scholarly journals A New Computer-Aided Diagnosis System with Modified Genetic Feature Selection for BI-RADS Classification of Breast Masses in Mammograms

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Said Boumaraf ◽  
Xiabi Liu ◽  
Chokri Ferkous ◽  
Xiaohong Ma
Keyword(s):  
Feature Selection ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Breast Imaging ◽  
Feature Selection Method ◽  
Computer Aided Diagnosis ◽  
Screening Mammography ◽  
Breast Masses ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Aided Diagnosis

Mammography remains the most prevalent imaging tool for early breast cancer screening. The language used to describe abnormalities in mammographic reports is based on the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Assigning a correct BI-RADS category to each examined mammogram is a strenuous and challenging task for even experts. This paper proposes a new and effective computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system to classify mammographic masses into four assessment categories in BI-RADS. The mass regions are first enhanced by means of histogram equalization and then semiautomatically segmented based on the region growing technique. A total of 130 handcrafted BI-RADS features are then extracted from the shape, margin, and density of each mass, together with the mass size and the patient’s age, as mentioned in BI-RADS mammography. Then, a modified feature selection method based on the genetic algorithm (GA) is proposed to select the most clinically significant BI-RADS features. Finally, a back-propagation neural network (BPN) is employed for classification, and its accuracy is used as the fitness in GA. A set of 500 mammogram images from the digital database for screening mammography (DDSM) is used for evaluation. Our system achieves classification accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Matthews correlation coefficient of 84.5%, 84.4%, 94.8%, and 79.3%, respectively. To our best knowledge, this is the best current result for BI-RADS classification of breast masses in mammography, which makes the proposed system promising to support radiologists for deciding proper patient management based on the automatically assigned BI-RADS categories.

scholarly journals Classification of Breast Masses Using a Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme of Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammograms

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 1419-1431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gopichandh Danala ◽  
Bhavika Patel ◽  
Faranak Aghaei ◽  
Morteza Heidari ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computer Aided Diagnosis ◽  
Breast Masses ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Aided Diagnosis

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATIC TWO STAGES CLASSIFICATION OF BREAST MASS IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAM IMAGES

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (01) ◽  
pp. 1950007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Mohammad Alqudah ◽  
Huda M. S. Algharib ◽  
Amal M. S. Algharib ◽  
Hanan M. S. Algharib
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Computer Aided Diagnosis ◽  
Breast Mass ◽  
Breast Masses ◽  
Cad System ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Two Stages ◽  
Aided Diagnosis ◽  
Mammogram Images

Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer type that is diagnosed in women. The exact causes of such cancer are still unknown. Early and precise detection of breast cancer using mammogram images or biopsy to provide the required medications can increase the healing percentage. There are much current research efforts to developed a computer aided diagnosis (CAD) system based on mammogram images for detecting and classification of breast masses. In this research, a CAD system is developed for automated segmentation and two-stages classification of breast masses. The first stage includes the classification of the masses into seven classes (normal, calcification, circumscribed, spiculated, ill-defined, architectural distortion, asymmetry), which is done using probabilistic neural network (PNN). The second classification stage is to define the severity of abnormality into two classes (Benign and Malignant) which were done using support vector machine (SVM). The results of applying the proposed method on two mammogram image show that the accuracy of detection and segmentation of the breast mass was 99.8% for mammographic image analysis society database (MIAS-DB) with 322 images and 97.5% for breast cancer digital repository (BCDR), BCDR-F03 and BCDR-DN01 with 936 images, while for the first classification stage has accuracy of 97.08%, sensitivity of 98.30% and specificity of 89.8%, and the second classification stage has an accuracy of 99.18%, sensitivity of 98.42% and specificity of 94.90%.

Particle swarm optimized computer aided diagnosis system for classification of breast masses

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 2819-2828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Punitha ◽  
Subban Ravi ◽  
M. Anousouya Devi ◽  
Jothimani Vaishnavi
Keyword(s):  
Particle Swarm ◽  
Computer Aided Diagnosis ◽  
Breast Masses ◽  
Diagnosis System ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Aided Diagnosis

Computer-Aided Diagnosis for the Classification of Breast Masses in Automated Whole Breast Ultrasound Images

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 539-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Woo Kyung Moon ◽  
Yi-Wei Shen ◽  
Chiun-Sheng Huang ◽  
Li-Ren Chiang ◽  
Ruey-Feng Chang
Keyword(s):  
Computer Aided Diagnosis ◽  
Breast Ultrasound ◽  
Ultrasound Images ◽  
Breast Masses ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Aided Diagnosis

scholarly journals Breast elastography: diagnostic performance of computer-aided diagnosis software and interobserver agreement

2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo F. C. Fleury ◽  
Karem Marcomini
Keyword(s):  
Breast Imaging ◽  
Interobserver Agreement ◽  
Visual Assessment ◽  
Computer Aided Diagnosis ◽  
Ultrasound Elastography ◽  
Breast Masses ◽  
Cutoff Value ◽  
Cad System ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Aided Diagnosis

