tachibana
Keyword(s):  
Nmda Receptors ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Feedback Inhibition ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells

In many vertebrate CNS synapses, the neurotransmitter glutamate activates postsynaptic non- N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) and NMDA receptors. Since their biophysical properties are quite different, the time course of excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) depends largely on the relative contribution of their activation. To investigate whether the activation of the two receptor subtypes is affected by the synaptic interaction in the inner plexiform layer (IPL) of the mouse retina, we analyzed the properties of the light-evoked responses ofon-cone bipolar cells and on-transient amacrine cells in a retinal slice preparation. on-transient amacrine cells were whole cell voltage-clamped, and the glutamatergic synaptic input from bipolar cells was isolated by a cocktail of pharmacological agents (bicuculline, strychnine, curare, and atropine). Direct puff application of NMDA revealed the presence of functional NMDA receptors. However, the light-evoked EPSC was not significantly affected byd(−)-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (d-AP5), but suppressed by 2,3-dioxo-6-nitro-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrobenzo[f]quinoxaline-7-sulfonamide (NBQX) or 1-(4-aminophenyl)-4-methyl-7,8-methylenedioxy-5H-2,3-benzodiazepine hydrochloride (GYKI 52466). These results indicate that the light-evoked EPSC is mediated mainly by AMPA receptors under this condition. Since bipolar cells have GABACreceptors at their terminals, it has been suggested that bipolar cells receive feedback inhibition from amacrine cells. Application of (1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)methylphosphinic acid (TPMPA), a specific blocker of GABAC receptors, suppressed both the GABA-induced current and the light-evoked feedback inhibition observed in on-cone bipolar cells and enhanced the light-evoked EPSC of on-transient amacrine cells. In the presence of TPMPA, the light-evoked EPSC of amacrine cells was composed of AMPA and NMDA receptor-mediated components. Our results suggest that photoresponses of on-transient amacrine cells in the mouse retina are modified by the activation of presynaptic GABAC receptors, which may control the extent of glutamate spillover.

Localization of AMPA-selective glutamate receptor subunits in the cat retina: A light- and electron-microscopic study

1999 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
PU QIN ◽  
ROBERTA G. POURCHO
Keyword(s):  
Glutamate Receptor ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Morphological Evidence ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Electron Microscopic ◽  
Cat Retina ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells

The distribution of AMPA-selective glutamate receptor subunits was studied in the cat retina using antisera against GluR1 and GluR2/3. Both antisera were localized in postsynaptic sites in the outer plexiform layer (OPL) as well as the inner plexiform layer (IPL). Immunoreactivity for GluR1 was seen in a subpopulation of OFF cone bipolar cells and a number of amacrine and ganglion cells. Within the IPL, processes staining for GluR1 received input from OFF and ON cone bipolar cells but not from rod bipolars. Labeling for GluR2/3 was seen in horizontal cells, an occasional cone bipolar cell, and numerous amacrine and ganglion cells. In the IPL, GluR2/3 staining was postsynaptic to cone bipolar cells in both sublaminae. AII amacrine cells which receive rod bipolar input were also labeled for GluR2/3. With both antisera, staining was limited to a single member of the bipolar dyad complex, providing morphological evidence for functional diversity in glutamatergic pathways.

Synaptic organization of GABAergic amacrine cells in the salamander retina

2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 817-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
JUN ZHANG ◽  
HO-HWA WANG ◽  
CHEN-YU YANG
Keyword(s):  
Amacrine Cell ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Synaptic Organization ◽  
Proximal Margin ◽  
Functional Roles ◽  
Small Peak ◽  
Immuno Electron Microscopy

