scholarly journals A New Look at Trigger Point Injections

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara S. M. Wong ◽  
Steven H. S. Wong

Trigger point injections are commonly practised pain interventional techniques. However, there is still lack of objective diagnostic criteria for trigger points. The mechanisms of action of trigger point injection remain obscure and its efficacy remains heterogeneous. The advent of ultrasound technology in the noninvasive real-time imaging of soft tissues sheds new light on visualization of trigger points, explaining the effect of trigger point injection by blockade of peripheral nerves, and minimizing the complications of blind injection.

2008 ◽  
Vol 6;11 (12;6) ◽  
pp. 885-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth P. Botwin

Background: Myofascial pain is defined as pain that originates from myofascial trigger points in skeletal muscle. It is prevalent in regional musculoskeletal pain syndromes, either alone or in combination with other pain generators. The myofascial pain syndrome is one of the largest groups of under diagnosed and under treated medical problems encountered in clinical practice. Trigger points are commonly seen in patients with myofascial pain which is responsible for localized pain in the affected muscles as well as referred pain patterns. Correct needle placement in a myofascial trigger point is vital to prevent complications and improve efficacy of the trigger point injection to help reduce or relieve myofascial pain. In obese patients, these injections may not reach the target tissue. In the cervicothoracic spine, a misguided or misplaced injection can result in a pneumothorax. Here, we describe an ultrasound-guided trigger point injection technique to avoid this potential pitfall. Office based ultrasound-guided injection techniques for musculoskeletal disorders have been described in the literature with regard to tendon, bursa, cystic, and joint pathologies. For the interventionalist, utilizing ultrasound yields multiple advantages technically and practically, including observation of needle placement in real-time, ability to perform dynamic studies, the possibility of diagnosing musculoskeletal pathologies, avoidance of radiation exposure, reduced overall cost, and portability of equipment within the office setting. To our knowledge, the use of ultrasound guidance in performing trigger point injection in the cervicothoracic area, particularly in obese patients, has not been previously reported. Methods: A palpable trigger point in the cervicothoracic musculature was localized and marked by indenting the skin with the tip of a plastic needle cover. The skin was then sterile prepped. Then, using an ultrasound machine with sterile coupling gel and a sterile latex free transducer cover, the musculature in the cervicothoracic spine where the palpable trigger point was detected was visualized. Then utilizing direct live ultrasound guidance, a 25-gauge 1.5 inch needle connected to a 3 mL syringe was placed into the muscle at the exact location of the presumed trigger point. This guidance helps confirm needle placement in muscle tissue and not in an adipose tissue or any other non-musculature structure. Results: The technique is simple to be performed by a pain management specialist who has ultrasound system training. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided trigger point injections may help confirm proper needle placement within the cervicothoracic musculature. The use of ultrasound-guided trigger point injections in the cervicothoracic musculature may also reduce the potential for a pneumothorax by an improperly placed injection. Key words: Trigger point injection, myofascial pain, ultrasound


2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (02) ◽  
pp. 1250002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Reza Emad ◽  
Sharareh Roshanzamir ◽  
Mohsen Zafar Ghasempoor ◽  
Shahriar Mirshamsand Parisa Sedaghat

Background: One of the causes of musculoskeletal pain is trigger points. Trigger point injection is one of the acceptable methods to inactivate the trigger points and provide symptomatic relief. The goal of our study was to compare the effectiveness of the injection without muscle stretching versus stretching immediately after injection of methylprednisolon in the treatment of trigger points. Methods: Seventy patients with pain in the gluteal muscles due to trigger points were recruited after explanation regarding their treatment method. A written consent was collected from the patients prior to their participation in the study. The patients had two office visits and two phone follow-ups. All the patients were treated with injections of Lidocaine and Methylprednisolon. In group (A), injection was administered without stretching. In group (B), stretching of the muscle was performed immediately after the injection. The evaluation tools were Numeric Pain Intensity Scale (NPS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Brief Pain Inventory Scale (BPI). Results: Results from VAS showed significant difference between the two groups after one month. Significant difference was seen between groups, one month and two months after the injection according to NRS. However, no significant difference was detected between two groups in BPI, except in mood. Conclusion: This study, based upon follow-ups in two months upon injection, highlights the effectiveness of muscle stretching immediately after the injection in the treatment of symptomatic gluteal trigger points.


