scholarly journals Differential Microvasculature Dysfunction in Living Kidney Donor Transplant Recipients: Nondialyzed versus Dialyzed Chronic Kidney Disease Patients

2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ada W.Y. Chung ◽  
H.H. Clarice Yang ◽  
Mhairi K. Sigrist ◽  
Elliott Chum ◽  
Anthony D. Booth ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome F. O'Hara ◽  
Katrina Bramstedt ◽  
Stewart Flechner ◽  
David Goldfarb

Evaulating patients for living kidney donor transplantation involving a recipient with significant medical issues can create an ethical debate about whether to proceed with surgery. Donors must be informed of the surgical risk to proceed with donating a kidney and their decision must be a voluntary one. A detailed informed consent should be obtained from high-risk living kidney donor transplant recipients as well as donors and family members after the high perioperative risk potential has been explained to them. In addition, family members need to be informed of and acknowledge that a living kidney donor transplant recipient with pretransplant extrarenal morbidity has a higher risk of a serious adverse outcome event such as graft failure or recipient death. We review 2 cases involving living kidney donor transplant recipients with significant comorbidity and discuss ethical considerations, donor risk, and the need for an extended informed consent.


2015 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 540-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla S. Hanson ◽  
Steve J. Chadban ◽  
Jeremy R. Chapman ◽  
Jonathan C. Craig ◽  
Germaine Wong ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Roosa Lankinen ◽  
Markus Hakamäki ◽  
Tapio Hellman ◽  
Niina S. Koivuviita ◽  
Kaj Metsärinne ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background and Aims:</i></b> Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients and associated with increased mortality. Comparative data on the AAC score progression in CKD patients transitioning from conservative treatment to different modalities of renal replacement therapy (RRT) are lacking and were examined. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> 150 study patients underwent lateral lumbar radiograph to study AAC in the beginning of the study before commencing RRT (AAC1) and at 3 years of follow-up (AAC2). We examined the associations between repeated laboratory tests taken every 3 months, echocardiographic and clinical variables and AAC increment per year (ΔAAC), and the association between ΔAAC and outcomes during follow-up. <b><i>Results:</i></b> At the time of AAC2 measurement, 39 patients were on hemodialysis, 39 on peritoneal dialysis, 39 had a transplant, and 33 were on conservative treatment. Median AAC1 was 4.8 (0.5–9.0) and median AAC2 8.0 (1.5–12.0) (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). ΔAAC was similar across the treatment groups (<i>p</i> = 0.19). ΔAAC was independently associated with mean left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (log LVMI: β = 0.97, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and mean phosphorus through follow-up (log phosphorus: β = 1.19, <i>p</i> = 0.02) in the multivariable model. Time to transplantation was associated with ΔAAC in transplant recipients (per month on the waiting list: β = 0.04, <i>p</i> = 0.001). ΔAAC was associated with mortality (HR 1.427, 95% confidence interval 1.044–1.950, <i>p</i> = 0.03). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> AAC progresses rapidly in patients with CKD, and ΔAAC is similar across the CKD treatment groups including transplant recipients. The increment rate is associated with mortality and in transplant recipients with the time on the transplant waiting list.


2021 ◽  
pp. 11-22
Author(s):  
Martha Gershun ◽  
John D. Lantos

This chapter discusses a system for screening living donors. The chapter begins with a narrative of the author as she was anxiously waiting to hear whether the Transplant Selection Committee at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, was going to approve her as a kidney donor. It then recounts the author's decision to donate one of her kidneys to a stranger. A few months earlier, she had read an article in the Kansas City Jewish Chronicle about a woman who needed a kidney. The article detailed how Deb Porter Gill had been diagnosed with insulin dependent diabetes and developed unrelated chronic kidney disease. The chapter narrates the reasons why Deb's story tugged at the author. Ultimately, the chapter looks at the importance of the whole series of evaluation and screening in kidney transplantation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document