Abstract 13006: Digital Diabetes Prevention Program Reduces Medical Costs in the First 2 Years of Implementation in a Workplace Setting

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles E Birse ◽  
Olga A Iakoubova ◽  
Andre R Arellano ◽  
Maren S Fragala ◽  
Lance A Bare ◽  
...  

Introduction: The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) was shown to reduce body weight and lower incidence of diabetes in a cost-effective manner. Digital versions of the DPP (dDPP) have recently been implemented and shown to reduce body weight and other risk factors for chronic disease. We asked whether implementation of a dDPP in a workplace setting would reduce medical costs. Methods: Employees and spouses of a nation-wide medical diagnostic provider were eligible to participate in dDPP (Omada Health) if they had prediabetes (fasting glucose 100 to 125 mg/dL or HbA 1C 5.7% to 6.4%) and BMI ≥25 kg/m 2 at baseline (September to December 2017), and were continuously enrolled in a health plan from September 2016 to December 2019. Of those eligible (n=3,098), 432 participated and completed ≥1 lesson (dDPP group). A control group (n=856) was matched to the dDPP group by baseline age, sex, race, geography, comorbidities, health plan type, and medical and prescription costs. Generalized estimating equations adjusted for age, race and BMI were used to obtain all estimates. Allowed costs from administrative claims data were evaluated per member per month (PMPM); dDPP costs were not included. Results: In the control group, costs were higher in the post-dDPP period (2017-2019) compared to the pre-dDPP period (2016-2017) for inpatient ($124 vs $64, P= 0.01), prescription ($183 vs $155, P =0.02), and total ($696 vs $558, P <0.001; Figure). In the dDPP group, no changes were observed. Changes in total costs (post-dDPP minus pre-dDPP) were lower in the dDPP group than the control group, with a saving of $141 PMPM ( P =0.02; Figure). Conclusion: In the first two years of dDPP implementation, medical costs were unchanged in dDPP participants but higher in matched controls.

2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Ceglia ◽  
◽  
Jason Nelson ◽  
James Ware ◽  
Konstantinos-Dionysios Alysandratos ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Toro-Ramos ◽  
Andreas Michaelides ◽  
Maria Anton ◽  
Zulekha Karim ◽  
Leah Kang-Oh ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) diabetes prevention program (DPP) has formed the foundation for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) prevention efforts and lifestyle change modifications in multiple care settings. To our knowledge, no randomized controlled trial has verified the efficacy of a fully mobile version of CDC’s diabetes prevention program (DPP). OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the long-term weight loss and glycemic efficacy of a mobile-delivered DPP compared with a control group receiving usual medical care. METHODS Adults with prediabetes (N=202) were recruited from a clinic and randomized to either a mobile-delivered, coach-guided DPP (Noom) or a control group that received regular medical care including a paper-based DPP curriculum and no formal intervention. The intervention group learned how to use the Noom program, how to interact with their coach, and the importance of maintaining motivation. They had access to an interactive coach-to-participant interface and group messaging, daily challenges for behavior change, DPP-based education articles, food logging, and automated feedback. Primary outcomes included changes in weight and hemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub> (HbA<sub>1c</sub>) levels at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Exploratory secondary outcomes included program engagement as a predictor of changes in weight and HbA<sub>1c</sub> levels. RESULTS A total of 202 participants were recruited and randomized into the intervention (n=101) or control group (n=99). In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses, changes in the participants’ weight and BMI were significantly different at 6 months between the intervention and control groups, but there was no difference in HbA<sub>1c</sub> levels (mean difference 0.004%, SE 0.05; <i>P</i>=.94). Weight and BMI were lower in the intervention group by −2.64 kg (SE 0.71; <i>P</i>&lt;.001) and −0.99 kg/m2 (SE 0.29; <i>P</i>=.001), respectively. These differences persisted at 12 months. However, in the analyses that did not involve ITT, program completers achieved a significant weight loss of 5.6% (SE 0.81; <i>P</i>&lt;.001) at 6 months, maintaining 4.7% (SE 0.88; <i>P</i>&lt;.001) of their weight loss at 12 months. The control group lost −0.15% at 6 months (SE 0.64; <i>P</i>=.85) and gained 0.33% (SE 0.70; <i>P</i>=.63) at 12 months. Those randomized to the intervention group who did not start the program had no meaningful weight or HbA<sub>1c</sub> level change, similar to the control group. At 1 year, the intervention group showed a 0.23% reduction in HbA<sub>1c</sub> levels; those who completed the intervention showed a 0.28% reduction. Those assigned to the control group had a 0.16% reduction in HbA<sub>1c</sub> levels. CONCLUSIONS This novel mobile-delivered DPP achieved significant weight loss reductions for up to 1 year compared with usual care. This type of intervention reduces the risk of overt diabetes without the added barriers of in-person interventions. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03865342; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03865342


