scholarly journals Association of Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis on Survival: 15‐Year Institutional Experience With 1561 Cases

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip S. Wells ◽  
Isabel Theberge ◽  
Joshua Bowdridge ◽  
Erin Kelly ◽  
Ania Kielar ◽  
...  

Background Previous studies regarding survival in patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) are limited. This study measured overall survival in a large cohort of SVTs through linkage to population‐based data. Methods and Results Using a previously derived text‐search algorithm, we screened the reports of all abdominal ultrasound and contrast‐enhanced computed tomography studies at The Ottawa Hospital over 14 years. Screen‐positive reports were manually reviewed by at least 2 authors to identify definite SVT cases by consensus. Images of uncertain studies were independently reviewed by 2 radiologists. One thousand five hundred sixty‐one adults with SVT (annual incidence ranging from 2.8 to 5.9 cases/10 000 patients) were linked with population‐based data sets to measure the presence of concomitant cancer and survival status. Thrombosis involved multiple veins in 314 patients (20.1%), most commonly the portal vein (n=1410, 90.3%). Compared with an age‐sex‐year matched population, patients with SVT had significantly reduced survival in particular with local cancer (adjusted relative excess risk for recent cases 12.0 [95% CI, 9.8–14.6] and for remote cases 9.7 [7.7–12.2]), distant cancer (relative excess risk for recent cases 5.7 [4.5–7.3] and for remote cases 5.4 [4.4–6.6]), cirrhosis (relative excess risk 8.2 [5.3–12.7]), and previous venous thromboembolism (relative excess risk 3.8 [2.4–6.0]). One hundred fifty (23.9%) of patients >65 years of age were anticoagulated within 1 month of diagnosis. Conclusions SVT is more common than expected. Most patients have cancer and the portal vein is by far the most common vein involved. Compared with the general population, patients with SVT had significantly reduced survival, particularly in patients with concomitant cancer, cirrhosis, and previous venous thromboembolic disease. Most elderly patients did not receive anticoagulant therapy.

2021 ◽  
pp. 004947552199850
Author(s):  
Omkolsoum Alhaddad ◽  
Maha Elsabaawy ◽  
Omar Elshaaraawy ◽  
Mohamed Elhalawany ◽  
Mohamed Mohamed Houseni ◽  
...  

Portal vein thrombosis is a catastrophe not uncommonly complicating hepatitis C virus-related liver cirrhosis. To estimate its prevalence and clinical characteristics, we investigated 1000 cirrhotic patients by abdominal ultrasound or Doppler study at least. Portal vein thrombosis was found in 21.6%, of whom 157 (72.7%) had malignancy. Complete portal vein thrombosis was found in 70.4%. Half of all these patients had at least one episode of portal hypertensive bleeding, a third had abdominal pain and a quarter presented with jaundice. Portal bilopathy was diagnosed in two cases (0.9%). There was significant association between severity of liver disease, ascites, male gender and site of segmental focal lesion and portal vein thrombosis.


Author(s):  
A.V. Kuznetsova ◽  
◽  
A.V. Ivolgina ◽  
Ye.V. Dubotolkina ◽  
T.Ye. Makarova ◽  
...  

The article presents an extract from an outpatient case history card of a 47-year-old patient observed at the Central Hospital for Chronic Hepatitis C. In 2017, he received a course of therapy for this disease (Pegasis in combination with ribavirin). A sustained virological response (SVR) has been achieved. According to elastometry data dated 12/13/2017 – the degree of fibrosis F4 Metavir, 13.1 KPa. In January 2021, he suffered a coronavirus infection (according to the CT scan of the lungs, the lesion was 20 %). The disease proceeded against the background of chronic viral hepatitis C complicated by liver cirrhosis. He was treated symptomatically on an outpatient basis. He did not receive anticoagulant therapy. In February 2021, abdominal ultrasound (ABP) revealed a thrombus in the portal vein. The presence of a thrombus in the portal vein contributes to the further progression of liver cirrhosis


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. e0261499
Author(s):  
Lukas Sturm ◽  
Dominik Bettinger ◽  
Christoph Klinger ◽  
Tobias Krauss ◽  
Hannes Engel ◽  
...  

Introduction International guidelines propose color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) as primary imaging techniques in the diagnosis of acute splanchnic vein thrombosis. However, their reliability in this context is poorly investigated. Therefore, the aim of our study was to validate CDUS and CT in the radiologic assessment of acute splanchnic vein thrombosis, using direct transjugular spleno-portography as gold standard. Materials and methods 49 patients with non-malignant acute splanchnic vein thrombosis were included in a retrospective, multicenter analysis. The thrombosis’ extent in five regions of the splanchnic venous system (right and left intrahepatic portal vein, main trunk of the portal vein, splenic vein, superior mesenteric vein) and the degree of thrombosis (patent, partial thrombosis, complete thrombosis) were assessed by portography, CDUS and CT in a blinded manner. Reliability of CDUS and CT with regard to portography as gold standard was analyzed by calculating Cohen’s kappa. Results Results of CDUS and CT were consistent with portography in 76.6% and 78.4% of examinations, respectively. Cohen’s kappa demonstrated that CDUS and CT delivered almost equally reliable results with regard to the portographic gold standard (k = 0.634 [p < 0.001] vs. k = 0.644 [p < 0.001]). In case of findings non-consistent with portography there was no clear trend to over- or underestimation of the degree of thrombosis in both CDUS (60.0% vs. 40.0%) and CT (59.5% vs. 40.5%). Conclusions CDUS and CT are equally reliable tools in the radiologic assessment of non-malignant acute splanchnic vein thrombosis.


