Patterns of facilitation and suppression of antagonist forelimb muscles from motor cortex sites in the awake monkey

1985 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 805-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. D. Cheney ◽  
E. E. Fetz ◽  
S. S. Palmer
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Detectable Effect ◽  
Onset Latency ◽  
Inhibitory Effects ◽  
Extensor Muscles ◽  
Flexor Muscles ◽  
Forelimb Muscles ◽  
The Mean

Patterns of excitatory and inhibitory effects were produced in antagonistic forelimb muscles by single intracortical microstimuli (S-ICMS) applied to motor cortex sites in macaque monkeys performing ramp-and-hold wrist movements. Stimulus-triggered averages (stimulus-TAs) of rectified electromyographic (EMG) activity revealed poststimulus facilitation and/or suppression in identified flexor and extensor muscles of the wrist and fingers. At 22 cortical sites the action potentials of single cells were also recorded and used to compute spike-triggered averages (spike-TAs) of covarying muscles. The set of muscles activated during the movement in which the cell was active are referred to here as "agonists"; those muscles active during wrist movement in the opposite direction are called "antagonists." (At sites where cells were not isolated the muscles showing poststimulus facilitation were called agonists.) Poststimulus effects in agonist muscles typically consisted of facilitation in a subset of the agonists. For 48 sites from which poststimulus effects were tested on both flexors and extensors, the following combinations of effects were observed: 1) pure facilitation of agonist muscles with no effect on antagonists; 2) facilitation of both agonists and antagonists; 3) facilitation of agonist muscles with reciprocal suppression of antagonists; 4) "mixed" facilitation and suppression of synergist muscles; and 5) pure suppression of some muscles with no effect on their antagonists. The suppression effects appeared most commonly in flexor muscles; conversely, facilitation was generally stronger in extensors. Cortical sites eliciting pure suppression of flexor muscles with no facilitation of extensor muscles were found in two monkeys. These purely suppressive effects were observed not only in stimulus-TAs but also in spike-TAs computed from single cells at these sites. Some of these cells increased their activity during wrist extension (but had no detectable effect on the extensor muscles); others discharged during flexion. Several observations suggest that the cortically evoked suppression is mediated by polysynaptic relays. The mean onset latency of the postspike suppression (7.4 ms) produced by inhibitory cells was longer than the mean onset latency of postspike facilitation (6.7 ms) produced by CM cells. Similarly, the mean onset latency of poststimulus suppression (8.9 ms) was longer than that of poststimulus facilitation (8.0 ms). Moreover, suppression was usually weaker than facilitation in the spike-TAs, as well as in stimulus-TAs compiled for the same stimulus intensity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Comparable patterns of muscle facilitation evoked by individual corticomotoneuronal (CM) cells and by single intracortical microstimuli in primates: evidence for functional groups of CM cells

1985 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 786-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. D. Cheney ◽  
E. E. Fetz
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Muscle Activity ◽  
Action Potentials ◽  
Relative Strength ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Base Line ◽  
Onset Latency ◽  
Wrist Flexion ◽  
Forelimb Muscles ◽  
The Mean

We compared the averaged responses of forelimb muscles to action potentials of single motor cortex cells and to single intracortical microstimuli (S-ICMS). Activity of precentral neurons and 12 identified forelimb muscles (6 flexors and 6 extensors of wrist and fingers) was recorded in macaques while they performed alternating ramp-and-hold wrist movements. Action potentials of cells that covaried reliably with wrist flexion or extension were used to compile spike-triggered averages (spike-TAs) of rectified electromyographic (EMG) activity of six synergistically coactivated muscles. Cells whose spikes were followed by a clear postspike facilitation (PSF) of rectified muscle activity were designated corticomotoneuronal (CM) cells. CM cells typically facilitated a subset of the coactivated muscles called the cell's target muscles. The relative strength of the PSF in different target muscles ranged from clear increases above base-line fluctuations to weak but significant effects. For each CM cell we characterized the "PSF profile" of facilitation across different muscles, defined as the relative strength of PSF in each of the coactivated agonist muscles. After identifying the CM cell's target muscles, we delivered S-ICMS through the microelectrode at the same site. Biphasic stimuli were delivered during the same wrist movements in which the recorded CM cell had been active. Stimulus intensities were too weak (typically 5-10 microA) and their repetition rate too slow (5-15 Hz) to evoke muscle excitation evident in the raw EMG record. However, stimulus-triggered averages (stimulus-TAs) of the rectified EMGs of coactivated muscles revealed consistent patterns of poststimulus facilitation (PStimF). In most cases the muscles facilitated by the CM cell in spike-TAs (n = 60) were also facilitated by S-ICMS in stimulus-TAs. At sites of CM cells the threshold stimulus intensities for evoking a statistically significant effect were between 0.5 and 2 microA. S-ICMS of 5 microA evoked PStimF that was, on the average, six times stronger than the PSF of the CM cell. The height of the facilitation peak relative to base-line fluctuations was 5-60 times greater for the stimuli than the spikes of the CM cell. The average onset latency of PStimF (8.0 +/- 1.2 ms) was 1.3 ms longer than the mean latency of PSF (6.7 +/- 1.4 ms). At two-thirds of the cortical sites where both spike- and stimulus-TAs were computed (n = 30), the PStimF profile exactly matched the PSF profile.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Facilitation and suppression of wrist and digit muscles from single rubromotoneuronal cells in the awake monkey

