Longevity of Teeth and Dental Implants in Patients Treated for Chronic Periodontitis Following Periodontal Maintenance Therapy in a Private Specialist Practice: A Retrospective Study with a 10-Year Follow-up

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-98
Author(s):  
Renzo Guarnieri ◽  
Dario Di Nardo ◽  
Gianni Di Giorgio ◽  
Gabriele Miccoli ◽  
Luca Testarelli
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Chronic Periodontitis ◽  
Specialist Practice ◽  
Periodontal Maintenance ◽  
Private Specialist

scholarly journals Survival Rate of 1008 Short Dental Implants with 21 Months of Average Follow-Up: A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 3943
Author(s):  
João Caramês ◽  
Ana Catarina Pinto ◽  
Gonçalo Caramês ◽  
Helena Francisco ◽  
Joana Fialho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
High Survival ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Posterior Maxilla ◽  
Clinical Records

This retrospective study evaluated the survival rate of short, sandblasted acid-etched surfaced implants with 6 and 8 mm lengths with at least 120 days of follow-up. Data concerning patient, implant and surgery characteristics were retrieved from clinical records. Sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA)-surfaced tissue-level 6 mm (TL6) or 8 mm (TL8) implants or bone-level tapered 8 mm (BLT8) implants were used. Absolute and relative frequency distributions were calculated for qualitative variables and mean values and standard deviations for quantitative variables. A Cox regression model was performed to verify whether type, length and/or width influence the implant survival. The cumulative implant survival rate was assessed by time-to-event analyses (Kaplan–Meier estimator). In all, 513 patients with a mean age of 58.00 ± 12.44 years received 1008 dental implants with a mean follow-up of 21.57 ± 10.77 months. Most implants (78.17%) presented a 4.1 mm diameter, and the most frequent indication was a partially edentulous arch (44.15%). The most frequent locations were the posterior mandible (53.97%) and the posterior maxilla (31.55%). No significant differences were found in survival rates between groups of type, length and width of implant with the cumulative rate being 97.7% ± 0.5%. Within the limitations of this study, the evaluated short implants are a predictable option with high survival rates during the follow-up without statistical differences between the appraised types, lengths and widths.

Progression of Periodontitis and Tooth Loss Associated with Glycemic Control in Individuals Undergoing Periodontal Maintenance Therapy: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 595-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Oliveira Costa ◽  
Luís Otávio Miranda Cota ◽  
Eugênio José Pereira Lages ◽  
Alcione Maria Soares Dutra Oliveira ◽  
Peterson Antônio Dutra Oliveira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Tooth Loss ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
Periodontal Maintenance

Long-term Survival of Straumann Dental Implants with TPS Surfaces: A Retrospective Study with a Follow-up of 12 to 23 Years

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 480-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan T. Becker ◽  
Benedicta E. Beck-Broichsitter ◽  
Christian M. Rossmann ◽  
Eleonore Behrens ◽  
Arne Jochens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

Effect of compliance during periodontal maintenance therapy on c‐reactive protein levels: a 6‐year follow‐up

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Oliveira Costa ◽  
Rafael Paschoal Esteves Lima ◽  
Sheila Cavalca Cortelli ◽  
Adriana Moreira Costa ◽  
José Roberto Cortelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Periodontal Maintenance

Dental implants placed in resorbed alveolar ridges reconstructed with iliac crest autogenous onlay grafts: A 26-year median follow-up retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 805-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Maiorana ◽  
Pier Paolo Poli ◽  
Anna Mascellaro ◽  
Susanna Ferrario ◽  
Mario Beretta
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Iliac Crest ◽  
Onlay Grafts

scholarly journals Clinical and radiographic evaluation of narrow- vs. regular-diameter dental implants: a 3-year follow-up. A retrospective study

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Zweers ◽  
A. van Doornik ◽  
E. A. H. Hogendorf ◽  
M. Quirynen ◽  
G. A. Van der Weijden
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation

scholarly journals Dental implants placed in patients with mechanical risk factors: A long-term follow-up retrospective study

