Abstract PS9-59: Pooled efficacy analysis from two phase 3 studies in patients receiving eflapegrastim, a novel, long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, following TC for early-stage breast cancer

Author(s):  
Lee S Schwartzberg ◽  
Gajanan Bhat ◽  
Alvaro Restrepo ◽  
Osama Hlalah ◽  
Inderjit Mehmi ◽  
...  
1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 2435-2444 ◽  
Author(s):  
J H Silber ◽  
M Fridman ◽  
A Shpilsky ◽  
O Even-Shoshan ◽  
D S Smink ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To model the cost-effectiveness (CE) of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in early-stage breast cancer when its use is directed to those most in need of the medication. METHODS A conditional CE model was developed for the use of G-CSF based on a ranking of patient need as determined by patient blood counts during the first cycle of chemotherapy. In the base case, no G-CSF was used. In the alternative case, G-CSF was used in the following manner. If the risk of a neutropenic event (as defined by a predictive model based on nadir absolute neutrophil count [ANC] and hemoglobin decrease in cycle 1) was equal to or exceeded a predetermined critical value "T," then patients would receive G-CSF in cycles 2 through 6 of chemotherapy. If the risk of an event was less than T, patients would not use G-CSF unless an event occurred, at which time G-CSF would be administered with every subsequent cycle. RESULTS A decision rule (T) that would allow the most needy 50% of early-stage breast cancer patients to receive G-CSF after the first cycle of chemotherapy resulted in a CE ratio of $34,297 dollars per life-year saved (LYS). If only the most needy 10% of patients received G-CSF, then the associated CE ratio was $23,748/LYS; if 90% of patients could receive the medication, the CE ratio would be $76,487/LYS. These estimates were relatively insensitive to inpatient hospital cost estimates (inpatient costs for fever and neutropenia of $3,090 to $7,726 per admission produced dollar per LYS figures of $34,297 to $32,415, respectively). However, the model was sensitive to assumptions about the shape of the relationship between dose reduction and disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years. CONCLUSION Providing G-CSF to the neediest 50% of early-stage breast cancer patients (as defined by first-cycle blood counts) starting after the first cycle of chemotherapy is associated with a CE ratio of $34,297/LYS, which is well in the range of CE ratios for treatment of other common medical conditions. Furthermore, conditional CE studies, based on predictive models that incorporate individual patient risk, allow one to define populations for which therapy is, or is not, cost-effective. Limitations of our present understanding of the shape of the chemotherapy dose-response curve, especially at low levels of dose reductions, affect these results. Further work is required to define the shape of the dose-response curve in early-stage breast cancer.


1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 3426-3430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan L. Kobrinsky ◽  
Diane E. Sjolander ◽  
Mary S. Cheang ◽  
Ralph Levitt ◽  
Preston D. Steen

PURPOSE: To determine if inhibition of stem-cell activity induced by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor ([GM-CSF]; Sargramostim; Immunex Corporation, Seattle, WA) withdrawal or priming protects hematopoietic stem cells from the cytotoxic effects of adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serial blood counts were performed in 20 women with early-stage breast cancer receiving four courses of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin chemotherapy. By a double-blind, placebo-controlled, balanced randomization, subjects received GM-CSF priming on days 5 to 1 for courses 1 and 3 or courses 2 and 4. RESULTS: Compared with before priming, after priming the times to neutrophil nadir (12.8 ± 2.5 days v 14.8 ± 1.5 days, respectively; P = .0001) and platelet nadir (mean ± SD, 10.1 ± 1.9 days v 11.1 ± 2.2 days, P < .05) were shorter, indicating a shift of cytotoxicity to later progenitors. The neutrophil nadir was similar with and without priming (mean ± SD, 490 ± 310/μL v 550 ± 350/μL, respectively; P = .2); however, on day 16 the mean neutrophil count was higher (mean ± SD, 1030 ± 580/μL v 690 ± 370/μL, P = .004), and the proportion of patients with a neutrophil count less than 500/μL was lower after priming than before (six of 35 or 17.1% v 12 of 34 or 35.3%, respectively; P = .04). The platelet nadir was higher (mean ± SD, 166,000 ± 51,000/μL after priming v 151,000 ± 45,000/μL before priming, P = .007), and the duration of thrombocytopenia, ie, a platelet count less than 150,000/μL, was shorter (1.5 ± 2.1 days v 2.8 ± 2.9 days, P = .0025) after priming. Episodes of fever and neutropenia were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: GM-CSF priming from days 5 to 1 before doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy was associated with an earlier neutrophil and platelet nadir. On day 16, a higher mean neutrophil count and a lower proportion of patients with severe (< 500/μL) neutropenia were observed. Beneficial effects on the severity and duration of thrombocytopenia were also noted. These observations support the hypothesis that GM-CSF priming protects hematopoietic progenitors from the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document