Ventricular Arrhythmic Storm after Initiating Sacubitril/Valsartan

Cardiology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lourdes Vicent ◽  
Miriam Juárez ◽  
Irene Martín ◽  
Jorge García ◽  
Hugo González-Saldívar ◽  
...  

Objectives: Sacubitril/valsartan was approved recently for the treatment of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. We present 6 cases of ventricular arrhythmia, that occurred shortly after sacubitril/valsartan initiation, that required drug withdrawal. Other potential triggering factors of electrical storm were ruled out and, from the arrhythmic perspective, all of the patients were stable in the previous year. Our aim is to describe the possible association of sacubitril/valsartan with arrhythmic storm. Methods: This was an observational monocentric study performed in the first 7 months of sacubitril/valsartan commercialization in Spain (October 2016). All patients were included in the SUMA (Sacubitril/Varsartan Usado Ambulatoriamente en Madrid [Sacubitril/Valsartan Used in Outpatients in Madrid]) registry. Patients were consecutively enrolled on the day they started the drug. Ventricular arrhythmic storm was defined as ≥2 episodes of sustained ventricular arrhythmia or defibrillator therapy application in 24 h. Results: From 108 patients who received the drug, 6 presented with ventricular arrhythmic storm (5.6%). Baseline characteristics were similar in the patients with and without ventricular arrhythmic storm. The total number of days that sacubitril/valsartan was administered to each patient was 5, 6, 44 (8 since titration), 84, 93, and 136 (105 since titration), respectively. Conclusions: Our data are not enough to infer a cause-and-effect relationship. Further investigations regarding a potential proarrhythmic effect of sacubitril/valsartan are probably needed.

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott D Solomon ◽  
Milton Packer ◽  
Michael Zile ◽  
Jean Rouleau ◽  
Karl Swedberg ◽  
...  

Introduction: The angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 reduced cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization and all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction compared with enalapril. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that LCZ696 would reduce 30-day readmission after a heart failure hospitalization. Methods: PARADIGM-HF randomized 8399 patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction to either LCZ696 200mg bid or Enalapril 10mg bid. We assessed the risk of 30-day readmission for any cause following investigator reported and adjudicated hospitalization for heart failure. Admission and discharge dates were available for 2800 hospitalizations (95%) in 1638 patients. Results: Of 2800 HF hospitalizations, 1545 occurred in 871 patients in the enalapril group and 1255 occurred in 767 patients in the LCZ arm. Overall, 10.5% of these HF hospitalizations were followed by a repeat hospitalization for any cause within 30 days of discharge, and this occurred significantly less frequently in the LCZ arm (8.7%) relative to the enalapril arm (12.0%), in both unadjusted models and a random-effects logistic regression model accounting for the repeated HF hospitalizations experienced by some patients. We observed similar results in a sensitivity analysis restricted only to the first HF hospitalization for each patient. Further adjustment for baseline characteristics did not alter these findings. Similar effect sizes were observed for adjudicated heart failure hospitalizations. Conclusion: In patients admitted with heart failure in PARADIGM-HF, LCZ reduced 30-day readmissions for any-cause.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document