scholarly journals Type 2 Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Challenge in the Differential Diagnosis of a Pancreatic Mass

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 296-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cláudio Martins ◽  
Paula Lago ◽  
Paula Sousa ◽  
Tarcísio Araújo ◽  
José Davide ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 330-337
Author(s):  
S. V. Lishchuk ◽  
Е. A. Dubova ◽  
K. А. Pavlov ◽  
Yu. D. Udalov

Rationale: In the recent years, an increased interest to autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has been seen, related to growing diagnostic potential. In its turn, this leads to an increase in numbers of diagnosed AIP cases. At present, two types of AIP have been described with diverse clinical manifestation and morphology of the pancreas. However, the reproducibility of the differential diagnosis between AIP type 1 and 2 is low even among pancreatic pathologists.Aim: To identify criteria for the morphologic diagnosis of AIP type 1 and 2.Materials and methods: A morphological study of biopsy and surgical specimens from 26 patients with AIP was performed. There were 22 cases of AIP type 1 and 4 cases of AIP type 2. In addition to hematoxylin eosin staining of the specimens, immunohistochemistry was used with counting of CD138+ absolute numbers, determination of IgG+ and IgG4+ cells in the inflammatory infiltrates, as well as the ratios of IgG4+/IgG+ and IgG4+/CD138+ cells.Results: AIP type 1 was characterized by storiform fibrosis of the pancreatic tissue (81.8% cases), involving the parapancreatic fat tissue, by moderateto-severe lymphoplasmocytic infiltration and signs of obliterative/non-obliterative phlebitis. Type 2 AIP was characterized by severe fibrosis with predominantly periductal (centrilobular) fibrosis and mild chronic inflammatory infiltration of the pancreas, while there was no extension of fibrosis and inflammatory infiltration to the parapancreatic tissues in any case. The mean number of CD138+ cell in AIP type 1 was 101.2 ± 27.9 per 1 high-power field (HPF), and in AIP type 2, it was 42.8 ± 20.9 per 1 HPF. The mean absolute number of IgG+ cells in AIP type 1 was 99.6 ± 25.7 per 1 HPF, whereas in AIP type 2, 42.1 ± 20.8 per 1 HPF. In AIP type 1, the mean number of IgG4+ plasmatic cells in the infiltrates was 74.5 ± 27.2 per 1 HPF, whereas in AIP type 2, it was 3.4 ± 2.7 per 1 HPF. The IgG4+/IgG+ ratio was 75 ± 12.6% vs. 8.4 ± 6.2%, and the IgG4+/CD138+ ratio was 72.4 ± 12.3% vs. 8.3 ± 5.9% in AIP type 1 and type 2, respectively.Conclusion: For the differential diagnosis of type 1 and 2 AIP, it is necessary to take into consideration not only typical histological abnormalities, but also the numbers of CD138+, IgG+ and IgG4+ cells within the inflammatory infiltrate, as well as the IgG4+/IgG+ and IgG4+/CD138+ ratios.


2011 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeon Joo Chun ◽  
Jae Hyuck Chang ◽  
In Seok Lee ◽  
Jang Eun Lee ◽  
Mun Kyung Chung ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 071127170524002-??? ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Weintrob ◽  
Eti Stern ◽  
Yaffa Klipper-Aurbach ◽  
Moshe Phillip ◽  
Galia Gat-Yablonski

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. e375
Author(s):  
M. Distefano ◽  
A. Perduca ◽  
L. Parola ◽  
P. Sgaramella ◽  
G. Barera

Gut ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (9) ◽  
pp. 1373-1380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terumi Kamisawa ◽  
Suresh T Chari ◽  
Markus M Lerch ◽  
Myung-Hwan Kim ◽  
Thomas M Gress ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 628-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Loy ◽  
E. Perra ◽  
A. Melis ◽  
M. E. Cianchetti ◽  
M. Piga ◽  
...  

