scholarly journals Mergers of Teaching Hospitals in Boston, New York, and Northern California

Circulation ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 104 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheldon Goldberg
2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 845-852 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. W. Coombs ◽  
H. Van Gessel ◽  
J. C. Pearson ◽  
M.-R. Godsell ◽  
F. G. O'Brien ◽  
...  

Objective.To describe the control of an outbreak of infection and colonization with the New York/Japan methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) clone in multiple healthcare facilities, and to demonstrate the importance of making an MRSA management policy involving molecular typing of MRSA into a statewide public health responsibility.Setting.A range of healthcare facilities, including 2 metropolitan teaching hospitals and a regional hospital, as well as several community hospitals and long-term care facilities in a nonmetropolitan healthcare region.Interventions.A comprehensive, statewide MRSA epidemiological investigation and management policy.Results.In May 2005, there were 3 isolates referred to the Western Australian Gram-Positive Bacteria Typing and Research Unit that were identified as the New York/Japan MRSA clone, a pandemic MRSA clone with the ability to spread and replace existing clones in a region. Subsequent investigation identified 28 additional cases of infection and/or colonization dating from 2002 onward, including 1 involving a colonized healthcare worker (HCW) who had previously been hospitalized overseas. Of the 31 isolates detected, 25 were linked epidemiologically and via molecular typing to the isolate recovered from the colonized HCW. Four isolates appeared to have been introduced separately from overseas. Although the isolate from the single remaining case patient was genetically indistinct from the isolates that spread within Western Australia, no specific epidemiological link could be established. The application of standard outbreak management strategies reduced further spread.Conclusions.The elimination of the New/York Japan MRSA clone in a healthcare region demonstrates the importance of incorporating MRSA management policy into statewide public health programs. The mainstays of such programs should include a comprehensive and effective outbreak identification and management policy (including pre-employment screening of HCWs, where applicable) and MRSA clone identification by multilocus sequence typing.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. e410-e419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Solomon ◽  
Natalia Egorova ◽  
Kerin Adelson ◽  
Cardinale B. Smith ◽  
Rebeca Franco ◽  
...  

Purpose: Cancer, with readmission rates as high as 27%, has thus far been excluded from most readmission reduction efforts. However, some readmissions for patients with advanced disease may be avoidable. We assessed the prevalence of potentially preventable readmissions and associated factors in patients with metastatic cancer. Patients and Methods: Using a merged longitudinal data set of New York State hospital discharges and vital records, we measured 30-day readmissions for anemia, dehydration, diarrhea, emesis, fever, nausea, neutropenia, pain, pneumonia, and sepsis among patients with metastatic cancer between 2012 and 2014. We used competing-risk models to assess the effects of demographics, comorbidities, hospital type, payer, and discharge disposition. Results: A total of 11,275 patients had 19,307 hospitalizations. The 30-day readmission rate was 24.5%; 11.9% (n = 565) of readmissions were potentially preventable. Higher readmission rates occurred in black (hazard rate [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.35), Hispanic (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.31), and younger patients (HR per 10 years, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90 to 0.97). Lower rates were associated with female sex (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91 to 0.99), private insurance (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.81), teaching hospitals, and hospice discharge (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.91). Discharge home with services (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.27) or to a skilled nursing facility (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.23) increased readmission likelihood. Potentially preventable readmissions were associated with younger age (HR per 10 years, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.98 to 0.99) and discharge home with services (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.50). Likelihood decreased if care was received at a teaching hospital (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.99). Payer, sex, race, and comorbidities did not contribute. Conclusion: Although the overall rate of potentially preventable readmissions among patients with metastatic cancer is low, higher readmission rates among those discharged home with help suggest that services supplied may not be sufficient to address health needs.


Author(s):  
Leon D. Star ◽  
Louis R.M. DelGuercio ◽  
Louis C. Abelson

The concept of treating mass casualties in major disasters, particularly at or near airports, has gained considerable momentum in recent years (1). Major urban airports are almost without exception, plagued by access road traffic problems even under normal circumstances. Given a disaster within the confines of an airport, emergency equipment and medical support are found to be mired in a morass of sightseer and emergency service vehicles, compounding the congestion already present immeasurably (2).Evolving from experiences gained over the past 30 years in handling masses of casualties resulting from aircraft disasters, we at Kennedy Airport have developed a Mobile Emergency Hospital which now serves as the “workshop” for stabilizing large numbers of injuries prior to subsequent transfer to definitive hospitals. The keys to this plan are the Trauma Team support used in conjunction with the mobile hospitals.The ideal trauma team consists of 2 surgeons or trauma-trained physicians, one surgical nurse and one medical or 2 surgical technicians. These teams can be varied according to the immediate situation, time of day, available physicians, nurses and technicians. Anesthesiologists respond either individually or as members of some of the teams reporting directly to the operating units on arrival.For an efficient response plan to function, previous liaison must be established primarily with teaching hospitals with a surgical staff that includes surgery and trauma residents. The Kennedy plan has a working arrangement with the New York Medical College and 8 of its affiliated major teaching hospitals in Manhattan, as well as in the main campus at Valhalla, which maintains an associated Burn Center.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6640-6640
Author(s):  
Umut Sarpel ◽  
Natalia Egorova ◽  
Eugene Sosunov ◽  
Rebeca Franco ◽  
Yohana Taveras ◽  
...  

6640 Background: 30-day readmission rates are currently being used as a measure of performance quality. Among surgical patients, readmissions may be reducible for certain complications such as deep venous thrombosis or wound infection. We report 30-day readmission rates for potentially preventable readmissions following surgical treatment of the most common malignancies in the US. Methods: The most common cancer hospitalizations were identified from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Previously reported ICD-9 codes of preventable readmissions from cancer surgery were used to assess 30-day readmissions in New York State in 2009. We measured comorbidity using CMS hierarchical condition categories. Hospital teaching status was based on the American Hospital Association designation. Random effect hierarchical logistic regression models were run to account for clustering within hospitals. Results: 21,945 index admissions for cancer surgery occurred in 2009 at 169 teaching and 73 non-teaching hospitals. The most common operations were for prostate, breast, colon, lung, and renal cancer. 51% of patients were male and 12% were black. The overall readmission rate was 9.3% with readmissions being higher in non-teaching hospitals (11.2%) vs. teaching hospitals (8.6%) (p<0.0001). There was a significant interaction between hospital teaching status and patient race. In teaching hospitals, there was no racial difference in readmission. However, in non-teaching hospitals, black patients were more likely to be readmitted (15.1% vs 10.9%; p=0.02). Multivariate models found that being male (OR=1.17; 95% CI: 1.04; 1.31; p=0.007), undergoing surgery at a non-teaching hospital (OR=1.16; 95% CI: 1.00; 1.35; p=0.048), black race (OR=1.47; 95% CI: 1.04; 2.08; p=0.029), and certain comorbidities increased a patient’s risk of 30-day readmission for a preventable cause. Conclusions: The 30-day preventable readmission rate after index hospitalizations for cancer surgery is higher in non-teaching hospitals, and this difference is more pronounced for black patients. Clinical protocols in teaching hospitals may play a role in this phenomenon. Efforts to address remediable causes of this disparity are warranted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document