scholarly journals Validation of the New Algorithm for Rain Rate Retrieval from AMSR2 Data Using TMI Rain Rate Product

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizaveta Zabolotskikh ◽  
Bertrand Chapron

A new algorithm is derived for rain rate (RR) estimation from Advanced Microwave Sounding Radiometer 2 (AMSR2) measurements taken at 6.9, 7.3, and 10.65 GHz. The algorithm is based on the numerical simulation of brightness temperatures (TB) for AMSR2 lower frequency channels, using a simplified radiation transfer model. Simultaneous meteorological and hydrological observations, supplemented with modeled values of cloud liquid water content and rain rate values, are used for the calculation of an ensemble of AMSR2TBs and RRs. Ice clouds are not taken into account. AMSR2 brightness temperature differences at C- and X-band channels are then used as inputs to train a neural network (NN) function for RR retrieval. Validation is performed against Tropical Rain Measurement Mission (TRMM) Microwave Instrument (TMI) RR products. For colocated AMSR2-TMI measurements, obtained within 10 min intervals, errors are about 1 mm/h. The new algorithm is applicable for RR estimation up to 20 mm/h. ForRR<2 mm/h the retrieval error is 0.3 mm/h. ForRR>10 mm/h the algorithm significantly underestimates TMI RR.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Garnier ◽  
Jacques Pelon ◽  
Nicolas Pascal ◽  
Mark A. Vaughan ◽  
Philippe Dubuisson ◽  
...  

Abstract. Following the release of the Version 4 Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) data products from the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) mission, a new version 4 (V4) of the CALIPSO Imaging Infrared Radiometer (IIR) Level 2 data products has been developed. The IIR Level 2 data products include cloud effective emissivities and cloud microphysical properties such as effective diameter and ice or liquid water path estimates. Dedicated retrievals for water clouds were added in V4, taking advantage of the high sensitivity of the IIR retrieval technique to small particle sizes. This paper (Part I) describes the improvements in the V4 algorithms compared to those used in the version 3 (V3) release, while results will be presented in a companion (Part II) paper. To reduce biases at very small emissivities that were made evident in V3, the radiative transfer model used to compute clear sky brightness temperatures over oceans has been updated and tuned for the simulations using MERRA-2 data to match IIR observations in clear sky conditions. Furthermore, the clear-sky mask has been refined compared to V3 by taking advantage of additional information now available in the V4 CALIOP 5-km layer products used as an input to the IIR algorithm. After sea surface emissivity adjustments, observed and computed brightness temperatures differ by less than ± 0.2 K at night for the three IIR channels centered at 08.65, 10.6, and 12.05 µm, and inter-channel biases are reduced from several tens of Kelvin in V3 to less than 0.1 K in V4. We have also aimed at improving retrievals in ice clouds having large optical depths by refining the determination of the radiative temperature needed for emissivity computation. The initial V3 estimate, namely the cloud centroid temperature derived from CALIOP, is corrected using a parameterized function of temperature difference between cloud base and top altitudes, cloud absorption optical depth, and the CALIOP multiple scattering correction factor. As shown in Part II, this improvement reduces the low biases at large optical depths that were seen in V3, and increases the number of retrievals in dense ice clouds. As in V3, the IIR microphysical retrievals use the concept of microphysical indices applied to the pairs of IIR channels at 12.05 μm and 10.6 μm and at 12.05 μm and 08.65 μm. The V4 algorithm uses ice look-up tables (LUTs) built using two ice crystal models from the recent TAMUice 2016 database, namely the single hexagonal column model and the 8-element column aggregate model, from which bulk properties are synthesized using a gamma size distribution. Four sets of effective diameters derived from a second approach are also reported in V4. Here, the LUTs are analytical functions relating microphysical index applied to IIR channels 12.05 µm and 10.6 µm and effective diameter as derived from in situ measurements at tropical and mid-latitudes during the TC4 and SPARTICUS field experiments.


2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (S283) ◽  
pp. 520-521
Author(s):  
Dejan Vinković ◽  
Bruce Balick

AbstractNew Hubble images of the reflection nebula CRL 2688 from 0.6 to 1.6μm reveal significant variations of color and opacity in the distribution of scattered starlight. We have constructed a detailed radiation-transfer model consisting principally of an optically thick equatorial disk-like structure; bipolar lobes with density enhancements along the polar axis and at the base of lobes; an optically thin extended envelope containing spherical density-enhanced shells to mimic the outer rings of CRL 2688; and a pair of near-stellar caps that collimate and redden the dispersing starlight near its source. Our model nicely reproduces all of the basic features detected in the HST images, including the famous searchlights and arcs, as well as the measured spectral energy distribution (“SED”) of CRL 2688. Assuming a distance of 420 pc we estimate the light originates in a giant star with a temperature T ~ 7000 K and a luminosity L = 5500 ± 1100 L⊙.


2019 ◽  
Vol 224 ◽  
pp. 138-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.B. Korras-Carraca ◽  
V. Pappas ◽  
N. Hatzianastassiou ◽  
I. Vardavas ◽  
C. Matsoukas

2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1789-1812 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Thiel ◽  
L. Ammannato ◽  
A. Bais ◽  
B. Bandy ◽  
M. Blumthaler ◽  
...  

Abstract. Ultraviolet radiation is the key factor driving tropospheric photochemistry. It is strongly modulated by clouds and aerosols. A quantitative understanding of the radiation field and its effect on photochemistry is thus only possible with a detailed knowledge of the interaction between clouds and radiation. The overall objective of the project INSPECTRO was the characterization of the three-dimensional actinic radiation field under cloudy conditions. This was achieved during two measurement campaigns in Norfolk (East Anglia, UK) and Lower Bavaria (Germany) combining space-based, aircraft and ground-based measurements as well as simulations with the one-dimensional radiation transfer model UVSPEC and the three-dimensional radiation transfer model MYSTIC. During both campaigns the spectral actinic flux density was measured at several locations at ground level and in the air by up to four different aircraft. This allows the comparison of measured and simulated actinic radiation profiles. In addition satellite data were used to complete the information of the three dimensional input data set for the simulation. A three-dimensional simulation of actinic flux density data under cloudy sky conditions requires a realistic simulation of the cloud field to be used as an input for the 3-D radiation transfer model calculations. Two different approaches were applied, to derive high- and low-resolution data sets, with a grid resolution of about 100 m and 1 km, respectively. The results of the measured and simulated radiation profiles as well as the results of the ground based measurements are presented in terms of photolysis rate profiles for ozone and nitrogen dioxide. During both campaigns all spectroradiometer systems agreed within ±10% if mandatory corrections e.g. stray light correction were applied. Stability changes of the systems were below 5% over the 4 week campaign periods and negligible over a few days. The J(O1D) data of the single monochromator systems can be evaluated for zenith angles less than 70°, which was satisfied by nearly all airborne measurements during both campaigns. The comparison of the airborne measurements with corresponding simulations is presented for the total, downward and upward flux during selected clear sky periods of both campaigns. The compliance between the measured (from three aircraft) and simulated downward and total flux profiles lies in the range of ±15%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document