scholarly journals Cost Analysis and Supply Utilization of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trishul Kapoor ◽  
Sean M. Wrenn ◽  
Peter W. Callas ◽  
Wasef Abu-Jaish
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Acute Care Surgery ◽  
Case Volume ◽  
Case Duration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Care Surgery ◽  
Supply Costs

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the highest volume surgeries performed annually. We hypothesized that there is a statistically significant intradepartmental cost variance with supply utilization variability amongst surgeons of different subspecialty. This study sought to describe laparoscopic cholecystectomy cost of care among three subspecialties of surgeons. This retrospective observational cohort study captured 372 laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases performed between June 2015 and June 2016 by 12 surgeons divided into three subspecialties: 2 in bariatric surgery (BS), 5 in acute care surgery (ACS), and 5 in general surgery (GS). The study utilized a third-party software, Surgical Profitability Compass Procedure Cost Manager and Crimson System (SPCMCS) (The Advisory Board Company, Washington, DC), to stratify case volume, supply cost, case duration, case severity level, and patient length of stay intradepartmentally. Statistical methods included the Kruskal-Wallis test. Average composite supply cost per case was $569 and median supply cost per case was $554. The case volume was 133 (BS), 109 (ACS), and 130 (GS). The median intradepartmental total supply cost was $674.5 (BS), $534 (ACS), and $564 (GS) (P<0.005). ACS and GS presented with a higher standard deviation of cost, $98 (ACS) and $110 (GS) versus $26 (BS). The median case duration was 70 min (BS), 107 min (ACS), and 78 min (GS) (P<0.02). The average patient length of stay was 1.15 (BS), 3.10 (ACS), and 1.17 (GS) (P<0.005). Overall, there was a statistically significant difference in median supply cost (highest in BS; lowest in ACS and GS). However, the higher supply costs may be attenuated by decreased operative time and patient length of stay. Strategies to reduce total supply cost per case include mandating exchange of expensive items, standardization of supply sets, increased price transparency, and education to surgeons.

Role of Laparoscopic Surgery in the Current Management of Mirizzi Syndrome

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 667-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rondi Gelbard ◽  
Desmond Khor ◽  
Kenji Inaba ◽  
Obi Okoye ◽  
Crystal Szczepanski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Mirizzi Syndrome ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Care Surgery

Mirizzi syndrome (MS) is an uncommon complication of cholelithiasis caused by extrinsic biliary compression by stones in the gallbladder infundibulum or cystic duct. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes associated with a laparoscopic approach to this disease process. This is a 10-year, retrospective study conducted at two academic medical centers with established acute care surgery practices. Patients with a diagnosis of MS confirmed intraoperatively were included. Eighty-eight patients with MS were identified with 55 (62.5%) being type 1. Twenty six (29.5%) patients, all type 1, underwent successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Of the 62 patients that underwent open cholecystectomy, 27.3 per cent had a laparoscopy converted to open procedure. There was no significant difference in overall complications (19.2 vs 29%) among those undergoing laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy. Length of stay was lower in patients that had a laparoscopic approach ( P = 0.001). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can safely be attempted in type 1 MS and seems to be associated with fewer overall complications and shorter length of stay compared with an open approach.

An Acute Care Surgery Dilemma: Immediate Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy In Patients On Anti Platelet Therapy

2014 ◽  
Vol 186 (2) ◽  
pp. 495
Author(s):  
H. Aziz ◽  
B. Joseph ◽  
B. Rawashdeh ◽  
N. Kulvatunyou ◽  
V. Pandit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Acute Care Surgery ◽  
Anti Platelet Therapy ◽  
Care Surgery

scholarly journals Morning report decreases length of stay in emergency general surgery patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
James R. Gardner ◽  
John D. Wolfe ◽  
William C. Beck ◽  
Kevin W. Sexton ◽  
Avi Bhavaraju ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
General Surgery ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Acute Care Surgery ◽  
Morning Report ◽  
Emergency General Surgery ◽  
Medical Specialties ◽  
Surgical Critical Care ◽  
Care Surgery

