Abstract 14199: Long-term Impact of Baseline Anemia and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Huntae Kim ◽  
Jong-Il Park ◽  
Byung-Jun Kim ◽  
Jung-hee Lee ◽  
Ung Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Target Vessel Revascularization ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

Background: Anemia is a known risk factor for future ischemic events and bleeding for patients with ischemic heart disease. However, there are little data about dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration for patients with anemia after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: From 2010 to 2013, a total of 1,470 patients who underwent PCI were investigated. We categorized the study population into four groups based on the DAPT duration and anemia (Hemoglobin <13g/dL for men and <12g/dL for women): Group A (non-anemia & ≤12m DAPT, n=521), Group B (non-anemia & >12m DAPT, n=501), Group C (anemia & ≤12m DAPT, n=226), and Group D (anemia & >12m DAPT, n=222). We evaluated major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, repeat target vessel revascularization, or stroke, and bleeding complication. Results: Even though anemic patients had more severe angiographic findings, such as three-vessel disease or diffuse long lesion, the DAPT duration was similar between anemia and non-anemia group. MACCEs occurred less frequently in Group B (16.9%) than Group A (24.7%), Group C (34.6%), and Group D (35.1%) (p<0.001) at 8 years. After multivariate analysis, with Group A as a reference, the adjusted hazard ratio for MACCEs was 0.711 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.526-0.961, p=0.027) for Group B, 1.126 (95% CI 0.802-1.581, p=0.494) for Group C, and 0.995 (95% CI 0.706-1.405, p=0.980) for Group D. However, major bleeding occurred more frequently occurred in Group D (13.0%) than Group A (5.7%), Group B (7.5%), and Group C (11.2%) (p=0.035) at 8 years. Conclusions: Although extended DAPT showed reduced rate of MACCEs for non-anemic patients, it can be related with increased of major bleeding for anemic patients.

Abstract 2356: Dual Antiplatelet Therapy following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Stent Implantation in Patients on Chronic Oral Anticoagulation

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Rogacka ◽  
Alaide Chieffo ◽  
Iassen Michev ◽  
Flavio Airoldi ◽  
Azeem Latib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Stent Implantation ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Objectives: To evaluate the safety of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients in whom long-term anticoagulation (AC) with warfarin is recommended. Background: It is well established that antiplatelet therapy with aspirin ad thienopiridines is required following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation. Some patients have also indication for long-term AC. The optimal antithrombotic strategy following PCI in such patients is unclear. Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent PCI with stent implantation discharged on triple therapy (defined as the combination of aspirin and thienopyridines and AC with warfarin) were analyzed. Results One-hundred and twenty-seven patients with 224 lesions: 86.6% males, mean age 69.9±8.8 years were included in the study. Drug-eluting stents (DES) were positioned in 71 (55.9%) and bare metal stent (BMS) in 53 (41.7%) patients. Atrial fibrillation (AF) was the main indication (59.1%) for AC treatment, followed by prosthetic valves (12.4%) and mural left ventricular (LV) thrombus (9.1%). Average risk of thromboembolic events in the subgroup with AF was 1.79 ± 1.23 according to CHADS2 score. The mean triple therapy duration was 5.6±4.6 and clinical follow-up 21.0±19.8 months. During the triple therapy period, 6 patients (4.7%) developed major bleeding complications; 67% of which occurred within the first month. No significant differences between DES and BMS were observed in the incidence of major (respectively 5.6% vs. 3.8%, p=1.0) and minor bleeding (respectively 1.4% vs. 3.8%, p=0.57) and mortality (respectively 5.6% vs. 1.9%, p=0.39). Four patients died in DES group: 3 of major bleeding complications and one of ischemic stroke. The only death in the BMS group was due to subarachnoid hemorrhage. A significant difference was observed in favor of DES in target vessel revascularization (14.1% vs. 28.3%, p=0.041). Conclusions: While on triple therapy, major bleeding complications occurred in 4.7% of patients, half of them were lethal and most (67%) occurred within the first month.

Abstract 15439: Lesion Complexity and Long-term Outcomes According to Mean Observed Blood Pressure After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Il Park ◽  
Byung Jun Kim ◽  
Hun Tae Kim ◽  
Jung Hee Lee ◽  
Ung Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

Background: The guideline recommended strict blood pressure (BP) control for the patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to evaluate the relationship between mean observed BP and long-term outcomes for patients with or without lesion complexity. Methods: A total of 1,470 patients who underwent PCI were investigated. We categorized the study population into four groups based on mean observed BP and lesion complexity (left main & three-vessel disease, chronic total occlusion, total stent length ≥60mm, or bifurcation two stenting): Group A (non-complex & systolic BP ≤120mmHg, n=310), Group B (non-complex & systolic BP >120mmHg, n=674), Group C (complex & systolic BP ≤120mmHg, n=131), and Group D (complex & systolic BP >120mmHg, n=355). We evaluated major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat target vessel revascularization, or stroke. Results: Well-controlled BP group (Group A&C) showed significantly lower systolic BP than uncontrolled BP group (Group B&D) (114.3±6.1mmHg vs. 130.7±7.6mmHg, p<0.001). MACCEs occurred less frequently in Group A (18.9%) than Group B (23.6%), Group C (22.7%), and Group D (33.6%) (p=0.001) at 8 years. After multivariate analysis, with Group A as a reference, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for MACCEs was 1.382 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.978-1.954, p=0.067) for Group B, 1.559 (95% CI 0.957-2.540, p=0.075) for Group C, and 1.872 (95% CI 1.296-2.705, p=0.001) for Group D. In Cox regression model, although lesion complexity was not associated with MACCE, systolic BP≤120mmHg was an independent predictor for reduced rate of MACCE (HR 0.667, 95% CI 0.485-0.918, p=0.013). Conclusions: Mean observed systolic BP ≤120mmHg after PCI was independent predictor for reduced MACCEs regardless of lesion complexity. Key Words: Blood Pressure; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Lesion Complexity; Treatment Outcome