Abstract Objective: To determine the best cutoff value for classifying breast masses by ultrasound elastography, using dedicated software for strain elastography, and to determine the level of interobserver agreement. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 83 patients with 83 breast masses identified on ultrasound and referred for biopsy. After B-mode ultrasound examination, the lesions were manually segmented by three radiologists with varying degrees of experience in breast imaging, designated reader 1 (R1, with 15 years), reader 2 (R2, with 2 years), and reader 3 (R3, with 8 years). Elastography was performed automatically on the best image with computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software. Cutoff values of 70%, 75%, 80%, and 90% of hard areas were applied for determining the performance of the CAD software. The best cutoff value for the most experienced radiologists was then compared with the visual assessment. Interobserver agreement for the best cutoff value was determined, as were the interclass correlation coefficient and concordance among the radiologists for the areas segmented. Results: The best cutoff value of the proportion of hard area within a breast mass, for experienced radiologists, was found to be 75%. At a cutoff value of 75%, the interobserver agreement was excellent between R1 and R2, as well as between R1 and R3, and good between R2 and R3. The interclass concordance coefficient among the three radiologists was 0.950. When assessing the segmented areas by size, we found that the level of agreement was higher among the more experienced radiologists. Conclusion: The best cutoff value for a quantitative CAD system to classify breast masses was 75%.

Breast Cancer Detection and Classification using Traditional Computer Vision Techniques: A Comprehensive Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saliha Zahoor ◽  
Ikram Ullah Lali ◽  
Muhammad Attique Khan ◽  
Kashif Javed ◽  
Waqar Mehmood
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Computer Aided Diagnosis ◽  
Diagnose Breast Cancer ◽  
Initial Stage ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Diagnosis And Classification ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Tools And Techniques ◽  
Aided Diagnosis

: Breast Cancer is a common dangerous disease for women. In the world, many women died due to Breast cancer. However, in the initial stage, the diagnosis of breast cancer can save women's life. To diagnose cancer in the breast tissues there are several techniques and methods. The image processing, machine learning and deep learning methods and techniques are presented in this paper to diagnose the breast cancer. This work will be helpful to adopt better choices and reliable methods to diagnose breast cancer in an initial stage to survive the women's life. To detect the breast masses, microcalcifications, malignant cells the different techniques are used in the Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) systems phases like preprocessing, segmentation, feature extraction, and classification. We have been reported a detailed analysis of different techniques or methods with their usage and performance measurement. From the reported results, it is concluded that for the survival of women’s life it is essential to improve the methods or techniques to diagnose breast cancer at an initial stage by improving the results of the Computer-Aided Diagnosis systems. Furthermore, segmentation and classification phases are challenging for researchers for the diagnosis of breast cancer accurately. Therefore, more advanced tools and techniques are still essential for the accurate diagnosis and classification of breast cancer.

Clinical Application of Computer-Aided Diagnosis According to S-Detect in Category 4 Breast Lesions: Prospective Single-Center Study (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengfei Sun ◽  
Chen Chen ◽  
Weiqi Wang ◽  
Lei Liang ◽  
Dan Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Management ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Breast Biopsy ◽  
Computer Aided Diagnosis ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Breast Masses ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Conventional Ultrasound ◽  
Us Findings ◽  
Aided Diagnosis

BACKGROUND Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) is a useful tool that can provide a reference for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesion. Previous studies have demonstrated that CAD can improve the diagnostic performance. However, conventional ultrasound (US) combined with CAD were used to adjust the classification of category 4 lesions has been few assessed. OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to evaluate the diagnosis performance of conventional ultrasound combined with a CAD system S-Detect in the category of BI-RADS 4 breast lesions. METHODS Between December 2018 and May 2020, we enrolled patients in this study who received conventional ultrasound and S-Detect before US-guided biopsy or surgical excision. The diagnostic performance was compared between US findings only and the combined use of US findings with S-Detect, which were correlated with pathology results. RESULTS A total of 98 patients (mean age 51.06 ±16.25 years, range 22-81) with 110 breast masses (mean size1.97±1.38cm, range0.6-8.5) were included in this study. Of the 110 breast masses, 64/110 (58.18%) were benign, 46/110 (41.82%) were malignant. Compared with conventional ultrasound, a significant increase in specificity (0% to 53.12%, P<.001), accuracy (41.81% to70.19%, P<.001) were noted, with no statistically significant decrease on sensitivity(100% to 95.65% ,P=.48). According to S-Detect-guided US BI-RADS re-classification, 30 out of 110 (27.27%) breast lesions underwent a correct change in clinical management, 74of 110 (67.27%) breast lesions underwent no change and 6 of 110 (5.45%) breast lesions underwent an incorrect change in clinical management. The biopsy rate decreased from 100% to 67.27 % (P<.001).Benign masses among subcategory 4a had higher rates of possibly benign assessment on S-Detect for the US only (60% to 0%, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS S-Detect can be used as an additional diagnostic tool to improve the specificity and accuracy in clinical practice. S-Detect have the potential to be used in downgrading benign masses misclassified as BI-RADS category 4 on US by radiologist, and may reduce unnecessary breast biopsy. CLINICALTRIAL none

Computer-aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules using a two-step approach for feature selection and classifier ensemble construction

2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Lee ◽  
Lilla Boroczky ◽  
Kivilcim Sungur-Stasik ◽  
Aaron D. Cann ◽  
Alain C. Borczuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Feature Selection ◽  
Pulmonary Nodules ◽  
Computer Aided Diagnosis ◽  
Classifier Ensemble ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Aided Diagnosis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document