Responses of MT and MST Neurons to One and Two Moving Objects in the Receptive Field

1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 2904-2915 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. H. Recanzone ◽  
R. H. Wurtz ◽  
U. Schwarz
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Moving Objects ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Macaque Monkey ◽  
Single Object ◽  
Null Direction ◽  
Area Mt ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Mst Neurons

Recanzone, G. H., R. H. Wurtz, and U. Schwarz. Responses of MT and MST neurons to one and two moving objects in the receptive field. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 2904–2915, 1997. To test the effects of complex visual motion stimuli on the responses of single neurons in the middle temporal visual area (MT) and the medial superior temporal area (MST) of the macaque monkey, we compared the response elicited by one object in motion through the receptive field with the response of two simultaneously presented objects moving in different directions through the receptive field. There was an increased response to a stimulus moving in a direction other than the best direction when it was paired with a stimulus moving in the best direction. This increase was significant for all directions of motion of the non-best stimulus and the magnitude of the difference increased as the difference in the directions of the two stimuli increased. Similarly, there was a decreased response to a stimulus moving in a non-null direction when it was paired with a stimulus moving in the null direction. This decreased response in MT did not reach significance unless the second stimulus added to the null direction moved in the best direction, whereas in MST the decrease was significant when the second stimulus direction differed from the null by 90° or more. Further analysis showed that the two-object responses were better predicted by taking the averaged response of the neuron to the two single-object stimuli than by summation, multiplication, or vector addition of the responses to each of the two single-object stimuli. Neurons in MST showed larger modulations than did neurons in MT with stimuli moving in both the best direction and in the null direction and the average better predicted the two-object response in area MST than in area MT. This indicates that areas MT and MST probably use a similar integrative mechanisms to create their responses to complex moving visual stimuli, but that this mechanism is further refined in MST. These experiments show that neurons in both MT and MST integrate the motion of all directions in their responses to complex moving stimuli. These results with the motion of objects were in sound agreement with those previously reported with the use of random dot patterns for the study of transparent motion in MT and suggest that these neurons use similar computational mechanisms in the processing of object and global motion stimuli.

Response to Motion in Extrastriate Area MSTl: Center-Surround Interactions

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 282-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Eifuku ◽  
Robert H. Wurtz
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Opposite Direction ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Stimulus Presentation ◽  
Macaque Monkey ◽  
Object Motion ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Field Center ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Receptive Field Center

Eifuku, Satoshi and Robert H. Wurtz. Response to motion in extrastriate area MSTl: center-surround interactions. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 282–296, 1998. The medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey extrastriate visual cortex can be divided into a dorsal medial (MSTd) and a lateral ventral (MSTl) region. The functions of the two regions may not be identical: MSTd may process optic flow information that results from the movement of the observer, whereas MSTl may be related more closely to processing visual motion related specifically to the motion of objects. If MSTl were related to such object motion, one would expect to see mechanisms for the segregation of objects from their surround. We investigated one of these mechanisms in MSTl neurons: the effect of stimuli falling in the region surrounding the receptive field center on the response to stimuli falling in the field center. We found the effects of the surround stimulation to be modulatory with little response to the surround stimulus itself but a clear effect on the response to the stimulus falling on the receptive field center. The response to motion in the center in the direction preferred for the neuron usually increased when the surround motion was in the opposite direction to that in the center and decreased when surround motion was in the same direction as that in the center. Fifty-seven percent of the neurons showed a ratio of response for center motion with a surround moving in the opposite direction to that in the center for center motion alone that was >1. The response to motion in the center also increased when the surround stimulus was stationary, and this increase was sometimes larger than that with a moving surround. Nearly 70% of the neurons showed a ratio of response to center motion with a stationary surround to center motion alone that was >1. This is in contrast to the minimal effect of stationary surrounds in middle temporal area neurons. When the stimulus presentation was reversed so that the stimulus in the center was stationary and the surround moved, some MSTl neurons responded when the direction of motion in the surround was in the direction opposite to the preferred direction of motion in the center of the receptive field. Stimulation of the surround thus had a profound effect on the response of MSTl neurons, and this pronounced effect of the surround is consistent with a role in the segmentation of objects using motion.