The synaptic organization of GABA-immunoreactive (GABA-IR) amacrine cells in the inner plexiform layer (IPL) of salamander retina was studied with the use of postembedding immuno-electron microscopy. A total of 457 GABA-IR amacrine synapses, with identified postsynaptic elements, were analyzed on photomontages of electron micrographs covering 3,618 μm2 of the IPL. GABA-IR amacrine synapses were distributed throughout the IPL, with a small peak at the proximal margin of sublamina a. The majority of the output targets (81%) were GABA(−) neurons. Most of the contacts were simple synapses with one postsynaptic element identified as a process of an amacrine cell (55%), bipolar cell (19%) or ganglion cell (26%), and serial synapses were very rare. Of the 89 postsynaptic bipolar terminals, 63% participated in a reciprocal feedback synapse with the same presynaptic GABA-IR amacrine profile. There appeared to be no preference between GABA-IR amacrine contacts with rod- or cone-dominated bipolar cells (9.1% vs. 8.9%) or in the total number of amacrine synapses in sublaminas a and b (52% vs. 47%). The preponderance of amacrine cell input to bipolar cells in the OFF layer was derived from GABA-IR cells. These findings provide ultrastructural support to the existing physiological studies regarding the functional roles of the GABAergic amacrine cells in this species. Our results have added to the data base demonstrating that, in contrast to mammals, GABA-IR amacrine cells in amphibians and other nonmammals contact other amacrine cells more frequently, suggesting greater involvement of GABAergic amacrine cells in modulating lateral inhibitory pathways.

Synaptic connectivity of two types of recoverin-labeled cone bipolar cells and glutamic acid decarboxylase immunoreactive amacrine cells in the inner plexiform layer of the rat retina

1999 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 791-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
MYUNG-HOON CHUN ◽  
IN-BEOM KIM ◽  
SU-JA OH ◽  
JIN-WOONG CHUNG
Keyword(s):  
Amacrine Cell ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Acid Decarboxylase ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Rat Retina ◽  
Ribbon Synapses ◽  
Cell Processes ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells

We investigated the synaptic connectivity of two populations of recoverin-labeled bipolar cells and GABAergic neurons in the inner plexiform layer (IPL) of the rat retina. Two types of cone bipolar cells, type 2 and type 8, were stained with anti-recoverin antibodies, and GABAergic neurons were stained with anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) antibodies. Type 2 cone bipolar axons received synaptic input from amacrine cell processes in 177 cases; among these amacrine cell processes, 92 processes (52.0%) were GAD-like immunoreactive. A total of 159 amacrine cell processes, which are presynaptic to type 8 cone bipolar cells, were observed. Among these processes, 117 processes (73.6%) were GAD-like immunoreactive. The postsynaptic elements at the ribbon synapses of recoverin-labeled cone bipolar cells were observed in 482 processes. In both type 2 and type 8 cone bipolar cells, the major output was to amacrine cell processes. At the ribbon synapses of the type 2 cone bipolar cells, 224 of the postsynaptic profiles were amacrine cell processes, 97 processes (43.3%) were GAD-like immunoreactive. In type 8 cone bipolar cells, 45 processes (30.2%) of 149 amacrine cell processes were GAD-like immunoreactive. Our results provide morphological evidence that GABA is a major transmitter involved in the visual processing of type 2 and 8 cone bipolar cells and GABA may have a stronger influence on type 8 cone bipolar cells than type 2 cone bipolar cells in the IPL of the rat retina.

scholarly journals Synaptic input to an ON parasol ganglion cell in the macaque retina: A serial section analysis

2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID W. MARSHAK ◽  
ELIZABETH S. YAMADA ◽  
ANDREA S. BORDT ◽  
WENDY C. PERRYMAN
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cell ◽  
Bipolar Cell ◽  
Amacrine Cell ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Inhibitory Input ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Cell Processes

