Cell-Free DNA Testing: What Is the Reason Why High-Risk Women Choose It?

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Leticia Benítez-Quintanilla ◽  
Montse Pauta ◽  
Isabel Matas ◽  
Irene Madrigal ◽  
Antoni Borrell
2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 232-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Persico ◽  
Simona Boito ◽  
Benedetta Ischia ◽  
Adalgisa Cordisco ◽  
Valentina De Robertis ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Maeve K. HOPKINS ◽  
Nathanael KOELPER ◽  
Samantha CALDWELL ◽  
Brittany DYR ◽  
Lorraine DUGOFF

2015 ◽  
Vol 70 (8) ◽  
pp. 492-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn E. Palomaki ◽  
E. M. Kloza ◽  
G. M. Lambert-Messerlian ◽  
D. van den Boom ◽  
M. Ehric ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 44-44
Author(s):  
M. Smet ◽  
N. Chan ◽  
A. McLennan ◽  
F. da Silva Costa

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-143
Author(s):  
Sarang Younesi ◽  
Shahram Savad ◽  
Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard ◽  
Mohammad Mahdi Taheri-Amin ◽  
Pourandokht Saadati ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ashley N. Battarbee ◽  
Neeta L. Vora

In a prospective, multicenter blinded study at 35 international centers, the Noninvasive Examination of Trisomy (NEXT) study evaluated the performance of cell-free DNA screening for fetal trisomy compared to standard first trimester screening with nuchal translucency and serum analytes in a routine prenatal population. Among the 15,841 women who had standard screening and cell-free DNA analysis with neonatal outcome data, there were 68 chromosomal abnormalities (1 in 236). Of these, 38 were Trisomy 21 (1 in 417). Cell-free DNA analysis had a higher area under the curve (AUC) for trisomy 21, compared to standard screening (0.999 vs. 0.958, p = 0.001). Cell-free DNA analysis also had greater sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value compared to standard screening for trisomy 21, 18, and 13. While cell-free DNA analysis cannot detect all chromosome abnormalities, it performed better than standard screening for detection of trisomies 21, 18, and 13 in a routine population including low- and high-risk women.


2019 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona S. Togneri ◽  
Mark D. Kilby ◽  
Elizabeth Young ◽  
Samantha Court ◽  
Denise Williams ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for the detection of foetal aneuploidy through analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal blood is offered routinely by many healthcare providers across the developed world. This testing has recently been recommended for evaluative implementation in the UK National Health Service (NHS) foetal anomaly screening pathway as a contingent screen following an increased risk of trisomy 21, 18 or 13. In preparation for delivering a national service, we have implemented cfDNA-based NIPT in our Regional Genetics Laboratory. Here, we describe our validation and verification processes and initial experiences of the technology prior to rollout of a national screening service. Methods Data are presented from more than 1000 patients (215 retrospective and 840 prospective) from ‘high- and low-risk pregnancies’ with outcome data following birth or confirmatory invasive prenatal sampling. NIPT was by the Illumina Verifi® test. Results Our data confirm a high-fidelity service with a failure rate of ~0.24% and a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of foetal trisomy 13, 18 and 21. Secondly, the data show that a significant proportion of patients continue their pregnancies without prenatal invasive testing or intervention after receiving a high-risk cfDNA-based result. A total of 46.5% of patients referred to date were referred for reasons other than high screen risk. Ten percent (76/840 clinical service referrals) of patients were referred with ultrasonographic finding of a foetal structural anomaly, and data analysis indicates high- and low-risk scan indications for NIPT. Conclusions NIPT can be successfully implemented into NHS regional genetics laboratories to provide high-quality services. NHS provision of NIPT in patients with high-risk screen results will allow for a reduction of invasive testing and partially improve equality of access to cfDNA-based NIPT in the pregnant population. Patients at low risk for a classic trisomy or with other clinical indications are likely to continue to access cfDNA-based NIPT as a private test.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document