scholarly journals Comparison of Central, Ambulatory, Home and Office Blood Pressure Measurement as Risk Markers for Mild Cognitive Impairment in Hypertensive Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 274-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teodora Yaneva-Sirakova ◽  
Latchezar Traykov ◽  
Julia Petrova ◽  
Dobrin Vassilev
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Pulse Pressure ◽  
Target Organ Damage ◽  
Organ Damage ◽  
Target Organ ◽  
Risk Markers ◽  
Hypertensive Patients ◽  
Central Pulse Pressure

Aims: We compared the role of central blood pressure (BP), ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), home-measured BP (HMBP) and office BP measurement as risk markers for the development of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods: 70 hypertensive patients on combination medical therapy were studied. Their mean age was 64.97 ± 8.88 years. Eighteen (25.71%) were males and 52 (74.28%) females. All of the patients underwent full physical examination, laboratory screening, echocardiography, and office, ambulatory, home and central BP measurement. The neuropsychological tests used were: Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). SPSS 19 was used for the statistical analysis with a level of significance of 0.05. Results: The mean central pulse pressure values of patients with MCI were significantly (p = 0.016) higher than those of the patients without MCI. There was a weak negative correlation between central pulse pressure and the results from the MoCA and MMSE (r = –0.283, p = 0.017 and r = –0.241, p = 0.044, respectively). There was a correlation between ABPM and MCI as well as between HMBP and MCI. Conclusions: The correlation of central BP with target organ damage (MCI) is as good as for the other types of measurements of BP (home and ambulatory). Office BP seems to be the poorest marker for the assessment of target organ damage.

Pulse pressure and nocturnal fall in blood pressure are predictors of vascular, cardiac and renal target organ damage in hypertensive patients (LOD-RISK study)

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 145-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis García-Ortiz ◽  
Manuel A. Gómez-Marcos ◽  
Javier Martín-Moreiras ◽  
Luis J. González-Elena ◽  
Jose I. Recio-Rodriguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Pulse Pressure ◽  
Target Organ Damage ◽  
Organ Damage ◽  
Target Organ ◽  
Hypertensive Patients

Essential hypertension: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment

2020 ◽  
pp. 3753-3778
Author(s):  
Bryan Williams ◽  
John D. Firth
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Essential Hypertension ◽  
Severe Hypertension ◽  
Target Organ Damage ◽  
Organ Damage ◽  
Target Organ ◽  
Elevated Blood ◽  
Hypertensive Patients ◽  
Assessment And Treatment ◽  
Hypertension Diagnosis

Essential hypertension is invariably symptomless and usually detected by routine screening or opportunistic measurement of blood pressure. However, once a patient has been labelled as ‘hypertensive’ it is not uncommon for them to associate preceding symptoms to their elevated blood pressure. Some patients will claim that they can recognize when their blood pressure is elevated, usually on the basis of symptoms such as plethoric features, palpitations, dizziness, or a feeling of tension. Screening surveys have demonstrated that these symptoms occur no more commonly in untreated hypertensive patients than they do in the normotensive population. However, there are two important caveats to the symptomless nature of essential hypertension: (1) symptoms may develop as a consequence of target organ damage, (2) headache may be a feature of severe hypertension.

P5470Studying target organ damage indices in newly diagnosed and never treated extreme dipper patients with essential hypertension

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Triantafyllidi ◽  
A Schoinas ◽  
D Benas ◽  
M Varoudi ◽  
D Birba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Arterial Hypertension ◽  
Target Organ Damage ◽  
Organ Damage ◽  
Target Organ ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Night Time ◽  
Hypertensive Patients ◽  
Blood Pressure Decrease ◽  
Damage Indices

