scholarly journals Augmentation of Plasticity of the Central Auditory System by the Basal Forebrain and/or Somatosensory Cortex

2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofeng Ma ◽  
Nobuo Suga
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Auditory System ◽  
Basal Forebrain ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Electric Stimulation ◽  
Cortical Plasticity ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Cortical Stimulation ◽  
Cholinergic Basal Forebrain ◽  
Stimulation Of

Auditory conditioning (associative learning) or focal electric stimulation of the primary auditory cortex (AC) evokes reorganization (plasticity) of the cochleotopic (frequency) map of the inferior colliculus (IC) as well as that of the AC. The reorganization results from shifts in the best frequencies (BFs) and frequency-tuning curves of single neurons. Since the importance of the cholinergic basal forebrain for cortical plasticity and the importance of the somatosensory cortex and the corticofugal auditory system for collicular and cortical plasticity have been demonstrated, Gao and Suga proposed a hypothesis that states that the AC and corticofugal system play an important role in evoking auditory collicular and cortical plasticity and that auditory and somatosensory signals from the cerebral cortex to the basal forebrain play an important role in augmenting collicular and cortical plasticity. To test their hypothesis, we studied whether the amount and the duration of plasticity of both collicular and cortical neurons evoked by electric stimulation of the AC or by acoustic stimulation were increased by electric stimulation of the basal forebrain and/or the somatosensory cortex. In adult big brown bats ( Eptesicus fuscus), we made the following major findings. 1) Collicular and cortical plasticity evoked by electric stimulation of the AC is augmented by electric stimulation of the basal forebrain. The amount of augmentation is larger for cortical plasticity than for collicular plasticity. 2) Collicular and cortical plasticity evoked by AC stimulation is augmented by somatosensory cortical stimulation mimicking fear conditioning. The amount of augmentation is larger for cortical plasticity than for collicular plasticity. 3) Collicular and cortical plasticity evoked by both AC and basal forebrain stimulations is further augmented by somatosensory cortical stimulation. 4) A lesion of the basal forebrain tends to reduce collicular and cortical plasticity evoked by AC stimulation. The reduction is small and statistically insignificant for collicular plasticity but significant for cortical plasticity. 5) The lesion of the basal forebrain eliminates the augmentation of collicular and cortical plasticity that otherwise would be evoked by somatosensory cortical stimulation. 6) Collicular and cortical plasticity evoked by repetitive acoustic stimuli is augmented by basal forebrain and/or somatosensory cortical stimulation. However, the lesion of the basal forebrain eliminates the augmentation of collicular and cortical plasticity that otherwise would be evoked by somatosensory cortical stimulation. These findings support the hypothesis proposed by Gao and Suga.

scholarly journals Effects of Acetylcholine and Atropine on Plasticity of Central Auditory Neurons Caused by Conditioning in Bats

2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiqing Ji ◽  
Enquan Gao ◽  
Nobuo Suga
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Basal Forebrain ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Auditory Neurons ◽  
Tuning Curves ◽  
Acoustic Stimuli ◽  
Cholinergic Basal Forebrain ◽  
Big Brown Bat ◽  
Central Auditory Neurons

In the big brown bat ( Eptesicus fuscus), conditioning with acoustic stimuli followed by electric leg-stimulation causes shifts in frequency-tuning curves and best frequencies (hereafter BF shifts) of collicular and cortical neurons, i.e., reorganization of the cochleotopic (frequency) maps in the inferior colliculus (IC) and auditory cortex (AC). The collicular BF shift recovers 180 min after the conditioning, but the cortical BF shift lasts longer than 26 h. The collicular BF shift is not caused by conditioning, as the AC is inactivated during conditioning. Therefore it has been concluded that the collicular BF shift is caused by the corticofugal auditory system. The collicular and cortical BF shifts both are not caused by conditioning as the somatosensory cortex is inactivated during conditioning. Therefore it has been hypothesized that the cortical BF shift is mostly caused by both the subcortical (e.g., collicular) BF shift and the activity of nonauditory systems such as the somatosensory cortex excited by an unconditioned leg-stimulation and the cholinergic basal forebrain. The main aims of our present studies are to examine whether acetylcholine (ACh) applied to the AC augments the collicular and cortical BF shifts caused by the conditioning and whether atropine applied to the AC abolishes the cortical BF shift but not the collicular BF shift, as expected from the preceding hypothesis. In the awake bat, we made the following findings. ACh applied to the AC augments not only the cortical BF shift but also the collicular BF shift through the corticofugal system. Atropine applied to the AC reduces the collicular BF shift and abolishes the cortical BF shift which otherwise would be caused. ACh applied to the IC significantly augments the collicular BF shift but affects the cortical BF shift only slightly. ACh makes the cortical BF shift long-lasting beyond 4 h, but it cannot make the collicular BF shift long-lasting beyond 3 h. Atropine applied to the IC abolishes the collicular BF shift. It reduces the cortical BF shift but does not abolish it. Our findings favor the hypothesis that the BF shifts evoked by the corticofugal system, and an increased ACh level in the AC evoked by the basal forebrain are both necessary to evoke a long-lasting cortical BF shift.