Response selectivity of neurons in area MT of the macaque monkey during reversible inactivation of area V1

1992 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 1437-1446 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Girard ◽  
P. A. Salin ◽  
J. Bullier
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Macaque Monkey ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Area 17 ◽  
Visual Responses ◽  
Area Mt ◽  
Reversible Inactivation ◽  
Mt Neurons ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Blocking Index

1. Behavioral results in the monkey and clinical studies in human show remarkable residual visual capacities after a lesion of area V1. Earlier work by Rodman et al. demonstrated that visual activity can be recorded in the middle temporal area (MT) of the macaque monkey several weeks after a complete lesion of V1. These authors also tested the effect of a reversible block of area V1 on the visual responses of a small number of neurons in area MT and showed that most of these cells remain visually responsive. From the results of that study, however, it is difficult to assess the contribution of area 17 to the receptive-field selectivity of area MT neurons. To address this question, we have quantitatively measured the effects of a reversible inactivation of area 17 on the direction selectivity of MT neurons. 2. A circular part of the opercular region of area V1 was reversibly inactivated by cooling with a Peltier device. A microelectrode was positioned in the lower layers of V1 to control the total inactivation of that area. Eighty percent of the sites recorded in the retinotopically corresponding region of MT during inactivation of V1 were found to be visually responsive. The importance of the effect was assessed by calculating the blocking index (0 for no effect, 1 for complete inactivation). Approximately one-half of the quantitatively studied neurons gave a blocking index below 0.6, illustrating the strong residual responses recorded in many neurons. 3. Receptive-field properties were examined with multihistograms. It was found that, during inactivation of V1, the preferred direction changed for most neurons but remained close to the preferred direction or to its opposite in the control situation. During inactivation of V1, the average tuning curve of neurons became broader mostly because of strong reductions in the response to directions close to the preferred and nonpreferred. Very little change was observed in the responses for directions at 90 degrees to the optimal. These results are consistent with a model in which direction selectivity is present without an input from V1 but is reinforced by the spatial organization of this excitatory input. 4. Residual responses were found to be highly dependent on the state of anesthesia because they were completely abolished by the addition of 0.4-0.5% halothane to the ventilation gases. Finally, visual responses were recorded in area MT several hours after an acute lesion of area 17.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

scholarly journals Feature attention for binocular disparity in primate area MT depends on tuning strength

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (5) ◽  
pp. 1545-1555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. Ruff ◽  
Richard T. Born
Keyword(s):  
Binocular Disparity ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Sensory Information ◽  
Neuronal Population ◽  
Area Mt ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Mt Neurons ◽  
Feature Attention ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Relationship

Attending to a stimulus modulates the responses of sensory neurons that represent features of that stimulus, a phenomenon named “feature attention.” For example, attending to a stimulus containing upward motion enhances the responses of upward-preferring direction-selective neurons in the middle temporal area (MT) and suppresses the responses of downward-preferring neurons, even when the attended stimulus is outside of the spatial receptive fields of the recorded neurons (Treue S, Martinez-Trujillo JC. Nature 399: 575–579, 1999). This modulation renders the representation of sensory information across a neuronal population more selective for the features present in the attended stimulus (Martinez-Trujillo JC, Treue S. Curr Biol 14: 744–751, 2004). We hypothesized that if feature attention modulates neurons according to their tuning preferences, it should also be sensitive to their tuning strength, which is the magnitude of the difference in responses to preferred and null stimuli. We measured how the effects of feature attention on MT neurons in rhesus monkeys ( Macaca mulatta) depended on the relationship between features—in our case, direction of motion and binocular disparity—of the attended stimulus and a neuron's tuning for those features. We found that, as for direction, attention to stimuli containing binocular disparity cues modulated the responses of MT neurons and that the magnitude of the modulation depended on both a neuron's tuning preferences and its tuning strength. Our results suggest that modulation by feature attention may depend not just on which features a neuron represents but also on how well the neuron represents those features.