A labeled ON parasol ganglion cell from a macaque retina was analyzed in serial, ultrathin sections. It received 13% of its input from diffuse bipolar cells. These directed a large proportion of their output to amacrine cells but received a relatively small proportion of their amacrine cell input via feedback synapses. In these respects, they were similar to the DB3 bipolar cells that make synapses onto OFF parasol cells. Bipolar cell axons that contacted the ON parasol cell in stratum 4 of the inner plexiform layer always made synapses onto the dendrite, and therefore, the number of bipolar cell synapses onto these ganglion cells could be estimated reliably by light microscopy in the future. Amacrine cells provided the majority of inputs to the ON parasol cell. Only a few of the presynaptic amacrine cell processes received inputs from the same bipolar cells as the parasol cells, and most of the presynaptic amacrine cell processes did not receive any inputs at all within the series. These findings suggest that most of the inhibitory input to the ON parasol cell originates from other areas of the retina. Amacrine cells presynaptic to the parasol ganglion cell interacted very infrequently with other neurons in the circuit, and therefore, they would be expected to act independently, for the most part.

Synaptic microcircuitry of bipolar and amacrine cells with serotonin-like immunoreactivity in the retina of the turtle, Pseudemys scripta elegans

1993 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence B. Hurd ◽  
William D. Eldred
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Cell ◽  
Amacrine Cell ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Outer Plexiform Layer ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Synaptic Contacts ◽  
Synaptic Inputs ◽  
Cell Processes

AbstractAlthough serotonin is thought to be a neurotransmitter in a number of retinal systems, much of the precise synaptic connectivity of serotonergic neurons is unknown. To address this issue, we used an antiserum directed against serotonin to label serotonergic bipolar and amacrine cells in the turtle retina. Light-microscopic analysis of labeled amacrine and bipolar cells indicated that both had bistratified dendritic arborizations primarily in stratum 1 and in strata 4/5 of the inner plexiform layer.Ultrastructural analysis of the neurocircuitry of these cells indicated that the processes of labeled bipolar cells in the outer plexiform layer made basal junction contacts with photoreceptor terminals. Only in rare instances did labeled bipolar cells processes invaginate near photoreceptor ribbon synapses. Processes of labeled bipolar cells received both conventional and small ribbon synaptic contacts in the outer plexiform layer. Bipolar cell processes in stratum 1 of the inner plexiform layer synapsed onto either amacrine/amacrine or amacrine/ganglion cell dyads, and made rare ribbon synaptic contacts onto labeled amacrine cell processes. Synaptic inputs to serotonergic bipolar cells in stratum 1 were from unlabeled bipolar and amacrine cells. Bipolar cell contacts in strata 4/5 were similar to those in stratum 1, but were fewer in number and no bipolar cell inputs were seen.Labeled amacrine cell output in both strata was onto other unlabeled amacrine cells and ganglion cells; but synaptic outputs to unlabeled bipolar cells were only seen in strata 4/5. In both strata 1 and 4/5, synaptic inputs to labeled amacrine cells were from both unlabeled amacrine cells and labeled bipolar cells. The serotonergic amacrine cells had many more synaptic interactions in stratum 1 than in strata 4/5 which supports the role of serotonergic bipolar cells in the OFF pathway of retinal processing. Interactions between serotonergic bipolar and amacrine cells may play an important role in visual processing.

Membrane currents evoked by ionotropic glutamate receptor agonists in rod bipolar cells in the rat retinal slice preparation

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 401-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Hartveit
Keyword(s):  
Nmda Receptor ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Receptor Agonists ◽  
Long Latency ◽  
Glutamate Receptor Agonists ◽  
Conductance Increase ◽  
Rod Bipolar Cells

