scholarly journals Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 2608-2611 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Fadiga ◽  
L. Fogassi ◽  
G. Pavesi ◽  
G. Rizzolatti
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Muscle Activity ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Action Observation ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Hand Muscles ◽  
3D Objects ◽  
The One

1. We stimulated the motor cortex of normal subjects (transcranial magnetic stimulation) while they 1) observed an experimenter grasping 3D-objects, 2) looked at the same 3D-objects, 3) observed an experimenter tracing geometrical figures in the air with his arm, and 4) detected the dimming of a light. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from hand muscles. 2. We found that MEPs significantly increased during the conditions in which subjects observed movements. The MEP pattern reflected the pattern of muscle activity recorded when the subjects executed the observed actions. 3. We conclude that in humans there is a system matching action observation and execution. This system resembles the one recently described in the monkey.

Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Bimanual Movements

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jen-Tse Chen ◽  
Yung-Yang Lin ◽  
Din-E Shan ◽  
Zin-An Wu ◽  
Mark Hallett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Left Hemisphere ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Left Index Finger ◽  
Rhythmic Movements ◽  
Bimanual Movements ◽  
Ipsilateral Stimulation ◽  
The Right

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex can interrupt voluntary contralateral rhythmic limb movements. Using the method of “resetting index” (RI), our study investigated the TMS effect on different types of bimanual movements. Six normal subjects participated. For unimanual movement, each subject tapped either the right or left index finger at a comfortable rate. For bimanual movement, index fingers of both hands tapped in the same (in-phase) direction or in the opposite (antiphase) direction. TMS was applied to each hemisphere separately at various intensities from 0.5 to 1.5 times motor threshold (MT). TMS interruption of rhythm was quantified by RI. For the unimanual movements, TMS disrupted both contralateral and ipsilateral rhythmic hand movements, although the effect was much less in the ipsilateral hand. For the bimanual in-phase task, TMS could simultaneously reset the rhythmic movements of both hands, but the effect on the contralateral hand was less and the effect on the ipsilateral hand was more compared with the unimanual tasks. Similar effects were seen from right and left hemisphere stimulation. TMS had little effect on the bimanual antiphase task. The equal effect of right and left hemisphere stimulation indicates that neither motor cortex is dominant for simple bimanual in-phase movement. The smaller influence of contralateral stimulation and the greater effect of ipsilateral stimulation during bimanual in-phase movement compared with unimanual movement suggest hemispheric coupling. The antiphase movements were resistant to TMS disruption, and this suggests that control of rhythm differs in the 2 tasks. TMS produced a transient asynchrony of movements on the 2 sides, indicating that both motor cortices might be downstream of the clocking command or that the clocking is a consequence of the 2 hemispheres communicating equally with each other.

scholarly journals Re-emergence of hand-muscle representations in human motor cortex after hand allograft

2009 ◽  
Vol 106 (17) ◽  
pp. 7197-7202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia D. Vargas ◽  
Antoine Aballéa ◽  
Érika C. Rodrigues ◽  
Karen T. Reilly ◽  
Catherine Mercier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Cortical Representation ◽  
Human Motor Cortex ◽  
Hand Muscles ◽  
Right Hand ◽  
Hand Muscle ◽  
The Right

The human primary motor cortex (M1) undergoes considerable reorganization in response to traumatic upper limb amputation. The representations of the preserved arm muscles expand, invading portions of M1 previously dedicated to the hand, suggesting that former hand neurons are reassigned to the control of remaining proximal upper limb muscles. Hand allograft offers a unique opportunity to study the reversibility of such long-term cortical changes. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation in patient LB, who underwent bilateral hand transplantation 3 years after a traumatic amputation, to longitudinally track both the emergence of intrinsic (from the donor) hand muscles in M1 as well as changes in the representation of stump (upper arm and forearm) muscles. The same muscles were also mapped in patient CD, the first bilateral hand allograft recipient. Newly transplanted intrinsic muscles acquired a cortical representation in LB's M1 at 10 months postgraft for the left hand and at 26 months for the right hand. The appearance of a cortical representation of transplanted hand muscles in M1 coincided with the shrinkage of stump muscle representations for the left but not for the right side. In patient CD, transcranial magnetic stimulation performed at 51 months postgraft revealed a complete set of intrinsic hand-muscle representations for the left but not the right hand. Our findings show that newly transplanted muscles can be recognized and integrated into the patient's motor cortex.

scholarly journals Disrupted Central Inhibition after Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Motor Cortex in Schizophrenia with Long-Term Antipsychotic Treatment

