Advance Directive and Do-Not-Resuscitate Status among Advanced Cancer Patients with Acute Care Surgical Consultation

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (10) ◽  
pp. 1565-1569
Author(s):  
Lobsang Marcia ◽  
Zane W. Ashman ◽  
Eric B. Pillado ◽  
Dennis Y. Kim ◽  
David S. Plurad
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Acute Care Surgery ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Stage Iv Cancer ◽  
Care Surgery ◽  
Dnr Orders

Formal communication of end-of-life preferences is crucial among patients with metastatic cancer. Our objective is to describe the prevalence of advance directives (AD) and do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders among stage IV cancer patients with acute care surgery consultations, and the associated outcomes. This is a single institution retrospective review over an eight-year period. Two hundred and three patients were identified; mean age was 55.3 ± 11.4 years and 48.8 per cent were male. Fifty (24.6%) patients underwent exploratory surgery. Nineteen (10.6%) patients had another type of surgery. Twenty-one (10.3%) patients had a DNR order, and none had an AD on-admission. Fifty-four (26.6%) patients had a DNR order placed and four (2%) patients completed an AD postadmission. DNR postadmission was associated with the highest mortality at 42.6 per cent compared with 14.3 per cent for DNR on-admission and 1.56 per cent for full-code patients ( P < 0.001). Compared with patients that remained full-code and those with DNR on-admission, DNR postadmission was associated with longer length of stay (19.6 days; P < 0.001) and ICU length of stay (7.72 days; P < 0.001). The prevalence of AD and DNR orders among stage IV cancer patients is low. The higher in-hospital mortality of patients with DNR postadmission reflects the use of DNR orders during clinical decline.

Exploratory Study of Advance Care Discussions Among Chinese American and White Stage IV Cancer Patients at an American Tertiary Medical Center

2021 ◽  
pp. 104990912110126
Author(s):  
Avery Caz Glover ◽  
Courtney Schroeder ◽  
Emma Ernst ◽  
Tamara Vesel
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Exploratory Study ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Chinese American ◽  
Chinese Americans ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Essential Components ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Stage Iv Cancer ◽  
White Patients

Purpose: Timely advance care discussions are essential components of quality care for diverse populations; however, little is known about these conversations among Chinese American cancer patients. This exploratory study describes differences in advance care discussions and planning between Chinese American and White advanced cancer patients. Methods: We collected data for 63 Chinese American and 63 White stage IV cancer patients who died between 2013 and 2018. We compared: frequency and timing of prognosis, goals of care (GOC), and end-of-life care (EOLC) discussions in the final year of life; family inclusion in discussions; healthcare proxy (HCP) identification; do not resuscitate (DNR) order, do not intubate (DNI) order, and other advance directive (AD) completion. We did not conduct statistical tests due to the study’s exploratory nature. Results: Among Chinese American and White patients, respectively, 76% and 71% had prognosis, 51% and 56% had GOC, and 89% and 84% had EOLC discussions. Prognosis, GOC, and EOLC discussions were held a median of 34.0, 15.5, and 34.0 days before death among Chinese American and 17.0, 13.0, and 24.0 days before death among White patients. Documentation rates among Chinese American and White patients were 79% and 76% for DNRs, 81% and 71% for DNIs, 79% and 81% for HCPs, and 52% and 40% for other ADs. Conclusions: Findings suggest that Chinese Americans had similar rates of advance care discussions, completed conversations earlier, and had similar to higher rates of AD documentation compared to White patients. Further studies are needed to confirm our preliminary findings.

Implementation of an Acute Care Surgery Service in a Community Hospital: Impact on Hospital Efficiency and Patient Outcomes

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Kalina
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Hospital Efficiency ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Acute Care Surgery ◽  
Health Evaluation ◽  
Care Surgery

