Abstract 268: Evaluation of the Abdominal Aortic and Junctional Tourniquet as an Adjunct to Chest Compressions in a Swine Model of Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Rall ◽  
Chris Hewitt ◽  
Matthew Pombo ◽  
Maria Castaneda ◽  
Perry Blough
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Diastolic Pressure ◽  
Laboratory Animals ◽  
Swine Model ◽  
Coronary Perfusion ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Overall success in treating out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using traditional chest compressions is low. The abdominal aortic and junctional tourniquet (AAJT) is a device with a wedge-shaped air bladder that can be used to occlude the descending aorta at the level of bifurcation. In addition to shunting blood away from the lower extremities, this device may increase pleural pressures by inhibiting movement of the diaphragm during compressions. We have previously shown that the addition of an AAJT to mechanical chest compression leads to an increase in rate of survival in a model of traumatic cardiac arrest. Hypothesis: This study was designed to determine if application of the AAJT would lead to more effective chest compressions as measured by an increased rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and hemodynamic parameters. Methods: Yorkshire swine (n=6 per group) underwent general anesthesia and instrumentation. Ventricular fibrillation was electrically induced using spinal needles placed in contact with the left ventricle. After eight minutes of arrest, chest compressions were initiated. Animals were then allocated into groups with or without the AAJT. Following a total of ten minutes of compressions, the animals entered into a ten-minute advanced cardiac life support phase. Results: A ROSC was not achieved in either group. No significant differences were observed with coronary perfusion pressure or end tidal CO 2 . However, the AAJT group had a significantly higher carotid diastolic pressure and higher blood flow in the carotid as compared with repeated-measures ANOVA (p = 0.016 and 0.028 respectively). Conclusion: The AAJT did not confer a survival advantage during chest compressions in our swine model of cardiac arrest. However, while the AAJT was in place, improvement was observed in some measures of CPR efficacy. Disclaimer: The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official views or policy of the Department of Defense or its Components. The experiments reported herein were conducted according to the principles set forth in the National Institute of Health Publication No. 80-23, Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the Animal Welfare Act of 1966, as amended.

Abstract 2003: More Chest Compressions and Fewer Shocks Are Given During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation With the 2005 AHA Guidelines

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn J White ◽  
Sarah A Cantrell ◽  
Robert Cronin ◽  
Shawn Koser ◽  
David Keseg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Automated Analysis ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Care Protocol ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction Long pauses without chest compressions (CC) have been identified in CPR provided by EMS professionals for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA). The 2005 AHA ECC CPR guidelines emphasize CC. The 2005 AHA Basic Life Support (BLS) for Healthcare Professionals (HCP) course introduced a training method with more CPR skills practice during the DVD based course. The purpose of this before/after study was to determine whether CC rates increased after introduction of the 2005 course. Methods This urban EMS system has 400 cardiac etiology OOHCA events annually. A convenience sample of 49 continuous electronic ECG recordings of VF patients was analyzed with the impedance channel of the LIFEPAK 12 (Physio-Control, Redmond WA) and proprietary software. A trained researcher verified the automated analysis. Each CC during the resuscitation attempt and pauses in CC before and after the first defibrillation shock were noted. The time of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was determined by medical record review and onset of regular electrical activity without CC. Medical records were reviewed for outcome to hospital discharge. The EMS patient care protocol for VF was changed on July 1, 2006 to comply with the 2005 AHA ECC guidelines. Cases were grouped by the OOHCA date: 9/2004 to 12/31/2006 (pre) and 7/1/2006 to 4/21/2007 (post). EMS personnel began taking the 2005 BLS for HCP course during spring 2006. Monthly courses over 3 years will recertify 1500 personnel. Results 29 cases were analyzed from the pre group and 20 from the post group. Compressions per minute increased from a mean (±SD) of 47 ± 16 pre to 75 ± 33 post (P < 0.01). The mean count of shocks given per victim decreased from 4.5 ± 4.0 pre to 2.8 ± 1.8 post (P < 0.04). The CC pause before the first shock was unchanged (23.6 ± 18.4 seconds to 22.1 ± 17.9). but the CC pause following that shock decreased significantly from 48.7 ± 63.2 to 11.8 ± 22.5 (p=0.008). Rates of ROSC (55% pre, 50% post) and survival to discharge (15% pre, 13% post) were similar. Conclusion Following introduction of the 2005 BLS for HCP course and the EMS protocol change, the quality of CPR delivered to victims of OOHCA improved significantly compared with pre-2006 CPR. The sample size was too small to detect differences in survival rates.