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aulikki Ahlgrén-Rimpiläinen ◽  
Hannu Lauerma ◽  
Seppo Kähkönen ◽  
Ilpo Rimpiläinen
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Silent Period ◽  
Single Pulse ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Antipsychotic Treatment ◽  
Stimulation Of

Aims. Schizophrenia is a neuropsychiatric disorder associated with mental and motor disturbances. We aimed to investigate motor control, especially central silent period (CSP) in subjects with schizophrenia (n=11) on long-term antipsychotic treatment compared to healthy controls (n=9). Methods. Latency and duration of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and CSPs were measured with the help of single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and intramuscular electrodes. After stimulation of the dominant and nondominant motor cortex of abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscle areas, respective responses were measured on the contralateral side. Results. MEPs did not differ significantly between the groups. Multiple CSPs were found predominantly in subjects with schizophrenia, which showed a higher number of CSPs in the dominant ADM and the longest summarized duration of CSPs in the nondominant ADM (P<0.05) compared to controls. Conclusions. There were multiple CSPs predominantly in the upper extremities and in the dominant body side in subjects with schizophrenia. Behind multiple CSPs may lie an impaired regulation of excitatory or inhibitory neurotransmitter systems in central motor pathways. Further research is needed to clarify the role of the intramuscular recording methods and the effect of antipsychotics on the results.

Postexercise facilitation of motor evoked potentials following transcranial magnetic stimulation: A study in normal subjects

2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 448-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro Balbi ◽  
Anna Perretti ◽  
Marilena Sannino ◽  
Lucia Marcantonio ◽  
Lucio Santoro
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Normal Subjects

Hypoglossal Nerve Conduction Study by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Normal Subjects

1995 ◽  
Vol 112 (4) ◽  
pp. 520-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agustín Campos ◽  
Rafael Barona ◽  
Joaquín Escudero ◽  
José Montalt ◽  
Manuel Escudero
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Cranial Nerve ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Cranial Nerves ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Upper Face

The introduction of transcranial magnetic stimulation has allowed the study of conduction in the proximal portions and central pathways of the cranial nerves. A study is made of cranial nerve XII with transcranial magnetic stimulation at two levels, cortical and cisternal, registering the motor evoked potential by means of surface electrodes in contact with the upper face of the tongue. Motor evoked potentials were constantly observed on cortical stimulation, in a painless, easy, and reproducible way, with mean values of 10.84 ± 1.14 milliseconds (latency) and 7.81 ± 1.14 mV (amplitude). Motor evoked potentials were unconstant and showed reduced amplitues on cisternal stimulation, with mean values of 4.72 ± 0.62 milliseconds and 0.83 ± 1.26 mV. The magnetic stimulation technique allows the study of the entire motor pathway of cranial nerve XII (motor cortex-medulla, motoneuron-muscle). The method is efficient, noninvasive, painless, and easily reproduced, and it comes close to being an ideal clinical conduction study technique for this cranial nerve.

Role of Sustained Excitability of the Leg Motor Cortex After Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Associative Plasticity

2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 657-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
François D. Roy ◽  
Jonathan A. Norton ◽  
Monica A. Gorassini
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Single Pulse ◽  
Common Peroneal Nerve ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Sensory Inputs

Changes in the strength of corticospinal projections to muscles in the upper and lower limbs are induced in conscious humans after paired associative stimulation (PAS) to the motor cortex. We tested whether an intervention of PAS consisting of 90 low-frequency (0.1-Hz) stimuli to the common peroneal nerve combined with suprathreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) produces specific changes to the motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in lower leg muscles if the afferent volley from peripheral stimulation is timed to arrive at the motor cortex after TMS-induced firing of corticospinal neurons. Unlike PAS in the hand, MEP facilitation in the leg was produced when sensory inputs were estimated to arrive at the motor cortex over a range of 15 to 90 ms after cortical stimulation. We examined whether this broad range of facilitation occurred as a result of prolonged subthreshold excitability of the motor cortex after a single pulse of suprathreshold TMS so that coincident excitation from sensory inputs arriving many milliseconds after TMS can occur. We found that significant facilitation of MEP responses (>200%) occurred when the motor cortex was conditioned with suprathreshold TMS tens of milliseconds earlier. Likewise, it was possible to induce strong MEP facilitation (85% at 60 min) when afferent inputs were directly paired with subthreshold TMS. We argue that in the leg motor cortex, facilitation of MEP responses from PAS occurred over a large range of interstimulus intervals as a result of the paired activation of sensory inputs with sustained, subthreshold activity of cortical neurons that follow a pulse of suprathreshold TMS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document