scholarly journals Hand Robotics Rehabilitation: Feasibility and Preliminary Results of a Robotic Treatment in Patients with Hemiparesis

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrizio Sale ◽  
Valentina Lombardi ◽  
Marco Franceschini

Background. No strongly clinical evidence about the use of hand robot-assisted therapy in stroke patients was demonstrated. This preliminary observer study was aimed at evaluating the efficacy of intensive robot-assisted therapy in hand function recovery, in the early phase after a stroke onset.Methods. Seven acute ischemic stroke patients at their first-ever stroke were enrolled. Treatment was performed using Amadeo robotic system (Tyromotion GmbH Graz, Austria). Each participant received, in addition to inpatients standard rehabilitative treatment, 20 sessions of robotic treatment for 4 consecutive weeks (5 days/week). Each session lasted for 40 minutes. The exercises were carried out as follows: passive modality (5 minutes), passive/plus modality (5 minutes), assisted therapy (10 minutes), and balloon (10 minutes). The following impairment and functional evaluations, Fugl-Meyer Scale (FM), Medical Research Council Scale for Muscle Strength (hand flexor and extensor muscles) (MRC), Motricity Index (MI), and modified Ashworth Scale for wrist and hand muscles (AS), were performed at the beginning (T0), after 10 sessions (T1), and at the end of the treatment (T2). The strength hand flexion and extension performed by Robot were assessed at T0 and T2. The Barthel Index and COMP (performance and satisfaction subscale) were assessed at T0 and T2.Results. Clinical improvements were found in all patients. No dropouts were recorded during the treatment and all subjects fulfilled the protocol. Evidence of a significant improvement was demonstrated by the Friedman test for the MRC (P<0.0123). Evidence of an improvement was demonstrated for AS, FM, and MI.Conclusions. This original rehabilitation treatment could contribute to increase the hand motor recovery in acute stroke patients. The simplicity of the treatment, the lack of side effects, and the first positive results in acute stroke patients support the recommendations to extend the clinical trial of this treatment, in association with physiotherapy and/or occupational therapy.

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 236-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrizio Sale ◽  
Stefano Mazzoleni ◽  
Valentina Lombardi ◽  
Daniele Galafate ◽  
Maria P. Massimiani ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Andy Chien ◽  
Fei-Chun Chang ◽  
Nai-Hsin Meng ◽  
Pei-Yu Yang ◽  
Ching Huang ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Robot-assisted gait rehabilitation has been proposed as a plausible supplementary rehabilitation strategy in stroke rehabilitation in the last decade. However, its exact benefit over traditional rehabilitation remain sparse and unclear. It is therefore the purpose of the current study to comparatively investigate the clinical benefits of the additional robot-assisted training in acute stroke patients compared to standard hospital rehabilitation alone. Methods Ninety acute stroke patients (< 3 month) were recruited. All participants received the standard hospital neurorehabilitation comprises 45–60 min sessions daily for 3 weeks. Sixty patients also received an additional 30 min of robot-assisted gait training with the HIWIN MRG-P100 gait training system after each of the standard neurorehabilitation session. Outcome measures included: 1. Berg Balance Scale (BBS); 2. Brunnstrom Stage; 3. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and 4. Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire (TDQ) which were assessed pre-treatment and then after every five training sessions. Results Both groups demonstrated significant improvement pre- and post-treatment for the BBS (robotic group p = 0.023; control group p = 0.033) but no significant difference (p > 0.1) between the groups were found. However, the robotic training group had more participants demonstrating larger BBS points of improvement as well as greater Brunnstrom stage of improvement, when compared to the control group. No significant within and between group statistical differences (p > 0.3) were found for Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire. Conclusion The addition of robotic gait training on top of standard hospital neurorehabilitation for acute stroke patients appear to produce a slightly greater improvement in clinical functional outcomes, which is not transferred to psychological status.


2012 ◽  
Vol 02 (04) ◽  
pp. 16-21
Author(s):  
Mohamed Faisal C. K. ◽  
Priyabandani Neha Om Prakash ◽  
Ajith S.

