scholarly journals Dose-Dense Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel as Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Node-Positive Breast Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamid Reza Mirzaei ◽  
Parisa Sabet Rasekh ◽  
Fatemeh Nasrollahi ◽  
Parto Sabet Rasekh ◽  
Zahra Akbari Tirabad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Background. Adding taxanes to anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy has shown significant improvement particularly in node-positive patients, but optimal dose and schedule remain undetermined.Objectives. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer.Methods. All Patients first received 4 cycles of epirubicin (100 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) at 2-week interval then followed by docetaxel (100 mg/m2) at 2-week interval for 4 cycles, with daily Pegfilgrastim (G-CSF) that was administered in all patients on days 3–10 after each cycle of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide infusion.Results. Fifty-eight patients with axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer were enrolled in the study, of whom 42 (72.4%) completed the regimen. There were two toxicity-related deaths, one patient due to grade 4 febrile neutropenia and the other due to congestive heart failure. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were 13.8% and 5.1%. The most common grade 3/4 nonhematological complications were as follows: skin-nail disorders (48.3%), hand-foot syndrome (34.4%), paresthesia (38%), arthralgia (27.5%), and paresis (24.1%).Conclusions. Dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel with G-CSF support are not feasible, and it is not recommended for further investigation.

scholarly journals Dose-Dense Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Weekly Paclitaxel in Node-Positive Breast Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Hamid Reza Mirzaei ◽  
Fatemeh Nasrollahi ◽  
Ladan Mohammadi Yeganeh ◽  
Sepideh Jafari Naeini ◽  
Pegah Bikdeli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Background. Adding taxanes to anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy has shown significant improvement in node-positive breast cancer patients but the optimal dose schedule has still remained undetermined. Objectives. The feasibility of dose-dense epirubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide (EC) followed by weekly paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer patients was investigated. Methods. All patients were treated with epirubicin (100 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) every two weeks for four cycles with daily Pegfilgrastim (G-CSF) that was administered 3–10 days after each cycle of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide infusion which followed by (80 mg/m2) paclitaxel for twelve consecutive weeks. Results. Sixty consecutive patients were analyzed, of whom 57 patients (95%) completed the regimen and no case of toxicity-related death was observed. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was uncommon and the most common grade 3/4 nonhematological adverse event was neuropathy disorders. Conclusions. Dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by weekly paclitaxel with G-CSF support is a well-tolerated and feasible regimen in node-positive breast cancer patients without serious complications.

scholarly journals Dose-Dense Docetaxel versus Weekly Paclitaxel following Dose-Dense Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide as Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Sara Khoshroo ◽  
Saleh Sandoughdaran ◽  
Parisa Sabetrasekh ◽  
Parastoo Hajian ◽  
Pegah Bikdeli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Background/Aims. The anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy regimens are the standard adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer patients. Although it was believed that docetaxel and paclitaxel are similarly effective as adjuvant treatment in node-positive breast cancer, recent studies report that weekly paclitaxel is superior to weekly and triweekly docetaxel schedules in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has compared weekly paclitaxel with a dose-dense regimen of docetaxel. The current study is aimed at evaluating the outcome of women with node-positive breast cancer who had received weekly paclitaxel compared with those treated with dose-dense docetaxel. Methods. This study included patients from two prospective studies conducted in our institute from April 2007 to March 2009. Ninety-one women with axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer who had received four cycles of dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide were treated with either weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) for 12 doses or biweekly docetaxel (75 mg/m2) for four cycles. Results. After a median follow-up of 88 and 109 months, 11 (23.4%) and 10 (22.7%) patients had experienced disease recurrence ( p = 0.16 ), while 10 (21.3%) and 5 (11.4%) patients had died in the paclitaxel and docetaxel arm, respectively ( p = 0.56 ). No significant difference could be seen in 5-year DFS or OS among groups (HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.19–1.81, p = 0.35 ; HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.19–1.81, p = 0.35 , respectively). Conclusion. In conclusion, both evaluated adjuvant chemotherapy regimens have comparable effectiveness regarding DFS and OS.

Adjuvant CAF versus AC followed by paclitaxel for operable breast cancer with 4 or more involved axillary lymph nodes: Retrospective analysis

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10610-10610
Author(s):  
J. Ahn ◽  
S. Kim ◽  
B. Son ◽  
S. Ahn ◽  
W. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Axillary Lymph Nodes ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Axillary Nodes ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

10610 Background: Recently, adjuvant AC followed by paclitaxel has improved disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) of node-positive breast cancer. Although adjuvant TAC, as compared with FAC, significantly improves DFS and OS rate in node-positive breast cancer, AC→T has not been yet compared with FAC. Since 2001, we discussed the options of adjuvant CAF versus AC→T with patients who had 4 or more positive axillary nodes. We evaluated the efficacies of adjuvant CAF and AC→T, retrospectively. Methods: Between September 2001 and July 2004, a total of 1,394 patients underwent surgery and received adjuvant chemotherapy. Among them, 253 (18.1%) patients had 4 or more than axillary nodes and received either six cycles of CAF (n = 116) or 4 cycles of AC→T) (n = 137). The medical records and pathologic data of these patients were reviewed, retrospectively. Results: Median age of all patients was 46 years (range, 22∼76 years). The two groups were well balanced in terms of demographic and tumor characteristics. With a median follow-up period of 24 months (range, 6∼90 months), 49 (19.4%) patients had disease recurrence including 27 (23.3%) in CAF group and 22 (16.1%) in AC→T group (p = 0.155). The 3 year-DFS rate was 68.3% in CAF group and 71.1% in AC→T group (p = 0.9366), and the estimated 3-year OS rate was 90.3% and 92.3%, respectively (p = 0.8237). There was no significant difference in 3-year DFS rate according to hormone-receptor status. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 11 (9.6%) patients in CAF group and 7 (5.1%) patients in AC→T group (p = 0.222). Conclusion: Our data suggest that there is no significant difference in DFS or OS rates between six cycles of CAF and 4 cycles of AC followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with 4 or more than involved axillary nodes. However, long-term follow-up period and prospective studies are needed to define better regimen. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Assessing the impact of CMF/FEC/FEC-DOC/ETC (dose-dense) adjuvant chemotherapy in dependency of positive axillary lymph nodes on survival: A retrospective multicenter cohort study of 4,526 breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1074-1074
Author(s):  
Lukas Schwentner ◽  
Reyn Van Ewijk ◽  
Isabell Hoffmann ◽  
Rolf Kreienberg ◽  
Maria Blettner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Significant Benefit ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Positive Lymph Nodes ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

