Application of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia: A Follow-Up Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noof A. Alabdulqader ◽  
Sameera Q. Shareef ◽  
Jassim A. Ali ◽  
Mohammad M. Yousef ◽  
Mousa A. Al-Abbadi
Keyword(s):  
Improvement Program ◽  
Awareness Campaign ◽  
Eastern Province ◽  
Thyroid Cytology ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System

This is a follow-up study to our previous analysis of thyroid aspirates utilizing the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (BSRTC). The same study design was utilized for 2 years comparing 2 periods. A total of 251 thyroid aspirates from 218 patients were reviewed and deemed comparable to the previous cohort. The variance and consequently the number of interpretations dropped from 26 to 11 with a statistically significant 58% reduction and more consistency. Our unsatisfactory rate dropped from 22 to 10% (reduction of 55%). The risk of malignancy in this follow-up study showed a similar trend: an increase in risk with each step up in the BSRTC categories starting from the ‘nondiagnostic' and up to ‘malignant'. Few of our benign cases ended up with resection. We noticed sensitivity to the word ‘follicular' in this benign category; therefore we propose a modification of the current BSRTC system by omitting the word ‘follicular' from the benign category. We strongly believe that this modification harbors no serious damage to the intentions of BSRTC. This follow-up study has shown that the previous awareness campaign about the implementation has worked and can be considered a valid performance improvement program.

scholarly journals The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: A Cytohistological Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bakiarathana Anand ◽  
Anita Ramdas ◽  
Marie Moses Ambroise ◽  
Nirmal P. Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Follicular Neoplasm ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Introduction. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) is a significant step to standardize the reporting of thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA). It has high predictive value, reproducibility, and improved clinical significance. Aim. The study was aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility and reproducibility of “TBSRTC” at our institute. Methods and Material. The study included 646 thyroid FNAs which were reviewed by three pathologists and classified according to TBSRTC. Cytohistological correlation was done for 100 cases with surgical follow-up and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy, and risk of malignancy (ROM) were calculated. The interobserver variation among three pathologists was also assessed. Results. The distribution of cases in various TBSRTC categories is as follows: I—nondiagnostic 13.8%, II—benign 75.9%, III—atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) 1.2%, IV—follicular neoplasm (FN)/suspicious for follicular neoplasm (SFN) 3.7%, V—suspicious for malignancy (SM) 2.6%, and VI—malignant 2.8%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy are 72.4%, 94.3%, 84%, 89.2%, and 87.9%, respectively. The ROM of various TBSRTC categories were II—8.5%; III—66.7%; IV—63.6%; and V and VI—100%. Cohen’s Weighted Kappa score was 0.99 which indicates almost perfect agreement among the three pathologists. Conclusions. Our study substantiates greater reproducibility among pathologists using TBSRTC to arrive at a precise diagnosis with an added advantage of predicting the risk of malignancy which enables the clinician to plan for follow-up or surgery and also the extent of surgery.

scholarly journals Application of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology in the Pediatric Population

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huy Gia Vuong ◽  
Ayana Suzuki ◽  
Hee Young Na ◽  
Pham Van Tuyen ◽  
Doan Minh Khuy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Asian Countries ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Fine Needle Aspirates ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System

Abstract Objectives We aimed to provide the Asian experience with the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) in pediatric thyroid nodules. Methods Consecutive thyroid fine-needle aspirates (patient age, ≤18 years) were retrospectively collected from 7 tertiary centers in 5 Asian countries. Results Of 194,364 thyroid aspirates, 0.6% were pediatric cases (mean age, 15.0 years). Among 827 nodules with accessible follow-up, the resection rate and risk of malignancy (ROM) were 36.3% and 59.0%, respectively. Malignant nodules (n = 179) accounted for 59.7% of resected nodules and 21.6% of all thyroid nodules with available follow-up. Compared with the published adult series, pediatric nodules had a higher resection rate and ROM, particularly in the indeterminate categories. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that Asian pediatric thyroid nodules had higher ROM than those from adults. The prototypic outputs of TBSRTC may need to be adjusted in the pediatric population.

scholarly journals The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: Proposed Modifications and Updates for the Second Edition from an International Panel