Discharge Characteristics of Pursuit Neurons in MST During Vergence Eye Movements

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. 2415-2434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teppei Akao ◽  
Michael J. Mustari ◽  
Junko Fukushima ◽  
Sergei Kurkin ◽  
Kikuro Fukushima
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Visual Responses ◽  
Discharge Characteristics ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Mst Neurons ◽  
Pursuit Neurons ◽  
Vergence Tracking

For small objects moving smoothly in space close to the observer, smooth pursuit and vergence eye movements maintain target images near the foveae to insure high-resolution processing of visual signals about moving objects. Signals for both systems must be synthesized for pursuit-in-three-dimensions (3D). Recent studies have shown that responses of the majority of pursuit neurons in the frontal eye fields (FEF) code pursuit-in-3D. This area is known to have reciprocal connections with the medial superior temporal area (MST) where frontal pursuit neurons are found. To examine whether pursuit-in-3D signals are already present in MST and how MST neurons discharge during vergence-tracking induced by a small spot, we examined discharge of MST pursuit neurons in 2 monkeys. Of a total of 219 pursuit neurons examined during both frontal pursuit and vergence-tracking, 61% discharged only for frontal pursuit, 18% only for vergence-tracking, and 21% for both. A majority of vergence-related MST neurons exhibited sensitivity to vergence eye velocity. Their discharge was maintained during brief blanking of a vergence target. About 1/3 of vergence-related MST neurons exhibited visual responses to spot motion in depth. The preferred directions for visual motion and vergence-tracking were similar in half of our population. Some of the remaining neurons showed opposite preferred directions. A significant proportion (29%) of vergence-related neurons discharged before onset of eye movements with lead times longer than 20 ms. The results in this and previous studies indicate differences in discharge characteristics of FEF and MST pursuit neurons, suggesting different roles for the two in pursuit-in-3D.

Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: anatomic location and visual response properties

1993 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 902-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. L. Colby ◽  
J. R. Duhamel ◽  
M. E. Goldberg
Keyword(s):  
Visual Motion ◽  
Visual Response ◽  
Intraparietal Sulcus ◽  
Stimulus Motion ◽  
Area Mt ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Response Properties ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
The Face ◽  
Ventral Intraparietal Area

1. The middle temporal area (MT) projects to the intraparietal sulcus in the macaque monkey. We describe here a discrete area in the depths of the intraparietal sulcus containing neurons with response properties similar to those reported for area MT. We call this area the physiologically defined ventral intraparietal area, or VIP. In the present study we recorded from single neurons in VIP of alert monkeys and studied their visual and oculomotor response properties. 2. Area VIP has a high degree of selectivity for the direction of a moving stimulus. In our sample 72/88 (80%) neurons responded at least twice as well to a stimulus moving in the preferred direction compared with a stimulus moving in the null direction. The average response to stimuli moving in the preferred direction was 9.5 times as strong as the response to stimuli moving in the opposite direction, as compared with 10.9 times as strong for neurons in area MT. 3. Many neurons were also selective for speed of stimulus motion. Quantitative data from 25 neurons indicated that the distribution of preferred speeds ranged from 10 to 320 degrees/s. The degree of speed tuning was on average twice as broad as that reported for area MT. 4. Some neurons (22/41) were selective for the distance at which a stimulus was presented, preferring a stimulus of equivalent visual angle and luminance presented near (within 20 cm) or very near (within 5 cm) the face. These neurons maintained their preference for near stimuli when tested monocularly, suggesting that visual cues other than disparity can support this response. These neurons typically could not be driven by small spots presented on the tangent screen (at 57 cm). 5. Some VIP neurons responded best to a stimulus moving toward the animal. The absolute direction of visual motion was not as important for these cells as the trajectory of the stimulus: the best stimulus was one moving toward a particular point on the face from any direction. 6. VIP neurons were not active in relation to saccadic eye movements. Some neurons (10/17) were active during smooth pursuit of a small target. 7. The predominance of direction and speed selectivity in area VIP suggests that it, like other visual areas in the dorsal stream, may be involved in the analysis of visual motion.

