scholarly journals Can Nephrologists Use Ultrasound to Evaluate the Inferior Vena Cava A Cross-Sectional Study of the Agreement between a Nephrologist and a Cardiologist

Nephron Extra ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Muniz Pazeli ◽  
Daniel Fagundes Vidigal ◽  
Tarcísio Cestari Grossi ◽  
Natália Maria Silva Fernandes ◽  
Fernando Colugnati ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-14
Author(s):  
Kavous Shahsavarinia ◽  
Peyman Habibi ◽  
Ali Taghizadieh ◽  
Payman Moharamzadeh ◽  
Farzad Rahmani ◽  
...  

Background: Intravascular volume is the most important factor in determining patients' hemodynamic status. This present study aimed to assay the predictive value of aorta artery diameter and inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter in trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted on 69 trauma patients who referred to Imam Reza Hospital in Tabriz. Inclusion criteria were all trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock. Patients with diseases such as liver disease,cardiovascular,coronary heart disease and concurrent dehydration were excluded. Odds ratios and Adjusted odds ratios for the risk of events were obtained using cumulative logit ordinal regression model with version 15 of Stata software. Results: There were 58 men (84/1%) and 11 women (15/9%) with an average age of 36.4±12.4 year. Findings showed that for one unit increase in the diameter of the aorta by controlling the effect of other variables, the odds of mortality decreased for 2% compared with hospitalization in ward or intensive care unit (ICU). The reduction was also statistically significant (P=0.037). Furthermore, by modifying the effect of other variables, one unit increase in the diameter of IVC during inhale and exhale, increases the odds of hospitalization in ward or ICU. Conclusion: This study showed that the diameter of the aorta and also the diameter of IVC during inhale and exhale can be used to predict the outcome of trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock and eventually to take steps for emergent and effective treatment.


2011 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ganeshalingam ◽  
G. Rajeswaran ◽  
R.L. Jones ◽  
K. Thway ◽  
E. Moskovic

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Nania ◽  
Fabio Capilli ◽  
Eugenia Longo

Nowadays, incidental anatomical variants are frequent findings, due to the widespread diffusion of cross-sectional imaging. This case report illustrates a fairly uncommon anatomical variant, that is, the copresence of left inferior vena cava and retroaortic right renal vein reported in a 46-year-old lady, undergoing a staging CT for breast cancer. Although the patient was asymptomatic, the authors highlight potential risks related to the above-mentioned condition and the importance of correct identification and diagnosis of the findings.


2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osman Ahmed ◽  
Shermeen Sheikh ◽  
Patrick Tran ◽  
Brian Funaki ◽  
Alexandria M. Shadid ◽  
...  

Inferior vena cava filters are commonly encountered devices on diagnostic imaging that were highlighted in a 2010 Food and Drug Administration safety advisory regarding their complications from long-term implantation. The Predicting the Safety and Effectiveness of Inferior Vena Cava Filters (PRESERVE) trial is an ongoing after-market study investigating the safety and utility of commonly utilized filters in practice today. While most of these filters are safe, prompt recognition and management of any filter-associated complication is imperative to prevent or reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with them. This review is aimed at discussing the appropriate utilization and placement of inferior vena cava filters in addition to the recognition of filter-associated complications on cross-sectional imaging. An overview of the PRESRVE trial filters is also provided to understand each filter's propensity for specific complications.


Radiographics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 639-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Edward Bass ◽  
Michael D. Redwine ◽  
Larry A. Kramer ◽  
Phan T. Huynh ◽  
John H. Harris

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. e75
Author(s):  
Karolina S. Yukhnevich ◽  
Constantin V. Mazayshvili ◽  
Andrey I. Aitkulov ◽  
Yury A. Gustelev ◽  
Mikhail S. Pendyurin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document