Inhibitors in nonsevere haemophilia A: outcome and eradication strategies

2015 ◽  
Vol 114 (07) ◽  
pp. 46-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice S. van Velzen ◽  
Corien L. Eckhardt ◽  
Daniel P. Hart ◽  
Marjolein Peters ◽  
Savita Rangarajan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
High Titre ◽  
Source Population ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Anamnestic Response ◽  
Sustained Success

SummaryIn nonsevere haemophilia A (HA) patients the presence of an inhibitor may exacerbate the bleeding phenotype dramatically. There are very limited data on the optimal therapeutic approach to eradicate inhibitors in these patients. We aimed to describe inhibitor eradication treatment in a large cohort of unselected nonsevere HA patients with inhibitors. We included 101 inhibitor patients from a source population of 2,709 nonsevere HA patients (factor VIII 2–40 IU/dl), treated in Europe and Australia (median age 37 years, interquartile range (IQR) 15–60; median peak titre 7 BU/ml, IQR 2–30). In the majority of the patients (71 %; 72/101) the inhibitor disappeared; either spontaneously (70 %, 51/73) or after eradication treatment (75 %, 21/28). Eradication treatment strategies varied widely, including both immune tolerance induction and immunosuppression. Sustained success (no inhibitor after rechallenge with factor VIII concentrate after inhibitor disappearance) was achieved in 64 % (30/47) of those patients rechallenged with FVIII concentrate. In high-titre inhibitor patients sustained success was associated with eradication treatment (unadjusted relative risk 2.3, 95 % confidence interval 1.3–4.3), compared to no eradication treatment. In conclusion, in nonsevere HA patients most inhibitors disappear spontaneously. However, in 35 % (25/72) of these patients an anamnestic response still can occur when rechallenged, thus disappearance in these patients does not always equal sustained response. Treatment for those requiring eradication has to be decided case by case, as one single approach is unlikely to be appropriate for all.Study was carried out in: Emma Children’s Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Innowacyjna metoda prowadzenia ITI za pomocą preparatu czynnika VIII z frakcją Fc u pacjentów z hemofilią A z obecnością inhibitora czynnika VIII – przegląd literaturowy

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maciej Trzaska ◽  
Marek Karwacki ◽  
Paweł Łaguna ◽  
Michał Matysiak
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Immunological Tolerance ◽  
Therapeutic Benefit ◽  
High Titre ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
First Time

Eradication of factor VIII inhibitors using Immune tolerance induction (ITI) treatment is the standard of care for severe haemophilia A patients presenting with factor VIII inhibitors, but is not always effective. A description of the potential immunological tolerance effect of the IgG Fc domain of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc), as well as published experience with rFVIIIFc for ITI in patients with severe haemophilia A and high-titre inhibitors. Review of published literature describing cases of ITI with rFVIIIFc in patients with severe haemophilia A and high-titre inhibitors between November 2015 and June 2018. Four publications has been found. Of 56 patients with haemophilia A who presented with FVIII inhibitors, 28 achieved a negative Bethesda titre (< 0.6) after ITI treatment using rFVIIIFc. Additional patients continued on rFVIIIFc ITI at the time of publication, while a few were reported to have switched to bypass therapy alone or other factors . For those still undergoing ITI, longer follow-up is needed to determine final outcomes. No adverse events were reported. Based on literature review, preliminary evidence of FVIIIFc use in high risk, first-time ITI suggests rapid time to tolerization. For rescue ITI, rFVIIIFc showed therapeutic benefit in some patients who previously failed ITI. These findings give hope but highlight the need for further evaluation in ongoing clinical trials.

scholarly journals Immune Tolerance Therapy for Haemophilia A Patients with Acquired Factor VIII Alloantibodies: Comprehensive Analysis of Experience at a Single Institution

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (01) ◽  
pp. 35-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. J. Spence ◽  
E. L. Waters ◽  
R. Beresford-Webb ◽  
M. J. Mitchell ◽  
J. Cuttler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
Hla Class I ◽  
High Titre ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Immune Tolerance Induction

SummaryEleven children with severe haemophilia A associated with the IVS 22 inversion and acquired high titre neutralising antibodies to factor VIII underwent immune tolerance induction. HLA class I and high resolution class II type is detailed for each patient. A three phase approach to immune tolerance induction was used. During phase 1, which lasted a median of six weeks, patients received factor VIII 100 IU/kg twice daily. Phase 2 comprised a factor VIII dose reduction to 100 IU/kg once daily, and continued for a median duration of 14 weeks. Subsequently 10 of the 11 patients satisfied the criteria of absent factor VIII neutralising activity by the Bethesda method, and a factor VIII elimination half life of greater than 5 h, allowing progression to phase 3, a further factor VIII dose reduction to 50 IU/kg three times weekly. A model for dose reduction as factor VIII tolerance evolves, based on pharmacokinetic analysis, is described.

