Mechanoafferent neurons innervating tail of Aplysia. I. Response properties and synaptic connections

1983 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 1522-1542 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. T. Walters ◽  
J. H. Byrne ◽  
T. J. Carew ◽  
E. R. Kandel
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Action Potentials ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
The Body ◽  
Tail Region ◽  
Withdrawal Reflex ◽  
Somatotopic Organization ◽  
Stimulation Of

Mechanical, chemical, or electrical stimulation of the tail elicits a short-latency (less than 1 s) tail-withdrawal reflex that is graded with the intensity of the stimulus. The tail-withdrawal reflex is not elicited by stimulation of parts of the body outside of the tail region. Mechanoafferent neurons innervating the tail are located in a small subcluster within a large, homogeneous group of medium-size (40-80 micron) cells on the ventrocaudal (VC) surface of each pleural ganglion. The tail sensory neurons within this large VC cluster are activated by tactile pressure or by electrical stimulation of discrete regions of the tail. They adapt slowly to maintained stimulation and sometimes respond to stimulus offset as well. Both mechanical and electrical stimuli produce responses that are graded with the intensity of the stimulus. Cells in the VC cluster appear to be primary mechanoreceptors because they have axons in peripheral nerves (including nerves innervating the tail), they exhibit action potentials lacking prepotentials in response to tactile stimulation, and these action potentials are still produced by cutaneous stimulation when peripheral and central chemical synaptic transmission is blocked. Stimulation of fields all over the body surface evokes synaptically mediated hyperpolarizing responses in individual mechanoafferent neurons that may represent afferent inhibition. Hyperpolarizing responses lasting many seconds can be produced by brief cutaneous stimuli. The mechanoafferent neurons innervating the tail region make strong monosynaptic connections to tail motor neurons in the ipsilateral pedal ganglion, and through these connections this subpopulation of the VC neurons appears to make a substantial contribution to the short-latency tail-withdrawal reflex. In addition, the combined excitatory receptive fields of these mechanoafferents match the excitatory receptive field of the tail-withdrawal reflex. Mechanoafferent neurons in the VC cluster that have receptive fields on other parts of the body (outside the excitatory receptive field of the tail-withdrawal reflex) have not been observed to make monosynaptic connections to the tail motor neurons. The neurons innervating the tail are reliably found in a discrete region within the larger VC cluster. In addition to this gross somatotopic organization, there is evidence of a finer level of somatotopic organization between the position of the excitatory receptive field on the tail and the position of the cell soma in the tail subcluster.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Response properties and synaptic connections of mechanoafferent neurons in cerebral ganglion of Aplysia

1979 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 954-974 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. C. Rosen ◽  
K. R. Weiss ◽  
I. Kupfermann
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Cerebral Ganglion ◽  
The Body ◽  
Sensory Response ◽  
Tactile Stimuli ◽  
Dorsal Portion ◽  
Intracellular Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. The cells of two clusters of small neurons on the ventrocaudal surface of each hemicerebral ganglion of Aplysia were found to exhibit action potentials following tactile stimuli applied to the skin of the head. These neurons appear to be mechanosensory afferents since they possess axons in the nerves innervating the skin and tactile stimulation evokes spikes with no prepotentials, even when the cell bodies are sufficiently hyperpolarized to block some spikes. The mechanosensory afferents may be primary afferents since the sensory response persists after chemical synaptic transmission is blocked by bathing the ganglion and peripheral structures in seawater with a high-Mg2+ and low-Ca2+ content. 2. The mechanosensory afferents are normally silent and are insensitive to photic, thermal, and chemical stimuli. A punctate tactile stimulus applied to a circumscribed region of skin can evoke a burst of spikes. If the stimulus is maintained at a constant forces, the mechanosensory response slowly adapts over a period of seconds. Repeated brief stimuli have little or no effect on spike frequency within a burst. 3. Approximately 81% of the mechanoafferent neurons have a single ipsilateral receptive field. The fields are located on the lips, the anterior tentacles, the dorsal portion of the head, the neck, or the perioral zone. Because many cells have collateral axons in the cerebral connectives, receptive fields elsewhere on the body are a possibility. The highest receptive-field density was associated with the lips. Within each area, receptive fields vary in size and shape. Adjacent fields overlap and larger fields frequently encompass several smaller ones. The features of some fields appear invariant from one animal to the next. A loose form of topographic organization of the mechanoafferent cells was observed. For example, cells located in the medial cluster have lip receptive fields, and most cells in the posterolateral portion of the lateral clusters have tentacle receptive fields. 4. Intracellular stimulation of individual mechanoafferents evokes short and constant-latency EPSPs in putative motor neurons comprising the identified B-cell clusters of the cerebral ganglion. On the basis of several criteria, these EPSPs appear to be several criteria, these EPSPs appear to be chemically mediated and are monosynaptic. 5. Repetitive intracellular stimulation of individual mechanoafferent neurons at low rates results in a gradual decrement in the amplitude of the EPSPs evoked in B cluster neurons. EPSP amplitude can be restored following brief periods of rest, but subsequent stimulation leads to further diminution of the response. 6. A decremented response cannot be restored by strong mechanical stimulation outside the receptive field of the mechanoafferent or by electrical stimulation of the cerebral nerves or connectives...

