Abstract 3559: Gene-expression changes in adipose tissue with diet- and/or exercise-induced weight loss: a randomized controlled trial

Author(s):  
Karen Foster-Schubert ◽  
Kristin Campbell ◽  
Mario Kratz ◽  
Karen W. Makar ◽  
Derek Hagman ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 844-855.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Sophie Wedell-Neergaard ◽  
Louise Lang Lehrskov ◽  
Regitse Højgaard Christensen ◽  
Grit Elster Legaard ◽  
Emma Dorph ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (5) ◽  
pp. 933-945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Schübel ◽  
Johanna Nattenmüller ◽  
Disorn Sookthai ◽  
Tobias Nonnenmacher ◽  
Mirja E Graf ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background Although preliminary evidence suggests that intermittent calorie restriction (ICR) exerts stronger effects on metabolic parameters, which may link obesity and major chronic diseases, compared with continuous calorie restriction (CCR), there is a lack of well-powered intervention studies. Objective We conducted a randomized controlled trial to test whether ICR, operationalized as the “5:2 diet,” has stronger effects on adipose tissue gene expression, anthropometric and body composition measures, and circulating metabolic biomarkers than CCR and a control regimen. Design One hundred and fifty overweight and obese nonsmokers [body mass index (kg/m2) ≥25 to <40, 50% women], aged 35–65 y, were randomly assigned to an ICR group (5 d without energy restriction and 2 d with 75% energy deficit, net weekly energy deficit ∼20%), a CCR group (daily energy deficit ∼20%), or a control group (no advice to restrict energy) and participated in a 12-wk intervention phase, a 12-wk maintenance phase, and a 26-wk follow-up phase. Results Loge relative weight change over the intervention phase was −7.1% ± 0.7% (mean ± SEM) with ICR, −5.2% ± 0.6% with CCR, and −3.3% ± 0.6% with the control regimen (Poverall < 0.001, PICR vs. CCR = 0.053). Despite slightly greater weight loss with ICR than with CCR, there were no significant differences between the groups in the expression of 82 preselected genes in adipose tissue implicated in pathways linking obesity to chronic diseases. At the final follow-up assessment (week 50), weight loss was −5.2% ± 1.2% with ICR, −4.9% ± 1.1% with CCR, and −1.7% ± 0.8% with the control regimen (Poverall = 0.01, PICR vs. CCR = 0.89). These effects were paralleled by proportional changes in visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue volumes. There were no significant differences between ICR and CCR regarding various circulating metabolic biomarkers. Conclusion Our results on the effects of the “5:2 diet” indicate that ICR may be equivalent but not superior to CCR for weight reduction and prevention of metabolic diseases. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02449148.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey T. Kullgren ◽  
Andrea B. Troxel ◽  
George Loewenstein ◽  
Laurie A. Norton ◽  
Dana Gatto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document