A service led by acute care surgeons managing trauma, critically ill surgical, and emergency general surgery patients via an acute care surgery model of patient care improves hospital efficiency and patient outcomes at university-affiliated hospitals and American College of Surgeons–verified trauma centers. Our goal was to determine whether an acute care surgeon led service, entitled the Surgical Trauma and Acute Resuscitative Service (STARS) that implemented an acute care surgery model of patient care, could improve hospital efficiency and patient outcomes at a community hospital. A total of 492 patient charts were reviewed, which included 230 before the implementation of the STARS [pre-STARS (control)] and 262 after the implementation of the STARS [post-STARS (study)]. Demographics included age, gender, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation 2 score, and medical comorbidities. Efficiency data included length of stay in emergency department (ED-LOS), length of stay in surgical intensive care unit (SICU-LOS), and length of stay in hospital (H-LOS), and total in hospital charges. Average age was 64.1 + 16.4 years, 255 males (51.83%) and 237 females (48.17%). Average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation 2 score was 11.9 + 5.8. No significant differences in demographics were observed. Average decreases in ED-LOS (9.7 + 9.6 hours, pre-STARS versus 6.6 + 4.5 hours, post-STARS), SICU-LOS (5.3 + 9.6 days, pre-STARS versus 3.5 + 4.8 days, post-STARS), H-LOS (12.4 + 12.7 days, pre-STARS versus 11.4 + 11.3 days, post-STARS), and total in hospital charges ($419,602.6 + $519,523.0 pre-STARS to $374,816.7 + $411,935.8 post-STARS) post-STARS. Regression analysis revealed decreased ED-LOS—2.9 hours [ P = 0.17; 95% confidence interval (CI): -7.0, 1.2], SICU-LOS—6.3 days ( P < 0.001; 95% CI: -9.3, -3.2), H-LOS—7.6 days ( P = 0.001; 95% CI: -12.1, -3.1), and 3.4 times greater odds of survival ( P = 0.04; 95% CI: 1.1, 10.7) post-STARS. In conclusion, implementation of the STARS improved hospital efficiency and patient outcomes at a community hospital.

Aggressive care at the end of life: A study of practice based factors in patients with stage IV cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 80-80
Author(s):  
Mohammad Omar Atiq ◽  
Rahul Ravilla ◽  
Ajay Kumar ◽  
Sajjad Haider ◽  
Ji-Ling Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Goals Of Care ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Aggressive Care ◽  
Stage Iv Cancer ◽  
End Stage

80 Background: Numerous studies established that early utilization of palliative care-hospice services are beneficial to cancer patients. To reduce the incidence of aggressive care in terminal cancer patients, we conducted a quality improvement study to identify pertinent risk factors and develop interventions. Methods: Through chart review, we retrospectively identified patients with stage IV cancer that were followed by oncology clinic and were admitted to the University Hospital between 8/1/2015-10/31/15. For those patients who died during the last hospitalization or were discharged to hospice care, we obtained demographic, cancer related and practice related variables listed in Table. We used Mann Whitney U test and multivariable regression to find effects of factors related to length of stay (LOS) and cost of stay (COS). Results: Length of stay was significantly prolonged in those receiving chemotherapy within the past month (6 vs 3 p=0.035). Multivariate analyses found that patients with goals of care documented in the clinic had lower COS by 36.7% and LOS by 46.7%. On average, an ICU stay resulted in COS 2.2 times higher. No significant difference was seen in LOS based on a documented palliative care clinic visit or presence of an advanced directive. Conclusions: We identified practice based factors that need improvement including earlier goals of care conversations and less chemotherapy at the end of life. Identifying end stage patients in earlier admissions, collaborating with palliative care, and adding goals of care documentation to clinic note templates, are all interventions we are studying to improve care for end stage cancer patients. [Table: see text]

Predicting Postoperative Complications for Acute Care Surgery Patients Using the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (7) ◽  
pp. 733-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica R. Burgess ◽  
Benjamin Smith ◽  
Rebecca Britt ◽  
Leonard Weireter ◽  
Travis Polk
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Acute Care Surgery ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Risk Calculator ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Acs Nsqip ◽  
Care Surgery ◽  
Tract Infections

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) risk calculator has been used to assist surgeons in predicting the risk of postoperative complications. This study aims to determine if the risk calculator accurately predicts complications in acute care surgical patients undergoing laparotomy. A retrospective review was performed on all patients on the acute care surgery service at a tertiary hospital who underwent laparotomy between 2011 and 2012. The preoperative risk factors were used to calculate the estimated risks of postoperative complications in both the original ACS NSQIP calculator and updated calculator (June 2016). The predicted rate of complications was then compared with the actual rate of complications. Ninety-five patients were included. Both risk calculators accurately predicted the risk of pneumonia, cardiac complications, urinary tract infections, venous thromboembolism, renal failure, unplanned returns to operating room, discharge to nursing facility, and mortality. Both calculators underestimated serious complications (26% vs 39%), overall complications (32.4% vs 45.3%), surgical site infections (9.3% vs 20%), and length of stay (9.7 days versus 13.1 days). When patients with prolonged hospitalization were excluded, the updated calculator accurately predicted length of stay. The ACS NSQIP risk calculator underestimates the overall risk of complications, surgical infections, and length of stay. The updated calculator accurately predicts length of stay for patients <30 days. The acute care surgical population represents a high-risk population with an increased rate of complications. This should be taken into account when using the risk calculator to predict postoperative risk in this population.