An experimental algorithm versus standard advanced cardiac life support in a swine model of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

1993 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J Menegazzi ◽  
Eric A Davis ◽  
Donald M Yealy ◽  
Renee L Molner ◽  
Kristine A Nicklas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Advanced Cardiac Life Support ◽  
Swine Model ◽  
Experimental Algorithm ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

scholarly journals Does ‘heads-up’ cardiopulmonary resuscitation improve outcomes for patients in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? A systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 16-24
Author(s):  
Andrew Elphinstone ◽  
Samantha Laws
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Coronary Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Coronary Perfusion ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Survival rates for patients in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have remained around 10% in the United Kingdom for the past seven years. If outcomes are to be improved, research into new methods of advanced life support is required. One such method may be ‘heads-up’ cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Methods: A systematic review of literature exploring heads-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation was conducted in an attempt to identify its effects on survival to discharge and neurological outcome.Results: A comprehensive search of CINAHL, MEDLINE and Google Scholar was undertaken. Six papers were classed as sufficiently relevant for inclusion. Included studies were generally of low quality and none studied the effect of heads-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Animal studies identified a significant reduction in intracranial pressure and increase in cerebral and coronary perfusion pressure for use of augmented heads-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the porcine model of cardiac arrest.Conclusion: Further research is required to analyse the effects and potential benefits of augmented heads-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Abstract 9160: Epinephrine-Dominant versus Non-Epinephrine Dominant Resuscitation for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer W Chou ◽  
Amy Lin ◽  
Juan Toledo ◽  
Gabriel Wardi ◽  
Katrina Derry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Diastolic Pressure ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Myocardial Oxygen Demand ◽  
Coronary Perfusion ◽  
Dose Ratio ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Vasopressors are used during CPR to increase arterial resistance and aortic diastolic pressure, improving coronary perfusion and likelihood of ROSC. In comparison to epinephrine, vasopressin remains effective in an acidemic environment, has favorable cerebral perfusion, and does not directly increase myocardial oxygen demand. Studies comparing epinephrine and vasopressin report variable ROSC, survival, and neurological outcome. Most studies used few vasopressin doses and it is unclear whether greater vasopressin use leads to clinical benefit. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that a non-epinephrine dominant CPR approach with vasopressin would lead to greater ROSC than an epinephrine-dominant approach. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center study conducted at an 800-bed academic medical center. All first cardiac arrests among adult inpatients between Jan 2018 and Mar 2021 were screened, and those with at least 2 vasopressor doses used were included. Patients who received epinephrine-dominant resuscitation (epinephrine-to-vasopressin dose ratio >2 or CPR using only epinephrine) were compared to patients who received a non-epinephrine dominant approach (epinephrine-to-vasopressin dose ratio ≤2). The incidence of ROSC was analyzed using a Chi-squared test where p <0.05 was considered significant. Secondary outcomes included survival to discharge with favorable neurologic outcome, survival to discharge, and Cerebral Performance Category scores. Results: Of 663 in-hospital cardiac arrests screened, 264 were included. Two hundred twenty-eight (86%) presented with PEA/asystole as the initial rhythm, and the most common etiologies were circulatory (41%) and respiratory (26%). The epinephrine-dominant arm achieved ROSC in 89 (66%) patients compared to 87 (67%) patients in the non-epinephrine dominant arm (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.84-1.18, p=0.93). Survival to discharge was higher in the epinephrine-dominant arm (25% vs 15%, p=0.04). Conclusion: There was no difference in ROSC between epinephrine-dominant and non-epinephrine dominant resuscitation for adult in-hospital cardiac arrest. Future studies should examine the impact of non-epinephrine dominant CPR on long term neurologic outcomes.

scholarly journals The Physiologic Response to Rescue Therapy with Vasopressin versus Epinephrine during Experimental Pediatric Cardiac Arrest