Comparison of neuronal selectivity for stimulus speed, length, and contrast in the prestriate visual cortical areas V4 and MT of the macaque monkey

1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 2269-2280 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Cheng ◽  
T. Hasegawa ◽  
K. S. Saleem ◽  
K. Tanaka
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Macaque Monkey ◽  
Stimulus Motion ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Area V4 ◽  
Optimal Speed ◽  
Stimulus Speed ◽  
Stimulus Length ◽  
Visual Cortical

1. Prestriate area V4 and the middle temporal area (MT) compose the first stage in which the ventral and dorsal visual cortical pathways are segregated. To better known the functional dichotomy between the two pathways at this level, we recorded cell responses from V4 and MT using anesthetized, immobilized macaque monkeys and compared the selectivity for speed of stimulus motion and stimulus length and the sensitivity to luminance contrast between the two areas. 2. V4 cells were as selective as MT cells for speed. The sharpness of tuning was not different between the two populations. The optimal speed varied widely in both areas, but both of the two distributions showed peaks at 32 degrees/s. 3. V4 and MT cells were similar in that about one-half of the cells (45% in V4 and 48% in MT) showed inhibition by long (16 degrees) bars. However, V4 cells preferred stimuli whose lengths were distributed around the lengths of the receptive field, whereas an overwhelming majority of MT cells preferred stimuli whose lengths were much shorter than the lengths of the receptive field. 4. The cutoff contrast at which one-half the maximum response was elicited was distributed widely in both areas, and the two distributions considerably overlapped. MT cells as a whole, however, were slightly more sensitive to the luminance contrast than V4 cells. 5. There was a tendency toward local clustering for cells with similar speed preferences in MT but not in V4. Pairs of MT cells recorded within 400 microns had smaller difference in the optimal speed than that of cell pairs taken randomly from the whole sample of MT cells.

scholarly journals Task-specific, dimension-based attentional shaping of motion processing in area MT

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bastian Schledde ◽  
F. Orlando Galashan ◽  
Magdalena Przybyla ◽  
Andreas K. Kreiter ◽  
Detlef Wegener
Keyword(s):  
Visual Processing ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Color Change ◽  
Visual Stimulation ◽  
Motion Processing ◽  
Specific Response ◽  
Area Mt ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Baseline Activity ◽  
Feature Dimension

AbstractNon-spatial selective attention is based on the notion that specific features or objects in the visual environment are effectively prioritized in cortical visual processing. Feature-based attention (FBA) in particular, is a well-studied process that dynamically and selectively enhances neurons preferentially processing the attended feature attribute (e.g. leftward motion). In everyday life, however, behavior may require high sensitivity for an entire feature dimension (e.g. motion). Yet, evidence for feature dimension-specific attentional modulation on a cellular level is lacking. We here investigate neuronal activity in macaque motion-selective medio-temporal area (MT) in an experimental setting requiring the monkeys to detect either a motion change or a color change. We hypothesized that neural activity in MT is enhanced if the task requires perceptual sensitivity to motion. Despite identical visual stimulation, we found that mean firing rates were higher in the motion task, and response variability and latency were lower as compared to the color task. This task-specific response modulation in the processing of visual motion was independent from the relation between attended and stimulating motion direction. It emerged already in the absence of visual input, and consisted of a spatially global and tuning-independent shift of the MT baseline activity. The results provide single cell support for the hypothesis of a feature dimension-specific top-down signal emphasizing the processing of an entire feature class.

scholarly journals The contribution of area MT to visual motion perception depends on training

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu D. Liu ◽  
Christopher C. Pack
Keyword(s):  
Motion Perception ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Stimulus Motion ◽  
Area Mt ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Visual Motion Perception ◽  
Motion Discrimination ◽  
Cortex Area ◽  
Training History

SummaryPerceptual decisions require the transformation of raw sensory inputs into cortical representations suitable for stimulus discrimination. One of the best-known examples of this transformation involves the middle temporal area (MT) of the primate visual cortex. Area MT provides a robust representation of stimulus motion, and previous work has shown that it contributes causally to performance on motion discrimination tasks. Here we report that the strength of this contribution can be highly plastic: Depending on the recent training history, pharmacological inactivation of MT can severely impair motion discrimination, or it can have little detectable influence. Similarly, depending on training, microstimulation can bias motion perception or simply introduce noise. Further analysis of neural and behavioral data suggests that training shifts the readout of motion information between MT and lower-level cortical areas. These results show that the contribution of individual brain regions to conscious perception can shift flexibly depending on sensory experience.