Author(s):  
Ibrahima Niang ◽  
◽  
Cheikh Tidiane Diop ◽  
Khadidiatou Ndiaye Diouf ◽  
Mbaye Thiam ◽  
...  

Portal cavernoma is the cavernous transformation of the portal vein. It is the consequence of chronic portal vein thrombosis and occurs when collateral branches develop to bypass the portal occlusion. The clinical presentation includes hematemesis due to variceal bleeding, ascites or anemia, and splenomegaly. Herein we present images of a 37-year-old male patient received in our department for abdominal ultrasound, following 2 episodes of hematemesis. This case illustrates the ultrasound aspect of a voluminous portal cavernoma with portal hypertension signs.


Hematology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 318-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Baumann Kreuziger ◽  
Walter Ageno ◽  
Agnes Lee

Abstract A 75-year-old male with metastatic pancreatic cancer is undergoing chemotherapy with gemcitabine. A portal vein thrombosis was incidentally found on surveillance CT scan. He does not report any new abdominal pain or ascites. Should anticoagulation be used to treat asymptomatic portal vein thrombosis?


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5381-5381
Author(s):  
Dina Sameh Soliman ◽  
Aliaa Amer ◽  
Firyal Ibrahim ◽  
Ahmad Al-Sabbagh ◽  
Halima El-Omri ◽  
...  

Introduction: Philadephia-negative Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) include polycythemia Vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). The diagnosis of MPNs and further sub classification are based mainly on WHO diagnostic criteria which rely on the presence of an evidence of single or multiple cell lineage proliferation reflected by elevated hemoglobin, and / leukocytosis and /thrombocytosis. In addition, to presence of certain pathologic features in the bone marrow (BM) including hypercellularity , panmyelosis, proliferation of megakaryocytes, the presence of atypical megakaryocytes and or increased marrow fibrosis. This is in addition to the presence of molecular genetic marker specific for MPN including JAK-2, MPL and CALR. Making a diagnosis of MPN in absence of the previously mentioned features is always challenging. Herein, we analyze the clinical, pathologic and molecular genetics features for five cases presented with splanchnic vein thrombosis and found to be positive for JAK-2 V617F. However, from the hematpathologic point of view, apart from JAK-2 positivity, none of these cases had fulfilled the WHO diagnostic criteria for MPNs. Although the BM specimens were reviewed by at least two experienced hematopathologists, it was so difficult to conclude the diagnosis and or do further sub classification into a specific MPN category. Objective: The aim of this report is to highpoint the difficulty in establishing the diagnosis within this group of patients based on the current WHO diagnostic criteria, to focus on BM pathologic features of this group of patients. Patients and Methods: The patients reported here were referred to our center presenting with portal vein, superior mesenteric or splenic vein thrombosis. Five adult female patients were recognized (2015 and 2019). The mean age at diagnosis is 40.8 years (27-56). None of these cases had an increase in peripheral blood counts except for patient (1) which had mild leukocytosis and thrombocytosis. All patients showed normocellular or slightly hypercellular BM. Slight erythroid predominance was reported in patient (2) and (4). Megakaryocytes were increased in all patients except for patient (2). Interestingly, megakaryocytes morphology was similar in all five patients as they showed anisocytosis with some degree of pleomorphism with predominant of large forms, no clustering and no abnormal topography was noted (figure 1 and 2). All patients showed no significant increase in reticulin fibrosis. Sub-classification into a specific MPN category cannot be performed in all patients. Next generation sequence had been used to analyze targeted regions in recurrently mutated genes in myeloid neoplasia. JAK-2V617F mutation was detected in all studied patients. In patient number (2) JAK-2 mutation was detected at a low level (4%), however, on follow-up, the mutation level increased in addition to detection of 3bp insertion/deletion in CALR gene resulting in a mutation other than type I or type II. table (1). Discussion: Splanchnic veins thrombosis (SVT) includes the portal vein thrombosis (PVT), mesenteric (MVT) splenic vein thrombosis, and the Budd Chiari syndrome (BCS). SVTs are rare events, estimated by 0.7 per 100,000 patients per year for PVT [Rajani et al. 2010]. In a laboratory setting, the diagnosis of latent MPN in patients with SVT is challenging due to absence of elevated blood counts, probably caused by portal hypertension and splenomegaly that result from SVT and MPN. However, the reason why this group of patients does not have overt features of myeloproliferation (particularly) the hypercellularity in the BM is not yet clear. It is possible that JAK-2 positivity induced venous thrombosis longer time before development of the full blown picture of MPN. However, follow-up BM studies for this group of patients might help in better characterization of the pathologic features of these patients. These patients are included in the MPN, unclassifiable subcategory in the current WHO classification. However, based on our findings and the previously published data it seems that these patients have distinctive clinical and pathological features that necessitate having them in a separate MPN entity that might have less strict diagnostic criteria that might include clinical symptoms especially venous thrombosis in large vessels. Separating this group of patients will help to study them thoroughly. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. e441-e449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirstine Kobberøe Søgaard ◽  
Kasper Adelborg ◽  
Bianka Darvalics ◽  
Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó ◽  
Jan Beyer-Westendorf ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3390-3390
Author(s):  
Pranavi Ravichandran ◽  
Kris P Croome ◽  
Michael J. Kovacs ◽  
Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro ◽  
Alejandro Lazo-Langner