Plasticity of Bat's Central Auditory System Evoked by Focal Electric Stimulation of Auditory and/or Somatosensory Cortices

2001 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 1078-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofeng Ma ◽  
Nobuo Suga
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Electric Stimulation ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Recovery Period ◽  
Acoustic Stimulus ◽  
Acoustic Parameter ◽  
Response Curves ◽  
Stimulation Of

Recent findings indicate that the corticofugal system would play an important role in cortical plasticity as well as collicular plasticity. To understand the role of the corticofugal system in plasticity, therefore, we studied the amount and the time course of plasticity in the inferior colliculus (IC) and auditory cortex (AC) evoked by focal electrical stimulation of the AC and also the effect of electrical stimulation of the somatosensory cortex on the plasticity evoked by the stimulation of the AC. In adult big brown bats ( Eptesicus fuscus), we made the following major findings. 1) Electric stimulation of the AC evokes best frequency (BF) shifts, i.e., shifts in frequency-response curves of collicular and cortical neurons. These BF shifts start to occur within 2 min, reach a maximum (or plateau) at 30 min, and then recover ∼180 min after a 30-min-long stimulus session. When the stimulus session is lengthened from 30 to 90 min, the plateau lasts ∼60 min, but BF shifts recover ∼180 min after the session. 2) The electric stimulation of the somatosensory cortex delivered immediately after that of the AC, as in fear conditioning, evokes a dramatic lengthening of the recovery period of the cortical BF shifts but not that of the collicular BF shift. The electric stimulation of the somatosensory cortex delivered before that of the AC, as in backward conditioning, has no effect on the collicular and cortical BF shifts. 3) Electric stimulation of the AC evokes BF shifts not only in the ipsilateral IC and AC but also in the contralateral IC and AC. BF shifts are smaller in amount and shorter in recovery time for contralateral collicular and cortical neurons than for ipsilateral ones. Our findings support the hypothesis that the AC and the corticofugal system have an intrinsic mechanism for reorganization of the IC and AC, that the reorganization is highly specific to a value of an acoustic parameter (frequency), and that the reorganization is augmented by excitation of nonauditory sensory cortex that makes the acoustic stimulus behaviorally relevant to the animal through associative learning.

Lateral Inhibition for Center-Surround Reorganization of the Frequency Map of Bat Auditory Cortex

2004 ◽  
Vol 92 (6) ◽  
pp. 3192-3199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofeng Ma ◽  
Nobuo Suga
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Lateral Inhibition ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Electric Stimulation ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Constant Frequency ◽  
Specialized Area ◽  
Big Brown Bat ◽  
Frequency Map ◽  
Stimulation Of

Repetitive acoustic stimulation, auditory fear conditioning, and focal electric stimulation of the auditory cortex (AC) each evoke the reorganization of the central auditory system. Our current study of the big brown bat indicates that focal electric stimulation of the AC evokes center-surround reorganization of the frequency map of the AC. In the center, the neuron's best frequencies (BFs), together with their frequency–tuning curves, shift toward the BFs of electrically stimulated cortical neurons (centripetal BF shifts). In the surround, BFs shift away from the stimulated cortical BF (centrifugal BF shifts). Centripetal BF shifts are much larger than centrifugal BF shifts. An antagonist (bicuculline methiodide) of inhibitory synaptic transmitter receptors changes centrifugal BF shifts into centripetal BF shifts, whereas its agonist (muscimol) changes centripetal BF shifts into centrifugal BF shifts. This reorganization of the AC thus depends on a balance between facilitation and inhibition evoked by focal cortical electric stimulation. Unlike neurons in the AC of the big brown bat, neurons in the Doppler-shifted constant-frequency (DSCF) area of the AC of the mustached bat are highly specialized for fine-frequency analysis and show almost exclusively centrifugal BF shifts for focal electric stimulation of the DSCF area. Our current data indicate that in the highly specialized area, lateral inhibition is strong compared with the less-specialized area and that the specialized and nonspecialized areas both share the same inhibitory mechanism for centrifugal BF shifts.

