Abstract 15714: Intra-cardiac Pressure Estimation Using Subharmonic Aided Pressure Estimation (SHAPE) - A Clinical Evaluation

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cara Esposito ◽  
Michael P Savage ◽  
Praveen Mehrotra ◽  
Ira Cohen ◽  
David L Fischman ◽  
...  

Introduction: Subharmonic aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) utilizes ambient pressure sensitivity of subharmonic signals from ultrasound contrast agents. The objective was to evaluate SHAPE with Definity (Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc.) and Sonazoid (GE Healthcare) microbubbles for intra-cardiac pressure estimation. Hypothesis: Errors between SHAPE and pressures obtained during cardiac catheterization ≤ 5 mmHg. Methods: IRB approved this study. Consenting patients received an infusion of Definity (56 patients; 2 vials in 50 mL of saline; infusion rate: 4-10 mL/min) or Sonazoid (77 patients; rate (mL/hour) = 0.18 x weight in kg co-infused with saline at 120 mL/hour) during cardiac catheterization. Subharmonic data was acquired using a SonixTablet (PA 4/2 array; BK Ultrasound) synchronously with pressures from the left and right ventricles and the aorta (for left heart catheterizations only). Subharmonic data (in dB) was converted to pressure values (in mmHg) using calibration factors (mmHg/dB) based on data obtained from the aorta - utilizing pressures from the aorta either during the catheterization procedure or pressures obtained using a SphygmoCor (AtCor Medical Pty. Ltd.) device after the catheterization procedure. Clinically relevant pressures between the SHAPE technique and the pressure catheter were compared. Results: Correlation coefficient between the subharmonic and pressure data was -0.8 ± 0.1. With Definity, mean absolute errors ranged from 2.9 ± 1.5 to 5.0 ± 4.2 mmHg and from 4.4 ± 5.7 to 23.7 ± 28.3 mmHg for calibration factors utilizing aortic pressures from pressure catheter and SphygmoCor, respectively. For Sonazoid microbubbles, these errors ranged from 7.9 ± 12.0 to 10.1 ± 12.4 mmHg and from 7.2 ± 11.5 to 15.0 ± 23.2 mmHg, respectively. Two adverse events occurred during Definity infusion; these were resolved with return to baseline conditions. Conclusion: SHAPE may be useful for estimating intra-cardiac pressures noninvasively.

Cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography are both key components to routine cardiology practice. This new edition of Cardiac Catheterization and Coronary Intervention has been fully updated since the first edition, with new sections on primary percutaneous coronary intervention, trends in vascular access, bioabsorbable stents, optical coherence tomography, and more. Filled with over 150 clinical images and schematic illustrations, the handbook is an accessible ‘how-to’ guide, designed to demystify complex cardiac catheterization investigations. Expanded to reflect developments in practice, this new edition also introduces a new chapter on the multidisciplinary team and their roles and responsibilities from pre- to post-procedural care and relevant training requirements. It contains detailed instructions on how to perform a comprehensive left and right heart catheterization procedure, choosing the correct catheter for coronary and graft angiography, and how to perform a diagnostic coronary angiogram and interpret the subsequent findings.


2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 208
Author(s):  
Erhan Kaya ◽  
Hakan Fotbolcu ◽  
Zeki Şimşek ◽  
Ömer Işık

We report a 61-year-old patient who suffered from a type A aortic dissection that mimicked an acute inferior myocardial infarction. During a routine cardiac catheterization procedure, diagnostic catheters can be inserted accidentally into the false lumen. Invasive cardiologists should keep this complication in mind.


Author(s):  
Andrew Mitchell ◽  
Giovanni Luigi De Maria ◽  
Adrian Banning

Cardiac catheterization allows the invasive acquisition of haemodynamic data using direct and indirect pressure measurements and oxygen saturations, and provides anatomical information using contrast angiography. Right heart catheterization used to be a routine part of an invasive cardiac study. The increased accessibility and accuracy of non-invasive imaging (in particular, echocardiography and Doppler techniques), however, has reduced the need to perform right heart catheterization. This chapter describes the principal uses of cardiac catheterization, the basics of pressure waveforms, equipment required, accessing the left and right heart, left and right heart pressures and waveforms, how to perform calculations, and the techniques of ventriculography and aortography.


1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 308-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Simon ◽  
B Bumgarner ◽  
K Clark ◽  
S Israel

BACKGROUND: Most cardiac catheterizations are performed via femoral artery access. Reported rates of both peripheral vascular complications and success rates for the use of manual and mechanical compression techniques to achieve femoral artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization vary. OBJECTIVE: To determine is use of a mechanical clamp is as effective as standard manual pressure for femoral artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization. METHODS: Subjects consisted of 720 patients from 2 community hospitals who had elective diagnostic cardiac catheterization via the femoral artery. The control group (n=343) received manual compression for hemostasis; the study group (n=377) received mechanical compression. Standard protocols were used for the 2 compression techniques. Pressure was applied for a minimum of 10 minutes for 5F and 6F sheaths and catheters and for a minimum of 15 minutes for 7F and 8F sheaths and catheters. Prospective data were collected and analyzed for each patients, including sheath or catheter size, blood pressure, height, weight, age, time from administration of local anesthetic to successful cannulation of the femoral artery, anticoagulation status, total compression time, physician performing the catheterization procedure, nurse or technician who obtained hemostasis, and complications. In follow-up, patients were asked site-specific and functional status questions 1 to 2 days after the catheterization procedure and again 3 days after the catheterization procedure. RESULTS: Data were analyzed by using frequency distributions, measures of central tendency, and measures of variability. Only 1 difference between the 2 groups was significant: manual compression time was 14.93 +/- minutes, whereas mechanical compression time was 17.13 +/- minutes. CONCLUSION: Mechanical compression is as effective as manual compression for femoral artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization.


Sensors ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 4083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Li ◽  
Deyu Li ◽  
Fei Yan

Microbubbles are considered a promising tool for noninvasive estimation of local blood pressure. It is reported that the subharmonic scattering amplitude of microbubbles decreases by 9 to 12 dB when immersed in the media under an ambient pressure variation from 0 to 180 mmHg. However, the pressure sensitivity still needs to be improved to satisfy clinical diagnostic requirements. Here, we investigated the effects of acoustic parameters on the pressure sensitivity of microbubbles through measuring the acoustic attenuation and scattering properties of commercially available SonoVue microbubbles. Our results showed that the first harmonic, subharmonic, and ultraharmonic amplitudes of microbubbles were reduced by 6.6 dB, 10.9 dB, and 9.3 dB at 0.225 mechanical index (MI), 4.6 dB, 19.8 dB, and 12.3 dB at 0.25 MI, and 18.5 dB, 17.6 dB, and 12.6 dB at 0.3 MI, respectively, when the ambient pressure increased from 0 to 180 mmHg. Our finding revealed that a moderate MI (0.25–0.4) exciting microbubbles could significantly improve their sensitivities to detect ambient pressure.


2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathew Mercuri ◽  
Shamir Mehta ◽  
Changchun Xie ◽  
Nicholas Valettas ◽  
James L. Velianou ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 659-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukmanda Evan Lubis ◽  
Ika Bayuadi ◽  
Supriyanto Ardjo Pawiro ◽  
Kwan-Hoong Ng ◽  
Hilde Bosmans ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document