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piero Papi ◽  
StefanoDi Carlo ◽  
Francesca Mencio ◽  
Daniele Rosella ◽  
FrancescaDe Angelis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

scholarly journals Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma Patients Progressing on Lenalidomide Maintenance

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1779-1779
Author(s):  
Larysa Sanchez ◽  
Erin Moshier ◽  
Alexander Coltoff ◽  
Ali Mustafa ◽  
Darren Pan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Total Change ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Introduction: Lenalidomide (R) maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). Even in the transplant ineligible population, R until progression is associated with improved PFS. The ever-increasing use of R maintenance therapy, however, eventually leads to refractoriness to R at maintenance doses. Moreover, clinical trials with len-dex (Rd) backbone regimens including daratumumab, elotuzumab, ixazomib, and carfilzomib have all excluded such patients (pts). This is particularly an issue for elotuzumab and ixazomib, which have no single agent approval. There are currently no published data on the outcomes of full dose Rd or Rd backbone containing regimens in pts refractory to R maintenance. A prospective randomized trial would be difficult to perform given variability in pt factors (i.e. R tolerance, age, renal function) and disease factors (i.e. molecular risk and clinical vs biochemical progression). We therefore performed a retrospective study to characterize outcomes of pts on R maintenance therapy. Methods: This is a single-institution, retrospective study in which we reviewed the records of all consecutive pts with a diagnosis of MM at the Mount Sinai Hospital between February 2010 and October 2016. There were 465 pts identified who had maintenance R as a single agent or in combination with low-dose dexamethasone or prednisone. Pts were excluded if insufficient data were available or < 3 month (mo) follow up from time of initiation of R maintenance. Time to progression (TTP) on R maintenance, next line of therapy, and PFS on next line of therapy were determined using Kaplan Meyer analysis. Results: A total of 350 pts were included in this study. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median follow up time was 59 mos and median time on R maintenance was 21.0 mos. 172 pts (49%) progressed while on R maintenance or within 60 days of R discontinuation. 51 pts (15%) remain on R maintenance as of last follow up. The remaining 127 pts (36%) discontinued R for reasons other than progression and either progressed after 60 days (median 658 days, range 91-2053 days) or have not progressed. The median TTP on R maintenance was 34.2 mos (Fig 1A) and the majority of these were characterized by the treating physician as biochemical (65% during maintenance and 56% after R discontinuation). Of the patients with serologic and symptomatic progression, the majority were by bone disease (24% and 37%, respectively). 234 pts had data available on next line of therapy and the median PFS on this next line was 16.8 mo (95% CI: 13.2-20.1), however the PFS was shorter for those who had progressed while on R maintenance versus those who had progressed after R maintenance had been discontinued (13.2 mos vs. 28.9 mos, respectively, p 0.0001). The median PFS according to next line of therapy for those who received an increase in R dose + dex vs 3rd agent added to Rd backbone vs total change in therapy was 9.5 mos vs 21.0 mos vs 14.2 mos, respectively (Fig 1B). The most common drugs added to an Rd backbone were bortezomib and elotuzumab with an associated PFS of 19.0 and 40.1 mos, respectively. The majority of those receiving elotuzumab + Rd had progressed on R maintenance (15/18 = 83%). The most common regimens for those with a total change in therapy are summarized in Table 2. Conclusions: The median TTP on R maintenance was 34.2 mos and while most progression was felt to be biochemical, of those with symptomatic progression as well, the primary manifestation was bone disease (approximately 30% of patients), highlighting the importance of surveillance osseous imaging in MM. While an increase in R dose with steroids was associated with an additional 9.5 mos PFS and a total change in regimen with 14.2 mos PFS, those who received an Rd containing triplet had impressive results. In particular, Rd + elotuzumab resulted in a PFS of 40.1 mos. Multivariate analysis accounting for the potential confounding patient and disease factors inherent to treatment selection in retrospective studies will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Cho: BMS: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Employment; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agenus: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Jagannath:Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Medicom: Speakers Bureau; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy. Madduri:Abbvie: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; undation Medicine: Consultancy. Parekh:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Karyopharm Inc.: Research Funding; Foundation Medicine Inc.: Consultancy. Richter:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chari:Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Array Biopharma: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document