Background: Amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis (AIT) may be caused by excessive thyroidal hormone synthesis and release (type 1) or by a destructive process (type 2). This differentiation is considered essential for therapeutic choice. Purpose: To evaluate the utility of color-flow Doppler sonography (CFDS) in the differential diagnosis and management of AIT. Material and Methods: The clinical and laboratory data, thyroid sonography (grayscale sonography [GSS], CFDS), thyroid radioiodine uptake (RAIU) and thyroid scintigraphy, treatment, and clinical outcome were retrospectively reviewed in 21 AIT patients. The CFDS pattern of thyroid nodules was separately described from that of the perinodular parenchyma, and AIT was classified as type 1 (increased blood flow) or type 2 (low/no blood flow). Type 1 AIT patients were treated with methimazole (alone or associated with potassium perchlorate), while type 2 patients were treated with prednisone or amiodarone withdrawal alone. Results: Eleven patients with increased blood flow were considered as type 1, and 10 with low/no blood flow as type 2. Ten of the 11 patients in the first group showed a hypervascular nodular pattern, while one showed a hypervascular parenchymal pattern. Clinical diagnoses were toxic nodular goiter and Graves' disease, respectively. Of the 10 patients with low/no blood flow, six had normal thyroid volume, three small diffuse goiter, and one small multinodular goiter. The clinical outcome showed that 20 of the 21 patients were treatment responsive. Conclusion: CFDS is a useful tool in the differential diagnosis of AIT. This differentiation appeared to be of clinical relevance as regards therapeutic choice. Separate evaluation of parenchymal blood flow from that of nodules may prove beneficial in the diagnosis of underlying thyroid diseases in patients with type 1 AIT.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison L Yang ◽  
Julia McNabb-Baltar

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a subcategory of chronic pancreatitis that is highly responsive to steroids. The term was first proposed in 1995 by Yoshida and colleagues, and since its discovery, the diagnosis of AIP has dramatically increased. AIP is a chronic fibroinflammatory disease characterized by lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates and fibrosis on histology. There are two distinct subtypes: type 1 AIP is the pancreatic manifestation of a systemic serum immunoglobulin G subtype 4–related disease (IgG4-RD) and type 2 AIP is described clinically as idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis and has no association with IgG4. Clinically, AIP presents most commonly as obstructive jaundice in type 1 AIP and can present as acute pancreatitis in type 2 AIP. The diagnostic criteria include histology, imaging findings, and responsiveness to steroids as well as laboratory findings and other organ involvement. The mainstay of treatment is steroid therapy, with immunomodulators such as rituximab used for maintenance or relapsing disease. Long-term complications of AIP include pancreatic insufficiency and are often associated with relapsing disease. This review contains 45 references, 1 figure, and 2 tables. Key Words: autoimmune pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, EUS-guided biopsy, IgG4, immunomodulatory, obstructive jaundice, pancreas mass, steroid


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Nikolic ◽  
Poya Ghorbani ◽  
Raffaella Pozzi Mucelli ◽  
Sam Ghazi ◽  
Francisco Baldaque- Silva ◽  
...  

Introduction: Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a disease that may mimic malignant pancreatic lesions both in terms of symptomatology and imaging appearance. The aim of the present study is to analyse experiences of surgery in patients with AIP in one of the largest European cohorts. Methods: We performed a single-centre retrospective study of patients diagnosed with AIP at the Department of Abdominal Diseases at Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden, between January 2001 and October 2020. Results: There were 159 patients diagnosed with AIP, and among them 35 (22.0%) patients had surgery: 20 (57.1%) males and 15 (42.9%) females; average age at surgery was 59 years (range 37-81). Follow-up period after surgery was 67 months (range 1-235). AIP type 1 was diagnosed in 28 (80%) patients and AIP type 2 in 7 (20%) patients. Malignant and premalignant lesions were diagnosed in 8 (22.9%) patients for whom AIP was not the primary differential diagnosis but, in all cases, it was described as a simultaneous finding and recorded in retrospective analysis in histological reports of surgical specimens. Conclusions: Diagnosis of AIP is not always straightforward, and, in some cases, it is not easy to differentiate it from the malignancy. Surgery is generally not indicated for AIP but might be considered in patients when suspicion of malignant/premalignant lesions cannot be excluded after complete diagnostic work-up.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document