Objective: Communication in the hospital setting is an easy target for quality improvement. Capturing this change via communication between providers during hand-offs is necessary to reduce delays and errors. While this process has been more widely characterized in medical specialties, we designed this study to address the knowledge gap in surgical specialties.Methods: Our institution’s division of Acute Care Surgery (ACS) implemented Morning Report (MR) in October of 2015. At MR, all admissions and service transfers were discussed from Trauma, Emergency General Surgery (EGS), and Surgical Critical Care services from the previous 24 hours. This study compared patients who underwent a surgical procedure during their hospital stay before and after protocol implementation.Results: 974 patients were included in this study. The average patient was 50.3 years of age, 65.4% were white, and 51.7% were male. The average length of stay (LOS) was 8.3 days with 1.75 days to procedure. The post-MR cohort LOS was 2.7 shorter and had 0.85 fewer days to procedure. In an adjusted regression analysis, days to procedure and LOS decreased by 33% (p < .01) and 17% (p < .01) respectively.Conclusions: Implementation of MR led to a decrease in the overall LOS and days to procedure for operative patients. Our results advocate for the standard use of structured hand-offs in surgical units.

Implementation of an Acute Care Surgery Service in a Community Hospital: Impact on Hospital Efficiency and Patient Outcomes

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Kalina
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Hospital Efficiency ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Acute Care Surgery ◽  
Health Evaluation ◽  
Care Surgery

A service led by acute care surgeons managing trauma, critically ill surgical, and emergency general surgery patients via an acute care surgery model of patient care improves hospital efficiency and patient outcomes at university-affiliated hospitals and American College of Surgeons–verified trauma centers. Our goal was to determine whether an acute care surgeon led service, entitled the Surgical Trauma and Acute Resuscitative Service (STARS) that implemented an acute care surgery model of patient care, could improve hospital efficiency and patient outcomes at a community hospital. A total of 492 patient charts were reviewed, which included 230 before the implementation of the STARS [pre-STARS (control)] and 262 after the implementation of the STARS [post-STARS (study)]. Demographics included age, gender, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation 2 score, and medical comorbidities. Efficiency data included length of stay in emergency department (ED-LOS), length of stay in surgical intensive care unit (SICU-LOS), and length of stay in hospital (H-LOS), and total in hospital charges. Average age was 64.1 + 16.4 years, 255 males (51.83%) and 237 females (48.17%). Average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation 2 score was 11.9 + 5.8. No significant differences in demographics were observed. Average decreases in ED-LOS (9.7 + 9.6 hours, pre-STARS versus 6.6 + 4.5 hours, post-STARS), SICU-LOS (5.3 + 9.6 days, pre-STARS versus 3.5 + 4.8 days, post-STARS), H-LOS (12.4 + 12.7 days, pre-STARS versus 11.4 + 11.3 days, post-STARS), and total in hospital charges ($419,602.6 + $519,523.0 pre-STARS to $374,816.7 + $411,935.8 post-STARS) post-STARS. Regression analysis revealed decreased ED-LOS—2.9 hours [ P = 0.17; 95% confidence interval (CI): -7.0, 1.2], SICU-LOS—6.3 days ( P < 0.001; 95% CI: -9.3, -3.2), H-LOS—7.6 days ( P = 0.001; 95% CI: -12.1, -3.1), and 3.4 times greater odds of survival ( P = 0.04; 95% CI: 1.1, 10.7) post-STARS. In conclusion, implementation of the STARS improved hospital efficiency and patient outcomes at a community hospital.

Advance Directive and Do-Not-Resuscitate Status among Advanced Cancer Patients with Acute Care Surgical Consultation

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (10) ◽  
pp. 1565-1569
Author(s):  
Lobsang Marcia ◽  
Zane W. Ashman ◽  
Eric B. Pillado ◽  
Dennis Y. Kim ◽  
David S. Plurad
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Acute Care Surgery ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Stage Iv Cancer ◽  
Care Surgery ◽  
Dnr Orders

Formal communication of end-of-life preferences is crucial among patients with metastatic cancer. Our objective is to describe the prevalence of advance directives (AD) and do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders among stage IV cancer patients with acute care surgery consultations, and the associated outcomes. This is a single institution retrospective review over an eight-year period. Two hundred and three patients were identified; mean age was 55.3 ± 11.4 years and 48.8 per cent were male. Fifty (24.6%) patients underwent exploratory surgery. Nineteen (10.6%) patients had another type of surgery. Twenty-one (10.3%) patients had a DNR order, and none had an AD on-admission. Fifty-four (26.6%) patients had a DNR order placed and four (2%) patients completed an AD postadmission. DNR postadmission was associated with the highest mortality at 42.6 per cent compared with 14.3 per cent for DNR on-admission and 1.56 per cent for full-code patients ( P < 0.001). Compared with patients that remained full-code and those with DNR on-admission, DNR postadmission was associated with longer length of stay (19.6 days; P < 0.001) and ICU length of stay (7.72 days; P < 0.001). The prevalence of AD and DNR orders among stage IV cancer patients is low. The higher in-hospital mortality of patients with DNR postadmission reflects the use of DNR orders during clinical decline.

