scholarly journals Roles of Methylated DNA Biomarkers in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyao Ma ◽  
Marissa Williams ◽  
Yuen Yee Cheng ◽  
Wai K. Leung

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cancer globally; therefore, early diagnosis and surveillance of this cancer are of paramount importance. Current methods of CRC diagnosis rely heavily on endoscopy or radiological imaging. Noninvasive tests including serum detection of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) are associated with low sensitivity and specificity, especially at early stages. DNA methylation biomarkers have recently been found to have higher accuracy in CRC detection and enhanced prediction of prognosis and chemotherapy response. The most widely studied biomarker in CRC is methylated septin 9 (SEPT9), which is the only FDA-approved methylation-based biomarker for CRC. Apart from SEPT9, other methylated biomarkers including tachykinin-1 (TAC1), somatostatin (SST), and runt-related transcription factor 3 (RUNX3) have been shown to effectively detect CRC in a multitude of sample types. This review will discuss the performances of various methylated biomarkers used for CRC diagnosis and monitoring, when used alone or in combination.

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley D. Bond ◽  
Michael D. Burkitt ◽  
David Sawbridge ◽  
Bernard M. Corfe ◽  
Chris S. Probert

Background & Aims: Colorectal cancer screening programmes that target detection and excision of adenomatous colonic polyps have been shown to reduce colorectal cancer related mortality. Many screening programmes include an initial faecal occult blood test (FOBt) prior to colonoscopy. To refine the selection of patients for colonoscopy other faecal-based diagnostic tools have been proposed, including tumour M2-pyruvate kinase (tM2-PK). To determine whether tM2-PK quantification may have a role in diverse settings we have assessed the assay in a cohort of patients derived from both the England bowel cancer screening programme (BCSP) and symptomatic individuals presenting to secondary care. Method. Patients undergoing colonoscopy provided faecal samples prior to bowel preparation. Faecal tM2-PK concentrations were measured by ELISA. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and ROC analyses were calculated. Results. Ninety-six patients returned faecal samples: 50 of these with adenomas and 7 with cancer. Median age was 68. Median faecal tM2-PK concentration was 3.8 U/mL for individuals without neoplastic findings at colonoscopy, 7.7 U/mL in those with adenomas and 24.4 U/mL in subjects with colorectal cancer (both, p=0.01). ROC analysis demonstrated an AUROC of 0.66 (sensitivity 72.4%, specificity 48.7%, positive predictive value 67.7%, negative predictive value 36.7%). Amongst BCSP patients with a prior positive FOBt faecal tM2-PK was more abundant (median 6.4 U/mL, p=0.03) and its diagnostic accuracy was greater (AUROC 0.82). Conclusion. Our findings confirm that faecal tM2-PK ELISA may have utility as an adjunct to FOBt in a screening context, but do not support its use in symptomatic patients. Abbreviations: BCSP: Bowel cancer screening programme; EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection; FAP: Familial adenomatous polyposis; FOBt: Faecal occult blood testing; NHS: National Health Service; tM2-PK: tumour M2-pyruvate kinase.


2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 305-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isa Ricardo-Rodrigues ◽  
Rodrigo Jiménez-García ◽  
Valentín Hernández-Barrera ◽  
Pilar Carrasco-Garrido ◽  
Isabel Jiménez-Trujillo ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 126-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Saraste ◽  
Daniel J Öhman ◽  
Marika Sventelius ◽  
K Miriam Elfström ◽  
Johannes Blom ◽  
...  

Objectives To assess patterns and probabilities of participation in multiple rounds of colorectal cancer screening. Methods All individuals who were invited to participate in population-based colorectal cancer screening in the Stockholm-Gotland region in Sweden between 1 January 2008 and 30 September 2015 were included in the study. Guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing was used. All individuals invited to the three first consecutive screening rounds were included in the analysis. Results There were 346,168 individuals eligible for invitation to screening. The average participation rate during the follow-up period was 60%. Eligible individuals could be invited 1–4 times, depending on age at first invitation. Of 48,959 individuals invited to the three first consecutive rounds of screening, 71% participated at least once, and 50% participated in all three rounds. Participation at first invitation was a predictor for participation in subsequent rounds, and the likelihood of continuous participation following participation in the first round was 84%. Of those who attended the first and second rounds, 93% also participated in the third round. Similar patterns of consistency were seen among non-participants. For individuals not participating in the first screening round, the likelihood of consistent non-participation was 71. Conclusions Participation in the first round of screening is a strong predictor for participation in subsequent rounds. Therefore, reducing barriers for initial participation is a key for achieving consistent participation over several rounds in organized colorectal cancer screening programmes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolla Hamdan ◽  
Jessie Johnson ◽  
Maryam Fatemi ◽  
Kathleen Benjamin ◽  
Afrah Moosa

Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of death worldwide. Bowel cancer screening helps prevent colon cancer by early detection of polyps, leading to efficient treatment and reduced mortality. Within Qatar, primary health facilities promote bowel screening by using the faecal occult blood test. However, the popularity and use of this test is still low. Aim: The aim of this literature review is to explore barriers related to colorectal cancer bowel screening using the faecal occult blood test in primary health care settings to facilitate colorectal cancer screening in Qatar. Method: Cronin’s five step framework for literature reviews was utilized for this paper. This review included nine articles that were peer-reviewed and published between 2009 and 2019. The nine articles were appraised by using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. This tool has separate criteria to assess the quality of the qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies. Result: Three main barriers to bowel cancer screening included knowledge deficit, personal beliefs and organizational barriers. Conclusion: The main barriers are related to the patients’ lack of knowledge and personal beliefs. Overcoming these barriers is essential to raising awareness about this issue among all nurses, physicians, and patients. It is necessary to involve stakeholders in order to mitigate barriers. Developing educational activities for healthcare professionals will provide information that they can share with patients to encourage screening and decrease the fear of the test. Developing a pamphlet to increase patient awareness will also encourage screening and work toward decreasing fear. Key words: faecal occult blood test, faecal immunochemical test, barriers


2011 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 1571-1577 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Dekker ◽  
L.G.M. van Rossum ◽  
M. Van Vugt-van Pinxteren ◽  
S.H.C. van Stiphout ◽  
R.P.M.G. Hermens ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Bryan J Starkey

Colorectal cancer (CRC) causes 20 000 deaths per annum in the UK alone. Screening has been shown to reduce mortality but debate exists as to which approach to use. Direct visualization of the colorectum has the advantage that it detects lesions most effectively and is required at less frequent intervals, but the procedure is invasive and at present too costly for screening purposes. Faecal occult blood measurement, despite its limitations, is currently the recommended screening method, with follow-up of positive tests by colonoscopy or other visualization techniques. This strategy has been shown to reduce mortality from CRC by about 20% and screening trials directed towards individuals in the over 50 years age group are underway in the UK and elsewhere. Future developments in CRC screening include colorectal visualization by computed colonography - a less-invasive alternative to colonoscopy. Developments in stool analysis are also occurring. Examination of faecal samples for cellular products derived from neoplasms (e.g. calprotectin) may prove more sensitive and specific than faecal occult blood measurements. In addition, detection of altered DNA in faeces is being investigated by molecular biology techniques. Using a multi-target assay panel to detect point mutations and other neoplasia-associated DNA abnormalities may be an effective strategy for CRC screening in the future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document