Abstract Abstract 3390 Background: In the absence of primary liver disease, thrombosis of the splanchnic vessels (portal, mesenteric, and splenic veins) is a rare occurrence with variable etiologies. Early diagnosis of non-cirrhotic splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) and prompt treatment with anticoagulation therapy (ACT) has consistently led to high recanalization rates, symptom relief, and improved survival. For ongoing prothrombotic risk factors, prolonged ACT prevents symptom progression and recurrence. We aim to describe our centre's experience with managing non-cirrhotic SVT, and to identify factors associated with the need for further interventions beyond ACT alone. Methods: We reviewed all consecutive adult patients referred to the Thrombosis clinics at our institution between 2008 and 2011 for first-episode non-cirrhotic SVT. The primary efficacy outcome studied was SVT symptom resolution or no need for additional medical, endoscopic, or surgical treatments beyond ACT. The secondary efficacy outcome was recanalization of splanchnic vessels on follow-up imaging. Patients were categorized as resolved or unresolved based on achievement of the primary efficacy outcome. The measured safety outcome of ACT was major bleeding according to standard definitions. Results: We included 22 patients (mean age 51±12; 9 female). Nine patients had multi-vessel thrombosis involving combinations of the portal vein, superior mesenteric vein (SMV), splenic vein, and/or concurrent non-splanchnic vein thrombosis, while 13 had isolated vessel involvement (7 portal vein, 6 SMV). The portal vein was involved in 73% of patients, SMV in 59%, and splenic vein in 27%. Nine patients had completely occluded vessels, and 4 also demonstrated portal vein cavernomatous transformation on initial imaging. Upon diagnosis, all patients received ACT with either unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin, followed by oral vitamin K antagonists. Four patients were not suitable for oral therapy and were maintained on low molecular weight heparin throughout their course of treatment. Long-term ACT was indicated in 3 patients with SVTs of unknown etiology and in 8 patients with isolated or combined systemic thrombophilias, including Factor V Leiden (n=4), JAK2V617Ftyrosine kinase mutation or overt myeloproliferative disorder (MPD) (n=6), and prothrombin gene variant (n=2). The remaining 11 patients with local or transient risk factors, such as recent abdominal surgery or non-hepatic malignancy, were treated with ACT for 3 to 6 months. Fifteen patients (68%) achieved complete symptom resolution with ACT alone. In the remaining 7 patients that comprised the unresolved group, there was an increased frequency of completely occluded vessels (P=0.03) and the Jak2V617F mutation or an overt MPD (P=0.004). Signs of either portal hypertension (including ascites and gastroesophageal varices) or cavernomatous transformation at the time of diagnosis tended to be more frequent among the unresolved group (P=0.005 and 0.06, respectively). Four patients in the unresolved group required invasive interventions including variceal band ligation, splenectomy, bowel resection and liver transplantation. Among the resolved group, radiographic recanalization of vessels was observed in 9 cases. The 6 remaining patients had persistent but asymptomatic vessel thrombosis in follow-up. Recanalization was more likely to occur in patients with non-occlusive thrombi (P<0.001) and local/transient etiologies (P=0.002). One patient experienced recurrent non-major gastrointestinal bleeding that ceased upon the completion of a 6-month course of ACT. Variceal hemorrhage occurred in 1 patient who subsequently underwent variceal band ligation prior to resuming prolonged ACT due to recurrent thrombosis. Conclusions: Our data, albeit limited, suggests that ACT is a safe and effective first-line treatment for patients with SVT. Short-term ACT is appropriate for patients with a clear mechanical or transient eliciting factor and non-occlusive thrombi, as recanalization rates are high in these cases. The presence of the Jak2 mutation or overt MPD, occlusive vessel thrombosis, or portal hypertensive pathology at presentation might help to identify patients who are less likely to respond to ACT and might require additional interventions. Disclosures: Lazo-Langner: Leo Pharma: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document