scholarly journals Pomaglumetad Methionil (LY2140023 Monohydrate) and Aripiprazole in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Double-Blind Comparison

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Adams ◽  
Lu Zhang ◽  
Brian A. Millen ◽  
Bruce J. Kinon ◽  
Juan-Carlos Gomez
Keyword(s):  
Weight Gain ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Blind Comparison

We tested the hypothesis that long-term treatment with pomaglumetad methionil would demonstrate significantly less weight gain than aripiprazole in patients with schizophrenia. In this 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 study, 678 schizophrenia patients were randomized to either pomaglumetad methionil (n=516) or aripiprazole (n=162). Treatment groups were also compared on efficacy and various safety measures, including serious adverse events (SAEs), discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), and suicide-related thoughts and behaviors. The pomaglumetad methionil group showed significantly greater weight loss at Week 24 (Visit 12) compared with the aripiprazole group (−2.8 ± 0.4 versus 0.4 ± 0.6;P<0.001). However, change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores for aripiprazole was significantly greater than for pomaglumetad methionil (−15.58 ± 1.58 versus −12.03 ± 0.99;P=0.045). The incidences of SAEs (8.2% versus 3.1%;P=0.032) and discontinuation due to AEs (16.2% versus 8.7%;P=0.020) were significantly higher for pomaglumetad methionil compared with aripiprazole. No statistically significant differences in the incidence of TEAEs, EPS, or suicidal ideation or behavior were noted between treatment groups. In conclusion, long-term treatment with pomaglumetad methionil resulted in significantly less weight gain than aripiprazole. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.govNCT01328093.

scholarly journals Reducing the Toxicity of Long-Term Glucocorticoid Treatment in Large Vessel Vasculitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andriko Palmowski ◽  
Frank Buttgereit
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Takayasu Arteritis ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Large Vessel Vasculitis ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Glucocorticoid Treatment ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Higher Doses

Abstract Purpose While glucocorticoids (GCs) are effective in large vessel vasculitis (LVV), they may cause serious adverse events (AEs), especially if taken for longer durations and at higher doses. Unfortunately, patients suffering from LVV often need long-term treatment with GCs; therefore, toxicity needs to be expected and countered. Recent Findings GCs remain the mainstay of therapy for both giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis. In order to minimize their toxicity, the following strategies should be considered: GC tapering, administration of conventional synthetic (e.g., methotrexate) or biologic (e.g., tocilizumab) GC-sparing agents, as well as monitoring, prophylaxis, and treatment of GC-related AEs. Several drugs are currently under investigation to expand the armamentarium for the treatment of LVV. Summary GC treatment in LVV is effective but associated with toxicity. Strategies to minimize this toxicity should be applied when treating patients suffering from LVV.

scholarly journals Spotlight on eltrombopag in pediatric ITP in China: a long-term observational study in real-world practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (19) ◽  
pp. 3799-3806
Author(s):  
Xiaoling Cheng ◽  
LingLing Fu ◽  
Jingyao Ma ◽  
Hao Gu ◽  
Zhenping Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Platelet Counts ◽  
Chronic Itp ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Concomitant Medications

Abstract Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder with isolated thrombocytopenia and risk of hemorrhage. Treatment with eltrombopag increases and maintains hemostatic platelet counts; however, to date, long-term data are lacking on the outcome of children with ITP who are treated with eltrombopag. This prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study evaluated the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag in pediatric patients with persistent or chronic ITP. For the 116 pediatric patients enrolled, duration of eltrombopag treatment was at least 3 months. Median effective dose was 25 mg/day, 50 mg/day, and 50 mg/day, respectively, for children age 5 years or younger, 6 to 11 years, or 12 years or older. In all, 89 patients (76.7%) achieved overall response, 53 (45.7%) achieved complete response, and 36 (31.0%) achieved response. Median platelet counts increased by week 1 and were sustained throughout the treatment period. During treatment with eltrombopag, the proportion of patients with grade 1 to 4 bleeding symptoms decreased from 83.61% at baseline to 9.88% at 6 months when only grade 1 was reported. Forty-three patients (37.1%) reported using concomitant medications at study entry, which was reduced to 1 patient (2.5%) who needed concomitant medications at 12 months. All adverse events were grade 1 or 2 according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. No serious adverse events, cataracts, malignancies, or thromboses were reported during the study. Long-term treatment with eltrombopag was generally safe, well tolerated, and effective in maintaining platelet counts and reducing bleeding in most pediatric patients with persistent or chronic ITP. Combined with future studies, these findings will help establish how eltrombopag should best be used in the management of pediatric patients with East Asian ancestry.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response trial of oral clodronate in patients with bone metastases.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 929-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
N O'Rourke ◽  
E McCloskey ◽  
F Houghton ◽  
H Huss ◽  
J A Kanis
Keyword(s):  
Term Treatment ◽  
Calcium Excretion ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Oral Clodronate