1991 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 1965-1977 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Mewes ◽  
P. D. Cheney
Keyword(s):  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Onset Latency ◽  
Wrist Movement ◽  
Spike Triggered Averaging ◽  
Extensor Muscles ◽  
Flexor Muscles ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Flexion And Extension ◽  
Forearm Flexor

1. The output effects of 214 cells in the magnocellular red nuclei of two rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) were tested with spike-triggered averaging of electromyogram (EMG) activity from six forearm extensor and six flexor muscles. The monkeys performed an alternating wrist movement task (auxotonic paradigm) or generated wrist torque trajectories alternating between flexion and extension (isometric paradigm). 2. Sixty-five cells (30%) were identified as rubromotoneuronal (RM) cells on the basis of their postpike effects on forearm flexor and extensor muscles. Three major types of RM cell output organization were identified: 1) pure facilitation (28 cells), 2) reciprocal (18 cells), and 3) cofacilitation (16 cells). 3. RM cell output showed a strong preference for facilitation of extensor forearm muscles. This preference was reflected in the fact that 69% (43 of 62) of RM cells facilitated extensors exclusively or most strongly; 27% facilitated flexors exclusively or most strongly; and 5% facilitated flexors and extensors equally. Postspike facilitation (PSpF) was observed in 45% of the extensor muscles and 20% of the flexors tested. In contrast, postpike suppression (PSpS) was observed in 3% of the extensors and 7% of the flexors. 4. The mean number of extensors facilitated per RM cell was 3.1 (53% of tested) compared with 2.8 (51% of tested) flexors facilitated per cell. The extensor and flexor PSpS muscle field sizes were both 2.0 (35% of extensors and 36% of flexors tested). The mean number of muscles facilitated by cofacilitation cells was 5.8 (48%) per cell. No clear preference was found for facilitation of particular combinations of synergist muscles. 5. PSpF magnitude was assessed by measuring both the percent change of facilitation or suppression from baseline and the signal-to-noise ratio of effects. The overall average magnitudes of RM PSpF and PSpS were 4.1 +/- 2.0 and 4.0 +/- 2.3% change from baseline, respectively. The average magnitude of PSpF in flexors was not significantly different from that of extensors; neither was there a difference in the average magnitude of PSpS in flexors and extensors. 6. The mean onset latency of RM cell PSpS was greater than PSpF (9.2 +/- 3.0 vs. 5.7 +/- 1.8 ms; P less than or equal to 0.05). This can be attributed to an underlying minimal disynaptic linkage to motoneurons for suppression effects, whereas most PSpFs are probably mediated by underlying monosynaptic connections. The mean onset latency of flexor PSpFs was greater than that of extensors (6.4 +/- 2.3 vs. 5.4 +/- 1.5 ms; P less than or equal to 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Distribution and Characteristics of Poststimulus Effects in Proximal and Distal Forelimb Muscles From Red Nucleus in the Monkey

1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 1777-1789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abderraouf Belhaj-Saïf ◽  
Jennifer Hill Karrer ◽  
Paul D. Cheney
Keyword(s):  
Functional Organization ◽  
Red Nucleus ◽  
Muscle Synergy ◽  
Reaching Movements ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Hand Muscles ◽  
Extensor Muscles ◽  
Flexor Muscles ◽  
Forelimb Muscles ◽  
Intrinsic Hand Muscles

