Human Gaze Stabilization During Natural Activities: Translation, Rotation, Magnification, and Target Distance Effects

1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 2129-2144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin T. Crane ◽  
Joseph L. Demer
Keyword(s):  
Slip Velocity ◽  
Active Role ◽  
Target Distance ◽  
Viewing Condition ◽  
Gaze Stabilization ◽  
Visual Pursuit ◽  
Image Velocity ◽  
Gain Enhancement ◽  
Distance Effects ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex

Crane, Benjamin T. and Joseph L. Demer. Human gaze stabilization during natural activities: translation, rotation, magnification, and target distance effects. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 2129–2144, 1997. Stability of images on the retina was determined in 14 normal humans in response to rotational and translational perturbations during self-generated pitch and yaw, standing, walking, and running on a treadmill. The effects on image stability of target distance, vision, and spectacle magnification were examined. During locomotion the horizontal and vertical velocity of images on the retina was <4°/s for a visible target located beyond 4 m. Image velocity significantly increased to >4°/s during self-generated motion. For all conditions of standing and locomotion, angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (AVOR) gain was less than unity and varied significantly by activity, by target distance, and among subjects. There was no significant correlation( P > 0.05) between AVOR gain and image stability during standing and walking despite significant variation among subjects. This lack of correlation is likely due to translation of the orbit. The degree of orbital translation and rotation varied significantly with activity and viewing condition in a manner suggesting an active role in gaze stabilization. Orbital translation was consistently antiphase with rotation at predominant frequencies <4 Hz. When orbital translation was neglected in computing gaze, computed image velocities increased. The compensatory effect of orbital translation allows gaze stabilization despite subunity AVOR gain during natural activities. Orbital translation decreased during close target viewing, whereas orbital rotation decreased while wearing telescopic spectacles. As the earth fixed target was moved closer, image velocity on the retina significantly increased ( P < 0.05) for all activities except standing. Latency of the AVOR increased slightly with decreasing target distance but remained <10 ms for even the closest target. This latency was similar in darkness or light, indicating that the visual pursuit tracking is probably not important in gaze stabilization. Trials with a distant target were repeated while subjects wore telescopic spectacles that magnified vision by 1.9 or 4 times. Gain of the AVOR was enhanced by magnified vision during all activities, but always to a value less than spectacle magnification. Gain enhancement was greatest during self-generated sinusoidal motion at 0.8 Hz and was less during standing, walking, and running. Image slip velocity on the retina increased with increasing magnification. During natural activities, slip velocity with telescopes increased most during running and least during standing. Latency of the visually enhanced AVOR significantly increased with magnification ( P < 0.05), probably reflecting a contribution of the visual pursuit system. The oculomotor estimate of target distance was inferred by measuring binocular convergence, as well as from monocular parallax during head translation. In darkness, target distance estimates obtained by both techniques were less accurate than in light, consistently overestimating for near and underestimating for far targets.

Viewing Target Distance Influences the Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Gain when Assessed Using the Video Head Impulse Test

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 285-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Castro ◽  
Sara Sena Esteves ◽  
Florencia Lerchundi ◽  
David Buckwell ◽  
Michael A. Gresty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head Movements ◽  
Target Distance ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Video Head Impulse Test ◽  
Gaze Stabilization ◽  
Head Impulse ◽  
Ocular Reflex ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex ◽  
Reflex Gain

Gaze stabilization during head movements is provided by the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). Clinical assessment of this reflex is performed using the video Head Impulse Test (vHIT). To date, the influence of different fixation distances on VOR gain using the vHIT has not been explored. We assessed the effect of target proximity on the horizontal VOR using the vHIT. Firstly, we assessed the VOR gain in 18 healthy subjects with 5 viewing target distances (150, 40, 30, 20, and 10 cm). The gain increased significantly as the viewing target distance decreased. A second experiment on 10 subjects was performed in darkness whilst the subjects were imagining targets at different distances. There were significant inverse relationships between gain and distance for both the real and the imaginary targets. There was a statistically significant difference between light and dark gains for the 20- and 40-cm distances, but not for the 150-cm distance. Theoretical VOR gains for different target distances were calculated and compared with those found in light and darkness. The increase in gain observed for near targets was lower than predicted by geometrical calculations, implying a physiological ceiling effect on the VOR. The VOR gain in the dark, as assessed with the vHIT, demonstrates an enhancement associated with a reduced target distance.