AbstractStroke is a worldwide health problem. Hand function is one of the important factors which are affected in stroke. Stroke patients are usually given a conventional physiotherapy but if an additional FNMES is given it might show better improvement. By keeping these facts in view, the present study aims at evaluating and comparing the efficacy of conventional physiotherapy and adding FNMES will make any better outcome in the acute stroke survivals. The subjects were randomly assigned to any of the two groups; control group consisted of 15 subjects who received only conventional therapy for 4 weeks and experimental group consisting of 15 subjects who received an additional FNMES along with conventional physiotherapy for 4 weeks. The hand function was assessed on day 1 and to know the recovery, at the end of four weeks of intervention with the help of action research arm test (ARAT) and box and block test (BBT). At the end of 4 weeks of intervention both the groups showed significant improvements. On ARAT, control group showed a mean of 10.2000 whereas, experimental group showed mean of 20.8000 with p = 0.001 (p ≤ 0.05) and on BBT, the control group showed a mean of 21.666 and experimental group showed 30.933 with p = 0.41 (p ≤ S 0.05). Therefore the study concludes that, though there was improvement in both the groups, the experimental group who received an additional FNMES along with conventional physiotherapy showed better improvement in hand functions in the acute stroke survivals.


2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Udby Blicher ◽  
Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen

Introduction. The contribution of hyperreflexia to impairment after stroke is debated. Spinal motoneuron excitability in healthy subjects and stroke patients with and without spasticity was compared. Methods. Twenty-four patients with single stroke more than 6 months ago and 18 gender-matched healthy volunteers were included. Spasticity was assessed according to the Modified Ashworth Scale. Mmax amplitude and F wave frequency in the abductor pollicis brevis muscle were measured by electrical stimulation of the median nerve. Results . Mmax values were comparable between the groups. However, patients with (n = 7) and without (n = 17) clinically evident spasticity had a significant increase in F wave frequency when compared with healthy subjects. F wave frequency did not differ between spastic and nonspastic patients. Discussion. Increase in spinal motoneuron excitability after stroke is present in stroke patients with minor or no motor deficiencies and does not necessarily lead to spasticity.


1987 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 110-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. de Weerdt ◽  
N. B. Lincoln ◽  
M. A. Harrison

1987 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 110-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. de Weerdt ◽  
N. B. Lincoln ◽  
M. A. Harrison

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 696-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Ho Hwang ◽  
Jin Wan Seong ◽  
Dae-Sik Son

Objective: To evaluate individual finger synchronized robot-assisted hand rehabilitation in stroke patients. Design: Prospective parallel group randomized controlled clinical trial. Subjects: The study recruited patients who were ≥18 years old, more than three months post stroke, showed limited index finger movement and had weakened and impaired hand function. Patients with severe sensory loss, spasticity, apraxia, aphasia, disabling hand disease, impaired consciousness or depression were excluded. Interventions: Patients received either four weeks (20 sessions) of active robot-assisted intervention (the FTI (full-term intervention) group, 9 patients) or two weeks (10 sessions) of early passive therapy followed by two weeks (10 sessions) of active robot-assisted intervention (the HTI (half-term intervention) group, 8 patients). Patients underwent arm function assessments prior to therapy (baseline), and at 2, 4 and 8 weeks after starting therapy. Results: Compared to baseline, both the FTI and HTI groups showed improved results for the Jebsen Taylor test, the wrist and hand subportion of the Fugl-Meyer arm motor scale, active movement of the 2nd metacarpophalangeal joint, grasping, and pinching power ( P < 0.05 for all) at each time point (2, 4 and 8 weeks), with a greater degree of improvement for the FTI compared to the HTI group ( P < 0.05); for example, in Jebsen Taylor test (65.9 ± 36.5 vs. 46.4 ± 37.4) and wrist and hand subportion of the Fugl-Meyer arm motor scale (4.3 ± 1.9 vs. 3.4 ± 2.5) after eight weeks. Conclusions: A four-week rehabilitation using a novel robot that provides individual finger synchronization resulted in a dose-dependent improvement in hand function in subacute to chronic stroke patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document