2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kaye Kramer ◽  
Karl K. Vanderwood ◽  
Vincent C. Arena ◽  
Rachel G. Miller ◽  
Rebecca Meehan ◽  
...  

Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an adapted Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) lifestyle program, DPP Group Lifestyle Balance (GLB), delivered in 3 economically diverse senior/community centers. Methods The DPP-GLB was implemented in 3 senior/community centers in Allegheny County, PA. A 6-month delayed control intervention design was used. Participants were randomized to begin the DPP-GLB immediately (immediate) or after a 6-month delay (delayed). Adults (n = 134; mean age = 62.8 years) with BMI ≥24 kg/m2 and prediabetes and/or the metabolic syndrome took part. Weight, physical activity (PA), and diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors were assessed at 6, 12, and 18 months from baseline. Results At 6 months, the immediate group demonstrated greater mean weight loss than the delayed control group as well as significantly greater improvements in PA, A1C, fasting insulin, and waist circumference. In pre-post analyses, both randomized groups showed similar success that was maintained at 18 months. Conclusions The DPP-GLB delivered in economically diverse community centers was effective in this group of older adults. These findings support provision of coverage for prevention programs in older adults at risk for diabetes/CVD, which is important considering the large number of individuals who will be Medicare eligible in the near future.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabil Sulaiman ◽  
Elaine Hadj ◽  
Amal Hussein ◽  
Doris Young

In Australia, type 2 diabetes and prediabetes are more prevalent in culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities than mainstream Australians. Purpose. To develop, implement, and evaluate culturally sensitive peer-supported diabetes education program for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in high-risk middle-aged Turkish- and Arabic-speaking people. Methods. A two-day training program was developed. Ten bilingual peer leaders were recruited from existing health and social networks in Melbourne and were trained by diabetes educators. Each leader recruited 10 high-risk people for developing diabetes. Questionnaires were administered, and height, weight, and waist circumference were measured at baseline and three months after the intervention. The intervention comprised two 2-hour group sessions and 30 minutes reinforcement and support telephone calls. Results. 94 individuals (73% women) completed the program. Three months after the program, the participants’ mean body weight (before = 78.1 kg, after = 77.3; Z score = −3.415, P=0.001) and waist circumference (Z = −2.569, P=0.004) were reduced, their diabetes knowledge was enhanced, and lifestyle behaviours were significantly improved. Conclusions. A short diabetes prevention program delivered by bilingual peers was associated with improved diabetes awareness, changed lifestyle behaviour, and reduction in body weight 3 months after intervention. The findings are encouraging and should stimulate a larger control-designed study.


10.2196/17842 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. e17842
Author(s):  
Tatiana Toro-Ramos ◽  
Andreas Michaelides ◽  
Maria Anton ◽  
Zulekha Karim ◽  
Leah Kang-Oh ◽  
...  