Belhaj-Saı̈f, Abderraouf, Jennifer Hill Karrer, and Paul D. Cheney. Distribution and characteristics of poststimulus effects in proximal and distal forelimb muscles from red nucleus in the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 1777–1789, 1998. We used stimulus-triggered averaging (StTA) of electromyographic (EMG) activity to investigate two major questions concerning the functional organization of the magnocellular red nucleus (RNm) for reaching movements in the macaque monkey. The first is whether the clear preference toward facilitation of extensor muscles we have reported in previous studies for distal (wrist and digit) forelimb muscles also exists for proximal muscles (shoulder and elbow). The second question is whether distal and proximal muscles may be cofacilitated from RNm suggesting the representation of functional muscle synergies for coordinated reaching movements. Two monkeys were trained to perform a prehension task requiring multijoint coordination of the forelimb. EMG activity was recorded from 24 forelimb muscles including 5 shoulder, 7 elbow, 5 wrist, 5 digit, and 2 intrinsic hand muscles. Microstimulation (20 μA at 20 Hz) was delivered throughout the movement task. From 137 microstimulation sites in the RNm, a total of 977 poststimulus effects was obtained including 733 poststimulus facilitation effects (PStF) and 244 poststimulus suppression effects (PStS). Of the PStF effects, 58% were obtained from distal muscles; 42% from proximal muscles. Digit muscles were more frequently facilitated (35%) than the wrist, elbow, or shoulder muscles (20, 24, and 18%, respectively). The intrinsic hand muscles were infrequently facilitated (3%). At all joints tested, PStF was more common in extensor muscles than flexor muscles. This extensor preference was very strong for shoulder (85%), wrist (85%), and digit muscles (94%) and weaker for elbow muscles (60%). Of the PStS effects, 65% were in distal muscles and 35% in proximal muscles. Interestingly, the flexor muscles were more frequently inhibited from RNm than extensor muscles. At 72% of stimulation sites, at least two muscles were facilitated. The majority of these sites (61%) cofacilitated both proximal and distal muscles. At the remaining sites (39%), PStF was observed in either the proximal (17%) or distal muscles (22%). Facilitation most often involved combinations of shoulder, elbow, and distal muscles (30%) or shoulder and distal muscles (26%). Only rarely were intrinsic hand muscles part of the total muscle synergy. Our results show that the RNm 1) controls both proximal and distal muscles but the strength of influence is biased toward distal muscles, 2) preferentially controls extensor muscles not only at distal forelimb joints but also at proximal joints, and 3) output zones cofacilitate synergies of proximal and distal muscles involved in the control of forelimb reaching movements.

Characteristics of corticomotoneuronal postspike facilitation and reciprocal suppression of EMG activity in the monkey

1985 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 959-978 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Kasser ◽  
P. D. Cheney
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Cortical Cell ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Base Line ◽  
Onset Latency ◽  
Full Wave ◽  
Antagonist Muscles ◽  
Spike Triggered Averaging ◽  
Extensor Muscles ◽  
Forearm Flexor

In this study we present further evidence supporting the reciprocal nature of output effects on forearm flexor and extensor muscles from single corticomotoneuronal (CM) cells. Spike-triggered averaging of rectified EMG activity was used to test the output effects of 105 motor cortex cells in two rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) trained to perform alternating wrist movements and power grip. The electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from six forearm flexor and six forearm extensor muscles through pairs of percutaneously inserted intramuscular stainless steel wires. CM cells were identified by their characteristic postspike facilitation (PSF) in spike-triggered averages of agonist muscle EMG activity. Agonist muscles are those which coactivate with the cortical cell during movement. Of 105 motor cortex cells tested, 56 (53%) had no effect on either agonist or antagonist muscles. Of 49 cells that produced PSF of the agonist muscles, 14 (29%) also produced clear postspike suppression (PSS) of the antagonist muscles. Reproducibility of postspike effects was demonstrated by comparing spike-triggered averages of full-wave rectified EMG with averages of the same EMG activity triggered from randomly generated pulses. Consecutive averages from random triggers never showed consistent postspike effects. As a further test that our postspike effects were real, we computed averages of simulated EMG activity from the spikes of CM cells with reciprocal output effects. None of these averages showed consistent postspike effects. The mean onset latency of PSF calculated from 14 reciprocal CM cells yielding 51 PSF effects was 6.3 ms compared with 10.1 ms for 28 PSS effects from the same cells. PSS effects from a particular CM cell were nearly always longer in latency than the cell's PSF effects; only 2 of 28 PSS onset latencies were shorter than the longest latency PSF onset from the same cell. Average peak latencies for PSF and PSS were 8.6 and 11.6 ms, respectively. The magnitude of postspike effects was expressed as the percent of peak facilitation above the base-line mean for PSF or peak suppression below the base-line mean for PSS. With this measure, the average magnitude of PSF was 7.0% compared with 4.1% for reciprocal PSS. There was no correlation between onset latency and magnitude of PSF or PSS, although strong PSFs tended to have shorter latencies. Concerning the distribution of postspike effects, the average reciprocal CM cell facilitated 3.8 agonist muscles and suppressed 2.1 antagonist muscles. EDC was facilitated by all extension-related reciprocal CM cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Plasticity in the Distribution of the Red Nucleus Output to Forearm Muscles After Unilateral Lesions of the Pyramidal Tract

