Visit-to-Visit B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Variability during the Previous Year Has Independent Prognostic Value in Patients with Stable Chronic Heart Failure

Cardiology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 143 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 92-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuyuki Kagiyama ◽  
Takuya Yuri ◽  
Akihiro Hayashida ◽  
Atsushi Hirohata ◽  
Keizo Yamamoto ◽  
...  

Background: There is wide variability of visit-to-visit (V2V) B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), even when they are stable. The prognostic significance of V2V-BNP variability has not been investigated. We aimed to test whether V2V-BNP variability during the stable period of CHF has prognostic value regardless of BNP level. Methods: In 278 stable outpatients (75 ± 10 years, 65% male) with CHF, we studied V2V-BNP variability, which was defined as the coefficient of variance of BNP values measured during 1 year before enrollment. All-cause death and rehospitalization due to HF were considered the primary endpoint. Results: The median V2V-BNP variability was 25.7% (IQR: 19.2–34.4%). During the follow-up period (median 3.2 years), 100 patients reached the endpoint and those with high V2V-BNP variability (≥25.7%) had a significantly higher rate of events (p = 0.001). CHF severity in terms of BNP level and MAGGIC risk score was not significantly different between those with high and low V2V-BNP variability. Multivariable analysis showed that high V2V-BNP variability was independently associated with increased event rates even after adjustment for other known prognostic predictors, including BNP (hazard ratio 1.90, p = 0.003), or for MAGGIC risk score and BNP (hazard ratio 1.72, p = 0.010). The hazard for the outcome consistently increased as V2V-BNP variability increased, with a marked increase up to about 30%. Conclusions: Even in the stable phase of CHF, V2V-BNP variability was associated with worse long-term outcomes, independent of BNP level.

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Z Dai ◽  
T Asano ◽  
S Ohde ◽  
N Komiyama

Abstract Background N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a potential biomarker for monitoring the status of heart failure. However, the optimal monitoring interval is unknown. This study aims to investigate minimal informative monitoring interval of NT-proBNP in patients with stable chronic heart failure. Methods In this retrospective open cohort study, adult patients followed up at a tertiary hospital for chronic heart failure with NT-proBNP measurements were included if they had been previously admitted due to acute heart failure and were free from readmission over 6 months after discharge. We analyzed NT-proBNP measured between 6 months after discharge and the timepoint of an alteration of medication regimen or readmission due to worsening of heart failure. To distinguish actual progression of the disease from biological variability and measurement error, the signal-to-noise ratio method was applied with a random-effects model. Stratified analysis was performed according to underlying risks. Results In this analysis, 368 patients were included with NT-proBNP measured between July 2009 and December 2017. The patients had 6.0 times of NT-proBNP measurements in median (interquartile range [IQR] 4.0–10.0) during the follow-up period (median 12.0 months [IQR 6.0–27.0]). In the estimates of the random-effects model, signal (i.e. actual progression of the disease) exceeded noise (i.e. biological variability and measurement error) at 8.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.7–10.1) after the index measurement. In a subgroup analysis according to the AHEAD risk score, the minimal informative monitoring interval was shortened as the risk score increased (0–1 point: 12.3 months [95% CI: 10.3–14.5]; 2–3 points: 8.0 months [95% CI: 6.8–9.7]; 4–5 points: 3.3 months [95% CI: 3.0–3.8]; Figure). Informative intervals stratified by risk Conclusion In patients with stable chronic heart failure, the overall minimal informative monitoring interval of NT-proBNP measurement was 8.1 months, which varies by underlying risk. The optimal monitoring interval could be lengthened especially for patients at lower risk.


2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Beatrice Scardovi ◽  
Renata De Maria ◽  
Andrea Celestini ◽  
Claudio Coletta ◽  
Nadia Aspromonte ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document