Corticogeniculate neurons, corticotectal neurons, and suspected interneurons in visual cortex of awake rabbits: receptive-field properties, axonal properties, and effects of EEG arousal

1987 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 977-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. A. Swadlow ◽  
T. G. Weyand
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Spontaneous Firing ◽  
Visual Responses ◽  
Firing Rates ◽  
Axonal Conduction ◽  
Conduction Velocities ◽  
Stimulation Of

The intrinsic stability of the rabbit eye was exploited to enable receptive-field analysis of antidromically identified corticotectal (CT) neurons (n = 101) and corticogeniculate (CG) neurons (n = 124) in visual area I of awake rabbits. Eye position was monitored to within 1/5 degrees. We also studied the receptive-field properties of neurons synaptically activated via electrical stimulation of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGNd). Whereas most CT neurons had either complex (59%) or motion/uniform (15%) receptive fields, we also found CT neurons with simple (9%) and concentric (4%) receptive fields. Most complex CT cells were broadly tuned to both stimulus orientation and velocity, but only 41% of these cells were directionally selective. We could elicit no visual responses from 6% of CT cells, and these cells had significantly lower conduction velocities than visually responsive CT cells. The median spontaneous firing rates for all classes of CT neurons were 4-8 spikes/s. CG neurons had primarily simple (60%) and concentric (9%) receptive fields, and none of these cells had complex receptive fields. CG simple cells were more narrowly tuned to both stimulus orientation and velocity than were complex CT cells, and most (85%) were directionally selective. Axonal conduction velocities of CG neurons (mean = 1.2 m/s) were much lower than those of CT neurons (mean = 6.4 m/s), and CG neurons that were visually unresponsive (23%) had lower axonal conduction velocities than did visually responsive CG neurons. Some visually unresponsive CG neurons (14%) responded with saccadic eye movements. The median spontaneous firing rates for all classes of CG neurons were less than 1 spike/s. All neurons synaptically activated via LGNd stimulation at latencies of less than 2.0 ms had receptive fields that were not orientation selective (89% motion/uniform, 11% concentric), whereas most cells with orientation-selective receptive fields had considerably longer synaptic latencies. Most short-latency motion/uniform neurons responded to electrical stimulation of the LGNd (and visual area II) with a high-frequency burst (500-900 Hz) of three or more spikes. Action potentials of these neurons were of short duration, thresholds of synaptic activation were low, and spontaneous firing rates were the highest seen in rabbit visual cortex. These properties are similar to those reported for interneurons in several regions in mammalian central nervous system. Nonvisual sensory stimuli that resulted in electroencephalographic arousal (hippocampal theta activity) had a profound effect on the visual responses of many visual cortical neurons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Chronic paw denervation causes an age-dependent appearance of novel responses from forearm in "paw cortex" of kittens and adult cats

