Platelet miR-107 Participates in Clopidogrel Resistance after PCI Treatment by Regulating P2Y12

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Qi Zhang ◽  
Fan Zhu ◽  
Yuyin Luo ◽  
Jun Liao ◽  
Jiancheng Cao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Reactivity ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Gene Expression Omnibus ◽  
Luciferase Reporter ◽  
Clopidogrel Resistance ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Qrt Pcr ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Polymerase Chain

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> High platelet reactivity (HPR) caused by clopidogrel tolerance is an adverse reaction of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients who receive clopidogrel antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) surgery. Platelet microRNA (miRNA) is related to platelet reactivity. This study explored the mechanism of platelet miRNA in regulating platelet reactivity. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We recruited 50 ACS/PCI patients and divided them into the HPR group (P2Y12 reaction units [PRU] ≥300) and the LPR group (PRU &#x3c; 170) according to the PRU through the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. P2Y12-related miRNAs were screened by TargetScan, miRWalk, and Gene Expression Omnibus. The expressions of P2Y12 and miRNAs in the HPR group and the LPR group were determined by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation between P2Y12 and miRNAs. The interactions between P2Y12 and miR-107 were predicted by TargetScan and verified by dual-luciferase reporter assay. The regulation of miR-107 mimic or inhibitor on P2Y12 expression was detected by qRT-PCR and Western blot. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There were 22 patients in the LPR group and 28 patients in the HPR group. PY212 was highly expressed in the HPR group compared with the LPR group. We screened the P2Y12-related miRNAs (miR-145-5p, miR-4701-3p, miR-107, and miR-15b-5p), but only miR-107 and miR-15b-5p expressions were downregulated in the HPR group and were negatively correlated with PY212 expression. P2Y12 was the target gene of miR-107. PY212 expression was inhibited by miR-107 overexpression but suppressed by miR-107 silencing. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Platelet miR-107 participated in clopidogrel resistance in ACS/PCI patients by regulating P2Y12 expression.

Effects of the rs2244613 polymorphism of the CES1 gene on the antiplatelet effect of the receptor P2Y12 blocker clopidogrel

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin B. Mirzaev ◽  
Darya V. Osipova ◽  
Elena J. Kitaeva ◽  
Vladimir V. Shprakh ◽  
Sherzod P. Abdullaev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Platelet Reactivity ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Carrier Rate ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Healthy Participants ◽  
Ces1 Gene

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of the carriage of the rs2244613 polymorphism of the CES1 gene with clopidogrel resistance as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of antiplatelet therapy in the carriers of this marker who have had acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study also analyzes the procedure of percutaneous coronary intervention and compares the rs2244613 carrier rate between patients with ACS and healthy participants. Methods The study involved 81 patients diagnosed with ACS and 136 conditionally healthy participants. The optical detection of platelet agglutination by VerifyNow was employed to measure residual platelet reactivity in patients with ACS. The rs2244613 polymorphism was determined using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results According to the results, the AA genotype of the rs2244613 polymorphism of the CES1 gene was detected in 37 patients (45.6%), the CA genotype in 42 patients (51.8%) and the CC genotype in 2 patients (2.6%). The level of residual platelet reactivity in rs2244613 carriers was higher compared with patients who did not have this allelic variant: 183.23 PRU ± 37.24 vs. 154.3 PRU ± 60.36 (p = 0.01). The frequencies of the minor allele C were 28.4% and 28.3% in patients with ACS and healthy participants, respectively. The results of the linear statistical model PRU due to CES1 genotype were as follows: df = 1, F = 6.96, p = 0.01). The standardized beta was 0.285 (p = 0.01) and R2 was 0.081. However, we also added CYP2C19*2 and *17 into the linear regression model. The results of the model were as follows: df = 3, F = 5.1, p = 0.003) and R2 was 0.166. Conclusions We identified a statistically significant correlation between the carriage of the rs2244613 polymorphism of the CES1 gene and the level of residual platelet aggregation among patients with ACS and the procedure of percutaneous coronary intervention.

scholarly journals Does Baseline On-treatment Platelet Reactivity Impact Long-term Prognosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Thrombocytopenia Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ru Liu ◽  
Tianyu Li ◽  
Deshan Yuan ◽  
Yan Chen ◽  
Xiaofang Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Real World ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Platelet Reactivity ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
The Real ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Abstract Objectives: This study analyzed the association between on-treatment platelet reactivity and long-term outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and thrombocytopenia (TP) in the real world. Methods: A total of 10724 consecutive cases with coronary artery disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were collected from January to December 2013. Cases with ACS and TP under dual anti-platelet therapy were enrolled from the total cohort. 5-year clinical outcomes were evaluated among cases with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR), low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR) and normal on-treatment platelet reactivity (NTPR), tested by thromboelastogram (TEG) at baseline. Results: Cases with HTPR, LTPR and NTPR accounted for 26.2%, 34.4% and 39.5%, respectively. Cases with HTPR were presented with the most male sex, lowest hemoglobin level, highest erythrocyte sedimentation rate and most LM or three-vessel disease, compared with the other two groups. The rates of 5-year all-cause death, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, stroke and bleeding were all not significantly different among three groups. Multivariable Cox regression indicated that, compared with cases with NTPR, cases with HTPR were not independently associated with all endpoints, as well as cases with LTPR (all P>0.05). Conclusions: In patients with ACS and TP undergoing PCI, 5-year all-cause death, MACCE, MI, revascularization, stroke and bleeding risk were all similar between cases with HTPR and cases with NTPR, tested by TEG at baseline, in the real world. The comparison result was the same between cases with LTPR and NTPR.