P3123Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Graca Santos ◽  
R Ribeiro Carvalho ◽  
F Montenegro ◽  
C Ruivo ◽  
J Correia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Group A ◽  
St Elevation ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background The use of intravenous enoxaparin (LBWH) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) was upgraded in the latest European Guidelines to a class IIa recommendation. Purpose The authors aim to compare safety and prognostic impact of LMWH versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) use in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. Methods Retrospective study of 3875 STEMI patients who underwent pPCI between October 2010 and September 2017 and were included in a national multicenter registry. Group A consisted of patients managed only with LMWH, and Group B patients were treated with UFH regardless of eventual LMWH associated exposure. The groups were compared according to their demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics. The primary endpoint (PE) results from a composite which included: procedural failure (pPCI failure or bailout use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors), in-hospital mortality, re-infarction or major bleeding (according to the registry criteria). The secondary endpoint (SE) included: in-hospital major bleeding, need for red blood cell transfusion, or haemoglobin drop ≥2g/dL. A 1:1 propensity score (PS) analysis was performed according to demographic variables, medical history and previous medication, physical examination, electrocardiogram characteristics and left ventricular function, matching 1558 of the 3875 patients for later comparison between groups. Results Overall, Group A included 1083 (27.9%) and Group B 2792 (72.1%) patients. The mean age was 63±14 years, and 33.5% of the cohort were female. Despite the baseline characteristics heterogeneity between groups, this phenomenon was not observed after PS matching. The PE was more frequent in Group A, without reaching statistical relevance (15.6% vs 13.3%, p=0.07). The SE was superior in Group A (34.4 vs 29.4%, p=0.01). According to the PS matching analysis, there were no differences beetween groups in terms of the PE (13.9% vs 12.0%, p=0.28), while the SE kept more frequent among Group A (34.9% vs 28.5%, p=0.02) [Figure]. Propensity score: group comparison Conclusion In this study based on a national multicentric registry of STEMI patients, the use of LMWH was not associated with better in-hospital prognosis in terms of major cardiovascular events and was related with higher rates of bleeding related events in the scenario of pPCI, compared to UFH. According to these results, further studies are required to support the widespread use of LMWH in this clinical scenario.

scholarly journals Benefits and Harms of Extending the Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-Eluting Stents: A Meta-Analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun Shing Kwok ◽  
Heerajnarain Bulluck ◽  
Alisdair D. Ryding ◽  
Yoon K. Loke
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Drug Eluting Stents ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Drug Eluting

Background.The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unclear.Methods.We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating risk of adverse events in participants receiving different durations of DAPT following insertion of drug-eluting stents.Results.Five trials were included, but only four had data suitable for meta-analysis (n=8,231participants). No significant increase in the composite endpoint of death and nonfatal myocardial infarction was observed with earlier cessation of DAPT in any instance when compared to longer durations of DAPT (RR 0.64 95% CI 0.25–1.63 for 3 versus 12 months, RR 1.09 95% CI 0.84–1.41 for 6 versus 12 months and, RR 0.64 95% CI 0.35–1.16 for 12 versus 24 months). Pooled results showed a significantly lower risk of major bleeding (RR 0.48 95% CI 0.25–0.93) and total bleeding (RR 0.30 95% CI 0.16–0.54) for shorter compared to longer duration of DAPT. Subgroup analysis based on age, prior diabetes, and prior ACS failed to show any group where longer durations were consistently better than shorter ones.Conclusions.There are no cardiovascular or mortality benefits associated with extended duration of DAPT, but the risk of major bleeding was significantly lower with shorter lengths of therapy.

TWILIGHT: A Randomized Trial of Ticagrelor Monotherapy Versus Ticagrelor Plus Aspirin Beginning at 3 Months in High-risk Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johny Nicolas ◽  
Usman Baber ◽  
Roxana Mehran
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Risk Patients

A P2Y12 inhibitor-based monotherapy after a short period of dual antiplatelet therapy is emerging as a plausible strategy to decrease bleeding events in high-risk patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients After Coronary Intervention (TWILIGHT), a randomized double-blind trial, tested this approach by dropping aspirin at 3 months and continuing with ticagrelor monotherapy for an additional 12 months. The study enrolled 9,006 patients, of whom 7,119 who tolerated 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy were randomized after 3 months into two arms: ticagrelor plus placebo and ticagrelor plus aspirin. The primary endpoint of interest, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding, occurred less frequently in the experimental arm (HR 0.56; 95% CI [0.45–0.68]; p<0.001), whereas the secondary endpoint of ischemic events was similar between the two arms (HR 0.99; 95% CI [0.78–1.25]). Transition from dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of ticagrelor plus aspirin to ticagrelor-based monotherapy in high-risk patients at 3 months after percutaneous coronary intervention resulted in a lower risk of bleeding events without an increase in risk of death, MI, or stroke.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document