1979 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 618-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Kalaska ◽  
B. Pomeranz
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Peripheral Nerve Injury ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Similar Process ◽  
Nerve Injuries ◽  
Somatotopic Organization ◽  
Natural Stimulation ◽  
Age Dependent ◽  
Adult Cats ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. In normal kittens and cats, cells in a region of primary somatosensory cortex (SI) responded exclusively to input from the contralateral front paw; we called this area paw cortex (PC). A neighboring region of SI responded to input from the contralateral forearm above the wrist; we called this area forearm cortex (FC). The centers of PC and FC were about 4 mm apart. 2. In kittens several weeks after transection of the nerves to the front paw, the following changes were observed in PC: a) 52% of PC cells had receptive fields on the forearm; normally, PC cells responded to natural stimulation only of the front paw; b) many cells in PC (58%) responded to electrical stimulation of the medial cutaneous nerve from the forearm; normally, very few PC cells (9%) responded to this nerve; c) there was a 370% increase in the median amplitude of medial cutaneous-evoked potentials in PC; d) in contrast to these enhanced inputs, PC responses to ulnar nerve stimulation decreased significantly. 3. In adult cats, paw denervation initiated a similar process as in kittens, but with less marked somatotopic changes. 4. In both kittens and adults, FC was unaffected by the nerve injuries. 5. We conclude that a chronic peripheral nerve injury can produce extensive changes in SI cortex somatotopic organization; the nature of the effect is age dependent.

Receptive fields and properties of a new cluster of mechanoreceptor neurons innervating the mantle region and the branchial cavity of the marine mollusk Aplysia californica

1991 ◽  
Vol 156 (1) ◽  
pp. 315-334
Author(s):  
B. Dubuc ◽  
V. F. Castellucci
Keyword(s):  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Action Potentials ◽  
Aplysia Californica ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Abdominal Ganglion ◽  
Sensory Cells ◽  
Sensory Threshold ◽  
Marine Mollusk ◽  
Withdrawal Reflex ◽  
Branchial Cavity

The rostral LE cluster (rLE) is a new set of mechanoreceptor neurons of the abdominal ganglion innervating the mantle area, the branchial cavity, the gill and the siphon of the marine mollusk Aplysia californica Cooper. We have compared the organization of rLE cell receptive fields with that of three other clusters of sensory neurons in the abdominal ganglion (LE, RE and RF) that we have reanalysed. There is extensive overlap of receptive fields from the four populations of sensory cells, and the most exposed areas of the mantle are the most densely innervated. The sensory threshold is similar for all groups. The action potentials of the LE, rLE and RE neurons are broadened by serotonin and the peptide SCPB and narrowed by dopamine and FMRFamide. The RF group does not show the same kind of sensitivity to these neuromodulators. The synaptic outputs of the LE and rLE neurons undergo similar synaptic depression and homosynaptic and heterosynaptic facilitation. We estimate that 100 mechanoreceptor neurons innervate the entire mantle and siphon skin, gill and branchial cavity of Aplysia. The degree of their convergence onto various interneurons and motor neurons mediating the gill- and siphon-withdrawal reflex and other reflexes is under investigation.

Control of pedal and parapodial movements in Aplysia. II. Cerebral ganglion neurons