On-ticagrelor platelet reactivity and clinical outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
marc laine ◽  
Vassili PANAGIDES ◽  
Corinne Frère ◽  
thomas cuisset ◽  
Caroline Gouarne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Platelet Reactivity ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
The Relationship

Background: A strong association between on-thienopyridines platelet reactivity (PR) and the risk of both thrombotic and bleeding events in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been demonstrated. However, no study has analyzed the relationship between on-ticagrelor PR and clinical outcome in this clinical setting. Objectives: We aimed to investigate the relationship between on-ticagrelor PR, assessed by the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) index, and clinical outcome in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. Methods: We performed a prospective, multicenter, observational study of patients undergoing PCI for ACS. PR was measured using the VASP index following ticagrelor loading dose. The primary study endpoint was the rate of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type ≥2 at 1 year. The key secondary endpoint was the rate of major cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and urgent revascularization. Results: We included 570 ACS patients, among whom 33.9% had ST-elevation myocardial infarction. BARC type ≥ 2 bleeding occurred in 10.9% and MACE in 13.8%. PR was not associated with BARC ≥ 2 or with MACE (p=0.12 and p=0.56, respectively). No relationship between PR and outcomes was observed, neither when PR was analyzed quantitatively nor qualitatively (low on-treatment PR (LTPR) vs no LTPR). Conclusion: On-ticagrelor PR measured by the VASP was not associated with bleeding or thrombotic events in ACS patients undergoing PCI. PR measured by the VASP should not be used as a surrogate endpoint in studies on ticagrelor.

scholarly journals Modern Antiplatelet Therapy for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. How to Make the Right Choice?

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 1017-1023
Author(s):  
T. M. Uskach ◽  
A. S. Tereshchenko
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Platelet Reactivity ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Dual antiplatelet therapy is the most important step in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treatment. The new generation of inhibitors of P2Y12 platelet receptors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) provide more pronounced platelet inhibition than clopidogrel. The drugs differ in pharmacodynamics and platelet reactivity tests due to different mechanisms of binding to P2Y12 receptors. The antiplatelet effect of prasugrel and ticagrelor provides clinical benefit and better prognosis in patients with various forms of ACS. In patients with ST-segment elevation ACS prasugrel and ticagrelor are preferred over clopi-dogrel due to their higher efficacy and better clinical outcomes, and currently have preferential positions in guidelines compared to clopidogrel. The comparison of prasugrel versus ticagrelor (ISAR-REACT 5 trial) demonstrated superiority of prasugrel over ticagrelor in patients with ST-segment elevation ACS, for whom an invasive evaluation is planned and in early invasive treatment non-ST-segment elevation ACS. The choice of a drug for dual antiplatelet therapy in various clinical situations remains controversial. The latest ESC guidelines on non-ST elevation ACS (2020) [1] demonstrate the possible preference for prasugrel in patients with ACS without ST-segment elevation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Current article demonstrates the results of recent clinical studies and the real clinical data regarding antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary interventions. The indications for the use of P2Y12 platelet inhibitors in certain groups of patients are outlined. Treatment selection of the most effective and safe drugs in patients with ACS is highlighted according to the updated European guidelines.

Onset of optimal P2Y12-ADP receptor blockade after ticagrelor and prasugrel intake in Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome

2015 ◽  
Vol 114 (10) ◽  
pp. 702-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Laine ◽  
Laurence Camoin-Jau ◽  
Frederic Noirot ◽  
Régis Guieu ◽  
Françoise Dignat-George ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Platelet Reactivity ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Receptor Blockade ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
St Elevation ◽  
Adp Receptor ◽  
The Mean

SummaryPretreatment with a loading dose (LD) of clopidogrel or ticagrelor before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is supported by the guidelines, but debated following a recent meta-analysis on clopidogrel pretreatment and the ACCOAST trial. In this trial prasugrel pretreatment failed to reduce ischaemic events. The timing of optimal platelet reactivity (PR) inhibition of ticagrelor and prasugrel in non ST-elevation ACS (NSTE ACS) is yet undetermined. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the delay required to reach optimal PR inhibition in NSTE ACS following a LD of ticagrelor or prasugrel. Consecutive patients undergoing PCI for NSTE ACS were randomised in this monocentre study. The Vasodilatorphosphoprotein index (VASP) was used to measure PR before the LD and then at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4 and 24 hours (h) post-LD. Optimal PR inhibition was defined as a VASP< 50 %. We randomised 24 patients to ticagrelor or prasugrel LD. One hour after the LD, 29 % of patients had a VASP > 50 % (ticagrelor and prasugrel: 25 vs 33 %; p=0.7). Optimal PR inhibition was obtained 2 h after the LD in both groups (12/12 with ticagrelor and 11/12 with prasugrel). At that time, the mean VASP index was 19 ± 16 % (95 %CI: 12–25). Maximal PR inhibition was reached after 4 h: 11 ± 10 % (95 %CI: 6–15). In NSTE ACS undergoing PCI a LD of ticagrelor or prasugrel given during the procedure provides optimal P2Y12-ADP receptor blockade in 2 h and maximal inhibition within 4 h.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document