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 399-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Pusztaszeri ◽  
Esther Diana Rossi ◽  
Manon Auger ◽  
Zubair Baloch ◽  
Justin Bishop ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Thyroid Cytology ◽  
Management Algorithm ◽  
International Panel ◽  
Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Thyroid Fna ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC) was proposed in 2007 at the National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration State of the Art and Science Conference held in Bethesda, Maryland. The aim was to address the inconsistent and sometimes confusing reporting terminologies used for thyroid FNA throughout the world. The TBSRTC consists of 6 diagnostic categories, each associated with an implied risk of malignancy that translates directly into a clinical management algorithm. Since the publication of the TBSRTC cytology Atlas in January 2010, considerable experience has been gained regarding its application in cytology practice, clinical impact, and limitations. In conjunction with the International Academy of Cytology (IAC), an international panel composed of sixteen cytopathologists and an endocrinologist with special interest in thyroid cytology, including several co-authors of the 2010 TBSRTC Atlas, was created to: (1) analyze the current worldwide impact of TBSRTC, (2) report on the current state of TBSRTC based upon a review of the published literature, and (3) provide possible recommendations for a future update of TBSRTC. Herein, we summarize the panel's deliberations and key recommendations that our panel hopes will be useful during the preparation of the second edition of TBSRTC.

scholarly journals Impact of Bethesda System of Reporting for Thyroid Cytopathology

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22
Author(s):  
Varsha Dhume ◽  
Vikas Kavishwar
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Management Approach ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Major Step ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Thyroid Fna ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System

ABSTRACT FNAC though considered the gold standard diagnostic test in the evaluation of a thyroid nodule, has many issues regarding the terminologies and interpretation. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) hosted the NCI Thyroid Fine needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference in 2007, which acknowledged the importance of developing a uniform terminology for reporting thyroid FNA results to facilitate effective communication among cytopathologists, endocrinologist, surgeons, radiologists and other healthcare providers. The NCI Conference concluded the terminology and morphologic criteria which formed the framework for The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (TBSRTC). It is a 6 tiered ‘The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology’ (TBSRTC) for unifying the terminology and morphologic criteria along with the corresponding risk of malignancy. Bethesda also offers management approach for all the categories. Bethesda system is presently widely accepted in western countries and is being introduced in rest of the world. This system of reporting undoubtedly represents a major step toward standardization, reproducibility and ultimately improvement in clinical significance, usefulness and predictive value of thyroid FNAC. The problems faced by the cytopathologist while implementing Bethesda during reporting are centred on AUS/FLUS category. The heterogeneity of this low-risk category leads to significant variability in its reported percentage as well as reported rate of malignancy. How to cite this article Dhume V, Kavishwar V. Impact of Bethesda System of Reporting for Thyroid Cytopathology. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Clin 2014;6(1):15-22.

scholarly journals Rate of malignancy for thyroid nodules with AUS/FLUS cytopathology in a tertiary care center – a retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalpesh Hathi ◽  
Tarek Rahmeh ◽  
Vicki Munro ◽  
Victoria Northrup ◽  
Ali Sherazi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Treatment Pathway ◽  
Malignancy Rate ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Abstract Background Thyroid nodules are stratified through fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and are often categorized using The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, which estimates the risk of malignancy for six cytopathological categories. The atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) and follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) categories have varying malignancy rates reported in the literature which can range from 6 to 72.9%. Due to this heterogeneity, we assessed the malignancy rate and effectiveness of repeat FNA (rFNA) for AUS/FLUS thyroid cytopathology at our institution. Methods Electronic health records of patients with AUS/FLUS thyroid cytopathology on FNA at our center since the implementation of the Bethesda System on May 1, 2014–December 31, 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, treatment pathway, and pathology results were collected. The treatment pathway of the nodules, the rFNA results, and the malignant histopathology results were reported. Malignancy rates were calculated as an upper and lower limit estimate. Results This study described 182 AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules from 177 patients. In total, 24 thyroid nodules were deemed malignant upon histopathology, yielding a final malignancy rate of 13.2–25.3%. All of the malignancies were variants of papillary thyroid carcinoma. The malignancy rate of the nodules which underwent resection without rFNA (21.5%) was lower than the malignancy rate of the nodules which underwent resection after rFNA (43.8%). 45.5% of the rFNA results were re-classified into more definitive categories. Conclusion The malignancy rate of AUS/FLUS thyroid cytopathology at our center is in line with the risk of malignancy stated by the 2017 Bethesda System. However, our malignancy rate is lower than some other Canadian centers and approximately half of our rFNAs were re-classified, highlighting the importance of establishing center-specific malignancy and rFNA re-classification rates to guide treatment decisions.