Human Horizontal Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Initiation: Effects of Acceleration, Target Distance, and Unilateral Deafferentation

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 1151-1166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin T. Crane ◽  
Joseph L. Demer
Keyword(s):  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Linear Acceleration ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Target Distance ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Viewing Distance ◽  
Gaze Stabilization ◽  
Ocular Reflex ◽  
Acceleration Period ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex

Crane, Benjamin T. and Joseph L. Demer. Human horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex initiation: effects of acceleration, target distance, and unilateral deafferentation. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 1151–1166, 1998. The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) generates compensatory eye movements in response to angular and linear acceleration sensed by semicircular canals and otoliths respectively. Gaze stabilization demands that responses to linear acceleration be adjusted for viewing distance. This study in humans determined the transient dynamics of VOR initiation during angular and linear acceleration, modification of the VOR by viewing distance, and the effect of unilateral deafferentation. Combinations of unpredictable transient angular and linear head rotation were created by whole body yaw rotation about eccentric axes: 10 cm anterior to eyes, centered between eyes, centered between otoliths, and 20 cm posterior to eyes. Subjects viewed a target 500, 30, or 15 cm away that was extinguished immediately before rotation. There were four stimulus intensities up to a maximum peak acceleration of 2,800°/s2. The normal initial VOR response began 7–10 ms after onset of head rotation. Response gain (eye velocity/head velocity) for near as compared with distant targets was increased as early as 1–11 ms after onset of eye movement; this initial effect was independent of linear acceleration. An otolith mediated effect modified VOR gain depending on both linear acceleration and target distance beginning 25–90 ms after onset of head rotation. For rotational axes anterior to the otoliths, VOR gain for the nearest target was initially higher but later became less than that for the far target. There was no gain correction for the physical separation between the eyes and otoliths. With lower acceleration, there was a nonlinear reduction in the early gain increase with close targets although later otolith-mediated effects were not affected. In subjects with unilateral vestibular deafferentation, the initial VOR was quantitatively normal for rotation toward the intact side. When rotating toward the deafferented side, VOR gain remained less than half of normal for at least the initial 55 ms when head acceleration was highest and was not modulated by target distance. After this initial high acceleration period, gain increased to a degree depending on target distance and axis eccentricity. This behavior suggests that the commissural VOR pathways are not modulated by target distance. These results suggest that the VOR is initially driven by short latency ipsilateral target distance dependent and bilateral target-distance independent canal pathways. After 25 ms, otolith inputs contribute to the target distance dependent pathway. The otolith input later grows to eventually dominate the target distance mediated effect. When otolith input is unavailable the target distance mediated canal component persists. Modulation of canal mediated responses by target distance is a nonlinear effect, most evident for high head accelerations.

Modification of compensatory saccades after aVOR gain recovery

2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 285-291
Author(s):  
Michael C. Schubert ◽  
Americo A. Migliaccio ◽  
Charles C. Della Santina
Keyword(s):  
Head Rotation ◽  
Rehabilitation Program ◽  
Inverse Dynamic ◽  
Gaze Stabilization ◽  
Ocular Reflex ◽  
Dynamic Relationship ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex ◽  
Functional Relevance ◽  
Vestibular Neuronitis ◽  
Eye Velocity

The recruitment of extra-vestibular mechanisms to assist a deficient angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (aVOR) during ipsilesional head rotations is well established and includes saccades of reduced latency that occur in the direction of the lesioned aVOR, termed compensatory saccades (CS). Less well known is the functional relevance of these unique saccades. Here we report a 42 y.o. male diagnosed with right unilateral vestibular hypofunction due to vestibular neuronitis who underwent a vestibular rehabilitation program including gaze stabilization exercises. After three weeks, he had a significant improvement in his ability to see clearly during head rotation. Our data show a reduction in the recruitment and magnitude of CS as well as improved peripheral aVOR gain (eye velocity/head velocity) and retinal eye velocity. Our data suggest an inverse, dynamic relationship between the recruitment of CS and the gain of the aVOR.

