scholarly journals Optimal Allocation of Shared Manufacturing Resources Based on Bilevel Programming

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Peng Liu ◽  
Caiyun Liu ◽  
Xiaoling Wei

In the shared manufacturing environment, on the basis of in-depth analysis of the shared manufacturing process and the allocation process of manufacturing resources, a bilevel programming model for the optimal allocation of manufacturing resources considering the benefits of the shared manufacturing platform and the rights of consumers is established. In the bilevel programming model, the flexible indicators representing the interests of the platform are the upper-level optimization target of the model and the Quality of Service (QoS) indicators representing the interests of consumers are the lower-level optimization goal. The weights of the upper indicators are determined by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Improved Order Relation Analysis (Improved G1) combination weighting method and the bilevel programming model is solved by the Improved Fast Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (Improved NSGA-II). Finally, the effectiveness of the model is validated by a numerical example.

Complexity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Xu ◽  
Yinyun Yu

Discrete manufacturing products are often assembled from multiple parts through a series of discrete processes. How to effectively configure resources in a discrete manufacturing environment is an important research topic worthy of attention. Based on an in-depth analysis of the discrete manufacturing operation model and the manufacturing resource allocation process, this paper fully considers the uncertainty factors of the manufacturing resource customers and the interests of the manufacturing resource suppliers and proposes a bilevel planning model under a fuzzy environment that comprehensively considers the customers’ expectation bias and the suppliers’ profit maximization. The method firstly uses a language phrase to collect the language evaluation of the customers and suppliers for manufacturing tasks and uses a trapezoidal fuzzy number to convert the language evaluation phrase into a value that can be calculated. Then, we use the prospect theory to optimize the constraint indicators based on the language evaluation of customers and suppliers. Next, the bilevel planning model for optimal configuration of manufacturing resources in discrete manufacturing environment is established under the consideration of the respective interests of both the customers and the suppliers, and the fast nondominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) is used to solve the model. Finally, an example is given to verify the validity and feasibility of the model.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozgur Baskan ◽  
Huseyin Ceylan ◽  
Cenk Ozan

In this study, we present a bilevel programming model in which upper level is defined as a biobjective problem and the lower level is considered as a stochastic user equilibrium assignment problem. It is clear that the biobjective problem has two objectives: the first maximizes the reserve capacity whereas the second minimizes performance index of a road network. We use a weighted-sum method to determine the Pareto optimal solutions of the biobjective problem by applying normalization approach for making the objective functions dimensionless. Following, a differential evolution based heuristic solution algorithm is introduced to overcome the problem presented by use of biobjective bilevel programming model. The first numerical test is conducted on two-junction network in order to represent the effect of the weighting on the solution of combined reserve capacity maximization and delay minimization problem. Allsop & Charlesworth’s network, which is a widely preferred road network in the literature, is selected for the second numerical application in order to present the applicability of the proposed model on a medium-sized signalized road network. Results support authorities who should usually make a choice between two conflicting issues, namely, reserve capacity maximization and delay minimization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document