Influence of timing of goals of care discussion on hospitalization outcomes in metastatic cancer patients.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18183-e18183
Author(s):  
Oluwadunni Emiloju ◽  
Djeneba Audrey Djibo ◽  
Jean G Ford
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Goals Of Care

e18183 Background: Cancer patients often require acute hospitalizations, many of which are unplanned. These hospitalizations have been shown to increase in frequency near the end of life. The American College of Physicians recommends that goals of care (GOC) discussions be initiated early for metastatic cancers. We hypothesize that discussing GOC during hospitalization will help reduce readmissions and improve patient satisfaction, by helping to ensure that patients receive goal-congruent care. We aim to examine the association between the timing of GOC discussion and the patient's length of stay and the time to hospital readmission. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records of patients with stage IV solid tumors who were hospitalized acutely between August 2017 and July 2018 (N = 241). We assessed demographics, clinical information, timing of GOC discussion, use of palliative care services and hospital readmissions within 90 days. Chi-square tests were used to identify independent associations with having a GOC discussion; and anova was used for continuous variables. We used logistic regression to examine the association with a hospital readmission within 90 days, controlling for potential confounders. Results: The subjects were 26-92 years old and 40.6% were female. Only 43% (n = 106) of patients had a GOC discussion. Age, gender, tumor site, and presenting complaint were not independently associated with having a GOC discussion (p > 0.05). Overall, 34.4% (n = 83) had a palliative care encounter. Having a palliative care consult and being admitted to critical care were independently associated with having a GOC discussion. Early timing of GOC discussion was inversely associated with admission to critical care units (p < 0.05). Length of stay was positively correlated with having a GOC discussion. Thirty-seven percent (n = 91) had unplanned hospital readmission within 90 days. Having any GOC discussion reduced the odds of an unplanned hospital readmission within 90 days by 75% [OR = 0.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14-0.45]. Conclusions: Among hospitalized patients with stage IV cancer, performing an early GOC discussion is associated with better hospitalization outcomes. It is therefore important to perform GOC discussion early when such patients are acutely hospitalized.

Influence of timing of goals of care discussion on hospitalization outcomes in metastatic cancer patients.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 219-219
Author(s):  
Oluwadunni Emiloju ◽  
Jean G Ford ◽  
Djeneba Audrey Djibo
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Goals Of Care

219 Background: Cancer patients often require acute hospitalizations, and these hospitalizations have been shown to increase in frequency near the end of life. The American College of Physicians recommends that goals of care (GOC) discussions be initiated early for metastatic cancers. Discussing GOC during hospitalization can help reduce readmissions and improve patient satisfaction, by helping to ensure that patients receive goal-congruent care. We aim to examine the association between the timing of GOC discussion and the patient's length of stay and the time to hospital readmission. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records of patients with stage IV solid tumors who were hospitalized acutely between August 2017 and July 2018. We assessed demographics, timing of GOC discussion, use of palliative care services and hospital readmissions within 90 days. Chi-square tests were used to identify independent associations with having a GOC discussion; and anova was used for continuous variables. We used logistic regression to examine the association with a hospital readmission within 90 days, controlling for potential confounders. Results: The subjects were 26-92 years old and 40.6% were female. Only 46% (n = 112) of patients had a GOC discussion. Age, tumor site, and presenting complaint were not independently associated with having a GOC discussion (p > 0.05). Overall, 34% (n = 82) had a palliative care encounter. Having a palliative care consult and being admitted to critical care were independently associated with having a GOC discussion. Early timing of GOC discussion was inversely associated with admission to critical care units (p < 0.05). Length of stay was positively correlated with having a GOC discussion. Thirty-eight percent (n = 92) had unplanned hospital readmission within 90 days. Having any GOC discussion reduced the odds of an unplanned hospital readmission within 90 days by 79% [OR = 0.21, 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.37]. Conclusions: Among hospitalized patients with stage IV cancer, performing an early GOC discussion is associated with better hospitalization outcomes. It is therefore important to perform GOC discussion early when such patients are acutely hospitalized.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document