PURPOSE Despite evidence that clodronate inhibits tumor-induced osteolysis, no studies have directly assessed the optimal dose for long-term treatment. The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to determine the safety and efficacy of different doses of clodronate in affected patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eighty-four patients with tumor-induced osteolysis were randomized to receive treatment with placebo, or 400 mg, 1,600 mg, or 3,200 mg of clodronate, daily for 4 weeks. Patients were reviewed weekly during treatment. Fasting urinary calcium excretion was the primary variable used to assess response. Visual analog pain scores and adverse events were documented. RESULTS In the clodronate-treated groups, there was a dose-dependent reduction in fasting calcium excretion with a highly significant difference between placebo and 1,600 mg clodronate (P = .0002) and placebo and 3,200 mg clodronate (P = .0001), but no significant difference between 1,600 mg and 3,200 mg clodronate. There was no discernible change in pain scores or analgesic requirements. Bone-derived isoenzyme alkaline phosphatase values increased in all groups, with a significant difference between baseline and final values in the 1,600-mg and 3,200-mg groups (P < .01 and P = .03, respectively). Adverse events were distributed evenly across the four treatment groups. Compliance was greater than 99% in all treatment groups. CONCLUSION Oral clodronate at a dose of 1,600 mg or 3,200 mg will inhibit bone resorption. Since there was no significant difference between these two doses in terms of efficacy at 4 weeks, 1,600 mg/d can be recommended for long-term treatment. This dose is well tolerated and may promote bone repair, as judged by increases in bone alkaline phosphatase levels.

scholarly journals Double-blind comparison of the effects of long-term treatment with doxazosin or atenolol on serum lipoproteins.

1986 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. 77S-81S ◽  
Author(s):  
A Lehtonen ◽  
P Himanen ◽  
M Saraste ◽  
K Niittymaki ◽  
J Marniemi
Keyword(s):  
Term Treatment ◽  
Serum Lipoproteins ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Blind Comparison

scholarly journals Automated summaries of serious adverse events in the hepatitis C antiviral long-term treatment against cirrhosis trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 618-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret C Bell ◽  
Patricia R Robuck ◽  
Elizabeth C Wright ◽  
Marina S Mihova ◽  
Charlotte Hofmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Long Term Treatment

Long-Term, Open-Label Extension Study of Guanfacine Extended Release in Children and Adolescents with ADHD

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 1047-1055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Biederman ◽  
Raun D. Melmed ◽  
Anil Patel ◽  
Keith McBurnett ◽  
Jessica Donahue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Extended Release ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Multicenter Trial ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Open Label Extension

ABSTRACTIntroduction:Guanfacine is a noradrenergic agonist that is believed to improve symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) through selective actions at α2A-adrenoceptors in the prefrontal cortex. A recent double-blind, multicenter trial supports the efficacy and safety of guanfacine extended release (GXR) for pediatric ADHD. This long-term, open-label extension was conducted to study the safety profile and effectiveness of GXR for up to 2 years.Methods:Subjects were 240 children 6–17 years of age with a diagnosis of ADHD who participated in the preceding randomized trial. GXR was initiated at 2 mg/day and titrated as needed in 1-mg increments to a maximum of 4 mg/day to achieve optimal clinical response.Results:The most common adverse events were somnolence (30.4%), headache (26.3%), fatigue (14.2%), and sedation (13.3%). Somnolence, sedation, and fatigue were usually transient. Cardiovascular-related adverse events were uncommon, although small reductions in mean blood pressure and pulse rate were evident at monthly visits. ADHD Rating Scale, Version IV, total and subscale scores improved significantly from baseline to endpoint for all dose groups (P<.001 for all comparisons, intent-to-treat population).Conclusion:Long-term treatment with GXR was generally safe for up to 24 months of treatment, and effectiveness was maintained over this treatment period.

scholarly journals Venlafaxine Extended Release (ER) in the Treatment of Generalised Anxiety Disorder

2001 ◽  
Vol 179 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christer Allgulander ◽  
David Hackett ◽  
Eliseo Salinas
Keyword(s):  
Anxiety Disorder ◽  
Extended Release ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Generalised Anxiety Disorder ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Higher Doses

BackgroundGeneralised anxiety disorder (GAD) has received less study than other anxiety disorders, particularly its long-term treatment.AimsTo assess the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine extended release (ER) in patients with GAD.MethodA total of 541 out-patients, 18–86 years old, were recruited to this 24-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of three fixed doses (37.5, 75 and 150 mg/day) of venlafaxine ER.ResultsAll doses of venlafaxine ER showed efficacy superior to placebo, apparent from week 2, that was sustained throughout the 24-week study for the two higher doses. The discontinuation rate did not differ significantly among the treatment groups.ConclusionsVenlafaxine ER is an effective and safe treatment for GAD for up to 6 months.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document