scholarly journals TO STUDY THYROID CYTOLOGY BY CONVENTIONAL METHOD AND APPLYING BETHESDA SYSTEM TO SAME SMEARS.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishan Kumar Sharma ◽  
Ashik Mullik
Keyword(s):  
Benign Lesion ◽  
Follicular Neoplasm ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Thyroid Cytology ◽  
Prospective Group ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System

Method: The thyroid cytology smears reported at the Department of Pathology Index medical College over a two year period from May 2015 to June 2017 and a prospective thyroid FNAC smears from Sep 2017 to Aug 2019 were studied at the Department of Pathology Index Medical College. The conventional and Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology were followed for reporting. A comparison of old conventional reporting system and Bethesda system were then analyzed.      Result: In Bethesda System None of the patients in both the group showed Inadequate diagnosis which was seen in the retrospective group using conventional system. Bethesda System has revealed that out of 81 patients with Benign Lesion, 41 (50.6%) were in retrospective group and 40 (49.4%) were in prospective group. Malignant was present in 2 (40%) and 3 (60%) patients in Retrospective and prospective group. Similarly out of 4 patients with Follicular Neoplasm, 3 (75%) and 1 (25%) were in retrospective and prospective group. However the distribution was comparable between both the groups. Conclusion: Adapting the Bethesda system of reporting has led to a high to sensitivity, specificity and high negative predictive values. Use of Bethesda systems helps in the prognosis, management and minimizes the unnecessary surgical procedures of thyroid swelling. Keywords: Thyroid, Cytology, Bethesda & Smears.

scholarly journals Malignancy Rate in Thyroid Nodules with Atypia or Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (02) ◽  
pp. e221-e226
Author(s):  
Hamdan Ahmed Pasha ◽  
Rahim Dhanani ◽  
Ainulakbar Mughal ◽  
Kaleem S. Ahmed ◽  
Anwar Suhail
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Follicular Carcinoma ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Diagnostic Categories ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Abstract Introduction Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) is one of the six diagnostic categories of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. The prevalence of malignancy among Bethesda category III cytology is variable, ranging from 5% to 37% in the literature. Objective To determine the rate of malignancy in thyroid nodules reported as Bethesda category III. Methods A total of 495 patients underwent surgical intervention for thyroid nodules from January 2015 to December 2017. The present study included 81 cases reported as Bethesda category III, and their medical records were reviewed. Results Out of 495 fine-needle aspiration cytology samples, 81 (16.4%) samples were labeled as AUS/FLUS. Among these 81 patients, the mean age was 43.0 years (± 13.9), with only 11 (14%) patients older than 55 years of age. Most of our patients were female (n = 69; 85.2%), and the rest were male. The rate of malignancy based on the final histology was of 33.3% (n = 27). The majority were 17 cases (21%) of papillary carcinoma, followed by follicular carcinoma (n = 6) (7.4%). Conclusion The risk of malignancy can be higher than it is commonly believed, and guidelines should be based on the data from the institutions themselves for a better assessment of the outcomes.

Review of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: A Local Study in Bohol Island, Philippines

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette L. Salillas ◽  
Faye Candice S. Sun ◽  
Emelisa G. Almocera
Keyword(s):  
Kappa Statistic ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Kappa Statistics ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Local Study ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the adaptability and reproducibility of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) in a local setting and to determine the risk of malignancy for each category. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study of 80 thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology cases using the BSRTC with corresponding histopathology was done between September 2009 and December 2012. Agreement scores were calculated using kappa statistics. Results: Consensus among two readers was attained for 73 cases (91.25%). No disagreement was noted for the malignant cases. The strength of agreement was very good, with a kappa statistic of 0.90. The risk of malignancy observed histologically was as follows: benign 3%, atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) 50%, suspicious for follicular/Hürthle cell neoplasm 50%, suspicious for malignancy 78%, and malignant 100%. Conclusion: In this study, there is an outstanding reproducibility for the classification scheme. The application of the BSRTC as the standardized reporting is readily adaptable and therefore its application in larger medical centers is highly recommended. Our findings of a higher risk of malignancy seen in AUS (50%) and malignant (100%) categories in those who underwent surgical resection corroborated other published studies. Conveying this risk to clinical colleagues is important and will facilitate optimal patient care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document