Abstract 13281: Effect of Arteriovenous Anastomosis on Blood Pressure Reduction in Patients With Isolated Systolic Hypertension Compared to Combined Hypertension

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Ott ◽  
Mel D Lobo ◽  
Paul A Sobotka ◽  
Felix Mahfoud ◽  
Roland Schmieder ◽  
...  

Background: Several interventional therapeutic options for blood pressure (BP) lowering in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH) were introduced, such as renal denervation (RDN) and creation of an arteriovenous (AV) anastomosis using the ROX coupler. It was shown that BP response after RDN is greater in patients with combined hypertension (CH) compared to patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH). We analyzed now the effect of ROX coupler implantation in the subgroups with CH and ISH. Methods: The randomized, controlled, ROX CONTROL HTN study included patients with true TRH (office systolic BP ≥140mmHg, and average daytime ambulatory BP ≥135/85mmHg, despite treatment with at least 3 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic). In our post-hoc analysis we have stratified the patients of the ROX coupler group (n=42) according CH (n=31) versus ISH (n=11). Results: Baseline systolic office (177±18 versus 169±17 mmHg, p=0.163) and ambulatory BP (159±16 versus 154±11 mmHg, p=0.463) did not differ between CH and ISH. Creation of an AV anastomosis resulted in a significant reduction in systolic office (CH: -28±22 versus ISH: -22±31 mmHg, p=0.572) as well as ambulatory BP (CH: -14±20 versus ISH: -13±15 mmHg, p=0.672), but without significant differences between the two subgroups. The non-responder rate (systolic office BP reduction < 10 mmHg) after 6 months was not different between the subgroups (CH: 18 % versus ISH: 23 %, p=0.844). Conclusions: Thus, our data suggest that creation of an AV anastomosis using the ROX coupler reduces systolic office and ambulatory BP, without any significant difference between CH and ISH. In contrast to RDN, creation of an AV anastomosis reduced BP to similar extent in both subtypes of TRH.

2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. S217-S222
Author(s):  
Matthew R Weir ◽  
Rebecca Y Wang

Angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor blockers are the newest class of antihypertensive drugs to be developed. No large-scale clinical trials have been performed to evaluate their efficacy alone, or in combination with other drugs. A large-scale, eight week, open-label, non-placebo-controlled, single-arm trial evaluated the efficacy, tolerability and dose-response of candesartan cilexetil, 16—32 mg once-daily, either as monotherapy or as part of combination therapy, in a diverse hypertensive population in actual practice settings. 6465 patients with high blood pressure, of whom 52% were female and 16% African American, with a mean age of 58 years, were included. 5446 patients had essential hypertension and 1014 patients had isolated systolic hypertension. In order to be included in this study, patients had either untreated or uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure (SBP) 140—179 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 90—109 mmHg inclusive at baseline), despite a variety of other antihypertensive drugs. Of the 5156 patients with essential hypertension and at least one post baseline efficacy measurement, the mean pretreatment blood pressure (BP) was 156/97 mmHg. Candesartan cilexetil monotherapy reduced mean SBP/DBP by 18.0/12.2 mmHg. Similarly, in the 964 patients with isolated systolic hypertension and at least one post baseline efficacy measurement, candesartan cilexetil monotherapy reduced SBP/DBP from 158/81 by 16.5/4.5 mmHg. Candesartan cilexetil was similarly effective when employed as add-on therapy. When added to baseline antihypertensive medication in 51% of the patients with essential hypertension not achieving BP control, additional reduction in BP was achieved regardless of the background therapy, including diuretics (17.8/11.7 mmHg) calcium antagonists (16.6/11.2 mmHg), beta-blockers (16.5/10.4 mmHg), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) (15.3/10.0 mmHg), and alpha blockers (16.4/10.4 mmHg). Likewise, when candesartan cilexetil was used as add-on therapy in patients with isolated systolic hypertension, there was a consistent further reduction of mean SBP/DBP, regardless of the background therapy. Moreover, these monotherapeutic or add-on efficacy benefits were seen regardless of age (<65 or >65 years), gender, or race. Despite the open-label design of the study which enhances efficacy owing to the placebo effect, the Ang II receptor blocker, candesartan cilexetil either alone, or as an add-on therapy, is highly effective for assisting in the control of systolic and diastolic hypertension.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-9
Author(s):  
V. A Aydarova ◽  
Z. T Astahova ◽  
F. U Kanukova ◽  
M. M Besaeva

The study examined the effectiveness of drug correction of high numbers of blood pressure (BP) by means of modern groups of antihypertensive drugs, the effect of a fixed combination of perindopril and indapamide on circadian blood pressure monitoring, and a commitment to patients of antihypertensive therapy, based on the opened simple randomization three groupswere formed: 1st comprised of 21 patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISAH) and 22 patients with systolic-diastolic hypertension (SDAH) - they all received monotherapy with calcium antagonists (amlodipine 10 mg/day); Group 2 - of 16 ISAH patients and 24 SDAH patients - who received monotherapy with perindopril (2 mg/day) and the third group - of 17 patients with ISAH and 14 patients with SDAH - who received combination therapy with the drug noliprel (Servier) with a fixed combination of perindopril (2 mg) and indapamide of 0,625 mg. Treatment efficacy was assessed primarily to reduce the absolute numbers of blood pressure, and taken into account as a reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), uncontrolled drop of which, according to the literature, in elderly patients can have fatal consequences


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117954762090488
Author(s):  
Keiko Hosohata ◽  
Ayaka Inada ◽  
Saki Oyama ◽  
Takashi Doi ◽  
Iku Niinomi ◽  
...  

Adherence to medications is an important challenge while treating chronic disease such as resistant hypertension, which is defined as uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) despite treatment with more than 3 antihypertensive drugs to achieve targets. It is possible that poor adherence is the most significant contributor to rates of pseudo-resistance among treated hypertensive patients. In this report, we describe 4 patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension, who received intervention to promote adherence by pharmacists who set the prescribed medicines in a weekly medication calendar and conducted a weekly pill count. The results showed that the intervention of pharmacists to medication adherence improved systolic BP in patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension; however, further controlled trials are required to strengthen supporting evidence.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 324-326
Author(s):  
Maria Łukasiewicz ◽  
Marta Swarowska-Skuza

Arterial hypertension, as a very widespread chronic disease, and thus differing in both pathomechanism and course in patients, requires a significant individualization of pharmacotherapy. One such special group is the elderly. Both the low-renin pathomechanism of arterial hypertension and its phenotype (isolated systolic hypertension) imply the choice of a specific pharmacotherapy. Additionally, in this group, side effects should be observed much more vigilantly, while target blood pressure values should be treated more liberally. An example of antihypertensive therapy in a patient belonging to the group described is presented in the following case.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document