Microstimulation of Cortical Area MT Affects Performance on a Visual Working Memory Task

2001 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 187-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Bisley ◽  
Daniel Zaksas ◽  
Tatiana Pasternak
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Stimulus Motion ◽  
Area Mt ◽  
Directional Information ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Mt Neurons ◽  
Directional Motion ◽  
Term Storage

We applied electrical stimulation to physiologically identified sites in macaque middle temporal area (MT) to examine its role in short-term storage of recently encoded information about stimulus motion. We used a behavioral task in which monkeys compared the directions of two moving random-dot stimuli, sample and test, separated by a 1.5-s delay. Four sample directions were used for each site, and the animals had to indicate whether the direction of motion in the sample was the same as or different to the direction of motion in the test. We found that the effect of stimulation of the same directional column in MT depended on the behavioral state of the animal. Although stimulation had strong effects when applied during the encoding and the storage components of the task, these effects were not equivalent. Stimulation applied during the presentation of the sample produced signals interpreted by the monkeys as directional motion. However, the same stimulation introduced during the period of storage no longer produced signals interpreted as unambiguous directional information. We conclude that the directional information used by the monkeys in the working memory task is likely to be provided by neurons in MT, and the use of this information appears to be dependent on the portion of the task during which stimulation was delivered. Finally, the disruptive effects of stimulation during the delay suggest that MT neurons not only participate in the encoding of visual motion information but also in its storage by either maintaining an active connection with the circuitry involved in storage or being an integral component of that circuitry.

scholarly journals Processing of object motion and self-motion in the lateral subdivision of the medial superior temporal area in macaques

2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (4) ◽  
pp. 1207-1221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryo Sasaki ◽  
Dora E. Angelaki ◽  
Gregory C. DeAngelis
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cues ◽  
Moving Objects ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Object Motion ◽  
Image Motion ◽  
Motion Processing ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Medial Superior Temporal ◽  
Visual Motion Processing ◽  
Self Motion

Multiple areas of macaque cortex are involved in visual motion processing, but their relative functional roles remain unclear. The medial superior temporal (MST) area is typically divided into lateral (MSTl) and dorsal (MSTd) subdivisions that are thought to be involved in processing object motion and self-motion, respectively. Whereas MSTd has been studied extensively with regard to processing visual and nonvisual self-motion cues, little is known about self-motion signals in MSTl, especially nonvisual signals. Moreover, little is known about how self-motion and object motion signals interact in MSTl and how this differs from interactions in MSTd. We compared the visual and vestibular heading tuning of neurons in MSTl and MSTd using identical stimuli. Our findings reveal that both visual and vestibular heading signals are weaker in MSTl than in MSTd, suggesting that MSTl is less well suited to participate in self-motion perception than MSTd. We also tested neurons in both areas with a variety of combinations of object motion and self-motion. Our findings reveal that vestibular signals improve the separability of coding of heading and object direction in both areas, albeit more strongly in MSTd due to the greater strength of vestibular signals. Based on a marginalization technique, population decoding reveals that heading and object direction can be more effectively dissociated from MSTd responses than MSTl responses. Our findings help to clarify the respective contributions that MSTl and MSTd make to processing of object motion and self-motion, although our conclusions may be somewhat specific to the multipart moving objects that we employed. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Retinal image motion reflects contributions from both the observer’s self-motion and the movement of objects in the environment. The neural mechanisms by which the brain dissociates self-motion and object motion remain unclear. This study provides the first systematic examination of how the lateral subdivision of area MST (MSTl) contributes to dissociating object motion and self-motion. We also examine, for the first time, how MSTl neurons represent translational self-motion based on both vestibular and visual cues.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document