1978 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 609-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Jahan-Parwar ◽  
S. M. Fredman
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Action Potentials ◽  
Cerebral Ganglion ◽  
Proprioceptive Reflexes ◽  
Intracellular Stimulation ◽  
Large Motor ◽  
Ganglion Neurons ◽  
Evoked Contractions ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Intracellular stimulation of individual neurons in the two symmetrical A neuron clusters of the cerebral ganglion evoked contractions of both the foot and parapodia. Electrical stimulation of pedal and parapodial nerves caused antidromic action potentials in A neurons. Units recorded in the nerves followed the driven somatic spike 1:1. This suggests that the A neurons are presumptive pedal and parapodial motor neurons.2. Individual A neurons evoked both bilteral and unilateral contractions of the parapodia or split foot. Contractions in the parapodia were independent of those in the foot. An individual A neuron caused contractions in either the foot or the parapodia, but not both. Sequential transection of parapodial nerves had only a slight effect until a key nerve was cut. The contractions produced by a single A neuron on one side were then abolished. These data suggest that the motor fields of the A neurons are well defined within the foot or the parapodia. 3. Parapodial contractions produced by individual A neurons are not dependent on the excitation of follower motor neurons. Blocking synaptic transmission by the addition of CoCl2 did not eliminate the contractions produced by driving individual A neurons. This is consistent with the A neurons being motor neurons. 4. Intracellular stimulation of individual neurons in the symmetrical B neuron clusters of the cerebral ganglion also evoked pedal and parapodial contractions. Electrical stimulation of the pedal and parapodial nerves elicited antidromic spikes in these neurons. Individual B neurons caused contractions in both the foot and parapodia. This suggests that the B neurons are motor neurons with very large motor fields. 5. Filling the pedal and parapodial nerves with cobalt primarily filled the cell bodies of neurons located in the pedal and pleural ganglia. The somata of A and B neurons were also occasionally filled. This is consistent with the electrophisiological results. 6. Other neurons also evoked parapodial contractions. Intracellular stimulation of neurons in the pedal and pleural ganglia caused parapodial contractions in intact animals. Some of these neurons were excited by stretching the parapodia or touching the tentacles. 7. The B neurons are strongly excited by tactile stimulation of the tentacles. Since they can cause pedal and parapodial contractions they may mediate reflex contractions elicited by tentacular stimulation. Stretching the parapodia only occasionally caused the A neurons to fire. This makes it unlikely that they make a major contribution to pedal and parapodial proprioceptive reflexes. These reflexes are probably controlled by neurons in the pedal and pleural ganglia.

Defense reaction in the pond snail Planorbis corneus. I. Activity of the shell-moving and respiratory systems

1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 882-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. I. Arshavsky ◽  
T. G. Deliagina ◽  
I. L. Okshtein ◽  
G. N. Orlovsky ◽  
Y. V. Panchin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Electrical Coupling ◽  
The Body ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Pond Snail ◽  
Defense Reaction ◽  
Planorbis Corneus ◽  
Weak Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. In the intact pond snail Planorbis corneus, tactile or electrical stimulation of the skin evoked a biphasic general defense reaction. A weak stimulation evoked only the first phase of the reaction, represented as a fast pulling of the shell towards the head. With stronger stimulation, this phase was followed by the second phase that was comprised of three components: detachment from the substrate, slow retraction of the body into the shell, and letting out of air from the lung through the pneumostome. 2. About 70 motor neurons (MNs) of the columellar muscle have been revealed in different ganglia by means of their cobalt back-filling through the cut columellar nerve. A complicated pattern of electrical coupling was found for different groups of MNs. Excitation of individual MNs, evoked by current injection, resulted in contraction of the columellar muscle (CNS-columellar muscle preparation). The strongest contraction was evoked by the cerebral MNs; fast small contraction by the parietal MNs; and slow, long-latency contraction, by the pedal MNs. 3. In the same preparation, electrical stimulation of the cutaneous (lip) nerve evoked biphasic contraction of the columellar muscle (a first phase lasting approximately 3 s, and a second phase of up to 1 min). The temporal pattern of this response was similar to that of the defense reaction in the intact animal. A weak stimulation evoked only the first phases of the reaction, while a stronger stimulation evoked both phases. The amplitude of both the first and the second phase was graded with the strength of stimulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Sensorimotor Integration in the Precentral Gyrus: Polysensory Neurons and Defensive Movements

2004 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 1648-1660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan F. Cooke ◽  
Michael S. A. Graziano
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Sensorimotor Integration ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
The Body ◽  
Auditory Stimuli ◽  
Precentral Gyrus ◽  
Defensive Reaction ◽  
Defensive Reactions ◽  
The Face ◽  
Stimulation Of