1970 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-40
Author(s):  
MHM Delwar Hossain ◽  
Md Rezaul Alam Choudhury ◽  
Md Masudur Alam Mojumder

Non-specific low backache of mechanical origin is common symptoms of disability in the community. There are many causes of low backache; these are mechanical and non-mechanical types. The commonest form of low backache is structural dysfunction that has direct relationship with activity. There are many regimens of treatment of low backache and trigger points injection (TPI) is one modality of them. This comparative study between TPI and conventional treatment of chronic backache was carried out at Combined Military Hospital (CMH) Bogra over a period of one year where 60 patients were treated. Out of 60 patients, 30 patients in group-I was given conventional treatment and other 30 patients in group-II were provided TPI. The mean age distribution was 42.33±5.79 years in group-I and 43.76±6.35 years in group-II, mean weight of the patients was 73.43±7.2 kg in group-I and 74.46±8.04 kg in group-II. Mean height of the patients were 165.33±9.84 cm in group-I and 166.50±9.10 cm in group-II. Mean duration of backache was 33.86 ±16.89 months in group-I and 32.10.±14.53 months in group- II and male female ratio was 18:12 in group-I and 22: 8 in group-II. In group-II TPI was provided, where their mean sessions of TPI requirement was 4.1±1.21. After treatment, their mean visual analogue scale (VAS) was 4.77±0.76 in group-I and 3.81±0.84 in group-II which is not statistically significant and duration of mean pain relief was 3.78±0.79 months in group-I and 5.65±1.21 months in group-II which is statistically significant. TPI is not a new modality of treatment of pain but it is not commonly practice in this country; which can be adopted for pain management usually without side effect. Key Words: Backache, Trigger point injection (TPI).   doi: 10.3329/jafmc.v5i1.2850 JAFMC Bangladesh. Vol 5, No 1 (June) 2009 pp.37-40


2007 ◽  
Vol 6;10 (6;11) ◽  
pp. 753-756
Author(s):  
Kenneth P. Botwin

Background: Myofascial pain is defined as pain that originates from myofascial trigger points in skeletal muscle. It is prevalent in regional musculoskeletal pain syndromes, either alone or in combination with other pain generators. The myofascial pain syndrome is one of the largest groups of under-diagnosed and under-treated medical problems encountered in clinical practice. Trigger points are commonly seen in patients with myofascial pain that can be responsible for localized pain in the affected muscles as well as referred pain patterns. Correct needle placement in a myofascial trigger point is vital to prevent complications and improve efficacy of the trigger point injection to help reduce or relieve myofascial pain. In the obese patients, these injections may not reach the target tissue. In the cervicothoracic spine, a misguided or misplaced injection can result in a pneumothorax. Here, we review an electromyographically guided trigger point injection technique to avoid this potential pitfall. Methods: Using a disposable Teflon coated hypodermic injection needle attached to an electromyography (EMG) machine, a trigger point injection can be performed utilizing electromyographic guidance. This guidance by observing motor unit action potentials (MUAPs) on the EMG screen helps confirm the needle placement to be within the muscle tissue and not in an adipose tissue or any other non-musculature structure. Results: The technique is simple when performed by a pain management specialist who has electromyographic training. Conclusion: This technique helps confirm proper needle placement within the cervicothoracic musculature in an obese patient in whom the musculature is not readily palpated. This, thus, reduces the potential for a pneumothorax by an improperly placed injection. Key words: Trigger point injection, myofascial pain, electromyography


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document