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 3147-3153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abderraouf Belhaj-Saïf ◽  
Paul D. Cheney
Keyword(s):  
Pyramidal Tract ◽  
Red Nucleus ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Motor Impairments ◽  
Forearm Muscles ◽  
Extensor Muscles ◽  
Flexor Muscles ◽  
Lesion Method ◽  
Stimulus Triggered Averaging ◽  
Suppression Effects

It has been hypothesized that the magnocellular red nucleus (RNm) contributes to compensation for motor impairments associated with lesions of the pyramidal tract. To test this hypothesis, we used stimulus triggered averaging (StTA) of electromyographic (EMG) activity to characterize changes in motor output from the red nucleus after lesions of the pyramidal tract. Three monkeys were trained to perform a reach and prehension task. EMG activity was recorded from 11 forearm muscles including one elbow, five wrist, and five digit muscles. Microstimulation (20 μA at 20 Hz) was delivered throughout the movement task to compute StTAs. Two monkeys served as controls. In a third monkey, 65% of the left pyramidal tract had been destroyed by an electrolytic lesion method five years before recording. The results demonstrate a clear pattern of postlesion reorganization in red nucleus–mediated output effects on forearm muscles. The normally prominent extensor preference in excitatory output from the RNm (92% in extensors) was greatly diminished in the lesioned monkey (59%). Similarly, suppression effects, which are normally much more prominent in flexor than in extensor muscles (90% in flexors), were also more evenly distributed after recovery from pyramidal tract lesions. Because of the limited excitatory output from the RNm to flexor muscles that normally exists, loss of corticospinal output would leave control of flexors particularly weak. The changes in RNm organization reported in this study would help restore function to flexor muscles. These results support the hypothesis that the RNm is capable of reorganization that contributes to the recovery of forelimb motor function after pyramidal tract lesions.

Sequential activation of neurons in primate motor cortex during unrestrained forelimb movement

1985 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 435-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. T. Murphy ◽  
Y. C. Wong ◽  
H. C. Kwan
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Zone Model ◽  
Somatosensory Stimulation ◽  
Reaching Movement ◽  
Sequential Activation ◽  
Forelimb Muscles ◽  
Muscle Groups ◽  
Forelimb Movement ◽  
Discharge Patterns

We trained monkeys to perform an unrestrained, reaching movement of the arm. Electromyogram (EMG) recordings of forelimb muscles revealed sequential activation, proximal to distal, of muscle groups involved in the task. The delay in onset of EMG activity between proximal (shoulder and elbow) and distal (wrist and finger) muscles was approximately 60 ms. We identified the neurons in the forelimb area of the contralateral motor cortex as controlling particular joints by previously defined criteria involving responses to somatosensory stimulation and effects of intracortical microstimulation. Many cells discharged prior to the onset of EMG activity acting on the appropriate joint, whereas others began firing at a later phase of the movement. The population of all proximal cells altered discharge patterns approximately 60 ms earlier than the population of distal cells. A small percentage of cells showed an initial inhibitory change in discharge frequency, and this inhibition typically occurred prior to the excitatory changes seen in the majority of cells. The results are discussed in terms of the "nested-zone" model of the forelimb motor cortex. The data support one of the predictions of this model, namely that discharges of identified cells within the cortical zones are causally related to voluntary movement at appropriate forelimb joints.

scholarly journals Interhemispheric modulations of motor outputs by the rostral and caudal forelimb areas in rats