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Slovis ◽  
Ryan Morgan ◽  
William Landis ◽  
Anna L Roberts ◽  
Constantine Mavroudis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Coronary Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Coronary Perfusion ◽  
Cerebral Vasculature ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Rescue Dose ◽  
Physiologic Response ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background: While epinephrine is the mainstay of therapy during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, it is potentially detrimental to the cerebral vasculature and ineffective in certain populations. This study compares a rescue dose of vasopressin to a rescue dose of epinephrine after ineffective initial doses of epinephrine in diverse models of pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest. 67 one- to three-month old female swine (10-30kg) in six experimental cohorts from one laboratory received hemodynamic-directed CPR, a resuscitation method where high quality chest compressions are provided and vasopressor administration is titrated to coronary perfusion pressure (CoPP) ³20 mmHg. Vasopressors are given when CoPP is <20 mmHg, in sequences of two doses of 0.02 mg/kg epinephrine separated by minimum one-minute, then a rescue dose of 0.4 U/kg vasopressin followed by minimum two-minutes. Invasive measurements were used to evaluate and compare the hemodynamic and neurologic effects of each vasopressor dose. Results: Increases in CoPP and cerebral blood flow (CBF) were greater with vasopressin rescue than epinephrine rescue (CoPP: +8.16 [4.35, 12.06] mmHg vs. +5.43 [1.56, 9.82] mmHg, p=0.022; CBF: +14.58 [-0.05, 38.12] vs. +0.00 [-0.77, 18.24] perfusion units (PFU), p=0.005). Twenty animals (30%) failed to achieve CoPP ³20 mmHg after two doses of epinephrine; 9/20 (45%) non-responders achieved CoPP ³20 mmHg after vasopressin. Among all animals, the increase in CBF was greater with vasopressin (+14.58 [-0.58, 38.12] vs. 0.00 [-0.77, 18.24] PFU, p=0.005).Conclusions: CoPP and CBF rose significantly more after rescue vasopressin than after rescue epinephrine. Importantly, CBF increased after vasopressin rescue, but not after epinephrine rescue. In the 30% that failed to meet CoPP of 20mmHg after two doses of epinephrine, 45% achieved target CoPP with a single rescue vasopressin dose.

scholarly journals Correlation between end-tidal carbon dioxide and the degree of compression of heart cavities measured by transthoracic echocardiography during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Critical Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman Skulec ◽  
Petr Vojtisek ◽  
Vladimir Cerny
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Transthoracic Echocardiography ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Compression Index ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
End Tidal Carbon Dioxide ◽  
End Tidal ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background The concept of personalized cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) requires a parameter that reflects its hemodynamic efficiency. While intra-arrest ultrasound is increasingly implemented into the advanced life support, we realized a pre-hospital clinical study to evaluate whether the degree of compression of the right ventricle (RV) and left ventricle (LV) induced by chest compressions during CPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and measured by transthoracic echocardiography correlates with the levels of end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) measured at the time of echocardiographic investigation. Methods Thirty consecutive patients resuscitated for OHCA were included in the study. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed from a subcostal view during ongoing chest compressions in all of them. This was repeated three times during CPR in each patient, and EtCO2 levels were registered. From each investigation, a video loop was recorded. Afterwards, maximal and minimal diameters of LV and RV were obtained from the recorded loops and the compression index of LV (LVCI) and RV (RVCI) was calculated as (maximal − minimal/maximal diameter) × 100. Maximal compression index (CImax) defined as the value of LVCI or RVCI, whichever was greater was also assessed. Correlations between EtCO2 and LVCI, RVCI, and CImax were expressed as Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r). Results Evaluable echocardiographic records were found in 18 patients, and a total of 52 measurements of all parameters were obtained. Chest compressions induced significant compressions of all observed cardiac cavities (LVCI = 20.6 ± 13.8%, RVCI = 34.5 ± 21.6%, CImax = 37.4 ± 20.2%). We identified positive correlation of EtCO2 with LVCI (r = 0.672, p < 0.001) and RVCI (r = 0.778, p < 0.001). The strongest correlation was between EtCO2 and CImax (r = 0.859, p < 0.001). We identified that a CImax cut-off level of 17.35% predicted to reach an EtCO2 level > 20 mmHg with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions Evaluable echocardiographic records were reached in most of the patients. EtCO2 positively correlated with all parameters under consideration, while the strongest correlation was found between CImax and EtCO2. Therefore, CImax is a candidate parameter for the guidance of hemodynamic-directed CPR. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03852225. Registered 21 February 2019 - Retrospectively registered.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document