Background The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) diabetes prevention program (DPP) has formed the foundation for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) prevention efforts and lifestyle change modifications in multiple care settings. To our knowledge, no randomized controlled trial has verified the efficacy of a fully mobile version of CDC’s diabetes prevention program (DPP). Objective This study aimed to investigate the long-term weight loss and glycemic efficacy of a mobile-delivered DPP compared with a control group receiving usual medical care. Methods Adults with prediabetes (N=202) were recruited from a clinic and randomized to either a mobile-delivered, coach-guided DPP (Noom) or a control group that received regular medical care including a paper-based DPP curriculum and no formal intervention. The intervention group learned how to use the Noom program, how to interact with their coach, and the importance of maintaining motivation. They had access to an interactive coach-to-participant interface and group messaging, daily challenges for behavior change, DPP-based education articles, food logging, and automated feedback. Primary outcomes included changes in weight and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Exploratory secondary outcomes included program engagement as a predictor of changes in weight and HbA1c levels. Results A total of 202 participants were recruited and randomized into the intervention (n=101) or control group (n=99). In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses, changes in the participants’ weight and BMI were significantly different at 6 months between the intervention and control groups, but there was no difference in HbA1c levels (mean difference 0.004%, SE 0.05; P=.94). Weight and BMI were lower in the intervention group by −2.64 kg (SE 0.71; P<.001) and −0.99 kg/m2 (SE 0.29; P=.001), respectively. These differences persisted at 12 months. However, in the analyses that did not involve ITT, program completers achieved a significant weight loss of 5.6% (SE 0.81; P<.001) at 6 months, maintaining 4.7% (SE 0.88; P<.001) of their weight loss at 12 months. The control group lost −0.15% at 6 months (SE 0.64; P=.85) and gained 0.33% (SE 0.70; P=.63) at 12 months. Those randomized to the intervention group who did not start the program had no meaningful weight or HbA1c level change, similar to the control group. At 1 year, the intervention group showed a 0.23% reduction in HbA1c levels; those who completed the intervention showed a 0.28% reduction. Those assigned to the control group had a 0.16% reduction in HbA1c levels. Conclusions This novel mobile-delivered DPP achieved significant weight loss reductions for up to 1 year compared with usual care. This type of intervention reduces the risk of overt diabetes without the added barriers of in-person interventions. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03865342; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03865342


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Summers

BACKGROUND Prediabetes is the state of elevated blood glucose levels with glycaemic parameters above normal but below the (type 2) diabetes threshold. Prediabetes is considered a state of high risk for developing type 2 diabetes with yearly transition rate of 5%-10% to type 2 diabetes. There are almost 86 million adults with prediabetes in the United States alone. The world-wide prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT; a parameter of prediabetes) in 2010 was estimated to be 343 million (7.8%). Prediabetes is a global burden, with the International Diabetes Federation projecting an increase in prevalence of prediabetes to 471 million globally by 2035. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to evaluate the 1-year outcomes of the smart-phone delivered Low Carb Program for Prediabetes, a nutritionally focused, 12-session educational intervention for glycaemic control and weight loss for adults with prediabetes (i.e. a type 2 diabetes prevention program). The program reinforces carbohydrate restriction using behavioural techniques including goal setting, peer support, and behavioural self-monitoring. METHODS The study used a quasi-experimental research design comprised of an open-label, single-arm, pre-post intervention using a sample of convenience. We followed all of the 260 adults with prediabetes who had activated their referral to the program as a result of an NHS consultation between December 2018 and March 2019 and followed them for 12 months (N=260; mean age 44.7, SD 9.48 years; 36.1% (94/260) women; mean glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 6.25%, SD 0.11%; mean body weight 77.1kg, SD 17.5kg; taking mean 0.41, SD 0.49 diabetes medications). RESULTS Of the 260 participants followed, 221 (85%) individuals reported outcomes at 12 months. 122 (46.9%) completed 80% or more of lessons of the program. Of the 260 participants with a starting HbA1c at or above the prediabetes threshold of 6.0%, 124 (49.6%) reduced their HbA1c to below the threshold. Over a third (33.8%, 88/260) of all participants lost at least 5% of their body weight. Overall, glycaemic control and weight loss improved, especially for participants who completed all modules of the program. For example, participants who engaged in at least 10 of the 12 weekly modules reduced their HbA1c from 6.3% to 5.8% (P<.001) and lost an average of 4.38kg or 5.4% of their body weight (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS A smart-phone delivered program that teaches a carbohydrate-reduced diet to adults with prediabetes with behaviour change support can be scalable and effective for glycaemic control, weight loss and can act as an engaging intervention for diabetes prevention.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth L Ciemins ◽  
Patricia J Coon ◽  
Nicholas C Coombs ◽  
Barbara L Holloway ◽  
Elizabeth J Mullette ◽  
...  