2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (4) ◽  
pp. 1355-1368
Author(s):  
Boris Touvykine ◽  
Guillaume Elgbeili ◽  
Stephan Quessy ◽  
Numa Dancause
Keyword(s):  
Emg Activity ◽  
Inhibitory Effects ◽  
Opposite Hemisphere ◽  
Test Stimulation ◽  
Motor Network ◽  
Forelimb Muscles ◽  
The Common ◽  
Motor Outputs ◽  
Cortical Regions ◽  
Forelimb Movements

In rats, forelimb movements are evoked from two cortical regions, the caudal and rostral forelimb areas (CFA and RFA, respectively). These areas are densely interconnected and RFA induces complex and powerful modulations of CFA outputs. CFA and RFA also have interhemispheric connections, and these areas from both hemispheres send projections to common targets along the motor axis, providing multiple potential sites of interactions for movement production. Our objective was to characterize how CFA and RFA in one hemisphere can modulate motor outputs of the opposite hemisphere. To do so, we used paired-pulse protocols with intracortical microstimulation techniques (ICMS), while recording electromyographic (EMG) activity of forelimb muscles in sedated rats. A subthreshold conditioning stimulation was applied in either CFA or RFA in one hemisphere simultaneously or before a suprathreshold test stimulation in either CFA or RFA in the opposite hemisphere. Both CFA and RFA tended to facilitate motor outputs with short (0–2.5 ms) or long (20–35 ms) delays between the conditioning and test stimuli. In contrast, they tended to inhibit motor outputs with intermediate delays, in particular 10 ms. When comparing the two areas, we found that facilitatory effects from RFA were more frequent and powerful than the ones from CFA. In contrast, inhibitory effects from CFA on its homolog were more frequent and powerful than the ones from RFA. Our results demonstrate that interhemispheric modulations from CFA and RFA share some similarities but also have clear differences that could sustain specific functions these cortical areas carry for the generation of forelimb movements. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We show that caudal and rostral forelimb areas (CFA and RFA) have distinct effects on motor outputs from the opposite hemisphere, supporting that they are distinct nodes in the motor network of rats. However, the pattern of interhemispheric modulations from RFA has no clear equivalent among premotor areas in nonhuman primates, suggesting they contribute differently to the generation of ipsilateral hand movements. Understanding these interspecies differences is important given the common use of rodent models in motor control and recovery studies.

Effects on wrist and digit muscle activity from microstimuli applied at the sites of rubromotoneuronal cells in primates

1991 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 1978-1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. D. Cheney ◽  
K. Mewes ◽  
G. Widener
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Activity ◽  
Companion Paper ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Cell Aggregates ◽  
Onset Latency ◽  
Wrist Movement ◽  
Extensor Muscles ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Stimulus Triggered Averaging ◽  
Forearm Flexor

1. The purpose of this study was to use the techniques of spike- and stimulus-triggered averaging (SpTA and StTA, respectively) to examine the output organization of individual rubromotoneuronal (RM) cells in relation to clusters of neighboring cells. SpTA of electromyographic (EMG) activity in awake monkeys reveals the target muscles of an individual recorded neuron, whereas StTA reveals the target muscles of the neuronal aggregate activated by the stimulus. 2. Three questions were of particular interest. First, does the pattern of poststimulus facilitation (PStF) across forearm muscles match the pattern of postspike facilitation (PSpF)? Second, does the output of RM cell aggregates tested with StTA favor forearm extensor muscles, as reported for individual RM cells in the companion paper? Third, how do RM poststimulus effects compare with corticomotoneuronal (CM) poststimulus effects? 3. Microstimuli were applied at the sites of 37 RM cells, identified by SpTA of EMG activity in awake monkeys performing an alternating wrist movement task. 4. The magnitudes of PStF at 5, 10, and 20 microA were, respectively, 4.3, 10.1, and 13.7 times greater than PSpF of the same muscles, reflecting activation, by the stimulus, of multiple RM cells. RM cell PStF was weaker than CM PStF. 5. The onset latency of poststimulus suppression (PStS) exceeded that of PStF. For example, at 20 microA the difference was 2.6 ms, comparable with the difference between PSpF and postspike suppression (PSpS). 6. The patterns of poststimulus effects on forearm flexor and extensor muscles were categorized in the same manner as postspike effects. Three major patterns were observed: 1) pure facilitation, 2) reciprocal suppression, and 3) cofacilitation of extensors and flexors. 7. The profile of PStF across synergist muscles was broadly similar to that of PSpF. At 83% of sites, the muscle with the greatest PSpF was also the muscle with the greatest PStF. At 30% of sites (11 of 37), the set of muscles with PStF (muscle field) exactly matched the set with PSpF. Overall, the level of discrepancies in SpTAs versus StTAs computed at the same RM cell sites was 27%. Most of these discrepancies could be attributed to muscles with the weakest effects. 8. The fact that the poststimulus muscle fields at many RM cell sites matched the postspike fields at the same sites, even though the poststimulus effects were greater in magnitude and were mediated by more cells, suggests clustering of RM cells with similar target motoneuron pools.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

scholarly journals Representation of individual forelimb muscles in primary motor cortex