Intrinsic discharge patterns and somatosensory inputs for neurons in raccoon primary somatosensory cortex

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 2827-2839 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Istvan ◽  
P. Zarzecki
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Membrane Properties ◽  
Postsynaptic Potentials ◽  
Synaptic Inputs ◽  
Ionic Conductances ◽  
Discharge Patterns ◽  
Intrinsic Membrane Properties ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Discharge patterns of neurons are regulated by synaptic inputs and by intrinsic membrane properties such as their complement of ionic conductances. Discharge patterns evoked by synaptic inputs are often used to identify the source and modality of sensory input. However, the interpretation of these discharge patterns may be complicated if different neurons respond to the same synaptic input with a variety of discharge patterns due to differences in intrinsic membrane properties. The purposes of this study were 1) to investigate intrinsic discharge patterns of neurons in primary somatosensory cortex of raccoon in vivo and 2) to use somatosensory postsynaptic potentials evoked by stimulation of forepaw digits to determine thalamocortical connectivity for the same neurons. 2. Conventional intracellular recordings with sharp electrodes were made from 121 neurons in the cortical representation of glabrous skin of digit four (d4). Intracellular injection of identical current pulses (100-120 ms in duration) elicited various patterns of discharge in different neurons. Neurons were classified on the basis of these intrinsic patterns of discharge, rates of spike adaptation, and characteristics of spike waveforms. Three main groups were identified: regular spiking (RS) neurons, intrinsic bursting (IB) neurons, and fast spiking (FS) neurons. Subclasses were identified for the RS and IB groups. 3. Neurons were tested for somatosensory inputs by stimulating electrically d3, d4, and d5. Excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) were elicited in 100% of the neurons by electrical stimulation of d4, the "on-focus" digit. EPSPs were usually followed by inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs). Many neurons (41%) responded with EPSP-IPSP sequences after stimulation of d3 or d5, the "off-focus" digits. 4. Latencies of somatosensory EPSPs and IPSPs were used to determine the synaptic order in the cortical circuitry of RS, IB, and FS neurons. EPSPs with monosynaptic thalamocortical latencies were recorded in RS, IB, and FS neurons. 5. We conclude that precise patterns of neural discharge in primary somatosensory cortex cannot be reliable estimates of sensory inputs reaching these neurons because patterns of discharge are so strongly influenced by intrinsic membrane properties. Ionic conductances governing patterns of neuronal discharge seem almost identical in intact cortex of raccoon, rat, and cat, and in slices of rodent cortex, because similar patterns of discharge are found. The consistency of patterns of discharge across species and types of preparation suggests that these intrinsic membrane properties are a general property of cerebral cortical neurons and should be considered when evaluation sensory coding by these neurons.

Noradrenergic Induction of Selective Plasticity in the Frequency Tuning of Auditory Cortex Neurons

2004 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 1445-1463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yves Manunta ◽  
Jean-Marc Edeline
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Cortical Plasticity ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Tone Frequency ◽  
Cortical Cells ◽  
Tuning Curves ◽  
Alpha Receptors ◽  
Frequency Changes ◽  
Selective Effects

Neuromodulators have long been viewed as permissive factors in experience-induced cortical plasticity, both during development and in adulthood. Experiments performed over the last two decades have reported the potency of acetylcholine to promote changes in functional properties of cortical cells in the auditory, visual, and somatosensory modality. In contrast, very few attempts were made with the monoaminergic systems. The present study evaluates how repeated presentation of brief pulses of noradrenaline (NA) concomitant with presentation of a particular tone frequency changes the frequency tuning curves of auditory cortex neurons determined at 20 dB above threshold. After 100 trials of NA-tone pairing, 28% of the cells (19/67) exhibited selective tuning modifications for the frequency paired with NA. All the selective effects were obtained when the paired frequency was within 1/4 of an octave from the initial best frequency. For these cells, selective decreases were prominent (15/19 cases), and these effects lasted ≥15 min after pairing. No selective effects were observed under various control conditions: tone alone ( n = 10 cells), NA alone ( n = 11 cells), pairing with ascorbic acid ( n = 6 cells), or with GABA ( n = 20 cells). Selective effects were observed when the NA-tone pairing was performed in the presence of propranolol (4/10 cells) but not when it was performed in the presence phentolamine (0/13 cells), suggesting that the effects were mediated by alpha receptors. These results indicate that brief increases in noradrenaline concentration can trigger selective modifications in the tuning curves of cortical neurons that, in most of the cases, go in opposite direction compared with those usually reported with acetylcholine.

scholarly journals Modulation of thalamic auditory neurons by the primary auditory cortex

2012 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. 935-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Tang ◽  
Weiguo Yang ◽  
Nobuo Suga
Keyword(s):  
Signal Processing ◽  
Electric Stimulation ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Primary Auditory Cortex ◽  
Auditory Signal ◽  
Tuning Curves ◽  
Auditory Responses ◽  
Auditory Signal Processing ◽  
Plastic Changes ◽  
Stimulation Of