The long-term course of factor VIII inhibitors in patients with congenital haemophilia A without immune tolerance induction

2011 ◽  
Vol 105 (01) ◽  
pp. 59-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila Caram ◽  
Roberta Grazielle de Souza ◽  
Júlio Carepa de Sousa ◽  
Tatiana Araújo Pereira ◽  
Ana Maria do Amaral Cerqueira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Factor Viii ◽  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
Clotting Factor ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Immune Tolerance Induction ◽  
Inhibitor Titre ◽  
Very High

SummaryThe development of alloantibodies that inhibit or neutralise the function of factor VIII is considered the most serious complication of the treatment of congenital haemophilia A. In order to describe their course without immune tolerance induction (ITI), we documented data on all performed inhibitor tests with dates as well as on clotting factor infusions of all consecutive patients who were treated in our centre between 1993 and 2006. Patients were tested every 7.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.6–7.8). A ‘sustained negative inhibitor status’ was defined as consistent non-positive inhibitor measurements for two years or longer. A total of 60/486 (12%) patients tested had a positive inhibitor titre in two or more occasions. Most of the patients (56%) with a maximum inhibitor titre of < 5 Bethesda unit (BU)/ml (named “low titre inhibitor”) developed a sustained negative inhibitor status. Among patients with high (5–9.9 BU/ml) and very high (≥ 10 BU/ ml) inhibitor titres, the proportions were 50% and 3%, respectively. Our findings suggest that ITI might not be needed for all patients with non-transient inhibitors, especially when their maximum inhibitor titre is below 10 BU/ml. Further studies in countries where ITI is not available are needed to examine predictors of the natural sustained negative inhibitor status.

Comparison of Vasopressor Duration in Septic Shock Patients With and Without Cirrhosis

2020 ◽  
pp. 106002802098072
Author(s):  
Melissa M. Durst ◽  
Elizabeth A. Eitzen ◽  
Scott T. Benken
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Severity Of Illness ◽  
Discharge Disposition ◽  
Increase Risk ◽  
Vasopressor Use

Background Patients with cirrhosis have immune dysfunction, altered inflammatory response, and hemodynamic changes which increase risk of septic shock and potentially prolong management with fluids, vasopressors, and other therapies. Due to limited available guidance, this study aimed to characterize vasopressor use in patients with cirrhosis in relation to patients without cirrhosis in septic shock. Methods This was a retrospective matched cohort analysis of 122 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at an academic medical center from January 2015 to November 2017. Patients were grouped based on the presence or absence of cirrhosis and matched based on severity of illness scoring. The primary outcome was vasopressor duration. Secondary comparisons included total vasopressor requirement, length of hospital and ICU stay, in-hospital mortality, change in organ function, and discharge disposition. Results The group with cirrhosis had significantly longer median (interquartile range [IQR]) durations of vasopressor therapy compared with the group without cirrhosis (86.0 [42.0-164.5] vs 39.0 [14.5-82.0] hours; P = 0.003) leading to increased median (IQR) vasopressor exposure (71.7 [15.5-239.5] vs 24.7 [5.3-77.9] mg norepinephrine [NE] equivalents; P = 0.003). No difference was found in in-hospital mortality between groups. However, regression analysis showed vasopressor exposure was associated with in-hospital mortality. Conclusion and Relevance Patients with cirrhosis in septic shock have increased vasopressor durations and overall requirements compared with patients without cirrhosis. Increased durations and requirements is associated with poorer outcomes independent of presence of cirrhosis. Future studies are needed to improve vasopressor treatment strategies and end points utilized in cirrhosis.

Daratumumab rapidly reduces high‐titre factor VIII inhibitors in haemophilia A patients during life‐threatening haemorrhages

Haemophilia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chatphatai Moonla ◽  
Noppacharn Uaprasert ◽  
Phandee Watanaboonyongcharoen ◽  
Mukmanee Meesanun ◽  
Autcharaporn Sukperm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
High Titre ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Life Threatening
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document