2017 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather M. Hudson ◽  
Michael C. Park ◽  
Abderraouf Belhaj-Saïf ◽  
Paul D. Cheney
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Medial Branch ◽  
Precentral Gyrus ◽  
Body Parts ◽  
Reach To Grasp ◽  
Somatotopic Organization ◽  
Forelimb Muscles ◽  
First Time

Stimulus-triggered averaging (StTA) of forelimb muscle electromyographic (EMG) activity was used to investigate individual forelimb muscle representation within the primary motor cortex (M1) of rhesus macaques with the objective of determining the extent of intra-areal somatotopic organization. Two monkeys were trained to perform a reach-to-grasp task requiring multijoint coordination of the forelimb. EMG activity was simultaneously recorded from 24 forelimb muscles including 5 shoulder, 7 elbow, 5 wrist, 5 digit, and 2 intrinsic hand muscles. Microstimulation (15 µA at 15 Hz) was delivered throughout the movement task and individual stimuli were used as triggers for generating StTAs of EMG activity. StTAs were used to map the cortical representations of individual forelimb muscles. As reported previously (Park et al. 2001), cortical maps revealed a central core of distal muscle (wrist, digit, and intrinsic hand) representation surrounded by a horseshoe-shaped proximal (shoulder and elbow) muscle representation. In the present study, we found that shoulder and elbow flexor muscles were predominantly represented in the lateral branch of the horseshoe whereas extensors were predominantly represented in the medial branch. Distal muscles were represented within the core distal forelimb representation and showed extensive overlap. For the first time, we also show maps of inhibitory output from motor cortex, which follow many of the same organizational features as the maps of excitatory output. NEW & NOTEWORTHY While the orderly representation of major body parts along the precentral gyrus has been known for decades, questions have been raised about the possible existence of additional more detailed aspects of somatotopy. In this study, we have investigated this question with respect to muscles of the arm and show consistent features of within-arm (intra-areal) somatotopic organization. For the first time we also show maps of how inhibitory output from motor cortex is organized.

Properties of Primary Motor Cortex Output to Forelimb Muscles in Rhesus Macaques

2004 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 2968-2984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Park ◽  
Abderraouf Belhaj-Saïf ◽  
Paul D. Cheney
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Rhesus Macaques ◽  
Red Nucleus ◽  
Macaque Monkey ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Reach To Grasp ◽  
Distal Muscle ◽  
Forelimb Muscles ◽  
Multijoint Movements

Stimulus-triggered averaging (StTA) of electromyographic (EMG) activity from 24 simultaneously recorded forelimb muscles was used to investigate properties of primary motor cortex (M1) output in the macaque monkey. Two monkeys were trained to perform a reach-to-grasp task requiring multijoint coordination of the forelimb. EMG activity was recorded from 24 forelimb muscles including 5 shoulder, 7 elbow, 5 wrist, 5 digit, and 2 intrinsic hand muscles. Microstimulation (15 μA at 15 Hz) was delivered throughout the movement task. From 297 stimulation sites in M1, a total of 2,079 poststimulus effects (PStE) were obtained including 1,398 poststimulus facilitation (PStF) effects and 681 poststimulus suppression (PStS) effects. Of the PStF effects, 60% were in distal and 40% in proximal muscles; 43% were of extensors and 47% flexors. For PStS, the corresponding numbers were 55 and 45% and 36 and 55%, respectively. M1 output effects showed extensive cofacilitation of proximal and distal muscles (96 sites, 42%) including 47 sites that facilitated at least one shoulder, elbow, and distal muscle, 45 sites that facilitated an elbow muscle and a distal muscle, and 22 sites that facilitated at least one muscle at all joints. The muscle synergies represented by outputs from these sites may serve an important role in the production of coordinated, multijoint movements. M1 output effects showed many similarities with red nucleus output although red nucleus effects were generally weaker and showed a strong bias toward facilitation of extensor muscles and a greater tendency to facilitate synergies involving muscles at noncontiguous joints.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document