scholarly journals Lessons Learned from Radiation Oncology Clinical Trials

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (22) ◽  
pp. 6089-6100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei-Fei Liu ◽  
Paul Okunieff ◽  
Eric J. Bernhard ◽  
Helen B. Stone ◽  
Stephen Yoo ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Chen Hu ◽  
James J. Dignam

In this precision oncology era, where molecular profiling at the individual patient level becomes increasingly accessible and affordable, more and more clinical trials are now driven by biomarkers, with an overarching objective to optimize and personalize disease management. As compared with the conventional clinical development paradigms, where the key is to evaluate treatment effects in histology-defined populations, the choices of biomarker-driven clinical trial designs and analysis plans require additional considerations that are heavily dependent on the nature of biomarkers (eg, prognostic or predictive, integral or integrated) and the credential of biomarkers’ performance and clinical utility. Most recently, another major paradigm change in biomarker-driven trials is to conduct multi-agent and/or multihistology master protocols or platform trials. These trials, although they may enjoy substantial infrastructure and logistical advantages, also face unique operational and conduct challenges. Here we provide a concise overview of design options for both the setting of single-biomarker/single-disease and the setting of multiple-biomarker/multiple-disease types. We focus on explaining the trial design and practical considerations and rationale of when to use which designs, as well as how to incorporate various adaptive design components to provide additional flexibility, enhance logistical efficiency, and optimize resource allocation. Lessons learned from real trials are also presented for illustration.


Author(s):  
T.J. FitzGerald ◽  
Marcia Urie ◽  
Kenneth Ulin ◽  
Fran Laurie ◽  
Jeffrey Yorty ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. e788-e789
Author(s):  
R. Kouzy ◽  
J. Abi Jaoude ◽  
M.B. El Alam ◽  
W. Mainwaring ◽  
T.A. Lin ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. S50-S51
Author(s):  
T. Corr ◽  
C. van Tongeren ◽  
K. Whitaker ◽  
B. Baerg ◽  
T. Keane

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (17) ◽  
pp. 1195-1204
Author(s):  
Florence D Mowlem ◽  
Brad Sanderson ◽  
Jill V Platko ◽  
Bill Byrom

Aim: To understand the impact of anticancer treatment on oncology patients’ ability to use electronic solutions for completing patient-reported outcomes (ePRO). Materials & methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven individuals who had experienced a cancer diagnosis and treatment. Results: Participants reported that the following would impact the ability to interact with an ePRO solution: peripheral neuropathy of the hands (4/7), fatigue and/or concentration and memory issues (6/7), where they are in a treatment cycle (5/7). Approaches to improve usability included: larger, well-spaced buttons to deal with finger numbness, the ability to pause a survey and complete at a later point and presenting the recall period with every question to reduce reliance on memory. Conclusion: Symptoms associated with cancers and anticancer treatments can impact the use of technologies. The recommendations for optimizing the electronic implementation of patient-reported outcome instruments in this population provides the potential to improve data quality in oncology trials and places patient needs at the forefront to ensure ‘fit-for-purpose’ solutions.


Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aldo Badano

AbstractImaging clinical trials can be burdensome and often delay patient access to novel, high-quality medical devices. Tools for in silico imaging trials have significantly improved in sophistication and availability. Here, I describe some of the principal advantages of in silico imaging trials and enumerate five lessons learned during the design and execution of the first all-in silico virtual imaging clinical trial for regulatory evaluation (the VICTRE study).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document