Abstract 247: Process Improvement Initiatives to Reduce No Show Rates in Rural Communities

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara Haskell ◽  
Melissa Cushman

Objective: A large pediatric academic medical center (AMC) acquired an out-of-state private cardiology practice serving rural communities and without an EMR. No show rates at the private practice consistently ranged from 20-40%, compared to 11% at the AMC. No shows contribute to inefficient use of clinician time and access to care challenges for other patients. Upon acquisition, process improvement efforts began with the goal of decreasing the abnormally high no show rates. Methods/Findings: Under private practice, staff scheduled patient appointments without inquiring for their availability and then notified patients of their appointment date and time via letter 10 days prior to the scheduled appointment and then by phone 2 days prior to the appointment. Immediately following the acquisition in December 2018, staff began calling patients to inquire when they would like to be scheduled based on their availability. Patients were scheduled six months out, so the true impact of this process change would be fully realized in May 2019. Once an EMR was implemented, a dashboard was created to monitor no show rate data and identify trends. After six months, no show rates only slightly improved, so in addition to the automated emails, calls, or text reminders from the scheduling center, a dedicated staff member began making reminder calls to patients the day before their appointment. As a result of the process improvement efforts, no show rates decreased from a high of 42% to 16% in eight months. Further, to better understand why patients were not showing for their appointments, staff began calling patients after a no-show appointment to determine if there were barriers for not showing and offering to reschedule the appointment. Data collected shows that out of 470 no show appointments from May 2019 to December 2019, 117 patients had disconnected phone numbers, 230 had appointment reminder messages left on their voicemail, 68 did not answer the call and did not have voicemail to leave a message and 55 patients confirmed their appointment with staff, but did not show for the appointment. Of the 470 no shows, 394 were pediatric patients and 76 were adults. Data shows 185 out of 470, or 39% of reminders never reached the patient, and an additional 49% went to voicemail and may not have been heard. Conclusion: No show appointments negatively impact clinic efficiencies and the ability to provide care to the greatest number of patients. When a patient doesn’t show for their appointment, they are non-compliant with their recommended care and reserve a clinic appointment that another patient may need. Small tests of change were made in phases to ensure appointments were convenient for patients and families and metrics were set and tracked to monitor improvement. By implementing new patient-centric processes and data tracking, more patients in rural communities receive the required follow up CHD care, leading to improved outcomes.

2020 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy E. Strowd ◽  
Lauren Strauss ◽  
Rachel Graham ◽  
Kristen Dodenhoff ◽  
Allysen Schreiber ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTObjective:To describe rapid implementation of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and assess for disparities in video visit implementation in the Appalachian region of the United States.Methods:A retrospective cohort of consecutive patients seen in the first four weeks of telehealth implementation was identified from the Neurology Ambulatory Practice at a large academic medical center. Telehealth visits defaulted to video and when unable phone-only visits were scheduled. Patients were divided into two groups based on the telehealth visit type: video or phone-only. Clinical variables were collected from the electronic medical record including age, sex, race, insurance status, indication for visit, and rural-urban status. Barriers to scheduling video visits were collected at the time of scheduling. Patient satisfaction was obtained by structured post-visit telephone call.Results:Of 1011 telehealth patient-visits, 44% were video and 56% phone-only. Patients who completed a video visit were younger (39.7 vs 48.4 years, p<0.001), more likely to be female (63% vs 55%, p<0.007), be White or Caucasian (p=0.024), and not have Medicare or Medicaid insurance (p<0.001). The most common barrier to scheduling video visits was technology limitations (46%). While patients from rural and urban communities were equally likely to be scheduled for video visits, patients from rural communities were more likely to consider future telehealth visits (55% vs 42%, p=0.05).Conclusion:Rapid implementation of ambulatory telemedicine defaulting to video visits successfully expanded video telehealth. Emerging disparities were revealed, as older, male, black patients with Medicare or Medicaid insurance were less likely to adopt video visits.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 216495611983748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne M Cutshall ◽  
Tejinder K Khalsa ◽  
Tony Y Chon ◽  
Sairey M Vitek ◽  
Stephanie D Clark ◽  
...  

A growing number of patients and consumers are seeking integrative medicine (IM) approaches as a result of increasing complex medical needs and a greater emphasis on prevention and health promotion. Health-care professionals need to have knowledge of the evidence-based IM resources that are safe and available to patients. Medical institutions have acknowledged the need for education and training in various IM modalities and whole-health approaches in medical curricula. There is a strong need to develop and incorporate well-structured IM curricula across all levels of learning and practice within medicine. This article provides an example of the development, implementation, impact, and assessment of IM education curricula across all learner levels at a large academic medical center.