ObjectiveDetermine the effectiveness of a 16-week modified diabetes prevention program (DPP) administered simultaneously to multiple rural communities from a single urban site, as compared with a similar face-to-face intervention. A 12-week intervention was evaluated to consider minimization of staff costs in communities where resources are limited.Research design and methodsA prospective cohort study compared DPP interventions implemented in rural (via telehealth technology) and urban (face-to-face) communities using an intent-to-treat analysis. Primary outcome measures included 5% and 7% body weight loss. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine predictors of intervention success and included a variable for treatment effect.ResultsBetween 2010 and 2015, up to 667 participants were enrolled in the study representing one urban and 15 rural communities across Montana. The 16-week urban and rural interventions were comparable; 33.5% and 34.6% of participants lost 7% body weight, respectively; 50% and 47% lost 5% (p=0.22). Participants who were male (OR=2.41; 95% CI 1.32 to 4.40), had lower baseline body mass index (OR=1.03; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.07), attended more sessions (OR=1.33; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.58), and more frequently reported (OR=3.84; 95% CI 1.05 to 14.13) and met daily fat gram (OR=4.26; 95% CI 1.7 to 10.6) and weekly activity goals (OR=2.46; 95% CI 1.06 to 5.71) were more likely to meet their 7% weight loss goal. Predictors of meeting weight loss goals were similar for participants enrolled in the 12-week intervention.ConclusionsUsing telehealth technology to administer a modified DPP to multiple rural communities simultaneously demonstrated weight loss results comparable to those in a face-to-face intervention. Given the limitation of resources, linking rural areas to urban centers using telemedicine may increase access to much needed services to prevent or delay progression to diabetes.


Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 59-LB
Author(s):  
CHARLES E. BIRSE ◽  
MAREN S. FRAGALA ◽  
ANDRE R. ARELLANO ◽  
LANCE A. BARE ◽  
CYNTHIA CASTRO SWEET ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 184 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 647-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Taetzsch ◽  
Cheryl H Gilhooly ◽  
Asma Bukhari ◽  
Sai Krupa Das ◽  
Edward Martin ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Effective, standardized, and easily accessible weight management programs are urgently needed for military beneficiaries. Videoconference interventions have the potential for widespread scaling, and can provide both real time interaction and flexibility in delivery times regardless of location, but there is little information on their effectiveness and acceptability. Materials and Methods This study as part of a larger weight loss trial describes the videoconference adaption of Group Lifestyle Balance (GLB) program, a community group-based Diabetes Prevention Program intervention, and provides a comparison of weight loss and meeting attendance between in-person and videoconference delivery modes over 12 weeks in adult family members of military service members. Forty-three participants were enrolled from two military installations and received either the videoconference-adapted or an in-person GLB program in a non-randomized trial design. Differences in program attendance and percent weight lost at 12 weeks were compared by independent samples t-tests and nonparametric methods. Group differences in the percentage of weight lost over the 12-week period were analyzed using a linear mixed model. Results All GLB intervention components were successfully delivered by videoconference with minor adaptations for the different delivery mechanism. Participant retention was 70% and 96% in the in-person and videoconference groups, respectively (p = 0.04). Completing participants in both groups lost a significant percent body weight over the 12 week intervention (p &lt; 0.001) and there was no difference in percent body weight after 12 weeks of intervention (6.2 ± 3.2% and 5.3 ± 3.4% for in-person and videoconference at 12 weeks, respectively; p = 0.60). Conclusion This study describes the first videoconference adaption of the GLB program for use in military families. Attrition was lower in the videoconference group, and there were a similar levels of weight loss in both groups regardless of delivery modality. Videoconference weight loss interventions are effective and feasible for scaling to support healthy weight management in military as well as civilian populations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document