1074 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy has changed dramatically in the last decades. Anthracycline-/taxane-based and dose-dense chemotherapy regimens improved survival in node positive breast cancer. This study tries to answer the following questions: (1) Are there differences in survival dependent on chemotherapy regimens in 0/0-3/4-10/<10 positive lymph nodes? (2) Is it possible to define a cut-off of positive lymph nodes for the use of Taxane-based and dose dense chemotherapy? Methods: This German is a multi-center [17 participating hospitals all are certified as breast cancer centers] retrospective cohort study. We included CMF (1.385), FEC (1.170), FEC-DOC (1.723), and dose-dense ETC (248) into the analysis. Results: In case of 0 LN CMF/FEC/FEC-DOC did not show significant differences in DFS, but OAS was significantly impaired by the use of FEC-DOC in 0 LN [p=0.024; HR=2.02 (95% CI: 1.10-3.73)] (no ETC use in 0 LN). In case of 1-3 positive LN CMF/FEC/FEC-DOC/ETC did not differ significantly in survival parameters. But in 4-10 LN FEC-DOC [p=0.049; HR=0.67 (95% CI: 0.44-0.99)] and ETC [p=0.024; HR=0.56 (95% CI: 0.34-0.93)] demonstrated a significant benefit in DFS and a strong trend in OAS. Dose-dense ETC showed a significant improvement in DFS [p=0.003; HR=0.35 (95% CI: 0.17-0.69)] and OAS [p=0.009; HR=0.35 (95% CI: 0.16-0.77)] in patients with >10 positive LN. Conclusions: Our data confirms that Taxane-based chemotherapy does not improve DFS in LN negative breast cancer, but rather demonstrated an inferior OAS. But in LN positive breast cancer we can demonstrate a benefit by the use of Taxane-based chemotherapy regimens. Furthermore, dose-dense ETC demonstrated a significant benefit in survival in >10 positive LN.

NCIC-CTG MA.20: An intergroup trial of regional nodal irradiation in early breast cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA1003-LBA1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Whelan ◽  
I. Olivotto ◽  
I. Ackerman ◽  
J. W. Chapman ◽  
B. Chua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Adjuvant Systemic Therapy ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Regional Nodal Irradiation ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

LBA1003 Background: Randomized trials have demonstrated that locoregional radiation after mastectomy reduces locoregional recurrence and improves overall survival (OS) in women with node positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant systemic therapy. MA.20 evaluated the addition of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) to whole breast irradiation (WBI) following breast conserving surgery (BCS). Methods: Women with high risk node-negative or node-positive breast cancer treated with BCS and adjuvant chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy were stratified by positive nodes, axillary nodes removed, chemo- and endocrine therapy and randomized to WBI (50Gy in 25 fractions +/- boost irradiation) or WBI plus RNI (45Gy in 25 fractions) to the internal mammary, supraclavicular, and high axillary lymph nodes. The primary outcome was OS. The Data Safety Monitoring Committee approved the analysis plan for the protocol specified interim analysis of relapse patterns, survival and toxicity at 5 years. Upon review of the data, they recommended release of the results. Results: Between March 2000 to March 2007, 1,832 women were randomly assigned to WBI+RNI (916) or WBI (916). Median follow-up was 62 months. Characteristics of the study population were: mean age, 53.3 years; node negative, 10%; 1-3 positive nodes, 85%; > 4 positive nodes, 5%; adjuvant chemotherapy, 91%; and adjuvant endocrine therapy, 71%. WBI+RNI in comparison to WBI alone was associated with an improvement in isolated locoregional disease free survival (DFS; HR=.59, p=.02, 5 year risk: 96.8% and 94.5% respectively), distant DFS (HR=.64, p=.002, 5 year risk: 92.4% and 87.0% respectively), DFS (HR=.68, p=.003, 5 year risk: 89.7% and 84.0% respectively) and OS (HR=.76, p=.07, 5 year risk: 92.3% and 90.7% respectively). WBI+RNI in comparison to WBI was associated with an increase in grade 2 or greater pneumonitis (1.3% and 0.2% respectively, p=.01), and lymphedema (7.3% and 4.1% respectively, p=.004). Conclusions: The majority of women with node positive breast cancer are now managed by BCS followed by WBI and adjuvant systemic therapy. Results from MA.20 demonstrate that additional RNI reduces the risk of locoregional and distant recurrence, and improves DFS with a trend in improved OS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document