1. With the use of the whole cell voltage-clamp technique, I have recorded the current responses to ionotropic glutamate receptor agonists of rod bipolar cells in vertical slices of rat retina. Rod bipolar cells constitute a single population of cells and were visualized by infrared differential interference contrast video microscopy. They were targeted by the position of their cell bodies in the inner nuclear layer and, after recording, were visualized in their entirety by labeling with the fluorescent dye Lucifer yellow, which was included in the recording pipette. To study current-voltage relationships of evoked currents, voltage-gated potassium currents were blocked by including Cs+ and tetraethylammonium+ in the recording pipette. 2. Pressure application of the non-N-methyl-D-aspartate (non-NMDA) receptor agonists kainate and (S)-alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) from puffer pipettes evoked a long-latency conductance increase selective for chloride ions. When the intracellular chloride concentration was increased, the reversal potential changed, corresponding to the change in equilibrium potential for chloride. The response was evoked in the presence of 5 mM Co2+ and nominally O mM Ca2+ in the extracellular solution, presumably blocking all external Ca2(+)-dependent release of neurotransmitter. 3. The long latency of kainate-evoked currents in bipolar cells contrasted with the short-latency currents evoked by gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glycine in rod bipolar cells and by kainate in amacrine cells. 4. Application of NMDA evoked no response in rod bipolar cells. 5. Coapplication of AMPA with cyclothiazide, a blocker of agonist-evoked desensitization of AMPA receptors, enhanced the conductance increase compared with application of AMPA alone. Coapplication of the non-NMDA receptor antagonist 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione blocked the response to kainate and AMPA, indicating that the response was mediated by conventional ionotropic glutamate receptors. 6. The conductance increase evoked by non-NMDA receptor agonists could not be blocked by a combination of 100 microM picrotoxin and 10 microM strychnine. Application of the GABAC receptor antagonist 3-aminopropyl (methyl)phosphinic acid (3-APMPA) strongly reduced the response, and coapplication of 500 microM 3-APMPA and 100 microM picrotoxin completely blocked the response. These results suggested that the conductance increase evoked by non-NMDA receptor agonists was mediated by release of GABA and activation of GABAC receptors, and most likely also GABAA receptors, on rod bipolar cells. 7. Kainate responses like those described above could not be evoked in bipolar cells in which the axon had been cut somewhere along its passage to the inner plexiform layer during the slicing procedure. This suggests that the response was dependent on the integrity of the axon terminal in the inner plexiform layer, known to receive GABAergic synaptic input from amacrine cells. 8. The results indicate that ionotropic glutamate receptors are not involved in mediating synaptic input from photoreceptors to rod bipolar cells and that an unconventional mechanism of GABA release from amacrine cells might operate in the inner plexiform layer.

The number and distribution of bipolar to ganglion cell synapses in the inner plexiform layer of the anuran retina

1996 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1099-1107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Péter Buzás ◽  
Sára Jeges ◽  
Robert Gábriel
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cell ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Information Transfer ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Flow Through

AbstractThe main route of information flow through the vertebrate retina is from the photoreceptors towards the ganglion cells whose axons form the optic nerve. Bipolar cells of the frog have been so far reported to contact mostly amacrine cells and the majority of input to ganglion cells comes from the amacrines. In this study, ganglion cells of frogs from two species (Bufo marinus, Xenopus laevis) were filled retrogradely with horseradish peroxidase. After visualization of the tracer, light-microscopic cross sections showed massive labeling of the somata in the ganglion cell layer as well as their dendrites in the inner plexiform layer. In cross sections, bipolar output and ganglion cell input synapses were counted in the electron microscope. Each synapse was assigned to one of the five equal sublayers (SLs) of the inner plexiform layer. In both species, bipolar cells were most often seen to form their characteristic synaptic dyads with two amacrine cells. In some cases, however, the dyads were directed to one amacrine and one ganglion cell dendrite. This type of synapse was unevenly distributed within the inner plexiform layer with the highest occurrence in SL2 both in Bufo and Xenopus. In addition, SL4 contained also a high number of this type of synapse in Xenopus. In both species, we found no or few bipolar to ganglion cell synapses in the marginal sublayers (SLs 1 and 5). In Xenopus, 22% of the bipolar cell output synapses went onto ganglion cells, whereas in Bufo this was only 10%. We conclude that direct bipolar to ganglion cell information transfer exists also in frogs although its occurrence is not as obvious and regular as in mammals. The characteristic distribution of these synapses, however, suggests that specific type of the bipolar and ganglion cells participate in this process. These contacts may play a role in the formation of simple ganglion cell receptive fields.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document