Effect of Adaptation to Telescopic Spectacles on the Initial Human Horizontal Vestibuloocular Reflex

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin T. Crane ◽  
Joseph L. Demer
Keyword(s):  
Head Rotation ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Target Distance ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Rotational Axis ◽  
Vestibuloocular Reflex ◽  
Head Acceleration ◽  
Gain Enhancement ◽  
Lower Head ◽  
Distant Target

Gain of the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) not only varies with target distance and rotational axis, but can be chronically modified in response to prolonged wearing of head-mounted magnifiers. This study examined the effect of adaptation to telescopic spectacles on the variation of the VOR with changes in target distance and yaw rotational axis for head velocity transients having peak accelerations of 2,800 and 1,000°/s2. Eye and head movements were recorded with search coils in 10 subjects who underwent whole body rotations around vertical axes that were 10 cm anterior to the eyes, centered between the eyes, between the otoliths, or 20 cm posterior to the eyes. Immediately before each rotation, subjects viewed a target 15 or 500 cm distant. Lighting was extinguished immediately before and was restored after completion of each rotation. After initial rotations, subjects wore 1.9× magnification binocular telescopic spectacles during their daily activities for at least 6 h. Test spectacles were removed and measurement rotations were repeated. Of the eight subjects tolerant of adaptation to the telescopes, six demonstrated VOR gain enhancement after adaptation, while gain in two subjects was not increased. For all subjects, the earliest VOR began 7–10 ms after onset of head rotation regardless of axis eccentricity or target distance. Regardless of adaptation, VOR gain for the proximate target exceeded that for the distant target beginning at 20 ms after onset of head rotation. Adaptation increased VOR gain as measured 90–100 ms after head rotation onset by an average of 0.12 ± 0.02 (SE) for the higher head acceleration and 0.19 ± 0.02 for the lower head acceleration. After adaptation, four subjects exhibited significant increases in the canal VOR gain only, whereas two subjects exhibited significant increases in both angular and linear VOR gains. The latencies of linear and early angular target distance effects on VOR gain were unaffected by adaptation. The earliest significant change in angular VOR gain in response to adaptation occurred 50 and 68 ms after onset of the 2,800 and 1,000°/s2 peak head accelerations, respectively. The latency of the adaptive increase in linear VOR gain was ∼50 ms for the peak head acceleration of 2,800°/s2, and 100 ms for the peak head acceleration of 1,000°/s2. Thus VOR gain changes and latency were consistent with modification in the angular VOR in most subjects, and additionally in the linear VOR in a minority of subjects.

Context Compensation in the Vestibuloocular Reflex During Active Head Rotations

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 2904-2917 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. P. Medendorp ◽  
J.A.M. Van Gisbergen ◽  
S. Van Pelt ◽  
C.C.A.M. Gielen
Keyword(s):  
Human Subjects ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Target Distance ◽  
General Context ◽  
Vestibuloocular Reflex ◽  
Gaze Stabilization ◽  
Retinal Slip ◽  
Eye Velocity ◽  
Head Rotations

The vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) needs to modulate its gain depending on target distance to prevent retinal slip during head movements. We investigated gain modulation (context compensation) for binocular gaze stabilization in human subjects during voluntary yaw and pitch head rotations. Movements of each eye were recorded, both when attempting to maintain gaze on a small visual target at straight-ahead in a darkened room and after its disappearance (remembered target). In the analysis, we relied on a binocular coordinate system yielding a version and a vergence component. We examined how frequency and target distance, approached here by using vergence angle, affected the gain and phase of the version component of the VOR and compared the results to the requirements for ideal performance. Linear regression analysis on the version gain-vergence relationship yielded a slope representing the influence of target proximity and an intercept corresponding to the response at zero vergence (“default gain”). The slope of the fitted relationship, divided by the geometrically required slope, provided a measure for the quality of version context compensation (“context gain”). In both yaw and pitch experiments, we found default version gains close to one even for the remembered target condition, indicating that the active VOR for far targets is already close to ideal without visual support. In near target experiments, the presence of visual feedback yielded near unity context gains, indicating close to optimal performance (retinal slip <0.4°/s). For remembered targets, the context gain deteriorated but was still superior to performance in corresponding passive studies reported in the literature. In general, context compensation in the remembered target paradigm was better for vertical than for horizontal head rotations. The phase delay of version eye velocity relative to head velocity was small (∼2°) for both horizontal and vertical head movements. Analysis of the vergence data from the near target experiments showed that context compensation took into account that the two eyes require slightly different VORs. In thediscussion, comparison of the present default VOR gains and context gains with data from earlier passive studies has led us to propose a limited role for efference copies during self-generated movements. We also discuss how our analysis can provide a framework for evaluating two different hypotheses for the generation of binocular VOR eye movements.

An adaptive gaze stabilization controller inspired by the vestibulo-ocular reflex

2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 035001 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Lenz ◽  
T Balakrishnan ◽  
A G Pipe ◽  
C Melhuish
Keyword(s):  
Gaze Stabilization ◽  
Ocular Reflex ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex

Visual-Vestibular Interaction in Humans During Active and Passive, Vertical Head Movement1

1993 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-114
Author(s):  
Joseph L. Demer ◽  
John G. Oas ◽  
Robert W. Baloh
Keyword(s):  
Head Movement ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Normal Vision ◽  
Frequency Range ◽  
Gain Enhancement ◽  
Ocular Reflex ◽  
Sinusoidal Motion ◽  
Visual Vestibular Interaction ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex

We studied visual-vestibular interaction (VVI) in 9 normal human subjects using active and passive vertical head rotations. Gain and phase of the vertical vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and visually enhanced vestibulo-ocular reflex (VVOR) were measured for single frequency sinusoidal motion, as well as for sinusoidal motion of continuously increasing frequency, over the range of 0.4 to 4.0 Hz. In addition to measurement of VVOR during normal vision, telescopic spectacles having a magnification of 1.9× were used to challenge VVI to facilitate measurement of visual enhancement of VOR gain. In the mid-frequency range (1.6 to 2.4 Hz), the active VOR exhibited gain closer to compensatory than did the passive VOR; at other frequencies, active and passive VOR gains were similar. VVOR gain during normal vision was compensatory for both active and passive motion throughout the frequency range tested. VVOR gain with 1.9× telescopic spectacles was greater than VOR gain at all frequencies tested, including up to 3.2 Hz for passive bead movements, and up to 4.0 Hz for active head movement. However, gain enhancement with telescopic spectacles was consistently greater during active than during passive head movement. Phase errors for the VOR and VVOR were small under all testing conditions. Although active VOR and VVOR were directionally symmetrical, gain of upward slow phases differed from that of downward slow phases for passive VOR and VVOR in a manner depending on rotational frequency. For both active and passive testing, gain and phase values obtained during swept frequency rotations were similar to those obtained during single frequency sinusoidal testing. These data indicate that VVI can enhance gain of the passive vertical VOR even at frequencies above what is usually considered to be the upper limit of visual pursuit tracking. The additional enhancement observed during active bead movements at these high frequences is attributable to use of efference copy of the skeletal motor command to neck musculature.

scholarly journals Vestibulo-ocular reflex and gaze stabilization during high frequency oscillations.

1987 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Takahashi ◽  
Naomi Tujita ◽  
Ikuyo Akiyama
Keyword(s):  
High Frequency ◽  
Gaze Stabilization ◽  
Ocular Reflex ◽  
High Frequency Oscillations ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document