The precentral gyrus of monkeys contains a polysensory zone in which the neurons respond to tactile, visual, and sometimes auditory stimuli. The tactile receptive fields of the polysensory neurons are usually on the face, arms, or upper torso, and the visual and auditory receptive fields are usually confined to the space near the tactile receptive fields, within about 30 cm of the body. Electrical stimulation of this polysensory zone, even in anesthetized animals, evokes a specific set of movements. The movements resemble those typically used to defend the body from objects that are near, approaching, or touching the skin. In the present study, to determine whether the stimulation-evoked movements represent a normal set of defensive movements, we tested whether they include a distinctive, nonsaccadic, centering movement of the eyes that occurs during defensive reactions. We report that this centering movement of the eyes is evoked by stimulation of sites in the polysensory zone. We also recorded the activity of neurons in the polysensory zone while the monkey made defensive reactions to an air puff on the face. The neurons became active during the defensive movement, and the magnitude of this activity was correlated with the magnitude of the defensive reaction. These results support the hypothesis that the polysensory zone in the precentral gyrus contributes to the control of defensive movements. More generally, the results support the view that the precentral gyrus can control movement at the level of complex sensorimotor tasks.

The spino(trigemino)pontoamygdaloid pathway: electrophysiological evidence for an involvement in pain processes

1990 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 473-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Bernard ◽  
J. M. Besson
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Rapid Onset ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
The Body ◽  
Mechanical Stimuli ◽  
Somatotopic Organization ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Noxious Stimuli ◽  
Thermal Stimuli

1. Neurons were recorded in the parabrachial (PB) area, located in the dorsolateral region of the pons (with the use of extracellular micropipette), in the anesthetized rat. Parabrachioamygdaloid (PA) neurons (n = 67) were antidromically identified after stimulation in the centralis nucleus of the amygdala (Ce). The axons of these neurons exhibit a very slow conduction velocity, between 0.26 and 1.1 m/s, i.e., in the unmyelinated range. 2. These PA neurons were located in a restricted region of the PB area: the subnuclei external lateral (PBel) and external medial (PBem). A relative somatotopic organization was found in this region. 3. These units were separated into two groups: 1) a group of nociceptive-specific (NS) neurons (69%), which responded exclusively to noxious stimuli, and 2) a group of nonresponsive (NR) neurons (31%). 4. The NS neurons exhibited low or lacked spontaneous activity. They responded exclusively to mechanical (pinch or squeeze) and/or thermal (waterbath or waterjet greater than 44 degrees C) noxious stimuli with a marked and sustained activation with a rapid onset and generally without afterdischarge. Noxious thermal stimuli generally induced a stronger response than the noxious mechanical stimuli. These neurons exhibited a clear capacity to encode thermal stimuli in the noxious range: 1) the stimulus-response function was always positive and monotonic; 2) the slope of the curve progressively increased up to a maximum where it was very steep, then the steepness of the slope decreased close to the maximum response; and 3) the mean threshold was 44.1 +/- 2 degrees C, and the point of steepest slope of the mean curve was around 47 degrees C. 5. The excitatory receptive fields of the NS neurons were large in the majority (70%) of the cases and included several areas of the body. A more marked activation was often obtained from stimuli applied to one part of the body, denoted as the preferential receptive field (PRF). In the other cases (30%), the excitatory receptive field was relatively small (SRF) and restricted to one part of the body (the tail, a paw, a hemiface, or the tongue). Both the PRF and SRF were more often located on the contralateral side. In addition, noxious stimuli applied outside the excitatory receptive field were found to strongly inhibit the responses of NS neurons. 6. All the NS neurons responded to intense transcutaneous electrical stimulation applied to the PRF or SRF with two peaks of activation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Reorganization of the Raccoon Cuneate Nucleus After Peripheral Denervation