The central auditory system consists of the lemniscal and nonlemniscal pathways or systems, which are anatomically and physiologically different from each other. In the thalamus, the ventral division of the medial geniculate body (MGBv) belongs to the lemniscal system, whereas its medial (MGBm) and dorsal (MGBd) divisions belong to the nonlemniscal system. Lemniscal neurons are sharply frequency-tuned and provide highly frequency-specific information to the primary auditory cortex (AI), whereas nonlemniscal neurons are generally broadly frequency-tuned and project widely to cortical auditory areas including AI. These two systems are presumably different not only in auditory signal processing, but also in eliciting cortical plastic changes. Electric stimulation of narrowly frequency-tuned MGBv neurons evokes the shift of the frequency-tuning curves of AI neurons toward the tuning curves of the stimulated MGBv neurons (tone-specific plasticity). In contrast, electric stimulation of broadly frequency-tuned MGBm neurons augments the auditory responses of AI neurons and broadens their frequency-tuning curves (nonspecific plasticity). In our current studies, we found that electric stimulation of AI evoked tone-specific plastic changes of the MGBv neurons, whereas it degraded the frequency tuning of MGBm neurons by inhibiting their auditory responses. AI apparently modulates the lemniscal and nonlemniscal thalamic neurons in quite different ways. High MGBm activity presumably makes AI neurons less favorable for fine auditory signal processing, whereas high MGBv activity makes AI neurons more suitable for fine processing of specific auditory signals and reduces MGBm activity.

scholarly journals Corticofugal Modulation of the Paradoxical Latency Shifts of Inferior Collicular Neurons

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 1127-1134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofeng Ma ◽  
Nobuo Suga
Keyword(s):  
Electric Stimulation ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Tuning Curve ◽  
Cortical Stimulation ◽  
Auditory Neurons ◽  
Response Latencies ◽  
Distance Information ◽  
Specific Frequency ◽  
Latency Shift ◽  
Corticofugal Feedback

The central auditory system creates various types of neurons tuned to different acoustic parameters other than a specific frequency. The response latency of auditory neurons typically shortens with an increase in stimulus intensity. However, ∼10% of collicular neurons of the little brown bat show a “paradoxical latency-shift (PLS)”: long latencies to intense sounds but short latencies to weak sounds. These neurons presumably are involved in the processing of target distance information carried by a pair of an intense biosonar pulse and its weak echo. Our current studies show that collicular PLS neurons of the big brown bat are modulated by the corticofugal (descending) system. Electric stimulation of cortical auditory neurons evoked two types of changes in the PLS neurons, depending on the relationship in the best frequency (BF) between the stimulated cortical and recorded collicular neurons. When the BF was matched between them, the cortical stimulation did not shift the BFs of the collicular neurons and shortened their response latencies at intense sounds so that the PLS became smaller. When the BF was unmatched, however, the cortical stimulation shifted the BFs of the collicular neurons and lengthened their response latencies at intense sounds, so that the PLS became larger. Cortical electric stimulation also modulated the response latencies of non-PLS neurons. It produced an inhibitory frequency tuning curve or curves. Our findings indicate that corticofugal feedback is involved in shaping the spectrotemporal patterns of responses of subcortical auditory neurons presumably through inhibition.

Electrophysiological studies of acetylcholine and the role of the basal forebrain in the somatosensory cortex of the cat. I. Cortical neurons excited by glutamate

1990 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 1199-1211 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Tremblay ◽  
R. A. Warren ◽  
R. W. Dykes
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Basal Forebrain ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Cholinergic Neurons ◽  
Average Increase ◽  
Average Response ◽  
Electrophysiological Studies ◽  
Release Of Acetylcholine

1. Microelectrodes attached to iontophoretic pipettes were used to isolate 410 single neurons in the primary somatosensory cortex of halothane-anesthetized cats. Basal forebrain (BF) stimulation, when paired with pulses of iontophoretically administered glutamate, affected the responsiveness in 24 (54%) of 39 neurons; 17 were facilitated, and seven were inhibited. Five minutes after BF stimulation the average response for a sample of 20 cells was enhanced by 45% (+/- 19). All but one of the effects lasted as long as the cell was studied, often greater than 1 h. 2. When atropine was administered while the BF was stimulated during glutamate excitation, 7 of 16 cells were enhanced, but the average increase was only 16% (+/- 15) for a sample of 15 cells. After the atropine had dissipated, four cells were enhanced by the BF stimulus. In three of these the enhancement had been blocked previously by atropine. 3. BF stimulation had effects similar to iontophoretically administered acetylcholine (ACh), but the effects appeared more frequently with BF stimulation than they had with acetylcholine administration. 4. We propose that the enhanced neuronal responsiveness is due to the release of acetylcholine by cortical terminals of cholinergic neurons located in the BF. The BF stimulus may be more effective than acetylcholine administration because corticopetal cholinergic fibers may end in the immediate vicinity of receptors responsible for long-term changes in membrane permeability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document