2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan A. Rocchio ◽  
James W. Schurr ◽  
Aaron P. Hussey ◽  
Paul M. Szumita

Background: In October 2010, a pharmacist-driven stewardship program was implemented at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital to ensure continued adherence to the prescribing guideline, focusing on indications for intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) use and dosing per ideal body weight. Objective: The primary objective was to describe an IVIG stewardship program at a tertiary academic medical center. Methods: This was a prospective, observational study from January 2013 through December 2014. All patients ordered to receive IVIG during the defined study period were included. The intervention assessed describes a pharmacist-driven IVIG stewardship program for medication approval. The primary end point was guideline compliance based on indication, dose, dosing weight, and frequency. Secondary end points included the number of patients receiving IVIG, indications, orders discontinued as a result of guideline nonadherence, and total amount dispensed. Results: A total of 418 patients were identified during the study time frame. The top indications were: hypogammaglobulinemia in bone marrow transplantation and hematological malignancy (50.7%), acute solid organ rejection (11.8%), and immune thrombocytopenia with bleeding (10.1%). In all, 12 patients (2.9%) received IVIG for an indication nonadherent with the IVIG prescribing guideline; 9 patients (2.2%) and 2 patients (0.5%), respectively, received a different dose or frequency per the prescribed indication; and 12 orders (2.9%) for indications nonadherent to the guideline were discontinued. A total of 26 033 g of IVIG were dispensed during the study period. Conclusions: An IVIG stewardship program, including an institution-specific prescribing guideline and a pharmacist-driven stewardship program, may ensure guideline compliance for appropriateness of indication and dose at an academic medical center.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 128-128
Author(s):  
Michael Mearis ◽  
Joseph Shega ◽  
Randall Knoebel

128 Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines on cancer pain management were developed to direct pain assessment and management. The purpose of this study was to assess whether adherence to guidelines was associated with improved outcomes. Methods: One-hundred and nine patients admitted to the inpatient hematology oncology service that received at least one dose of morphine, oxycodone, or hydromorphone were evaluated and allocated into groups based on adherence to the NCCN guidelines. Safety and achievement of analgesia (pain score ≤ 4) at 24-hours after opioid initiation were compared between the two groups. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of opioid regimens non-adherent to guidelines. Results: Sixty-four percent of patients were initiated on regimens adherent to the NCCN guidelines. 63% of patients initiated on regimens adherent to NCCN guidelines reached the endpoint of analgesia at 24 hours compared to 41% of those who were not (p = 0.028). Adverse events were infrequent (p > 0.5). Opioid tolerance was the variable most predictive of being initiated on regimens non-adherent to guideline recommendations (OR 3.1, 95% confidence interval 1.24-7.82). Conclusions: A significant number of patients presenting with cancer pain are initiated on regimens non-adherent to NCCN guidelines, leading to reduced attainment of adequate analgesia. Opioid tolerant patients are at an increased risk of inadequate analgesia, and should be identified and initiated on proper pain regimens taking home opioid usage into consideration.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 707-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander H. Flannery ◽  
Melissa L. Thompson Bastin ◽  
Ashley Montgomery-Yates ◽  
Corrine Hook ◽  
Evan Cassity ◽  
...  

Background: Evidence-based medicine often has many barriers to overcome prior to implementation in practice, hence the importance of continuous quality improvement. We report on a brief (≤10 minutes) multidisciplinary meeting prior to rounds to establish a dashboard for continuous quality improvement and studied the success of this meeting on a particular area of focus: continuous infusion benzodiazepine minimization. Methods: This was a prospective observational study of patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) of a large academic medical center over a 4-month period. A morning multidisciplinary prerounding meeting was implemented to report on metrics required to establish a dashboard for MICU care for the previous 24 hours. Fellows and nurse practitioners on respective teams reported on key quality metrics and other important data related to patient census. Continuous benzodiazepines were tracked daily as the number of patients per team who had orders for a continuous benzodiazepine infusion. The aim of this report is to describe the development of the morning multidisciplinary prerounding meeting and its impact on continuous benzodiazepine use, along with associated clinical outcomes. Results: The median number of patients prescribed a continuous benzodiazepine daily decreased over this time period and demonstrated a sustained reduction at 1 year. Furthermore, sedation scores improved, corresponding to a reduction in median duration of mechanical ventilation. The effectiveness of this intervention was mapped post hoc to conceptual models used in implementation science. Conclusions: A brief multidisciplinary meeting to review select data points prior to morning rounds establishes mechanisms for continuous quality improvement and may serve as a mediating factor for successful implementation when initiating and monitoring practice change in the ICU.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document