scholarly journals Index Admission Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Our Experience after the Inception of Acute Care Surgery Programme

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Aakif ◽  
Zeeshan Razzaq ◽  
James Byrne ◽  
Hamid Mustafa ◽  
Mudassar Majeed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Index Admission ◽  
Acute Care Surgery ◽  
Biliary Colic ◽  
Biliary Pancreatitis ◽  
Acute Biliary Pancreatitis ◽  
Symptomatic Disease ◽  
Care Surgery

Abstract Background: Gallstones are very common and frequently present as acute cholecystitis in up to 20 % of patients with symptomatic disease, with wide variation in severity. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard for treatment of symptomatic disease. Although multiple studies have confirmed its safety, LC at index admission is still not widely practiced in Ireland. We present our experience of a cohort of patients who underwent index admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Cork University Hospital since the start of the acute care surgery program in May 2017.Aim: To determine the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy at index admission.Methods: All adult patients who presented to an acute surgical assessment unit (ASAU) with symptomatic gall stone disease and underwent early laparoscopic cholecystectomy at index admission were included. The duration of this prospective cohort study was 27 months (May 2017 to July 2019). Patient demographics, indication for surgery, post-operative complications and conversion rates were recorded. In addition, timing of imaging, imaging findings and length of hospital stay were also noted.Results: A total of 233 patients underwent laparoscopic Cholecystectomy at index admission for various indications. Median age was 50 years with range between 16 - 88. Male to female ratio was 1: 1.78. 142 (61%) patients had acute cholecystitis, while the other indications were CBD obstruction (15.5%), biliary colic (11%) and acute biliary pancreatitis (10.5%). 93 (40%) patients had pre-op MRCP while 41 (17.6%) underwent pre-op ERCP. All except 3 patients undergoing ERCP had pre-procedure MRCP. 2 patients had intra-operative cholangiograms. Overall morbidity was 4.7%. In terms of complications, 3 (1.3%) patients had bile leak and only 1 (0.85%) had re-operation. There was 1 common bile duct injury and only 1 conversion to open surgery. There was no mortality in this case series. The average length of hospital stay was 5.6 days. (Range 2 to 14 days).Conclusions: Index admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, biliary colic and acute biliary pancreatitis, has been a safe and feasible treatment option in our hospital. A safe practice can be ensured by adherence to this care pathway and a multidisciplinary, consultant-led service. Index cholecystectomy service can be provided safely to reduce disease-related morbidity and multiple re-admissions in patients awaiting interval surgery.

scholarly journals Intraoperative safety of low pressure pneumoperitoneum cholecystectomy: a comparative study

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 3679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salil Mahajan ◽  
Manu Shankar ◽  
Vinod K. Garg ◽  
Vijender Gupta ◽  
Jaya Sorout
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Parietal Peritoneum ◽  
Working Space ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Operative Difficulty ◽  
Secondary Port ◽  
Care Surgery ◽  
Bile Spillage

Background: With the establishment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as gold standard for management of cholelithiasis, the current stress is on increasing patient safety. Hence, this study was undertaken to compare the effect of low pressure pneumoperitoneum (LPP <10mm Hg) versus high pressure pneumoperitoneum (HPP >14mm Hg) in a prospective randomized manner on intraoperative safety, assessing the working space and safety by seeing contact of parietal peritoneum to underlying viscera during secondary port insertion.Methods: 120 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized into the LPP (<10mm Hg) group (n=60) and the HPP (>14mm Hg) group (n=60) prospectively. Available working space assessed directly, safety by contact of parietal peritoneum to underlying viscera during secondary port insertion and operative difficulty assessed by visualization, dissection and grasping, total duration of surgery; intra-operative gas consumption, and bile spillage were assessed.Results: There was no significant difference in terms of available working space, operative duration, consumption of carbon dioxide, surgeon’s operative difficulty and intraoperative bile spillage. Out of 180 secondary ports inserted, there was evident contact of 20 (11.1%) secondary ports in high pressure groups and 14 (7.7%) secondary ports in low pressure group, which is suggestive of adequate exposure and working space available for surgery at both pressures.Conclusions: Low-pressure cholecystectomy did not compromise intraoperative safety and should be the standard of care in day care surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document