Influence of Tri-Iodinated Contrast Media on Renal Function

Nephron ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 559-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Metyš ◽  
A. Hornych ◽  
B. Buriánová ◽  
J. Jirka
Nephron ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shao Bin Duan ◽  
Han Wen Wu ◽  
Ji An Luo ◽  
Fu You Liu

Radiology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 270 (2) ◽  
pp. 409-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Dong Zhang ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Jue Zhang ◽  
Xiaoying Wang ◽  
Xuexiang Jiang

2022 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 361
Author(s):  
Abdurrahman Hasyim Asy’ari ◽  
Anny Setijo Rahaju ◽  
Arifa Mustika

This research aimed to analyze the histopathology (tubular necrosis and proteinaceous casts) and renal function (SCr and BUN) differences of male Wistar strain white rats (Rattus norvegicus) after intravascular injection of iodinated contrast media Iohexol and Iopamidol. This research is an experimental laboratory with a post-test only control group design. Male Wistar rats that fit the criteria were divided into three groups by random sampling technique: Control (K), Treatment 1 (P1, Iohexol 350 mg iodine/mL), and Treatment 2 (P2, Iopamidol 370 mg iodine/mL). Iohexol and Iopamidol were injected at a dose of 1600 mg iodine/kg BW. The histopathology differences were observed under a light microscope with a magnification of 400x, which were analyzed semi-quantitatively through slides formed by the paraffin method and H&E staining. SCr and BUN levels were checked using an automatic analysis machine with blood samples taken through the cardiac ventricle. Kruskal-Wallis test (α= 0.05) on renal histopathology scores, both tubular necrosis and protein casts showed Asymp. Sig. value > 0.05, which means there is no significant difference between the groups (K, P1, and P2). Kruskal-Wallis test (α= 0.05) on SCr levels also showed the Asymp. Sig. value > 0.05 and One-Way ANOVA Comparative Test on BUN levels showed the Sig. value > 0.05 which means there is no significant difference in renal function between the groups. This study proved no difference in histopathology and renal function in Wistar rats after injection of iodinated contrast media Iohexol and Iopamidol.


2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii485-iii486
Author(s):  
Dorota Brodowska-Kania ◽  
Aleksandra Paturej ◽  
Małgorzata Wojciechowska ◽  
Małgorzata Dzierżanowska ◽  
Katarzyna Szamotulska ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 737-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. Siegle ◽  
W. L. McGuire ◽  
J. E. Peters

Author(s):  
Maithili Pramod Joshi ◽  
Ameya Chaudhari ◽  
Prashant S. Kharkar ◽  
Shreerang V. Joshi

: Historically, the use of Iodinated Contrast Media (ICM) for diagnostic purposes, particularly radiography and computed tomography (CT), is well-known. Many of the ICM are included in the World Health Organization (WHO)’s List of Essential Medicines. Depending on the chemotype and the presence of ionizable functional group(s), the ICM are categorized in the ionic/nonionic monomers/dimers. The lipophilicity, aqueous solubility, viscosity and osmolality are major characteristics dictating their use for one procedure versus the other. Over last several decades, substantial advancement occurred in the design and development of novel ICM, solely to reduce their propensity to cause adverse effects. Given the nature of their acute usage, some of the agents with appreciable toxicity are still used. Understanding their chemistry aspects is crucial to appreciate, acknowledge and justify the usage of these extremely important torch-bearers of diagnostic agent’s class. The present review article presents an in-depth overview of the synthetic methods, therapeutic indications, potential adverse effects along with the commercial and environmental aspects of ICM. The safety and tolerability of these agents is a field that has gained significant importance, which is given due importance in the discussion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document