1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 2924-2936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas D. Rasmusson ◽  
Stacey A. Northgrave
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Response Probability ◽  
Dorsal Column ◽  
Cuneate Nucleus ◽  
Intact Control ◽  
Somatotopic Organization ◽  
Low Threshold ◽  
Single Unit Recordings ◽  
Stimulation Of

Rasmusson, Douglas D. and Stacey A. Northgrave. Reorganization of the raccoon cuneate nucleus after peripheral denervation. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 2924–2936, 1997. The effects of peripheral nerve transection on the cuneate nucleus were studied in anesthetized raccoons using extracellular, single-unit recordings. The somatotopic organization of the cuneate nucleus first was examined in intact, control animals. The cuneate nucleus in the raccoon is organized with the digits represented in separate cell clusters. The dorsal cap region of the cuneate nucleus contains a representation of the claws and hairy skin of the digits. Within the representation of the glabrous skin, neurons with rapidly adapting properties tended to be segregated from those with slowly adapting properties. The representations of the distal and proximal pads on a digit also were segregated. Electrical stimulation of two adjacent digits provided a detailed description of the responses originating from the digit that contains the tactile receptive field (the on-focus digit) and from the adjacent (off-focus) digit. Stimulation of the on-focus digit produced a short latency excitation in all 99 neurons tested, with a mean of 10.5 ms. These responses had a low threshold (426 μA). Stimulation of an off-focus digit activated 65% of these neurons. These responses had a significantly longer latency (15.3 ms) than on-focus responses and the threshold was more than twice as large. Two to five months after amputation of digit 4, 97 cells were tested with stimulation of digits 3 and 5. A total of 44 were in the intact regions of the cuneate nucleus. They had small receptive fields on intact digits and their responses to electrical stimulation did not differ from the control neurons. The remaining 53 neurons were judged to be deafferented and in the fourth digit region on the basis of their location with respect to intact neurons. All but two of these cells had receptive fields that were much larger than normal, often including more than one digit and part of the palm. When compared with the off-focus control neurons, their responses to electrical stimulation had lower thresholds and an increased response probability and magnitude. The latencies of these cells did not decrease, however, and were the same as the off-focus control values. The enhanced responses of the deafferented neurons to adjacent digit stimulation indicate that there is a strengthening of synapses that were previously ineffective. The increased proportion of neurons that could be activated after amputation suggests that there is also a growth of new connections. This experiment demonstrates that reorganization in the adult somatotopic system does occur at the level of the dorsal column nuclei. As a consequence, many of the changes reported at the cortex and thalamus may be due to the changes occurring at this first synapse in the somatosensory pathway.

The processing of mechanosensory information by spiking local interneurons in the locust

1985 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 463-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Burrows
Keyword(s):  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
The Body ◽  
Direct Stimulation ◽  
Response Characteristics ◽  
Local Interneurons ◽  
Metathoracic Ganglion ◽  
Different Response ◽  
Individual Motor ◽  
Stimulation Of

The responses and receptive fields of a group of spiking local interneurons in the metathoracic ganglion of the locust were defined by making intracellular recordings from them while moving joints of a hindleg and stimulating external mechanoreceptors. Some interneurons respond both to inputs from internal mechanoreceptors (proprioceptors) at particular joints and to inputs from an array of external mechanoreceptors. The effects of both types of receptor can be excitatory or inhibitory. Other interneurons respond to proprioceptive input alone. There is a spectrum of responses. At one extreme are interneurons that respond tonically, the frequency of their spikes being determined by the angle of a particular joint. At the other extreme are interneurons that respond phasically to imposed movements of a joint in any direction. Inbetween are interneurons that respond with either a rapidly or a more slowly adapting change in the frequency of their spikes to the displacement of a joint in only one direction. Each movement of a particular joint excites or inhibits several interneurons with a range of different response characteristics. An interneuron typically receives inputs from only one joint, though some are excited by both femoral and tibial receptors. The interneurons spike during active movements of a leg elicited by direct stimulation of individual motor neurons, and during movements elicited by tactile stimulation of other parts of the body.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document