Abstract Background Cardiovascular risk estimation in arterial hypertension includes the investigation for target organ damage indices (TOD). 24h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) represents the gold standard method for the confirmation of the arterial hypertension disease. Dipping phenomenon, defined as blood pressure decrease >10% during night-time measurements, leads to hypertension burden reduce during night and carries a positive prognostic significance. However, there are doubts regarding its prognosis when it becomes augmented (extreme dipping defined as blood pressure decrease >20% during night-time measurements). Aim of our study is to explore TOD existence between extreme dipper and dipper hypertensive patients with newly diagnosed and never treated arterial hypertension. Methods From the 480 total patients with newly diagnosed and never treated arterial hypertension who subjected to ABPM, we excluded 190 non-dipper patients and we divided the rest 290 hypertensives (mean age 49±11 years, 193 males) in normal dippers (n=245, mean age 49±11 years, 160 males) and extreme dippers (n=45, mean age 49±10 years, 33 males). Both groups were subjected to the following measurements: arterial stiffness (PWV), 24h microalbumin levels (MAU), carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), diastolic dysfunction (E/Ea), left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and coronary flow reserve (CFR). Results We did not find any differences within groups regarding age, sex distribution, BMI, office SBP/DBP, cenrtal SBP/DBP and daytime average SBP/DBP as well as PWV, MAU, IMT, E/Ea and CFR. We noticed that extreme dippers had reduced 24h average SBP/DBP (p=0.001 and p=0.02, respectively) and increased LVMI (86±18 vs. 79±20 gr/m2, p=0.04) compared to normal dippers. Differences in LVMI Conclusions Extreme dipper hypertensive patients have an increased LVMI, probably as a result of myocardial hypoxia due to severe blood pressure reduction over night. Our results point to the possible increased cardiovascular risk in this group of hypertensive patients.

P804The significance of 24h blood pressure variability improvement regarding target organ damage indices three years after medical treatment initiation in essential hypertension

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Triantafyllidi ◽  
A Schoinas ◽  
D Benas ◽  
D Birba ◽  
D Voutsinos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Blood Pressure Variability ◽  
Treatment Initiation ◽  
Target Organ Damage ◽  
Organ Damage ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Target Organ ◽  
Hypertensive Patients ◽  
Damage Indices

Abstract Background Blood pressure variability (BPV) has been associated with development, progression and severity of cardiac and vascular organ damage and with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality, independently adding to cardiovascular risk, over and above the contribution of elevated mean BP levels. We aimed to explore any correlation between differences in BPV and target organ damage indices (TOD) in hypertensive patients three years after medical treatment initiation. Methods At baseline and before medical treatment initiation, we measured 24h average SBP and DBP as well as 24h systolic BPV after 24h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in newly diagnosed and never treated hypertensive patients (n=171, mean age=52+12 years, 110 males, 24h average SBP/DBP=138+10/87+9 mmHg, 24h systolic BPV=15+3) who were also subjected to arterial stiffness by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), left ventricular hypertrophy by left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) estimations. All the above tests were repeated approximately three years later after treatment initiation. Results Patients were characterized as controlled (n=113, mean age=54+12 years, 62 males, 24h average SBP/DBP=118+6/71+6 mmHg) or non-controlled hyperensives (n=58, mean age=48+11 years, 48 males, 24h average SBP/DBP=133+8/83+7 mmHg) based on ABPM results three years later (controlled BP=24h average BP<130/80 mmHg). In the whole population, 24h average SBP/DBP, systolic BPV (p<0.001) and LVMI (p=0.01) were decreased while systolic BPV difference was related with LVMI difference (r=0.27, p<0.001). In controlled hypertensives, 24h average SBP/DBP, systolic BPV (p<0.001) and LVMI (p=0.02) were decreased while systolic BPV difference was related with LVMI difference (r=0.35, p<0.001). In non-controlled hypertensives, 24h average SBP (p=0.001), DBP p<0.001) and systolic BPV (p=0.04) were decreased while PWV was increased (p=0.03) and no correlations were found between systolic BPV and TOD. Correlation between BPV and LVMI Conclusions It seems that antihypertensive-induced systolic BPV improvement relate with cardiovascular risk decrease occur only in the setting of blood pressure treated within normal limits and confirmed by ABPM. Our study confirms that left ventricular mass between other TOD primarily improves due to successful antihypertensive treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document